Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microhardness Variation
Microhardness Variation
www.actamat-journals.com
Abstract
Cr3C2NiCr thermal spray coatings have been extensively used to mitigate high temperature wear. During deposition
compositional degradation occurs through dissolution of the carbide phase into the matrix. High temperature exposure
leads to transformations in the microstructure, which influences the coating microhardness. While such developments
have been investigated in short-term trials, no systematic long-term investigations of the microhardness variation as a
function of microstructural development have been presented. In this work, high velocity sprayed Cr3C2NiCr coatings
were heat treated at 900 C for up to 60 days in air and argon. With treatment, matrix phase supersaturation was
reduced, while widespread carbide nucleation and growth generated an expansive carbide skeletal network. An initial
softening of the coatings occurred through matrix phase refinement, the subsequent hardness recovery was a function
of carbide development. Treatment in air generated further hardness increases as a result of internal oxidation.
2003 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ageing; Isothermal heat treatment; Cermets; Hardness; Thermal spray coatings
1. Introduction
Thermally sprayed Cr3C2NiCr cermets have
been used extensively to mitigate wear and erosion
at high temperatures where WC based composites
are not suitable [1,2]. During thermal spraying,
substantial variations in the cermet composition
and microstructure are possible due to exposure to
the high temperature accelerating gas [37]. Dissolution of the carbide phase into the alloy matrix
1359-6454/03/$30.00 2003 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00254-4
4268
2. Experimental procedure
A cermet powder of nominal composition
75%Cr3C225%NiCr (WOKA 2075-NiCr) was
sprayed on to mild steel substrates using Aerospray
The agglomerated and sintered WOKA 2075NiCr powder showed clear contrast between the
carbide and NiCr matrix phases (Fig. 1) indicative
of negligible carbide dissolution. This was
reflected in the XRD analysis (Fig. 2) where only
4269
4270
carbide content was retained in the HVAF coatings, the isolated carbide grains being homogeneously distributed. The alloy phase showed significantly lower degrees of greyscale variation than
in the HVOF coating (Fig. 1). The lower degree
of carbide dissolution is also apparent in the XRD
spectra (Fig. 2). Only Cr3C2 and NiCr were
detected, the spectra of the latter dominated by narrow crystalline peaks with smaller amorphous
background. A striking feature of this coating was
the lack of visible splat structure. No inter-splat
oxides were evident and the lack of wide spread
carbide dissolution eliminated the matrix phase
contrast of the previous coating. There are few
published studies of HVAF Cr3C2NiCr coatings
for comparison, but the general features described
herelow degree of carbide degradation and
homogeneous nature of the coating, mirror features
seen in WCCo and WCCoCr coatings sprayed
by HVAF [1618].
3.3. Heat treatment of the coating samples
It is evident from the XRD spectra of the heat
treated HVAF and HVOF coatings (Fig. 3) that
microstructural
transformations
were
well
advanced after 2 days of exposure. The amorphous
regions of the as-sprayed coating spectra had disappeared, with narrow, intense NiCr peaks dominating the matrix phase spectra. The carbide peaks
were also more defined, and BSE images showed
that fine precipitates had formed. Similar changes
have been documented by others [35,7] and can
take place within 1 h at 800 C [3]. Image analysis
of the BSE images indicated that the carbide volume fraction rapidly increased from approximately
36% and 67% in the HVOF and HVAF as-sprayed
coatings, respectively, to a value of approximately
75 vol.% (Fig. 4). This remained stable over the 60
days of treatment for both the HVAF and HVOF
coatings under air and argon. The carbide itself
was not significantly oxidised. Quantitative analysis of the carbide XRD spectra in terms of the peak
area, FWHM, and centre of gravity of the primary
peaks indicated that Cr3C2 remained the dominant
carbide phase and was not oxidised to Cr7C3 in the
HVAF coatings, although a small amount may
have formed in the HVOF coatings. Cr2O3 was
Fig. 4. Volume percent carbide in the HVAF and HVOF coatings as a function of heat treatment under argon.
4271
Fig. 5. BSE images of the HVAF microstructure in the assprayed condition and after 2, 20 and 60 days of treatment under
argon at 900 C.
4272
under argon the extensive variation in the assprayed matrix phase greyscale contrast was significantly reduced (Fig. 6). Widespread carbide
precipitation occurred, the average size smaller
than in the HVAF coatings. Unlike the HVAF
coatings, carbide nucleation occurred primarily in
the carbide free zones where the greatest degree
of dissolution had occurred during spraying. The
variation in the magnitude of dissolution generated
a variety of carbide distributions and morphologies
with heat treatment. Three generalised regions
were evident (Fig. 7). Region 1 occurred in the
centre of the largest splats in pools of relatively
unaffected material. Carbide dissolution was minimal and the subsequent carbide nucleation mirrored that of the HVAF coating. Region 2 occurred
midway between the core and periphery of the
largest splats, or within those splats where widespread carbide dissolution had occurred. Spongelike agglomerates formed via coalescence of large
numbers of nucleated carbides. These were
expansive in nature, occupying significant regions
of the splat, but at the edges of the splat followed
the splat contour. At the splat boundary, Region 3,
the carbides formed long thin stringers that in three
dimensions may have formed plate-like morphologies.
Growth of the individual carbide grains led to
coarsening of the sponge-like agglomerates, generating a more porous appearance to these features.
This occurred most rapidly away from the splat
peripheries leading to widespread coalescence and
bridging. While the peripheral plate-like carbides
were still evident after 5 days they were beginning
to break up into more isolated grains. After 1020
days the structure developed to a similar state as
the HVAF coating. Growth and spheriodisation of
the individual grains occurred, while coalescence
and bridging between the grains led to the development of a widespread skeletal network. Such development of the carbide phase began to overshadow
the preferential orientation of the carbides in
relation to the splat shape. Beyond 30 days, growth
slowed in a similar manner to the HVAF coating.
After 60 days both the HVOF and HVAF coatings
were comparable, the HVOF carbides having a
slightly wider size distribution and more distorted
morphologies. It was evident, however, that despite
Fig. 6. BSE images of the HVOF microstructure in the assprayed condition and after 2, 20 and 60 days of treatment in
air at 900 C.
4273
(1)
4274
ings have similar levels of porosity (3%), the difference in hardness in the as-sprayed coatings is
likely to be due to differences in matrix hardness
the matrix of the HVOF coating will be significantly harder due to solid solution strengthening
generated by more extensive carbide dissolution
during spraying. When Cr3C2 dissolves into the
matrix the dissolved Cr and C distort the Ni lattice,
inhibiting dislocations motion [23]. The structural
disorder caused by greater amounts of dissolved Cr
and C is shown in the larger XRD peak widths for
the matrix phase in the HVOF compared to the
HVAF (Fig. 2). The extent of binder phase
strengthening is dependent on the deposition parameters, being more influential in the higher temperature techniques where extensive carbide dissolution means that the coatings act more as
dispersion strengthened alloys than carbide based
composites. The higher oxide content of the HVOF
coating could also affect its hardness, however, the
role of oxides is ambiguous. On the one hand, their
higher hardness will increase the overall hardness,
on the other, their presence as stringers may reduce
splat/splat bonding, lowering the measured hardness [4].
Following heat treatment in argon, both the
HVAF and HVOF coatings experience a decrease
in hardness with gradual recovery and strengthening after 2 or 5 days, respectively. Other
researchers have also recorded decreases in hardness for HVOF coatings using similar powder
types and similar treatment regimesin vacuum at
temperatures between 800 and 900 C, 2 days
[35]. In these studies the treatments were shortterm, so the recovery in hardness was not documented.
The changes in hardness with heat treatment
were accompanied by concurrent changes in
microstructurenamely the precipitation of fine
carbides and their subsequent growth; and the
recrystalisation of the matrix. Recrystalisation of
the matrix was evident in the reduced matrix contrast in the BSE images and in the decrease in dspacing of the Ni peak due to a reduction in the
amount of dissolved Cr and C. As indicated by the
narrowing of the matrix phase XRD peaks, recovery, recrystalisation and grain growth occur rapidly, reducing the dislocation density, increasing
4275
4276
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Acknowledgements
[11]
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of WOKA, Metal Spray Suppliers (NZ) Ltd,
and Holster Engineering (NZ) Ltd for supplying
the powder and coatings for this work. The financial assistance provided by Material Performance
Technologies (NZ) and The University of Auckland is greatly appreciated.
References
[1] Sahoo P, Raghuraman R. Chromium carbide reinforced
composite coatings for high temperature hard-coat applications. In: Berndt CC, Bernecki TF, editors. Thermal
spray: research, design and applications. Materials Park,
OH, USA: ASM International; 1993. p. 40510.
[2] Sahoo P, Raghuraman R. High temperature chromium carbide reinforced metal matrix composite coatings for turbomachinery applications. In: TS93: Thermal Spraying
Conference (Thermische Spritzkonferenz). Deutscher Verlag fur Schweisstechnik DVS-Verlag GmbH; 1993. p.
296300.
[3] Zimmermann S, Kreye H. Chromium carbide coatings
produced with various HVOF spray systems. In: Berndt
CC, editor. Thermal spray: practical solutions for engineering problems. Materials Park, OH, USA: ASM International; 1996. p. 14752.
[4] Tomita T et al. Mechanisms of high hardness in Cr3C2
NiCr cermet coatings formed by vacuum plasma spraying.
In: Berndt CC, Khor KA, Lugscheider EF, editors. Thermal spray 2001: new surfaces for a new millennium.
Materials Park, OH, USA: ASM International; 2001. p.
699704.
[5] Otsubo F et al. Properties of Cr3C2NiCr cermet coating
sprayed by high power plasma and high velocity oxy-fuel
processes. J Therm Spray Technol 2000;9(4):499504.
[6] Guilemany JM, Calero JA. Structural characterisation of
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
cations of quantitative metallography. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1984. p. 6584.
[22] Engqvist H, Jacobson S, Axen N. A model for the hardness of cemented carbides. Wear 2002;252:38493.
[23] Felbeck DK. Introduction to strengthening mechanisms.
In: Dorn J, editor. Prentice-Hall series in materials science.
New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1968.
4277