'Man can only proceed in his production in the same way as nature itself, that is he can only alter the forms o f the material' (tm) by releasing the'slumbering powers' (r), men'redeem' it: changing the dead 'in-itself into a living 'for-itselT, they so to speak. Revolutionary practice assumes a 'cosmic' as well as a social significance.
'Man can only proceed in his production in the same way as nature itself, that is he can only alter the forms o f the material' (tm) by releasing the'slumbering powers' (r), men'redeem' it: changing the dead 'in-itself into a living 'for-itselT, they so to speak. Revolutionary practice assumes a 'cosmic' as well as a social significance.
'Man can only proceed in his production in the same way as nature itself, that is he can only alter the forms o f the material' (tm) by releasing the'slumbering powers' (r), men'redeem' it: changing the dead 'in-itself into a living 'for-itselT, they so to speak. Revolutionary practice assumes a 'cosmic' as well as a social significance.
matter. Man can only proceed in his production in the
same way as nature itself, that is he can only alter the forms o f the material' The alteration o f the forms can itself only take place with the help o f natural forces, amongst which M arx also counted the active human Subjects. By releasing the slumbering powers * o f the material o f nature, men redeem it: changing the dead in-itself* into a living for-itselT, they so to speak lengthen the series o f objects brought forth in the course o f the history o f nature, and continue it at a qualitatively higher level. Nature propels forward its process o f creation by the agency d f human labour. Revolutionary practice therefore assumes a cosmic * as well as a social significance. It is very remarkable that here, where M arx described human labour as the alteration o f the form o f matter in accordance with its natural laws,70he also had in view a very general philosophical state o f affairs: the world is matter in motion in definite forms. M arx agreed with Engels71 on this point, at least in abstracto. T his appears from his selecting the following quotation from the book Meditazioni Stella Economia Politico, by the Italian economist Pietro Verri, published in 1773, as corroboration o f the view quoted above, that man can only proceed in-his production in the same way as nature itself: A ll the phenomena o f the universe, whether produced by the hand o f man or b y the general laws o f physics, are not in fact newly-crcatcd but result solely from a transform ation o f existing materia). Composition and division arc the only elem ents, which the human spirit finds again and again when analysing the notion o f reproduction; and this is equally the case with the reproduction o f valu e. . . and o f riches, when earth, air, and water becom e transform ed into cam in the fields, or when through the hand o f man the secretions o f an insect turn into silk, or certain m etal parts are arranged to construct a repeating watch.7*
W hile natural processes independent o f men are essenti
ally transformations o f material and energy, human pro duction itself does not fall outside the sphere o f nature. Nature and society are not rigidly opposed. T he socially active man confronts the material o f nature as one o f her own forces. H e sets in