.

1427 2006 /

...
....
.....
...
....
....

": ".

.
.



.



17
.

. .


.

.

10

11

11

12

13

13

17

: :

18

20

23

51

: :

81

81

108

117
120

121

121

122

124

129

129

130

131

132

140

147

147

156

163

164

173

181

183

187

193

195

196

206

213



)(1

122

)(2

122

)(3

123

)(4

123

)(5

123

)(6

124

)(7

124

)(8

126

)(9

128

)(10

133

.
) (11

134

.
) (12

135

)(.
) (13

.

136

 )(14

137

.
)(15

138

.
)(16

141

.
)(17

142

.
)(18

143

.
)(19

145

.
)(20

147

.
)(21

)(

148

 .
)(22

)(

149

.
)(23

)(

150

.
)(24

)(

151

.
)(25

152

.
)(26

153

.
)(27

153

.
)(28

154

.
)(29

155

.
)(30

)(

156

 .
)(31

)(

157

.
)(32

)(

158

.
)(33

)(

159

.
)(34

160

.
)(35

160

.
)(36

161

.
)(37

162

)(1

30

)(2

139

)(3

146

) (1 .

214

) (2 .

222

) (3 .

230

) (4

231

)
-
- (.

:




) (0.05=

.
) (0.05=

:
.


) -
- (
) (1710 )2006/2005(
) (370 . ) (%21
.
:
-1 ) (44 :
)( .
-2 ) (34 :
.


).(Alpha Chronbach
:
) Pearson Correlation
(Coefficient )( ) (Independent T-test
) (One - Way ANOVA
).(Scheffee Test
:


).(%82.2



).(%76
) (0.05=
.
) (0.05=
.
) (0.05=
.
) (0.05=

.
) (0.05=
) (5 )(10
) (10 )(10
.
) (0.05=
.
) (0.05=

.

 :

.
.

.


.



. -



:



.


.




)
.(2005



)
.(2003


) (Roach" :
) (%80
2

 )" (1994

) .(Ryan, 1972 ) (Trow


).(1987


.

) (
) ( .
) .(1989
.

.



).(2000

.
)(constraints

3


)
.(1994



)(

.
:
)(Delegation of Authority
) (Effectiveness of Taking Decisions .


.
.
).(1999



) (2003


).(2003

.
& (Netzer, lanore, Eye, stevens
).Benson, 1979

) .(Maeroff, 1988
) (lightfoot, 1986
.
.
:
) .(white,1992 )(Zimmerman& Rappaport,1988

) (Dunst,1991
)
.(2003



) .(1996

. .
5

 ) .(2003
(Hersey & Blanchard cited in Hoy&Miskel,1991,305) :


)(

.
) (Netzer,et.al. 1979 : .
) (Short & Rinehart, 1992
) (Short & Greer, 1997
:
-1

-2

-3

-4

-5

-6.

.

).(1997
)(


"
" ).(1999


.

).(1999


.

) .(1994
) (Simon,1961
) .(2005 .
.
) (
.
).(1994

.



)
.(2005





) .(Duke,Daniell,1981






.

) .(1997
) (Prscott,1980
.
.



.
)(

8

 ) .(1981






..

).(1999

.
:


.


:
) .(Burke,1970



9



.
:

.
:
.1

.
.2

.
.3

.
.4 :


.

10

 .5

.
:
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4 :

.
:
:
.1

.2

11

 .3

.4

.
.5
:

:
:
.1 ) (0.05=

.
.2 ) (0.05=

:
.
.3 ) (0.05=

:
.
12

 :
:
.1 :

.
.2 :
)( ) :
- -
( . .
.3 :
2006.
.4 :
.
:
:
) :(Delegation of Authority


) .(1999 ) (Netzer, 1979
.

13

 ) :(Authority )" (Robbins,1990

.

" ) .(2003 )(Simon, 1961
" .
) :(Responsibility
) .(1999
) (Effectiveness Of Taking Decisions :


.
) :(Effectiveness ) (1995
) (Barnard,1976
) (2001
)(.
) :(Decision )(1994
)
(1994 ) (Yong
) (2003

) (2003
).(2001
14

 ) :(Decision making
) .(1994
) :(Decision Taking
.
)(2004

) .(1998
)( :
) (

.
) ( :

.
) ( :
:
.
) ( :

.
:
.
15



).(2004
) ( :

.

16



: :
-
-
-
: : :
-
-
-

17



: :



) (2000

) (1981


. :
.1
. .
.2
.
.3 ).(1994




18

 .
):(2000
.1 :

.
.
.2 :
.
.3 :


.
.4 )( :

) (
:
-
.
-
.

19

 -
.


):(1987
.1 : .
.2 :

.
.3 :


.



.
:
- .


20


).(1995

:

)

.(1994
) (1825
.

.


) .(1994
) (Trow

.
- -
.
.
.
.
).(1987
21


.

.


) (2003
).(1998
) (Smart & Montgomery

)
.(1998



.


).(1987

22

 . .
).(Authority
)(


.

).(2003

.
.
.
.
.
).(1999

) .(2000
) (Simon, 1961 " : ".
" :
" ).(1996

23

 :
.1

.2

.3.

.
:
.1 :
.
.2 :
.
.3 : )
.(1996

)
( ).(1998
.(Delegation of Authority) :
) (



).(2003
24


.
. ) (1999



. ) (2000

.

) .(2000
) (1999
.

.

.
.
:
) (Process of Delegation
) Netzer,
(1979 :

25

 -1 .
) (Ownership
.
.

)
(1995

.

.
) (2003 ) (1996 :
. :


.
. :

.

.
26

 . :



) (2003
.

.

.
-2
.


:
:


.
: .

27

 ) (2003 )
(1995 ) (1999 ) (1996 ).(2003
-3 :

.
.
) (
:



) (2003 ) (1995 ) (1999 ) (1996
).(2003


.


).(1999








28



.


.
.
) .(1999

)
(1996
)
.(1998 ) (Dale
)(
.


.

) .(1998
.
.
-
-

.
29

 .
.
.
:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 ).(1999


):(2003

-
-
-

) :(1 .
30

.

.
) (2001





) .(2001 :
.1 :
.
.2 :
.


) (2003 :
.1
.
.2

.
31

 .3 .
.4
.
.5 .
.6 .
.7 .
.8 .
.9
.
.10


.
.11 .
.
.12
.
.13
.

32


.
.14



) (2003 ) (1999 ) (1999 ) (1998
) (1996 ) (1995 ) (1980 ) .(1977


) .(1996

) (2001 ) (2000 ) (1999:
.1
)( .
.2
.
.
.3

.
.


33

 ) (1995 ) (1996 ) (1997 ) (1999

.



.
:



) (2003 ) (1999 ) (1999
) (1999 ) (1998 ) (1995
:
.1 :

34


.
.2 :


)(

.
.

.
.3 :



.

.


.

35



) (1999 ) (1999
:
.1 ) (

.
. ) (
.

.
.

.
.2 ) (
. .

. .

.

.


36




.

) (1999 ) (1999 ) (1999
:
.1 )(:

.

.
.
.
.2 :


. ) (1982

.

.
37

 .3 :
.
.

.
.
.
.4 )(:





.
.5 :


.



.


38


.
.6 :




.

.
.7 :
.


.

.
) (Regular .
.


.
39

 :
) (Newman :
.
.
.

.
.
).(1999

) (2003

:

.1
.
.2
.
.3 .
.4
.
) (1999 ) (1999
:

40

 .1 :
.

.
).(1999
.2 :



.


).(1999
.3 :



.


).(1999

41

 .4 :
.


).(1999
.5 :

.

.


).(1999
.6 :
.
.

.
).(1999

42

 :

. .

.
.
:
.


.


).(1999
) (1999

:
-1 :
) (Define duties clearly

.

. -
.
43


).(1999
:




.
:

.
) (1999 :
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
) (1997 :
- .
44

 - .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
) (1999
.

.
.


.


).(1999

45

 -2 .

.
-

.
" .3 " :

:

.
.4 :


.
)(


.

46

 :
) (2003
:
.1 )( :
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
.2 ) ( :
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
.3 )( :

47

 - ) (.
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
.4 ) (
:
:
- :




.. .
.
- :

48

 ... . )
.(2003
) (1998 )(1995
) (1999 :
.1 )(:
- :

.
.
- : - -


.
.


.

- :
.
. .
- : .
.

49

 .
.

.
.2 :
-

.
- .
.

-
.
.3 :

) (1998 ) (1995 ).(1999



.

50



.
) (2003


.

.
.
:

.





).(2000

. .
) .(2000 .
)(
51

 .
).(1990
) (2003 .
) (Etzioni " :
) .(2003 ) (1978
. ) (2000

.
.
) (Effectiveness ) (1983" :
)( )( )(Efficicy
"
" . ) (Barnard



).(1988
) (1986 ) (Reddin
:
. ) (Management Effectiveness
.

52

 . ) (Apparent Effectiveness

.
. ) (Personal Effectiveness
.

.


.
:




) .(1996
) (Simon, 1961
.


.

53

 ) .(1992
:
:
.
:
.
:
. :

) .(1994


. )(2005
:

.
.
:
)
.(1986 :
).(Moody, 1984

54



).(2000



.
:
.
- -
) (1999
) .(1997
) (1997 :
: .

: .
) (Vroom & yitton, 1973

:
. Decision Quality :
. Acceptance :
. ) Decision Timeliness : .(2005
55

 ) (2003 )(
. :
=
:
) (1997
.
.
.

.



.
.



).(1999

) (1997 :
. ) (Feed Back .
. .
56

 .
.

.
) (Effectiveness

.
:



.
:
- .
- .
- " ".
- .
- " ".
- .
57

 - ) .(2005

.



.
) .(1975
)(1993

:
.1 :
.

.
.2 :
.


.
.
.3 :


58


.
.4 :



.
.5 :

).(2001

:
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- ).(1994

59

 :

.


).(1998


:
.1 :
:
- :

.
- :

.
- .
- ).(1976

60

 .2 :
:
- )(
.
.

).(1998
- :
.

.
- :
.
.


.
).(1998

61

 .3 :
:
- ) ( :
.
. :
).(1998
- ) ( :
.

) (Gore,1962 ) .(1994

:

) .(2000

-

.
.4 :
:
- )( :

62

 .

.
) (Satisficing
- )( :

.


.


. )
.(1998
.5 :
:
- :
.
.
.
- :


63

 )( (fuzzy decision) .

.
.6 :
:
- ) ( :

) (1994 :
.

. . . - ) ( :
) (

) .(1985


:
)
.(1994
64



.

) .(1996

).(2003



.

) (1988 ) (1994 ) (1985
).(Huber, 1988
) (2003 :
"
.


.
) (
.

65




:
.1 ):(Meetings

:
).(1995



. ) (1988
:
.1 : .
.2 :
.
:
- .
- .

66

 .3 :
.
.4 :
. .
) (1994
:
.



.

.

) (1988 :
- ) (.
- .
- .
- .
- .
67

 ) (1989 ) (
:
- .
- .
- .
- .
-
.
- .
- .
- .
- .
) (1985 :
-

.
- .
-
) (Drummond, 1991
68


.

) (1994

:
- .
-
.


-
.

" "

.



.
-2 ):(Brain Storming

.
69



.
) (1985 :
- .
- .
- .
-
.
) Huber,
(1988:
- .
- .
- .
- .


.

.
70

 -3 :
:
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .

.

).(1985
-4 ):(Delphi




.
) (2004 :
71

 - .
- .
-
.
-
.
-
.
- .
- .





) .(1995

) .(1997


.
72

 -5 ):Nominal Group Technique (NGT

.
. ) (2004 :
- : .
- : .
- .
- :
.
- : : )(1
) (2 )) (5
( .
- :
.
) (1985 :
- .
- .
- .
- .
73

 - .

.

.
-6 ):(Ringi Method



.


) .(1995


.


).(1991


.

74



) (1994 :
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
:





.



75

 ) (1999 ) (1997 )
.(1998
:
- .
-
.
- .
-
.
- .
-
) .(1997
) (2003



.
:
) (1999 :

76

 -1 :
- :


.
- :

.
- :

.
-2 )( :
- .
- .
-
.
- )( .
- .
- .
-3 :
- .
77

 - .
- .
- .
- .
-4 :
-1 : :
- .
- .
- .
- .
-2 :
- .
- .
- ).(1999
) (1998 :
- :
.

.
78

 - :

.
- .
) (1997 :
- .
-
.
- .
- .
-
.
-

.
-
.
- .



79


)(
.

80

 :
: :
- .
- .
- .
- .
)(Honsinger, 1989 " : ".


.
.
) (
.

.
.
):(1991 " : ".

81



.

:
- .

- .

- .

- .

- .

- .

- .

- .

.

) (95.
:
.1 .
.2
.
.3
.
82

 :
.1
.
.2 .
).(Jablonski, 1992 " : ".


:
.

.
)(Morris & Nunnery, 1993 " : ".

) (140 ) (6
.
:

.
.
83

 )(Acker, 1995 " :

".
) (11 ) (14
:
- .
- .
- .
-.
- .
-

. .
)(Carlson, 1995 " : ".


. :
84

 - .
-.
- .
-.
- .
- .
- .
-.

.

. ) (%77
.
.
.
)(King, 1996 " : ".



85

 ) (24
:


.
)(Klecker et.al, 1996 " : ".
.


.
)(Jonhson & Short, 1998 " : ".

.

.

.

86

 )(Rinehart et.al, 1998 " : : ".

)
( :
.



.
.
.
)(2000 " :
".


) (362

:
.1
:
.
87

 .2

.

.3



.
.4

.
.5
.
)(Martin, 2001 :

.
""

88


.


.

.
)(2003 " :
".

. ) (128
) (60 ) (%47
: .
:

:
.1
:
.
.2 .
89

 .3 ) (0.05=
.
.4 ) (0.05=

.
.5 ) (0.05=
.
:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
)(2004 " :
".


) (187

:
90

 .1


.2
.
:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4
.
- .
)(1987 " : :
".


.

.
91


.




.

.
)(Engbreston, 1987 " : ".

)( ) (270 ) (31
) (6
) (L.B.D.Q
:
.1
.
.2
.

92

 )(1988 " : :
".



. ) (220
) (%21

:
.1
.
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5
) .(2000

)(1991 " :
".
93


) (50
:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5 .
.6 .
) (61
:
.1 :
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
94

 .2 .
.3 .
.4
:
) .(1994
)(Grzywinski, 1993 " : " ".



.
:
.1 .
.2
)(.

) (.

.

95


) (
.
)(1994 " : ".


) (193
) (%34
:
.3
.
.4
.
.5
.
.6 .
.7 .

96

 )(Bashiardis, 1994 " : ".

.

.


.
)(1994 " : ".

49 1972



:
.1 .

97

 .2
.
.3 :
-
.
-
.
- .
.4 :
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
)(1995 " : ".



98


.

)1974/73( ) (1992
)1994(

. :
.1
.
.2 .



.
)(1995 " : ".

:
.

99


) (239
.
:
.1 ) (86.4 .
.2
.
.3 .
.4 :
.
.5
.
)(1996 " :
".


.
) (73
:
100

 .1 .
.2

.
.3

.
.4
.
)(1997
" :
".



) (101 ) (%20
:
.1 ) (%67
.
.2 -
.
101

 .3 ) (%65.7 .
.4 ) (63.9

.
.5 ) (%55.2 .
.6 ) (%57.3
.
.7
:
) (%66 .
. .
)(Fiendish,1999 " : ".


)(36
.
102


:
.1 ) (14 ) (17
.
.2
.
.3
.
)(Glimpse, 1999 " : ".

) (25



:
.1 .
.2 .
.3
.
103

 .4 ) (15
.
)(Delorenzo, 1999 " :
".


) (415
:


.
)(2000 " : ".




) (334 ) (%40


104


:
.1 .
.2
.
.3
.
.4 .
.5
.
.6 .
)(Reiber, 2001 " : ".




) (6 ) (4
) (5 ) (5

105


:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4
.
.5
.
.6 .
.7
.
)(2005 " :
".


) (67
) (%42.14 ) (1250 ) (%30
.
106


:
.1

.
.2
.
.3 .
.4
.
.5
.
.6
.
.7
.
.8
.
- .
)(Chacko, 1987107

 " :
".
) (250



.
)(Mayseki, 1991 " :
) (wyoming ".
)
(wyoming
.
:
-1.

-2 /.

-4 .

-5.

-3.

)(
.

108

 - -

.

.
)(Ferrari, 1991 " : :
".


.

) .(1990 ) (60
) (120 .

.


.
:
-1
.
109

 -2

.

-3
.
-4

.
-5
.
-6
.
-7

.
)(Parker & Price, 1994 " : :
".



.
110


.
) (141
) (692
.

.


.
)(Kittell, 1994 " : ".



.
) (1992
)( :
-1 .

-2 .

-4 ) ( -5.

111

-3 )(.
-6 )(.

 ) (1466 ) (60
) (733
) (713 .

.
)(
) (

.
:
-1 ) (f .
-2 ) (f .
-3 ) (
.


.
)(Arlene,1996 " : ".

.
112




.
)(Miller, 1998 " :
".

. )(120


.
) (66 .

:
-1 .
-2 .
-3
.
-4 .

113

 -5
.
-6 .

.
)(Brost, 2000 " : ".






.
)(Showalter, 2002 " : : /
".


.

114



.

.





.



.
)(Fadal, 2004 " : :
".

) (500.


.
:
115


.
.
:




) (500 ) (40

.

.

.
) (%92.9
) (%96.2
) (%96.2 .
.

116

 :

:
.1
) (Honsinger,1989
) (King,1996 ) (Martin,2001 ).(Fadal,2004
.2
) (Honsinger,1989
) (Short & Rinehart,1992 ) (Jablonski, 1992
) (Carlson,1995 ).(Rinehart et.al, 1998
.3 "
" ) (1991 ) (2000
) (2003 ).(2004
.4


) (1987 ) (Bashiardis,1994
) (Acker,1995 ) (Fiendish,1999 )(Glimpse,1999
) (2000 ).(2003
.5

) (Honsinger,1989 )(1991
117



(2000,
)
) (Carlson ,1995

).(Martin,2001
.6 ) (1995
.
.7
:
) (Bashiardis,1994 ) (1994 ) ,(Glimpse,1999
).(2005
.8


) (1998 ) (1996
) (Feindish,1999 ).(Delorenzo,1999
.9 ) (1987 ) (1995 )(1997

.
.10

) ,(Ferrari,1991 ) (Kittel,1994
) (Brost,2000 ).(Fadal,2004
.11 .
.12 :
118

 - .
- .
- .
-
.
.13
.
.14 :
-
.
-
.

119

120




:
:
.
:

) -
- (
) (1710
)2006/2005(
.
) (1
.

121

 ) :(1 .

59

81

140

192

186

378

93

138

231

50

86

136

218

185

403

254

168

422

866

844

1710

:
) (370
) -
- (
) (%21
) ( 7) ( 6) ( 5) ( 4) ( 3) ( 2
.
.1 :
) :(2

)(%

306

82.7

64

17.3

370

%100

122

 .2 :
) :(3

)(%

34

9.2

41

11.1

72

19.5

74

20

42

11.4

107

28.9

370

%100

.3 :
) :(4

)(%

187

50.5

183

49.5

370

%100

.4 :
) :(5

)(%

217

58.6

153

41.4

370

%100

123

 .5 :
) :(6

)(%

284

76.8

86

23.2

370

%100

.6 :
) :(7

)(%

) (5

104

28.1

) (5 ) (10

100

27

) (10

166

44.9

370

%100

:
:
: .
.
: .

.
:

124

 - ) (Short & Rinehart, 1992

) (38 ) : )(
(.
- ) (2003 ) (32
(Short & Rinehart, 1992)

) (44 ) (1 :
: ) (Decision making :

) (12 ) (12-1 .
: ) ( Professional growth :

) (10 ) (22-13 .
: )( ) Status (Possition :

) (7
) (27-23 .
: ) (Self-Efficacy :

)(7
) (36-30 .

: ) (Impact:

) (8 ) (44-37 .
125

 :
) (1
) (13 )
(3 .


) (%70
) .(2
:
) Alpha
(Chronbach ) (8 .
) :(8

0.82

0.86

)(

0.83

0.82

0.83

0.93

) (8 )-0.82
(0.86 ) (0.93 .

126

 : .


) .(2000 ) (34 ) (1
:
.1 : ) ( :


) (9 ) (9-1 .
.2 : ) ( :


) (9
) (18-10 .
.3 : ) ( :



) (16 ) (34-19 .
:

) (1 ) (13
127

 ) (3
.

) (%70
) .(2
:

) (Alpha Chronbach ) (9 .
) :(9

0.89
0.90

0.94

0.96

) (9 )-0.89
(0.94 ) (0.96 .
:


)) (Likert scale ( :
) ( ) ( ) (
)( )( . .

128


.
:
:
.1 .
.2 .
.3
)2006/2005(
) (4
.
.4
).(SPSS
:
: ):(Independent Variables
-1 : ) : (.
-2 ) :
- - (.
-3 ) : (.
-4 ) : (.
-5 ) : (.
129

 -6 ) : ) (5 ) (5
) (10 ) (10(.
: ):(Dependent Variables
.
:

) (SPSS :
-1 .
-2 ).(Pearson Correlation Coefficient
-3 )( ).(Independent T- test
-4 ) (One-Way ANOVA )(Scheffee Test
.

130

131




:
: :



) (14) (13) (12) (11) (10
) (15 .
:
%80 .
%79.9 -70 .
%69.9 -60 .
%59.9 -50 .
%50 .

132

 -1 :
) :(10

)=(370

)(%

3.42

68.4

4.20

84

76.4

3.82

.
4

3.87

77.4

4.00

80

3.94

78.8

3.93

78.6

61.4

4.23

84.6

10

4.21

84.2

11

4.23

84.6

12

3.99

79.8

78.2

3.07

3.91

* ) (5.

) (10

) (11 10 9 5 2
) (%80 ) (12 7 6 4 3
133

 ) (%79.8-%76.4 )(8 1
.(%61.4) (%68.4) :

).(%78.2
-2 :
) :(11

)=(370
*

)(%

13

3.71

74.2

14

4.09

81.8

15

3.79

75.8

16

3.57

71.4

17

81.4

18

75.2

19

72.4

20

86.6

21

83

22

80

78.2

...(.

4.07

3.76

3.62

4.33

4.15

3.91

* ) (5.

134

 ) (11

) (22 21 20 17 14
) (%80 ) (19 18 16 15 13
) (%75.8-%71.4

).(%78.2
-3 )(:
) :(12

)( )=(370

23

24

)(%

4.41

88.2

87.8

25

4.19

83.8

26

4.57

91.4

27

4.24

84.8

4.39

.
28

29

4.23

84.6

85.2

86.6

4.26

4.33

* ) (5.

135

 ) (12

) (%80 .

).(%86.6
-4 :
):(13

)=(370

30

4.48

89.6

)(%

.
31

4.17

83.4

32

3.85

77

33

4.08

81.6

34

4.31

86.2

.
35

4.36

87.2

36

4.47

89.4

4.25

85

* ) (5.

) (13

136

 ) (36 35 34 33 31 30
) (%80 ) (32
) (%77
).(%85
-5 :
) :(14

)=(370

)(%

37

4.39

87.8

38

4.01

80.2

39

4.19

83.8

40

4.34

86.8

41

3.94

78.8

42

83.6

43

79.8

44

80.6

82.6

4.18

3.99

4.03

4.13

* ) (5.

) (14

137

 ) (43 42 40 39 38 37
) (%80 ) (43 41
) (%79.8) (%78.8
).(%82.6
-6 :
) :(15

)=(370

)(%

3.913

78.26

3.914

78.28

)(

4.33

86.6

4.25

85

4.13

82.6

4.11

82.2

* ) (5.

) (15 :

).(%82.2
:
: )( ).(%86.6
138

 : ).(%85
: ).(%82.6
: ).(%78.28
: ).(%78.26
).(2
4.4

4.3
4.33

4.3

4.3
4.25
4.2

4.1
4.13
4.1

4.0

3.9
3.914

3.9
3.913

3.9

3.8
5

) :(2 .

-1 -2 -3 )( -4
-5 .

139

 : :



) (18) (17) (16 ) (19
.
:
%80 .
%79.9 -70 .
%69.9 -60 .
%59.9 -50 .
%50 .

140

 - :
) :(16

)=(370

)(%

4.09

81.8

80.4

73.8

4.02

3.69

.
4

3.77

75.4

.
5

3.66

73.2

64.6

74

69.8

76.4

3.23

3.70

3.49

3.82

3.72

* ) (5.

141

74.4

 ) (16

) (2 1 )(%80
) (9 7 5 4 3

) (%76.4-%73.2 ) (8 6
.(%69.8) (%64.6) :

).(%74.4
-2 :
) :(17

)=(370

10

)(%

4.02

80.4

.
11

3.58

71.6

.
12

13

14

15

16

3.50

70

70.2

71.2

76.6

72.8

3.51

3.56

3.83

142

3.64

17

18

4.00

80

80.2

74.8

4.01

3.74

* ) (5.

) (17

) (18 17 10

) (%80 )14 13 12 11
(16 15 ).(%76.6 -%70

).(%74.8
-3 :

) :(18

)=(370

19

4.10

82

20

74.4

21

82.8

22

80.2

23

78

* )(%

3.72

4.14

4.01

143

3.90

24

3.75

75

.
25

26

27

28

29

30

3.77

75.4

76.1

75.8

76

78

80.8

3.81

3.79

3.80

3.90

4.04

31

3.96

79.2

32

4.03

80.6

.
33

4.27

85.4

.
34

4.04

80.8

3.94

* ) (5.

144

78.8

 ) (18

) (34 33 32 30 22 21 19
) (%80
).(%79.2 -%74.4

).(%78.8
-4 :
) :(19

)=(370

)(%

3.72

74.4

3.74

74.8

3.94

78.8

3.80

76

* ) (5.

) (19 :

).(%76

145

 :
: ).(%78.8
: ).(%74.8
: ).(%74.4
).(3
4.0

3.9
3.94
3.9

3.8

3.7
3.74
3.7
3.72

3.7

3.6
3

) :(3 .
-1 -2 -3 .

146

 : :

) (0.05=

.
) (20 .
) :(20

4.11

0.42

3.80

0.62

)(
0.70

*
*0.0001

) (20

) (0.70
).(0.0001
: :
) (0.05=

:
.
)(
:

147

 -1 :
) :(21 )(

)(

3.94

0.55

3.77

0.49

2.23

3.91

0.64

3.90

0.52

0.11

*0.02
0.90

4.35

0.50

4.22

0.47

1.92

0.055

)(

4.26

0.46

4.19

0.45

1.005

0.31

4.15

0.51

4.04

0.51

1.61

0.10

4.12

0.43

4.02

0.39

1.65

0.09

* )) (0.05=( ).(1.96

) (21
) (0.05= ) : )(
(

.

148

 -2 :
) :(22 )(

)(

3.91

0.56

3.91

0.52

0.03

0.97

3.92

0.62

3.89

0.63

0.45

0.64

4.34

0.49

4.31

0.50

0.69

0.48

)(

4.27

0.44

4.22

0.48

0.91

0.36

4.16

0.49

4.11

0.53

1.05

0.29

4.12

0.41

4.09

0.44

0.73

0.46

* )) (0.05=( ).(1.96

) (22
) (0.05=
.

149

 -3 :
) :(23 )(

)(

3.99

0.56

3.80

0.51

3.30

3.92

0.66

3.89

0.57

0.51

*0.001
0.61

4.35

0.49

4.30

0.50

1.01

0.31

)(

4.27

0.45

4.21

0.47

1.19

0.23

4.17

0.51

4.08

0.51

1.70

0.08

4.14

0.51

4.06

0.41

1.88

0.06

* )) (0.05=( ).(1.96

) (23
) (0.05= ) : )(
(

.

150

 -4 :
) :(24 )(

)(

3.86

0.57

4.06

0.41

2.91

*0.004

3.89

0.66

3.99

0.47

1.32

0.18

4.30

0.51

4.41

0.42

1.84

0.06

)(

4.23

0.47

4.31

0.41

1.49

0.13

4.11

0.52

4.21

0.48

1.56

0.11

4.08

0.45

4.20

0.31

2.25

*0.02

* )) (0.05=( ).(1.96

) (24
) (0.05= ) : )(
(

.
-5 :
) (25
) (26 .
151

 ) :(25

3.86

4.10

3.90

3.83

3.88

3.92

3.95

3.81

3.96

3.90

3.89

)(

4.42

4.30

4.24

4.35

4.22

4.40

4.38

4.24

4.20

4.16

4.19

4.32

4.18

4.21

4.05

4.12

4.04

4.20

4.16

4.17

4.04

4.08

4.05

4.15

) :(26

)(

)(

2.14

0.43

364

108.69

0.29

369

110.84

1.33

0.26

364

143.42

0.39

369

144.76

2.06

0.41

364

89.83

0.24

369

91.90

1.92

0.38

364

77.4

0.21

369

79.32

152

1.43

0.67

1.67

1.81

0.20

0.63

0.14

0.10

1.62

0.32

364

96.02

0.26

369

97.64

0.92

0.18

364

67.18

0.18

369

68.11

1.23

1.0

0.29

0.41

* ).(0.05=

) (26
) (0.05=
.
-6 :
) (27
) (28 .
) :(27

) (5

)(10

) (5

) (10

3.79

3.89

3.99

3.89

3.87

3.94

)(

4.25

4.27

4.41

4.15

4.23

4.32

4.01

4.11

4.22

4.02

4.08

4.18

153

 ) :(28

)(

)(

2.54

1.27

367

108.3

0.29

369

110.84

0.34

0.17

367

144.41

0.39

369

144.76

1.86

0.93

367

90.03

0.24

369

91.90

1.93

0.96

367

77.39

0.21

369

79.64

2.86

1.43

367

94.78

0.25

369

97.64

1.68

0.84

367

66.43

0.18

369

68.11

4.31

0.43

3.80

4.58

5.54

4.64

*0.01

0.64

*0.02

*0.01

0.0004
*

*0.01

* ).(0.05=

) (28
) (0.05=
) : )(
154

 ( .
.

) (29 .
) :(29

)(5

) (5

) (10

)(10

0.096-

*0.19-

) (5
) (10-5

0.10-

) (10

)(

0.017-

) (5
) (10-5

*0.150.13-

) (10

0.081-

) (5
) (10-5

*0.170.09-

) (10

0.097-

) (5
) (10-5

*0.200.11-

) (10

0.055-

) (5
) (10-5

*0.150.10-

) (10
* ).(0.05=

) (29
) (5 ) (10
155

 ) (10 ) (10
.
: :
) (0.05=

:
.
)(
:
-1 :
) :(30 )(

)(

3.73

3.74

0.74
0.76

3.65

0.58

0.78

0.43

3.75

0.65

0.07

0.94

3.96

0.63

3.87

0.52

0.94

0.34

3.81

3.76

0.65

* )) (0.05=( ).(1.96

156

0.49

0.58

0.56

 ) (30
) (0.05=
.
-2 :
) :(31 )(

)(

*
*0.04

3.65

0.76

3.79

0.65

1.98

3.62

0.84

3.86

0.61

3.11

*0.002

3.85

0.63

4.04

0.58

2.97

*0.003

3.70

0.67

3.90

0.55

2.97

*0.003

* )) (0.05=( ).(1.96

) (31 )
= (0.05

.

157

 -3 :
) :(32 )(

)(

3.70

0.71

3.74

0.71

0.43

0.66

3.71

0.79

3.78

0.67

0.84

0.39

3.99

0.62

3.87

0.60

1.79

0.07

0.64 3.807

0.59 3.801

0.08

0.93

* )) (0.05=( ).(1.96

) (32 )
= (0.05
.

158

 -4 :
) :(33 )(

)(

3.67

0.75

3.87

0.53

2.22

3.71

0.79

3.84

0.55

1.41

*0.02
0.15

3.90

0.64

4.08

0.51

2.34

*0.02

2.19

*0.02

3.76

0.66

3.93

0.44

* )) (0.05=( ) .( 1.96

) (33

) (0.05=
.


.
-5 :
) (34
) (35 .

159

 ) :(34

3.74

3.76

3.75

3.85

3.66

3.61

3.61

3.82

3.81

3.69

3.74

3.73

3.82

3.89

3.93

3.98

3.78

3.82

3.80

3.82

3.80

3.78

) :(35

) (

2.80

0.56

1.09

0.36

364

186.85

0.51

369

189.66

1.37

0.27

364

204.03

0.56

369

205.41

1.24

0.24

364

139.09

0.38

369

140.33

0.14

0.027

364

144.50

0.39

369

144.64

* ).(0.05=

160

0.49

0.65

0.07

0.78

0.66

0.99

 ) (35
) (0.05=
.
-6 :
) (36
) (37 .
) :(36

)(5

) (5

)(10

) (10

3.76

3.72

3.69

3.81

3.74

3.70

3.89

3.85

4.02

3.82

3.77

3.80

161

 ) :(37

)(

0.35

0.17

367

189.30

0.51

369

189.66

0.86

0.43

367

204.55

0.55

369

0.77

0.46

205.41

2.12

1.06

367

138.21

0.37

369

140.33

0.14

0.073

367

144.49

0.39

369

144.64

0.34

0.70

2.81

0.18

0.06

0.83

* ).(0.05=

) (37
) (0.05=
.

162

163



:



.
: :


.1 :
) (10 ) (133
) (%78.2
) (9 ) (11
(%84.6) : ) (%84.6:
-9 .
-11 .
) (1 )(8
) (68.4 ) (61.4:
-1 .
164

 -8 .

.


.


.

.

.
)(1999
) (1997 .

) (Honsinger, 1989 ) (Jablonski, 1992
) (Klekeret et.al, 1996 ) (Kittell, 1994 )(Acker, 1995
).(Carlson, 1995
) (1991 ) .(2003
.
.

165


.
.2 :
) (11 ) (134
) (%78.2
) (20 ) (21
(%86.6) : ) (%83.
-20 .
-21 .
) (16
) (19 ) (%71.4 )(%72.4
:
-16 ) ...(.
-19 .


) (Short & Rinehart,1992
) (Short&Gareer,1997 .
) (Dunst,1991
.

166

 ) Short
(& Rinehart,1991
) (Rinehart et.al, 1998

) (Fadal, 2004
) (Miller, 1998
) (Morris & Nunnery, 1993
.



.


.
.3 )(:
) (12 ) (135
)(
) (%86.6 )(
) (26 ) (23 (%91.4) :
) (%88.2:
-26 .
167

 -23 .




.


.

. .
) (2003

.
.4 :
) (13 ) (136
).(%85
) (30)(36
(%89.6) : ) (%89.4:
-30 .

168

 -36 .
) (31
) (%77 :
-31 .




.


.

.


.
.5 :
) (14 ) (137
).(%82.6
) (37 ) (40
(%87.8) : ) (%86.8:
169

 -37 .
-40 .
) (41 ) (43
) (%78.8 ) (%79.8:
-41 .
-43 .
)(




.




.

.
:

170




.

.
.6 :
) (14 ) (137

).(%82.2

:
.1 )( ).(%86.6
.2 ).(%85
.3 ).(%82.6

:
.1 ).(%78.26
.2 ).(%78.28


171



) : )( (
.

.


.
.


.
)(Rinehart et.al,1998
) (2003
) : )((

.
) (Kittell,1994 ) :
( ) : )(
( .
).(Showalter, 2002
172

 : :


.1 :
) (16 ) (141
) (%74.4
) (1 ) (2
(%81.8) : ) (%80.4:
-1 .
-2 .
) (6)(8
(%64.6) : ) (%89.8:
-6 .
-8 .



.
) (2

173





) ( . ).(2000
) (1994
.
) (6 ) (8
)(.

)(



.
) (12 ) (4-3
) (40


.




174


.
) (1995
.
.2 :
) (16 ) (141
) .(%74.8
) (10 ) (18
(%80.4) : ) (%80.2:
-10 .
-18 .
) (12
) (14 (%70) : )(%71.2
:
-12 .
-14 .





175


.




.
.3 :
) (18 ) (143

) (%78.8
) (33 ) (21
(%85.4) : ) (%82.8:
-33 .
-21 .
)(20
) (24 (%74.4) : ) (%75:
-20 .
-24
.

176


.

.


).(1994



. ) (2000
) (1997 ) (%55.8

.
) (1994 .


) (2000

.


.
177

 ) (2000 ) (1988
) (1994


.
.4 :
) (19 ) (145

).(%76

:
.1 ).(%78.8
:
.1 ).(%74.4
.2 ).(%74.8


) (




178




) ( .
) (2000
) (Fiendish,1997
) (1997

.
) (1994
.
) (1994

) (1995
.


.

) (%74.4

.
179



-
.
) (1997 ).(2000
) (1995

.
) (1991
.

.
) (1988
)( .

) (1995
.

.

180

 : :
) (0.05=

.
) (20 ) (147


) (0.70 ).(0.0001
:
.1 )(



.
.2

.
.3


.
181

 .4

.
) (Shacko,1987

) ( Mayeski,1991
) (Parker&Price,1994 ) (King et.al,1996


) (2005
) (Brost,2000


) (Arlene,1996

.
) (Fadal,2004
.
) (Kittell,1994 .
) (Showalter,2002
.
.

182

 : :
) (0.05=


:
.1 :
) (21 ) (148
) (0.05= ) )(
(


) (3.94 ) (3.77.



.
.

.
.2 :
) (22 ) (149
) (0.05=
183


.





.
.3 :
) (23 ) (150
) (0.05= ) : )(
(

.


.

.
.


.
184

 .4 :
) (24 ) (151
) (0.05= ) : )(
(


.


) (

.


.
.5 :
) (26 ) (152
) (0.05=
.
:
.1 .
185

 .2


.
.3

.
.4

.
.6 :
) (29 ) (155
) : )( (
) :
)( (
) (5 ) (10
) (10 ) (10
.
) (10

186


.
) (5 ) (10

.
) & Hersey

(Blanchard cited in Hoy & Miskel,1991

.
: :
) (0.05=


.
.1 :
) (30 ) (156
) (0.05=
.


.

187

 .2 :
) (31 ) (157
) (0.05=

.


.

.


)1997(
)(SANTE ANDROWS
)2000( )2002(
)2004(
.
.3 :
) (32 ) (158
) (0.05=
.

188



.
.4 :
) (33 ) (159
) (0.05=



.






.



.

189

 .5 :
) (35 ) (160
) (0.05=

.

.






) (1986


) (Grzgwinski,1993
.
.6 :
) (37 ) (162
) (0.05=

.
190

 :
.1




.
.2
. ) (1989
) (1987 ) (1994

.
.3 ) : )( (



.
) (Engbreston,1987

.

191

 ) ( Reiber,2001

.

192

:
:
.1

.
.2
.
.3

.
.4
.
.5

.
.6

)( .
.7
.

193

 .8
.
.9


.
.10
.
.11
.
.12

) ( )
(.
.13
.

194

: . - : .

195


: .
" .(2005).

" -
) (32) (1..30 -15 :
" .(2001) . "
.
" .(2000) . "
.
" .(2000) .
: "
) (15) (6..195 -141:
".(1998) . - "
.
".(2000) .
") (
.
" .(1995) . "
) (5 .
" .(2004) .
"
) (5) (3..337 -305:
196

 " .(1997) . "

.
" .(2000) . " ) (1
.
" .(1996) .

") ) (125 (
.
".(1994) .
"
) (6..134 - 10:
" .(2000) . " ) (1
.
" .(1999) . "
) (1999 .
" .(2003) . " ) (1
.
" .(2003) . " ) (1
.
" .(1999) . : "
.
" .(1998) . -
" ) (2 .
197

 " .(2003) . " ) (1

.
" .(1998) . " .
" .(1999). "
.
" .(2003) .
"
.
" .(1997) . " ) (1 .
" .(1989) . "
.
" .(2000) . " ) (1
.
" .(2001) . : "
.
" .(1995) .
" ) (12..62-40:
" .(1978) . " .
" .(1997) . "
.

198

 .
)" .(1998 - - "
) (1 .
" .(1995) . " ) (1
.
" .(1994) .
" )(49
) (14..96 - 53:
" .(1990) . "
.
" .(1997) . " .
" .(1976) . - "
.
" .(1977) . "
.
" .(2003) .
"
) (31..285 241 :
" .(1991) . ) "(Z
.
" .(1994) . " .

199

 " .(1981) . :
" ) (5) (21..141120:
" .(1991) .
") ( .
" .(1994) .
"

) (31..30 5 :
" .(1985) . "
) (13) (1..76 -50 :
" .(1996) . " ) (1
.
" .(2005) . "
.
" .(1996) . "
"" .
" .(1999) . - "
.
" .(2005) .
" .
" .(1980) . "
.

200

 " .(2001) . :
" ) (60
) (15..19 -6 :
" .(1998) . " ) (1
.
" .(2003) . " ) (1
.
" .(1986) . "
.
" .(1994).
" ) (1
.
" .(1992). "
.
" .(2000) .
")
( .
" .(2004) .
") (
.
" .(2004) . " ) (1
.

201

 " .(1994) . :
" .
" .(1998) .
" ) (6 .
" .(2004) . " ) (1
.
".(1994) . "
) ( .
" .(2005) .
") (
.
" .(1995) . "
) (61) (17..246 225 :

" .(1994) .
" ) (11..30 -5 :
".(1994) . "
) (57) (16..175 156 :
" .(1987) .
" ) (6..185 -170 :
" .(1997) . "
) (38) (1..70 -62:

202

 " .(1997) .
: "
) (9) (1..194 -170 :
" .(1994) . "
) ( .
" .(1982) . " .
" .(1995) . "
.
".(1989) .
" ) (28) (9..149 -120:
" .(1994) .
") (
.
" .(1997) . "
.
" .(1999) . " ) (6
.
" .(1998) . " ) (5
.
" .(2004) . " .

203

 " .(1994) .
"
) (9..146 - 110 :
" .(1975) . " ) (2
.
" .(1988) . "
.) (1..235 -190 :
" .(2003) . -
" ) (1 .
" .(1987) . :
" )(6
..149 -126 :
" .(1995) .
") (
.
" .(1986) . "
.
" .(1999) . " "1
" .
" .(1988) . "
.

204

 " .(1993) .
") (
.
" .(1994) . "
.

205

: :
Acker, E. E. (1995). Faculty moral and satisfaction in the academic
workplace of the Pennsylvania State system at higher education
universities, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University1994, Dissertation Abstracts International, 55/08-A, p.228.
Arlene, F.H.(1996). Creating A Positive Environment for Change,
Canada.
Barnard, Chester-I.(1976). The Functions of The Executive, Harvard
University Press.
Brost, P.(2000). Shared Decision Making for Better Schools, Principal
leadership, London, p.p:58-63.
Burke, S.H.(1970). Strengthening administration through effective
delegation, Pakistan Administrative Staff College Journal,Vol.8,
No.1, p.p:21-31.
Carlson, G. E. (1995). An analysis of Illinois teachers perceptions of
empowerment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northern Illinois
University 1994, Dissertation Abstracts International, 55/07
A,p.1754.
Ckacko,H.(1987)."Administrators' Methods of Upward Influence Goals
Motivational Need and Perceptions of Supervisors, Leadership
Styles",(Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation),Vol.99, No.6,1320-A.

206

Delorenzo, David.(1999). Relationship of Cooperative Education Exposure

to career Decision making self-efficiency and career focus of control,
Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol.59-11A, p.4065.
Drummoud, Helga.(1991). Effective Decision Making, Kogan Page
Limitted, London.
Duke, Daniell.(1981). Studying Shared Decision Making In School In
Samuel B. Bacharach (Ed.), Organizational Behavior In Schools
and School Districts, Praeger, New York.
Engbreston, Charles.(1987). An Analysis of Leadership Behavior of
Decision Chair Persons In Wyoming Communit College, Dissertation
Abstracts International, Vol.47,No. 9.
Fadal, Sylvester.(2004).Employee empowerment as a business optimization
technique:

Utilizing

continuous

training

and

development,

participation rights and decision making authority., Dissertation

Abstracts International, Vol. 64, No.12A, p.4533.
Ferrari, Frank Joseph.(1991).Empowerment for effective School: A study
of middle school principals and levels of teacher participation in
organizational decision-making, USA Pennsylvania, Dissertation
Abstracts International, Vol.52-12A,No.AA19214156.p.4160.
Fiendish,Nancy. 1999). Characteristics Training and Principles perceptions
of Arizona Mandon Ted School Councils, Shared, Decision Making,
Arizona Public Education, Dissertation Abstract International,
Vol.54-03A,No.AA19828174, p.672.

207

Glimpse, Joan Imal. (1999). Comparisons of Problem Solving Processes of

Educating Administrator leadership, Gender Decision Making
University of Texas, Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol.5901A, No.AA19822603,p.35.
Grzywinski, Carol Marie.(1993). Academic Decision-Making at Public
Colleges in New York

at Buffalo,

Dissertation Abstracts

International, Vol.54, No.6, p.2066.

Hosinger.

R.W.(1989).

empowerment.

secondary

Unpublished

school

doctoral

model

dissertation,

of

teacher

Coloumbia

University Teachers College, Dissertation Abstracts International.

49/ 09-A, p.2471.
Huber, George-P.(1988). Managerial Decision Making, Scott and
Foresman Company, Glerview, Illinois.
Jablonski, M. A. (1992). Leadership styles of women college presidents.
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Boston University, Dissertation
Abstracts International, 53/03-A, p.676.
Johnson, P. E & Short, P.M. (1998). Principals leader power, teacher
empowerment, teacher compliance, and conflict, Educational
Management & Administration, London, Vol.26, No.2,p.p:147-159.
King, Jacqueline-E.(1996). The decision to go to College, USA
Washington, ERIC, AN:ED398775.
Kittell, Andrew Joseph.(1994). The relationship of shared decision-making
and teacher empowerment, Dissertation Abstracts International,
Vol.55, No.11A:p.3357.
208

Klecher, Beverly & Loadman , William-E.(1996). Dimensions of Teacher

Empowerment: Identifying New Roles for Classroom Teachers in
Restructing Schools, USA Kentucky, ERIC, AN:ED405304.
Lightfoot, S. L. (l986). On goodness in schools: Themes of empowerment,
Peabody Journal of Education, Vol.63, No.3,p.p: 9-28.
Maeroff, G. I. (1988). A blueprint for empowerment teachers, Phi Delta
Kappan, Vol.69,p.p: 471-477.
Martin, Barbara-N. & Crossland, Barbara & Jobnson, Judy A. (2001). Is
There a connection: Teacher Empowerment, Teachers' Sense of
Responsibility, and Student success?, ERIC, ED460116,SP040473.
Mayeski, Fran.( 1991). Moving Toward Effective Teacher Empowerment
through Improved Decision Making at a Secondary School in
Wyoming, USA Colorado, ERIC, ED3366819,EA023265.
Miller, Margaret Dickinson. (1998). The impact of the principals' academy
on teacher perception of their empowerment in group decision making
in west Virginia faculty senates, West Virginia University; 0256,
Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol.60, No.06A:p.1853.
Moody, Paul-E.(1984). Decision making, McGraw-Hill Book Company,
New York.
Morris, Vivian Gunn & Nunnery, John-A.(1993). Teacher Empowerment
in a Professional Development School Collaborative, USA Tennessee,
ERIC, AN:ED368678.

209

Netzer, L.A. & Eye, G. G. & Stevens, D. M. & Benston, W.W. (l979).
Strategies for instructional management, Boston: Allyn and Bacon,
Inc.
Parker, Louise-E. & Price, Richard-H. (1994). Empowered managers and
empowered workers: The effects of managerial support and
managerial perceived control on workers' sense of control over
decision making, Santa Monica, PsyLIT Journal Articles, Vol.47,
No.8, p.p:911-928.
Pashiardis, Petros.(1994). Teacher Participation in Decision Making,
International Journal of Educational Management,Vol.8, No.5,
p.p:14-17.
Prescott, Bregan-D.(1980).Effective Decision-Making, Gower Publishing
Company Limited, Wesmead, England.
Reiber, Gwendloyn.(2001). Ethical dimensions of Administrative Decision
Making, in Georgia southern university, Dissertation Abstracts
International, A62/10, No:AAC772, p.3260.
Rinehart, J. S. & Short, P. M. (1991). Viewing reading recovery as
a restricting phenomenon, Journal of School Leadership, Vol.1,
No.4, p.p:379-399.
Rinehart, J. S. & Short, P.M. & Short ,R.J. & Eckley, M. R. (1998).
Teacher empowerment and principal leadership: Understanding the
influence, Educational Administration, Vol.34, p.p:630-649.

210

Ryan,Doris-W.

(1972).

The

Internal

Organization

of

Academic

Departments, The journal of higher Education, Vol.XLII, No.6,

p.p:416-464.
Shapiro, Arthur-S. & others.(1993). Enhancing Teacher Effectiveness,
Empowerment, and the Restructuring Process, via an Organizational
Decision-Making Process, USA Oklahoma, ERIC, ED358541,
EA024977.
Short, P. M. & Greer, J. T. (1997). Leadership in empowerment schools:
Themes from innovative efforts, Columbus, OH: Prentice - Hall.
Short, P. M. & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment
scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within the school
environment. Educational and Psychological measurement, Vol.52,
p.p:951-960.
Showalter,

Joseph

W.(2002).

Searching

for

Empowerment:

The

Structuration of Decision-Making Groups in Urban Schools, U.S.A.,

Pennsylvania, ERIC, (S. N.).
Simon, Herbert.(1961). Administrative Behavior of Decision Making,
Processes in Administrative Organization, Macmillane Co., New
York.
Stephen, Robbins.(1990). Organizational Theory, 3rd ed., Englewood,
N.J: Prentice - Hall Inc.
White , P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under "ideal" school site
autonomy, Educational Evaluation, Vol.14, No.1,p.p: 69-83.
211

Gore, William-J.(1962). Decision Making Approach, in S. Mailick Van

Ness(ed),Concepts

and

Issues

in

Administrative

Behavior,

Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall.

Zimmerman, M. A. & Rappaport, J.(1988). Citizen participation, perceived
control, and psychological empowerment, American Journal of
Community Psychology, Vol.16, No.5,p.p: 725-750.

212

) :(1
) :(2
) :(3
) :(4



-
-

213

 ) :(1 .
.................. .

)


(

: .

:
:

.1

.2

.3

.
.4 )
(
.

:
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5 .

.6 .

(.

.

214

 :
) (X :

) (

) (
3

) (5
) (5 ) (10
) (10 .

215

 : .
:

1
2

.

.

7
8

10

11

12

13

14

.
:

15

16

17

18

19
20

)
... (.

.

216

21

22

23

24

.

.
: )(

25

26

27

28

29
30
31

.
.

:
32

33

34

35

36

37

38

217

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

218

 :
:

7
8
9

.

.

.

.

.

.

:
10

11

12
13
14

.

.
.

.

219

15

16

17

18

.

.

.

.
:

19
20
21

22

23

.
.

24

25

26

27

28

.

.

220

29

30

31

32

33

34

221

 ) :(2 .
.
:
)


(
:
: .

: .
: .
:
.1
.
.2
.

.3
.
.4 :

222

)(9

) (5
) (5 ) (10

) (10

223

 : .
) (9 .

:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

.

.

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.
.

224

13

14

15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

...(.

.

.

.

.

: )(

23
24

25

26

27
28

225

29

30

31
32

33

35
36

34

.
.

.

:
37
38

39

40

41
42
43
44

.

.

226

 :
) (9 .

:
1
2
3

5
6
7
8

:
10

11

227

12
13
14

15

16

17
18

19
20
21
22

23

228


24

.
25
26
27
28
29

.

.

30

31

32

.
33

34

229

 ) :(3
. .

. .

230

 ) :(4

231

232

233

234

235

236

An-Najah National University

Faculty of Graduate Studies

The Relationship Between Delegation of Authority and

Effectiveness of Taking Decisions in the Academic
Departments from the Perspective of the Lecturers
in the Palestinian Universities.

Prepared by
Ibraheem Afife Ibraheem Muhanna

Supervised by
Dr. Ghassan Hussein Al-Huluow
&
Dr. Abdel Naser Abdel Rahim Al-Qadumi

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master

in Educational Administration, Faculty of Graduate Studies, at An- Najah
National University, Nablus, Palestine.

2006
237

The Relationship Between Delegation of Authority and

Effectiveness of Taking Decisions in the Academic
Departments from the Perspective of the Lecturers
in the Palestinian Universities.
Prepared by
Ibraheem Afife Ibraheem Muhanna
Supervised by
Dr. Ghassan Hussein Al-Huluow
&
Dr. Abdel Naser Abdel Rahim Al-Qadumi

Abstract
This study at identifying to determine the relationship between
delegation of authority and effectiveness of taking decisions in the
academic departments from the perspective of lecturers in the Palestinian
universities. This is done by reaching the degree of delegation of authority
and the degree of effectiveness of taking decisions by the various criteria in
academic departments from the perspective of lecturers in Palestinian
universities.
The study attempted to answer

some questions and test some

hypotheses:
- What is the degree of delegation of authority in academic departments
from the perspective of the lecturers in the Palestinian universities?
- What is the degree of effectiveness of taking decisions in academic
departments from the perspective of the lecturers in the Palestinian
universities?
- There are no significant statistical differences at ( = 0.05) between
delegation of authority and effectiveness of taking decisions in academic
departments from the perspective of the lecturers in the Palestinian
universities.
a

There are no significant statistical differences at ( = 0.05) between

delegation of authority and effectiveness of taking decisions in academic

departments from the perspective of the lecturers in the Palestinian
universities attributed to the variables of gender, university, faculty,
academic qualification, job classification ,and

years of experience in

teaching.
The studys society composed of all staff lecturers in the Palestinian
universities of (Bethlehem University, Birzeit University, Hebron
University, The Arab American University - Jenin, Jerusalem University Abu Dis, And An Najah National University), The lecturers held PH.D or
M.A degrees. The number of the study's society is (1710) for the year
(2005/2006). The thesis' sample consisted of (370) members that
represented approximately (21%) of the study's society. The study was
chosen by using the stratified random sample method.
Also, the researcher conducted his study by using the field
descriptive method. In the process of collecting data, the researcher used
two questionnaires:
1- Delegation of authority questionnaire which consisted of (44) items,
distributed by five criteria: decision making, professional development,
status (position), self efficacy, and impact.
2- Effectiveness of taking decisions questionnaire which consisted of (34)
items, distributed by three criteria: education responsibilities, and
administration responsibilities, and the action of taking decisions process.
Moreover, the researcher validated the study tool by presenting it to
experts in the fields of educational administration and business
b

administration, and to Arabic language professionals. In addition, he

calculated the reliability coefficient for both questionnaires by using Alpha
Chronbach.
The researcher answered the questions of the thesis by using the
following statistical processes: Mean value, Percentage value, Person
Correlation Coefficient, Independent T-test, One-Way ANOVA, and
Scheffee Test.
The study reached the following conclusions:
- The degree of delegation authority in the academic departments from the
perspective of lecturers in the Palestinian universities was very high; it was
(82.2%).
- The degree of effectiveness of taking decisions in the academic
departments from the perspective of lecturers in the Palestinian universities
was very high; it was (76%).
- There was a positive relationship that was statistically significant at
( = 0.05 ) between the delegation of authority and effectiveness of taking
decisions.
- There were differences statistically significant at ( = 0.05 ) in the
delegation of authority between males and females, the difference leaning
to males.
- There were differences statistically significant at ( = 0.05 ) in the
delegation of authority between PH.D and M.A holders, the difference
leaning to PH.D holders.
c

- There were differences statistically significant at ( = 0.05 ) in the

delegation of authority in the criteria of taking decision and the total degree
between academic education and academic administration; the difference
leaning to academic administration.
- There were differences statistically significant at ( = 0.05 ) in all the
criteria and the total level in the delegation of authority in the criteria of
experience in teaching from (5) years to (10) years and experience more
than (10) years; the difference leaning to more than (10) years experience
in teaching.
- There were differences statistically significant at ( = 0.05 ) in the
delegation of authority and effectiveness of taking decisions between
humanities faculties and science faculties; the difference leaning to science
faculties.
- There were differences statistically significant at ( = 0.05 ) in the
effectiveness of taking decisions in educational responsibilities, and the
action of tacking decisions process and the total degree of the effectiveness
of taking decisions in between academic education and academic
administration; the difference leaning to academic administration.
According to the study findings the researcher recommends the following:
- Giving more attention to the lecturers' scientific research projects because
it is the responsibility of the university, mainly the academic departments.
- Relating scientific projects and M.A and doctoral study to community
issues.

- Expanding the responsibilities of the academic departments' councils by

participation in department budget allocation.
- Giving more attention to the evaluation methods and studying the test
results and analyzing them to improve educational careers and giving
workers the opportunity to innovate and revise methods and ways.