rn Se Us ANB OES TTA eS
General Mental Ability in the World of Work: Occupational Attainment
and Job Performance
Frank L. Schmidt
University of lowa
John Hunter
Michigan State University
‘The psychological construct of general mental ability (GMA), intaxiced by C, Spearman (1908) nearly
100 Years ago, has enjoyed resurgence of interest and aemton in recent decades, Thi atc presents
‘he esearch evidence that GMA predicts both oecuptinal lve ataned and perormance within one’s
chosen oecipation and does so beter tan any ter ability, tit oy disposition and beter than jo
experience. The sizes ofthese rltonsips with GMA ar ls larger than mst fou in psychological
research, Evidence is resented that weighted combinations of specific ptitses tailored to individual
jobs do aot pee job performance beter than GMA alone, dsconfirming specific apne theory.
theory of job performance is deserted that explicate the central role of GMA ia the worl of work
‘These findings support Spearman’s proposition that GMA is of eel importance in bamaa alas
During the 1960s when we were graduate students, we fe
‘quently heard predictions from experimental psychologists and
‘experimental socal psychologists that in 20 or so years differential
psychology would be a dead field, hecause experimental research
would explain all individual differences as effects of past oF
present (environmental) treatment conditions, Obsously, this has
‘not happened, In fact, in recent years there has been a strong,
resurgence of interest in the psychology of individual differences
(Lubinski, 2000), This resurgence embraces general intelligence
(general mental ability, GMA), specific aptitudes and abilities,
Personality waits, interests, valves, and other tats showing im
‘poreant differences between individuals and groups
‘This resurgence has been particularly strong in connection with
GMA, a construct frst postulated and defined nearly 100 years ago
bby Spearman (1904). A number of developments and findings have
contributed to renewed interest in GMA. The accumulated evi-
dence has become very strong that GMA is cortelated witha wide
variety of life outcomes, ranging from risky health-related bebav-
iors, to criminal offenses, to the ability 00 use a bus or subway
system (Gottiedson, 1997; Lubinski & Humphreys, 1997). In
‘eddition, the more highly # given GMA measure loads on the
general factor in meaal ability (the g factor), the larger are these
correlations The relative standing of individuals on GMA has
ber found toe stable over periods of more than 65 years (Deary,
‘Whalley, Lemmon, Crawford, & Starr, 2000). Finding in behavior
genetics, including studies of identical twins roared apart and
together (e.g. Bouchard, Lykken, MeGue, Segal, & Tellegen,
1990), have shown heyond doubt that GMA has a strong genetic
basis (¢., Bouchard, 1998; McGue & Bouchard, 1998). Herits-
bility has been shown Co increase with age and to reac ievels of
Frank L. Semi, Tippie Collegeof Business, University of flows aha
unter, Deparment of Peychology, Michigan State Univesy
‘Comtespondenceconcering ths ale shouldbe adaresed to Frank
Schmid pple College of Business, Univesity of lows, lowa City, 1A,
32112, mal rank-sehmide@uiows.eds
6
80 oF higher in elderiy persons, (The square root of 80 is 89,
indicating a correlation of nearly 90 between genes and GMA in