Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Blog Criteria

    Uploaded by

    api-276934684
    161 views1 page
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating blogs and comments on four levels: just the basics, showing improvement, almost there, and wow! What a blog/comment. For blogs, it evaluates content development, use of reasoning/explanation, research links, style/mechanics, and grammar. For comments, it evaluates length, supporting evidence, relevance, and understanding of the content. The highest level includes a fully developed argument, counterargument, and engagement of the reader for blogs and shows a depth of understanding with links to supporting material for comments.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    blog criteria

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating blogs and comments on four levels: just the basics, showing improvement, almost there, and wow! What a blog/comment. For blogs, it evaluates content development, use of reasoning/explanation, research links, style/mechanics, and grammar. For comments, it evaluates length, supporting evidence, relevance, and understanding of the content. The highest level includes a fully developed argument, counterargument, and engagement of the reader for blogs and shows a depth of understanding with links to supporting material for comments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    161 views1 page

    Blog Criteria

    Uploaded by

    api-276934684
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating blogs and comments on four levels: just the basics, showing improvement, almost there, and wow! What a blog/comment. For blogs, it evaluates content development, use of reasoning/explanation, research links, style/mechanics, and grammar. For comments, it evaluates length, supporting evidence, relevance, and understanding of the content. The highest level includes a fully developed argument, counterargument, and engagement of the reader for blogs and shows a depth of understanding with links to supporting material for comments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Blog Criteria

    Intellectual
    Engagement

    Just the Basics

    Content is
    minimal
    Minimal
    reasoning or
    explanation
    No research links

    Showing
    Improvement

    Content is
    partially
    developed

    Some reasoning
    or explanation is
    evident
    One or two
    research
    hyperlinks are
    used to support
    content

    Almost There

    Content is fully
    developed with
    reasoning and
    explanation
    Three or more
    hyperlinks are
    used to support
    content

    Wow! What a Blog!

    Style and
    Mechanics

    Comment Criteria
    Comment Quality

    Consistent
    grammar/syntax/
    mechanical errors
    that make the
    content difficult
    for people to read
    Clearly the writing
    needs to be
    proofread by
    several people
    and revisions
    made

    Just the Basics

    Comment is short
    with no
    supporting
    evidence, such as
    good job, nice
    work, interesting
    Comment may be
    irrelevant to the
    content
    Comment does
    not express
    understanding of
    the content

    Seven to ten
    grammar/ syntax/
    mechanical errors
    Proofreading
    needs to be
    completed and
    revisions made

    Fewer than seven


    grammar/ syntax/
    mechanical errors

    Proofreading
    needs to be
    completed and
    revisions made ,
    but the errors do
    not impede
    understanding of
    the content

    Showing
    Improvement

    Comment
    includes specific
    feedback on the
    blog content
    Comment shows
    some insight
    Comment may
    contain some
    irrelevant ideas

    Almost There

    Comment shows
    insight and clear
    understanding of
    the blog
    Comment offers
    extends or
    elaborates on the
    content
    Comment may
    link additional
    supporting
    material

    Content is fully
    developed with
    reasoning and
    explanation
    Counterargument is
    used to further
    elaborate/explain/
    elaborate ideas
    A critical thinking or
    rhetorical question
    is used to engage
    the reader
    Three or more
    hyperlinks are used
    to support
    argumentation
    Congratulations! No
    discernable errors in
    grammar/ syntax/
    mechanical errors
    Proofreading is
    optional, as it is
    always an excellent
    idea to have
    someone else read
    the content for
    clarity

    Wow! What a
    Comment!

    Comment shows
    clear insight and
    depth of
    understanding
    Comment includes
    links to supporting
    material
    Comment offers a
    well-developed
    counterargument, a
    differing position, or
    a critical question
    related to the
    content

    You might also like