Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ipr Notes Paper 6
Ipr Notes Paper 6
reasonably affordable price, and the patented invention not being worked in the territory of
India). While the multinational giant was selling the drug at INR 2.80 lakh for a month's
course, Natco promised to make available the same at a price of about 3 % (INR 8800) of
what was charged by Bayer. Natco was directed to pay 6 percent of the net sales of the drug
as royalty to Bayer. Among other important terms and condition of the non assignable, non
exclusive license were directions to Natco to manufacture the patented drug only at their
own manufacturing facility, selling the drug only within the Indian Territory and supplying
the patented drug to at least 600 needy and deserving patients per year free of cost.
Aggrieved by the Controllers decision, Bayer immediately moved to the Intellectual Property
Appellate Board (IPAB) alleging that the grant of CL was illegal and unsustainable. The
Board rejected Bayers appeal holding that if stay was granted, it would definitely jeopardize
the interest of the public who need the drug at the later stage of the disease. It further held
that the right of access to affordable medicine was as much a matter of right to dignity of
the patients and to grant stay at this juncture would really affect them.
The Boards
chief Prabha Sridevan in an open court on March 4, 2013 dictated the order upholding the
Controllers decision for grant of compulsory license on Bayers patented drug, Sorafenib
Tosylate.
VERSIONS RECORDINGS:
his duly authorised agent or representative to inspect all records and books of account relating
to such sound recording: Provided that if on a complaint brought before the Copyright Board
to the effect that the owner of rights has not been paid in full for any sound recordings
purporting to be made in pursuance of this section, the Copyright Board is, prima facie, satisfied
that the complaint is genuine, it may pass an order ex parte directing the person making the
sound recording to cease from making further copies and, after holding such inquiry as it
considers necessary, make such further order as it may deem fit, including an order for payment
of royalty.
Explanation.For the purposes of this section cover version means a sound
recording made in accordance with this section.
The first noteworthy change in the
provision is with respect to the medium of version recording. The proviso to clause (1)
specifically provides that a conversion can be made only into the same medium of the original
recording, unless the earlier recording is no longer in commercial use. For example, if the first
recording was made on a magnetic tape, the cover version must also be on a magnetic tape.
You cannot make a digital recording of the cover version.
The Section states that
payment for the cover versions must be made to the authors in advance, and for at least fifty
thousand copies in an year. The cover version must not mention the original singer or the name
of the film for which the recording was made earlier. Finally, although minuscule, protection for
producers has been incorporated.
Cover versions can be made only after five years of the
first sound recording. Also, clause (3) prohibits any derivative works like remixes without the
permission of the author, giving them an opportunity to bargain
expressions, even though WIPO formally makes a distinction between TK on the one hand, and
TCEs on the other.
WHAT IS A DOMAIN NAME?
Domain names are the human-friendly forms of Internet addresses, and are commonly used to
find web sites. For example, the domain name wipo.int is used to locate the WIPO web site at
http://www.wipo.int or the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center site at
http://www.wipo.int/amc/. A domain name also forms the basis of other methods or applications
on the Internet, such as file transfer (ftp) or email addresses - for example the email address
arbiter.mail@wipo.int is also based on the domain name wipo.int.
GENE FUND :The New Delhi meeting rejected the UPOV Convention as an
adequate model for sui generis plant variety protection. It urged the adoption of
alternative models, incorporating the same sort of provisions as it recommended for
national patent laws, and recommended the inclusion of a comprehensive code of
provisions protecting Farmers Rights. The establishment of a gene fund, derived
from fees and other levies on plant breeding and the seed industry was
recommended, to be used to support in-situ farmers conservation. The
consideration of new varieties for protection should include an environmental and
social impact assessment to ensure that they do not threaten agro-diversity and
community rights.
"deceptively similar" A geographical indication shall be deemed to be deceptively
similar to another geographical indication if it so nearly resembles that other
geographical indication as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion;
with Environment and Forests of whom one shall be the Additional Director General of Forests
or the Director General of Forests;
(c)seven ex officio members to be appointed by the
Central Government to represent respectively the Ministries of the Central Government dealing
with (i)Agricultural Research and Education; (ii)Biotechnology; (iii) Ocean Development;
(iv) Agriculture and Cooperation; (v) Indian Systems of Medicine and Homoeopathy; (vi)
Science and Technology; (vii) Scientific and Industrial Research; (d) five non-official members
to be appointed from amongst specialists and scientists having special knowledge of, or
experience in, matters relating to conservation of biological diversity, sustainable use of
biological resources and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the use of biological
resources, representatives of industry, conservers, creators and know ledge-holders of biological
resources.
Conditions of service of Chairperson and members 9. The term of
office and conditions of service of the Chairperson and the other members other than ex officio
members of the National Biodiversity Authority shall be such as may be prescribed by the
Central Government. Chairperson to be Chief Executive of National Biodiversity Authority
10. The Chairperson shall be the Chief Executive of the National Biodiversity Authority and
shall exercise such powers and perform such duties, as may be prescribed. : 11. The Central
Government may remove from the National Biodiversity Authority any member who, in its
opinion, has
(a) been adjudged as an insolvent; or (b) been convicted of an offence which
involves moral turpitude; or (c) become physically or mentally incapable of acting
as a member; or (d)so abused his position as to render his continuance in office
detrimental to the public interest; or(e)acquired such financial or other interest as is
likely to affect prejudicially his functions as a member.
Meetings of
National Biodiversity Authority :
12. (1) The National Biodiversity
Authority shall meet at such time and place and shall observe such rules of
procedure in regard to the transaction of business at its meetings (including the
quorum at its meetings) as may be prescribed. (2) The Chairperson of the National
Biodiversity Authority shall preside at the meetings of the National Biodiversity
Authority. (3) If for any reason the Chairperson is unable to attend any meeting of
the National Biodiversity Authority, any member of the National Biodiversity
Authority chosen by the members present at the meeting shall preside at the
meeting. (4) All questions which come before any meeting of the National
Biodiversity Authority shall be decided by a majority of votes of the members
present and voting and in the event of equality of votes, the Chairperson or, in his
absence, the person presiding, shall have and exercise a second or casting vote. (5)
Every member who is in any way, whether directly, indirectly or personally,
concerned or interested in a matter to be decided at the meeting shall disclose the
nature of his concern or interest and after such disclosure, the member concerned
or interested shall not attend that meeting. (6) No act or proceeding of the National
Biodiversity Authority shall be invalidated merely by reason of
(a) any vacancy in, or any defect in the constitution of, the National Biodiversity
Authority; or (b)any defect in the appointment of a person acting as a member; or
(c) any irregularity in the procedure of the National Biodiversity Authority not
affecting the merits of the case.
Committees of National Biodiversity
Authority : 13. (1) The National Biodiversity Authority may constitute a committee
WHAT IS A WELL-KNOWN MARK?: A regime for the protection of well-known marks was first
introduced by the Paris Convention in Article 6bis:(1) The countries of the Union undertake, ex
officio if their legislation so permits, or at the request of an interested party,to refuse or to cancel
the registration, and to prohibit the use, of a trademark which constitutes a reproduction, an
imitation, or a translation, liable to create confusion, of a mark considered by the competent
authority of the country of registration or use to be well known in that country as being already
the mark of a person entitled to the benefits of this Convention and used for identical or similar
goods. These provisions shall also apply when the essential part of the mark constitutes a
reproduction of any such well-known mark or an imitation liable to create confusion therewith.
Subsequently, during drafting of the TRIPs Agreement, provisions to accommodate protection of
well-known marks as envisaged by Article 6bis of the Paris Convention were incorporated as
TRIPs Articles 16.2 and 16.3: 16.2Article 6bis of the Paris Convention (1967) shall apply,
mutatis mutandis, to services. In determining whether a trademark is well-known, Members shall
take account of the knowledge of the trademark in the relevant sector of the public, including
knowledge in the Member concerned which has been obtained as a result of the promotion of
the trademark.
16.3Article 6bis of the Paris Convention (1967) shall apply, mutatis
mutandis, to goods or services which are not similar to those in respect of which a trademark is
registered, provided that use of that trademark in relation to those goods or services would
indicate a connection between those goods or services and the owner of the registered
trademark and provided that the interests of the owner of the registered trademark are likely to
be damaged by such use. The provisions addressing protection of well-known marks evolved
somewhat from the Paris Convention to the TRIPs Agreement. The Paris Convention deals with
well-known marks in respect of goods alone, and provides protection only against use in
connection with identical or similar goods. The TRIPs Agreement mandated that protection be
extended by Member Countries to registered trademarks against use in connection with goods
and services; it also covers dissimilar goods and services to the extent the disputed third-party
use is found to indicate a connection between such dissimilar goods or services and the owner
of the registered mark, which is likely to harm the owners interests. Notably, both conventions
do not define what constitutes a well known mark, thereby leaving its definition to the individual
Member States. It is also of significance here that although the expression used in the Paris
Convention and the TRIPs Agreement is well known mark, different jurisdictions use different
expressions to denote marks falling into the category of well-known marks such as famous
marks, marks having a reputation, or notorious marks. Under the TM Act, while there is a
definition of well-known mark, the expressions well-known marks and [a] registered mark
[that] has a reputation are also used.
PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN
MARKS UNDER THE OLD INDIAN TRADE MARK STATUTE:
Before the enactment of the
TM Act, the statute governing trademarks in India was the TMM Act. The TM Act came into force
in September 2003. Prior to that date, well-known marks were protected under Section 47 of the
TMM Act, which provided for defensive registration of well-known marks as well as passing off
actions. Section 47(1) of the TMM Act read: 47(1)Defensive registration of well-known trade
marksWhere a trade mark consisting of any invented word has become so well-known as
respects any goods in relation to which it is registered and has been used, that the use thereof
in relation to other goods would be likely to be taken as indicating a connection in the course of
trade between those goods and a person entitled to use the trade mark in relation to the first
mentioned goods, then, notwithstanding that the proprietor registered in respect of the firstmentioned goods does not use or propose to use the trade mark in relation to those other goods
and notwithstanding anything in Section 46, the mark may, on application in the prescribed
manner by such proprietor, be registered in his name in respect of those other goods as a
defensive trade mark and while so registered, shall not be liable to be taken off the register in
respect of those goods under the said section. The test for eligibility for defensive registration of
a well-known mark under Section 47(1) was whether the use of the mark in connection with
goods other than the registered goods or goods in use would likely be perceived as indicating a
connection in the course of trade between such goods and the well-known marks proprietor. In
other words, likelihood of deception was the decisive factor in determining whether a well-known
mark was eligible for registration under this section. Owners of well-known marks often availed
themselves of this provision by registering their marks either in all classes or in selected classes
of interest. However, even without a defensive registration, Indian courts have upheld rights in
several well-known marks asserted by trademark owners through passing-off actions. These
court decisions and Indias international obligations to implement protection of well-known
marks led to the codification of the well-known marks provisions under the TM Act. Before
examining the TM Act, it is important to review some of the court decisions under the old statute,
the TMM Act, which are considered milestones in the evolution of Indian case law on wellknown marks and paved the way for its codification under the new statute.
Open Source:Generally
software for which the source code (underlying programming code) is made
freely available for use, reading the code, changing it or developing further
versions of the software, including adding amendments to it. Open source
software is often used as a general expression for many forms of nonproprietary software, which differ principally in respect of the licensing terms
under which changed versions of the source code may be further distributed.
Proprietary software, on the other hand, is usually understood to be software in
respect of which exclusive rights are maintained, such as those flowing from
copyright or patents. These rights allow to refuse access to the source code by
third parties for the purpose of copying or modifying the software, or at least to
control the use of the source code. Without going into the details here, there is a
difference between open source software and free software, on which more
details can be found through some of the hyperlinks
NON-CONVENTIONALTRADEMARK:A non-conventional trademark, also known
aS nontraditional trademark, is any new type of trademark which does not belong
to a preExisting, conventional category of trade mark, and which is often difficult to
register, but which may nevertheless fulfill the essential trademark function of
uniquely identifying the commercial origin of products or services. The term is
broadly inclusive as it encompasses marks which do not fall into the conventional
set of marks (e.g. those consisting of letters, numerals, words, logos, pictures,
symbols, or combinations of one or more of these elements), and therefore includes
marks based on appearance, shape, sound, smell, taste and texture.
Nonconventional trademarks may therefore be visible signs (e.g. colors, shapes, moving
images, holograms, positions), ornon-visible signs (e.g. sounds, scents, tastes,
textures). In recent years, trade mark registries and courts have grappled with applications for
silhouettes, shapes, scents, textures, short cartoons, single colors, body movements etc as
trademarks. This invasion of the unconventional is due to the abstract nature of the legal definition of
a trademark. On one hand the trade mark law has embraced an open- ended definition that
emphasis the functional, rather than the ontological status of a sign. Any sign which does the
communicative work of a trade mark, distinguishing goods or services on the basis of trade origin,
can be registered as one. On the other hand, the trade mark registration systems have historically
developed around paradigmatic subject matter: a conventional or traditional trade mark that is visual
and consists of words, devices or a combination of the two
Revenue engineering: The Traditional IP Revenue Methods Traditionally, there are three main
ways to make money from IP: 1. Exploit it. Simple enough, this means you use your IP to
create a product, and then sell it yourself. 2. License it. Let someone else pay you to use your IP,
such as a patent. They'll either pay you a one-time fee or you could earn a royalty on every sale.
3. Sell it off. Sometimes, it makes more sense to sell full ownership of your IP to a third party for
a one-time fee. This works especially well if the idea is risky, or if it will take more capital than
you can pull together in order to fully exploit it.
Non-Traditional IP Revenue Methods :
Beyond these three traditional avenues, individuals can quickly and easily benefit from their IP
by taking it in several additional directions. 1. Look at it askew. Sometimes all it takes to create
new IP is to take your previous IP and make a slight tweak. With patents, you can often make
subtle (or not-so-subtle) improvements to your original and file what is known as an
Improvement Patent, which builds upon a previous idea or invention and turns it into something
new. Bingo, your new patent is ready for its own exploitation or licensing.
2. Document and
share your original research. Think about how your IP was created in the first place. What
made it possible for you to successfully create it? What research did you conduct? What
processes and procedures did you have in place? What makes your IP unique? Once you've
answered these questions, ask yourself one more: Can others learn from your actions? If so, try
writing articles about your success or your techniques. Trade magazines in your industry want to
hear your ideas, and can often pay well for you to tell your story.
3. Talk about it. You did
the research, and you created the IP, which means that you know the subject better than anyone
else. So start talking about it.
Conferences, local technical meetings, professional societies,
and other events are always looking for interesting and effective speakers. Speaking
engagements are a great way to engage your audience, share your success, brand your company,
and earn speaking fees at the same time
products with actual or potential use of value, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE
HUMAN GENETIC MATERIAL.
B) To conserve and sustainable use of
Biological Diversity. Biological Diversity means variability among living
organisms from all sources and the ecological complexes of which they are
part and includes diversity within species or between species and of eco
systems.
C) To respect and protect KNOWLEDGE OF LOCAL
COMMUNITIES related to Bio Diversity.
D) To secure sharing of benefits
with local people as conservers of biological resources and holdersof
knowledge and information relating to the use of biological resources.
E) Conservation and development of areas important from the standpoint of
biological diversity by declaring them as Biological diversity heritage sites.
F) Protection and rehabilitation of threatened species.
G) Involvement
of institutions of self govt. in the broad scheme of the implementation of the
Act through constitution of committees.
Under this Act, no
foreigner or an Indian who is Non-resident or an Indian in association with the
Foreigner can get any Indian biological resource without permission. It
virtually creates a ban on transport across the border any Indian biological
resource. This ban and regulation is restricted to the use of Indian biological
resource by others for research or for commercial utilization or for bio survey
and bio-utilization. Collaborative research projects are exempted if such
collaborative research projects are approved by the Central Govt. and are
drawn up as per the policy guidelines specified by the Central Govt.
What is bio prospecting?:Bio prospecting means exploration of wild plants
and animals for commercially viable genetic and bio Chemical resources.
What is Bio Piracy?:Bio piracy means misappropriation of folk wisdom of
indigenous people by corporate/pirates to locate and understand the use of
medical plants and use this knowledge commercially and exploit it while the
indigenous people who made it all possible receive little or nothing in return.
UN Convention on Bio diversity 1992 (held in Rio de janerio) is a land mark in
the environment and development field as it takes for the first time a
comprehensive rather than sectoral approach to the conservation of Earths
Bio diversity and sustainable use of biological resources. Different Boards
under the Bio diversity Act, 2002:- 1) National Bio diversity Authority(NBA),
a body corporate with a perpetual succession. S.19 provides for approval by
NBA for undertaking certain activities, namely -for obtaining any biological
resource occurring in India.
-for applying for patent or any other form
of intellectual property protection.
2) State Biodiversity
Authority(SBA)
3) Bio diversity management Committees
(BMCs)MBAs and SBAs are required to consult the concerned BMCs on
matters related to use of BiologicalResources and associated knowledge
under section 17. Any person claiming to be the producer of the goods in
respect of which a GI has been registered under S.16, may apply in writing
to the Registrar for registering him as the Authorised User of such GI. The
procedure for registration of a GI also applies for registration an Authorised
user of a GI.
Duration and the rights conferred by the Registration:The Registration is for a period of Ten (10) years AND it can be renewed from
time to time (ie it is a perpetual right). Registration of an authorized user is
for a period of Ten (10) years or till the registration of GI(of which he is the
Authorised user) expires, whichever is EARLIER . If at the expiration of the
time prescribed in that behalf, those conditions are not complied with, the
registrar may remove a geographical indication or the Authorised user as the
case may be from the Register.
Prohibition of Assignment:- Section
24 of the Act.: The right to GI cannot be assigned, transmitted, licensed,
pledged or mortgaged. However, the right of the Authorized User devolves
on his successor in title.
Infringement and Action for infringement.
Section 22 of the Act.:- An Unauthorised user using a registered GI a) by
any means in the designation or presentation of goods suggesting that such
goods originate in a geographical area OTHER THAN THE TRUE PLACE OF
ORIGIN. b) in such a manner which constitutes an act of unfair competition
including passing off in respect of registered GI. Proceedings can be
instituted to prevent or to recover damages for the infringement of a
registered GI.
Protection of Plant varieties and Farmers Rights
Act, 2000.:Protection of Plant varieties either by patents or by an effective
sui generis (of its own kind, unique) system or any combination thereof.
Objectives:1) To protect and benefit the breeders of new plant varieties.
2) To protect and benefit the farmers as cultivators and conservers of
traditional local plant varieties which may be used in the development of
new varieties
and
3) To encourage the growth of seed industry
through domestic and foreign investments so as to ensure supply of high
quality seeds and planting materials to farmers.
How the right of
breeders are protected? :
The rights of the breeders are protected by
granting them a monopoly to use and sell the seeds and planting materials
of the new plant varieties evolved by them through a system by which they
are granted registration. Such a registration is equivalent to a patent granted
to the inventor in respect of manufactured goods. Those who use the new
plant varieties for purposes of business ie for the production and sale of
seeds and other planting material have to take a license from the breeder by
paying him fees which may be treated as Royalty. Who is a
breeder?:Breeder means a person or group of persons or a farmer or group
of persons or any institution which has bred, evolved or developed any
variety.
Who can make an application for registration under
the Act?:Section 16 of the Act gives the types of persons who can make an
application for registration under the Act, namely, -Breeder, successor or
assignee of breeder- any farmer or group of farmers or community of
farmers-any University or Publicly funded institution.
Criteria for making
an application under the Act:-1) Novelty:- Such a variety has not been sold or
disposed off.
2) Distinctiveness:- clearly distinguishable by at least
one essential characteristics from any other variety.
3) Uniformity:Uniformity in its essential characteristics(subject to variation that may be
expected from
the peculiar features of its propagation).
4)
Stability:- ie its essential characteristics remains unchanged after repeated or
in the case of a particular cycle of propagation, at the end of such cycle.
Tenure:- The certificate of registration shall be valid for - Nine(9)years in
case of trees and vines. Six(6)years in case of other crops may be reviewed
and renewed further, on payment of such fees, as may be fixed by the rules
so that the total period of protection will not be more than 18 years in case
of trees and wines and 15 years in case of other crops.
Semiconductor
Integrated
circuits
layout-Design
Act,
2002
[SICLD
ACT,2002]Semiconductor Integrated Circuits or Semiconductor IC.:
What is the object of the Act?:It provides protection to Semiconductor IC
Layout designs and matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
What is a semi conductor IC?:Semiconductor IC means a product having
transistors and other circuitry elements which are inseparably formed on a
semi conductor material or an insulating material or inside the semi
conductor material or an insulating material or inside the semi-conductor
material and designed to perform an electronic circuitry function. Every IC
has a number.
What is a transistor?:It is a semi conductor device with
three connections capable of amplification in addition to rectification. In
normal room (lower temperature), semiconductor acts as an insulator. If you
increase the temperature, it will conduct electricity. Semiconductor is an
element like Gold, Germanium (a grey crystalline element with semi
conducting properties resembling silicon) and silicon are main components
of semi conductor.
Layout design:- what is a Layout design?
Layout means a) the way in which something, esp., a page is laid out and b)
a thing set out in a particular way. Lay out design means a layout of
transistors and other circuitry elements and includes lead wires connecting
such elements and expressed in any manner in a semiconductor integrated
circuit.
What are the rights conferred on the registered
proprietor of the Lay-out design?:
The SICLD Act gives to the
registered proprietor of the layout-design, the exclusive right to use the
layout design and obtain relief in respect of infringement. It may be
noted here that the registration of a layout design does not give monopoly
rights but gives right to prevent infringement of the registered layout during
the period of registration
What constitutes infringement under
the Act?:Reproducing, 4.importing, selling, distributing the IC layout design
for commercial purposes only constitutes infringement
What are
requirements to get protection under the Act?:
-originality-should
not be commercially exploited-distinct from the others already existing in the
market.
What is meant by commercial exploitation in relation to
semi conductor integrated circuits layout design?:
Commercial
exploitation in relation to semiconductor integrated circuits layout-design
implies acts such as sell, lease, offer or exhibit for sale or otherwise
Patents Act, 1970 :Earlier there was only PROCESS PATENT and no
PRODUCT PATENT for drugs, foods and chemicals. Now product patent has
also come into existence for drugs, foods and chemicals. The Product patent
protection already exists IN ALL OTHER FIELDS. A patent is a right granted to
a person who has invented a new and useful article or an improvement of an
existing article or a new process of making an article. A Patent is not
granted for an idea or principle as such, but for some article or the
process of making some article applying the idea.
Application for
Patent:- :Who can apply for patent?: 1) Any person claiming to be the true
and first inventor of the invention;
2) by any person being the assignee
of the person claiming to be the true and first inventor in respect of the right
to make such an application;
3) by the legal representative of any
deceased person who immediately before his death was entitled to make
such an application. The application as above may be made by any of the
persons mentioned above either alone or jointly with any other person for
ONE INVENTION ONLY before the patent office. Every application for a patent
public domain.
-A patent is a creation of STATUTE and is therefore
territorial in Extent. Thus, a patent granted in one country cannot be
enforced in another country UNLESS the invention concerned is patented in
that country also.
What is infringement?: Infringement of patent
consists in the violation of any exclusive rights of the patentee, namely, to
make, use, exercise, sell or distribute the invention in India. Where the
invention claimed is an article or substance, the rights of the patentee are
infringed by any one who makes or supplies that article or substance
commercially for use by others. Where the patent is for a process, the right
of patentee is infringed by one who uses or exercises that method or process
in India.
Where to file relief for infringement?:Action for infringement of a
patent must be instituted by filing a suit in the Court having jurisdiction not
inferior to that of a District Court. The right to sue for infringement belongs
to the patentee. A person who threatens to infringe may also be sued. The
burden of establishing infringement is on the plaintiff , ie who has filed a suit.
What are the reliefs available?:It includes an injunction AND at the option of
the plaintiff, either damages or an account of profits. The limitation period for
taking action for infringement is three years from the date of infringement.
-APPLICATION FOR PATENT ABROAD:- For applying ABROAD, one has to first
apply in India and after six weeks to apply abroad.
-A Patent is a
Monopoly right.
- In case of an invention in the Research and
Development(R&D) Dept. of a Company, the application for a patent should
be made both by the Employer and the employee to avoid future
complication in the event of the employee in the R&D department resigns.
What is Para IV filing?In case of Para IV filing, the generic manufacturer
claims that either his product does not infringe the patent and /or the patent
itself is invalid. A successful patent challenge allows the challenger, a 180
days exclusivity in which no other company can launch a generic version.
What is Evergreening of a patent?:When a patent is ending its tenure
of Twenty years, there is a natural tendency on the part of the patent holder
to extend the patent by applying some cosmetic touches to the patent and
then apply to the patent authority to extend the same. In this way he can
prevent it from becoming generic. However, IndianPatent Law, under
Section 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970, provides that the mere discovery of a
new form of a known substance which does not result in the enhancement
of the known efficacy of that substance or the mere discovery of any new
property or new use for a known substance or of the mere use of a known
process, machine or apparatus does not entitle a person for a patent or the
extension of the patent.