Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English Debate Rules Dato Arshad Cup
English Debate Rules Dato Arshad Cup
1.
Name
Tan Sri Datuk Wira Abdul Rahman Arshad English Language Debate
2.
Format
2.1
2.2
2.3
NEGATIVE
TIME
1st Speaker
1st Speaker
8 minutes
2nd Speaker
2nd Speaker
8 minutes
3rd Speaker
3rd Speaker
8 minutes
Reply Speech
Reply Speech
4 minutes
2.4
The third debater from both teams shall not introduce any new arguments.
Their role is mainly to rebut.
2.5
While the debater is speaking the opposition team can offer Point(s) of
Information (formal interjections). The debater may accept or decline it.
2.6
After all the debaters have spoken once, the 1st or 2nd debater for each
side gives a reply speech with the Negatives Reply being delivered first
and the Affirmative second.
3.
4.
Eligibility
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Every member of a participating team should come from the same school.
Adjudication
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.6
A debate is won by the team which scored a majority of votes from the
adjudicators on the panel. Team marks or winning margins of
adjudicators are not to be added together to decide the winner.
4.7
Immediately after a debate, the Speaker will collect the score sheets from
the adjudicators. There should be no discussions among the adjudicators
when deciding the winner of the debate.
4.8
Once the score sheets has been handed in, the adjudicators shall meet
and confer to decide the Best Debater. They shall refer to the adjudicators
comment sheets to decide the winner.
5.
Procedure of Debate
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.
Points of Information
6.1
a question
a remark
a clarification
a correction of word (s) or statement (s)
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.7
6.8
6.9
1.0
1.1
SUBSTANCE
a.
Substance covers the arguments that are used divorced from the
speaking style. It is as if you are seeing the arguments written down rather
than spoken. You must assess the weight of the arguments without being
influenced by the magnificence of the orator that presented them.
b.
c.
d.
e.
1.2
1.3
STYLE
a.
The term is rather misleading. Adjudicators are not looking for debaters
who are stylish.
b.
Style covers the way the debaters speak. This can be noted in many
ways, in funny accents, body language (movement, poise, meaningful
gestures and eye contact) and with the use of specific terminology. Be
tolerant of different ways of presenting arguments.
c.
Use of palm cards and notes are allowed and should not be penalized,
unless a debater is reading from them heavily.
d.
STRATEGY
a.
.
b.
Structure
A good speech has a clear beginning, middle and end. Along the way
there are signposts to help us see where the debater is going. The
sequence of arguments is logical and flows naturally from point to point.
This is true of the first debater outlining the Governments case as it is of
the third debater rebutting the Governments case. Good speech structure,
therefore, is one component of the strategy.
c.
Timing is also important, but it must not be taken to extremes. There are
two aspects of timing:
i. speaking within the allowed time limit.
ii. Giving an appropriate amount of time to the issues in the speech.
d.
e.
So, the adjudicator must weigh not only the strength of the arguments in
the SUBSTANCE category, but also the proper time and priority given in
the STRATEGY category.
f.
g.
1.4
1.5
LANGUAGE
a.
b.
c.
On the other hand, any good language expression, including the use of
figures of speech, idioms, etc. appropriate and apt to the occasion, may
merit positive marks for Language.
REBUTTAL
a.
The use of general cases has consequences for rebuttal or clash. The
Opposition team cannot concentrate on attacking the examples used by
the Government. The examples might be weak, but the central case might
still be sound. Instead, the team will have to concentrate on that case,
because that is where the debate actually is.
b.
There is another consequence for rebuttal. It may be that a team has used
a number of examples to illustrate the same point. If they can all be
disposed off by the same piece of rebuttal, the rebutting team does not
have to attack each of the examples individually as well.
1.6
1.7
b.
A Reply speaker does not have time to deal with small arguments or
individual examples. The debater must deal with the two or three major
issues in the debate in global terms, showing how they favour the
debaters team and work against the opposition team. As a general rule , a
Reply speaker who descends to the level of dealing with individual
examples probably doesnt understand either the issues of the debate or
the principles of good arguments.
POINTS OF INFORMATION
a.
b.
c.
The debaters play this role by offering Points of Information. Even if the
points are not accepted, they must still demonstrate that they are involved
in the debate by at least offering. A debater who takes no part in the
debate other than by making a speech would be marked down for
Substance and Strategy.
TO REQUEST
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
TO ACCEPT
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
TO DECLINE
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Yes.
Yes, please.
Yes, Sir / Miss.
Please.
Please go ahead.
Yes, accepted.
If the opponent ( during his / her Point (s) of information ) is taking too much of your
time, you can ask him / her to sit down if he / she has exceeded the 15 seconds time
limit.
You may use these expressions:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Please sit down Sir / Miss. You are taking too much of my time.
You are taking too much of my time. Please sit down.
Kindly sit down. You have exceeded the time limit for POI.
Your time limit is up.
*** please note that it is of utmost importance that debaters be polite at all times during
the course of the debate especially when accepting or declining Point(s) of
Information.
GLOSSARY
1.
adjudicator
2.
barracking
3.
case line
4.
clarification -
5.
comment sheet-
6.
confer
7.
8.
harassment -
9.
heckling
to interrupt by taunts.
10.
majority vote -
11.
marked down -
12.
point(s) of
information
13.
rebuttal
14.
reply speech -
15.
reduction of marks- in Parliamentary Style Debate marks are not deducted from a
teams or individuals marks but are reduced.
16.
Speaker
17.
stand
18.
strategy
19.
substance