Suggested School Science Fair Judging Criteria NAME Science T Fair Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Minimally Judging Acceptable Criteria well-organized j00d organization | « average organization | + some organization | « poorly organized labeled, with labeled, with many | + labeled with some —_| « few labels, lttle + no labels, litle or no Physical details and some details & some information information Presentation | much information information information ‘+ some care & attention; care & attention; + superior care & * above average care « average care & somewhat neat messy attention: very neat_| _& attention: neat attention © speaks clearly with | * speaks clearly, + some preparation, | « litle preparation, no confident, well- confidence; prepared | prepared, some some confidence & onfidence, unclear Oral prepared ‘+ some memorization, | confidence clarity «no memorization, litle Presentation | «memorized, litle cue | some cue card use’ | e little memorization, | « no memorization: Use of cue cards care use ‘+ answers most mostly relies on cue | reads from cue cards | « answers few + answers al questions; good cards + answers some questions, limited questions well, knowledge of topic | « answors most questions; cannot understanding of excellent knowledge questions; difficulty | expand on topic topic of topic expan * great depth = depth in * general = Some general + Title understanding, ‘comprehensi Comprehension; good | understanding: some | understanding; litle | few details, confusing exc detail detail detail + many gaps in Knowledge | + good discussion of | « discussion of + some attempt to + simple, some gaps in | information Level application & application & discuss information ‘+ work obviously not in importance of importance of | + application of material | « work mostly not in ow | own words material material | + work presented words * work presented entirely in own words + work presented mostly in own words. somewhat in own, words Total (* could use highlighter to note criteria achieved) COMMENTS:Suggested School Science Criteria and Marking ‘Science Fair Judging Criteria Excellent Very Good _ Satisfactory Te Experiment wath research | Experiment with Research ‘Complex Research and application + very detailed relevant | » detalled with relevant | » some detal with * confusing and vague information ‘generalized information ite detail + discusses importance or | + may try to discuss + simple & straightforward | + simple vocabulary & application of info portance or epplication | + some gaps in knowledge & |” sentences, Knowledge logical + oss precision infor + many gaps in knowiedge & + comprehension is + may have small gapsin | « litle student voice n apparent comprehension ie student voice ‘+ mainly writen in student} « less enriched vocabulary voice > complex, detaied, = many dota + some details > not labeled > not abated | Diagrams & labeled + Tabeled + labeled + some explanation + no explanation Pictures + explanation to dearly | « support project + no explanation Suppor projact. + some explanation neat, clean, tidy, shows | » neat + reat + some neat pars [= messy : obvious care & attention | « above average care & | + average care & attention | « some care & attention + shows litte care or attention Presentation | « very legible atenton + legible + alterations apparent rations apparent + well organized + average organization | + some organization + hastily done + very well prepared + 900d preparation + sore proparaton notes ‘reparation of notes + speaks clearly & with * Speaks clearly reading trom notes + lack of confidence & a Oral confidence someniat confidently | « mostly reads from notes o | + no memorization + abe fo answer some Commun + well rehearsed + rehearsed, some ‘ue cards + answers some questions, Presentati ‘+ memorized or using cue | memorization with notes | « able to anewer most but unabe t expand topic or cue cards . + able to answer most dificult expanding topic questions 7 = most capitals Bor + some capiiale Blor + many capitals for + most capitals & punctuation punctuation comeet Punctuation missing punctuation missing missing Mechanics |. + attempting to use corect | « litte attempt at + no paragraphs . + one ortwo speling errors | paragrephing paragraphing + many speling rors a few spelling erors > propery dene * properly done propery done * missing or very poary done Bibliography | « many resources + some resources few resources + varied resources + some varity of resources ‘TOTAL (‘could use highlighter to note cnteria achieved) Comments: 253 4‘siuaunuog, :sjuepmis pon) OT canes sane (poop 2A) Ge qu Suosanb zawsue «| aBP9|OUN, sausuad Aop Cinco oy ado} a tes pue ado} 34) UO pusdx> + jpofoud ayy ynoge wopEWopU! WEs>p 949 [IAP U LIED + :an9 apg aHOOS NOTLanaosaar Vea sepouatpyop soul aa a4oyy Saud axe eLa9qUD 949 Jo sm = T ‘aanjayye sy2afoud ayy fssaz9nsa9]9 pes JBUH ase e}9}149 2M J suoreysedxo puosaq 03 Seu yoofoad aqp ‘wonounsip qyEA J9uL 24¥ WIINAD OD 5 jou om z € aU ae TEAS SST OF TNE, CIn CJA 2S91NJ oy} [12 0} oL0Ype yD0fo1d oY} Seog, saind uondussep 84) 0} wu0yu0d jm siaeloud ie yeu peroadxe YOU |! “e|NeyLO Yee 40} $0108 UBisse 0} poyse ale safpnt anyy “uonentens y2efoud 40; eLeyL9 [ex8UeB sy) apinosd SuoNCuasep BurMO{ON SUL Brey Bubp yey eoua|9g JoNN3SIq Jooyog AouiNg