Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STEMI'de Trombüsle Mücadele - Ertuğrul Okuyan
STEMI'de Trombüsle Mücadele - Ertuğrul Okuyan
YKSELMEL
MYOKARD
NFARKTSNDE
KORONER
TROMBSLE
MCADELE
Do.Dr.Erturul
Okuyan
DSTAL
EMBOL
Mekanik
olarak
mikrovaskler
yata
Ikayarak
miyokardn
devam
eden
iskemik
nekrozuna
yol
aar.
Lokal
olarak
in-situ
platelet
adhezyonunu
ve
trombosisi
uyararak
doku
perfzyonunun
bozulmasna
ve
no-reow
fenomenine
yol
aabilir.
Mikrovaskler
spazm
ve
lokal
enamatuar
sreci
uyararak
daha
fazla
miyokard
nekrozuna
sebep
olabilir
Mikrovaskler obstrksiyon
SubopHmal
reperfzyon
Artm
enfarkt
alan
Azalm
ventrikl
fonksiyonu
5-yllk
mortalitede
5
kat
arI
STENT
TROMBOZU
Angiographic
Stent
Thrombosis
A[er
RouHne
Use
of
Drug-EluHng
Stents
in
ST-Segment
ElevaHon
Myocardial
InfarcHon:
The
Importance
of
Thrombus
Burden
Georgios
Sianos,
MD,
PhD,
,
Michail
I.
Papafaklis,
MD,
Joost
Daemen,
MD,
Soa
Vaina,
MD,
Carlos
A.
van
Mieghem,
MD,
Ron
T.
van
Domburg,
PhD,
Lampros
K.
Michalis,
MD,
MRCP,
Patrick
W.
Serruys,
MD,
PhD,
FACC
Show
more
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.059
Journal
of
the
American
College
of
Cardiology
TROMBS YOK
TIMI
TROMBS OLMA HTMAL VAR
TROMBS 1
TIMI
TROMBS VAR EN BYK UZUNLUU
TROMBS 2 DAMAR APININ <1/2
TIMI
TROMBS VAR EN BYK UZUNLUU
TROMBS 3 DAMAR APININ >1/2 FAKAT <2
TIMI
TROMBS VAR EN BYK UZUNLUU
TROMBS 4 DAMAR APININ >2
TIMI
TOTAL TIKALI
TROMBS 5
Eftifibatide
Tirofiban
Hzl affinite
Yava ayrlm
Yarmasz
inhibisyon
Yava affinite
Hzl ayrlm
Yarmal
inhibisyon
Yava affinite
Hzl ayrlm
Yarmal
inhibisyon
90-150 dakika
90-150 dakika
Vcttan atlm
12-24 saat
2-4 saat
2-4 saat
Atlm yolu
Plasma
proteazlar
Bbrek
Bbrek(%30-60)
Karacier (%40-70)
Dier
-3 integrin
(vitronectin),
MAC-1 reseptr
inhibisyonu
Reseptr affinitesi
RANDOMIZED
STUDIES
1590
paXents
PopulaXon
Access
IC
Site
Study
GPI
ICE, 2010
E[ibaHde
ACS
(26%STEMI)
CICERO, 2010
Abciximab
STEMI
Iverson et al ,2011
Abciximab
STEMI
Dominguez
et
al,
2009
Abciximab
STEMI
Wu et al, 2008
Tiroban
ACS
(63%STEMI)
Abciximab
Femoral
IV
IC bolus/18-h IV inf.
IV bolus/18-h IV inf.
IC
bolus
a[er
thrombectomy
IV
bolus
a[er
thrombectomy
IC bolus/12-h IV inf.
IV bolus/12-h IV inf.
IC
bolus
a[er
thrombectomy/12-h
IV
inf.
IV
bolus
a[er
thrombectomy/12-h
IV
inf.
IC bolus/36-h IV inf.
IV bolus/36-h IV inf.
STEMI
IV bolus/12-h IV inf.
Tiroban
STEMI
IC bolus/36-h IV inf.
IV bolus/36-h IV inf.
Abciximab
STEMI
IC bolus/12-h IV inf.
IV bolus/12-h IV inf.
LIPSIA-STEMI 2010
Abciximab
STEMI
IC bolus/12-h IV inf
IV bolus/12-h IV inf
EASY-MI, 2010
Abciximab
STEMI
Transradial
IC bolus/12-h IV inf
IV bolus/12-h IV inf
Abciximab
ACS
(41%STEMI)
Radial or femoral
IC bolus/12-h IV inf
IV bolus/12-h IV inf
Femoral
Femoral
GPIIb/IIIa IC versus IV
TIMI 3 FLOW AFTER PCI
Study
RR
(95% CI)
% Weight
ICE
1.07 (0.89-1.28)
8.66
CICERO
1.03 (0.97-1.10)
34.90
Iversen
1.10(0.96-1.24)
17.43
Dominquez-Rodriquez
1.29 (0.96-1.76)
3.27
Wu
1.22 (1.01-1.48)
7.96
Thiele
0.98(0.86-1.12)
14.25
Yang
1.27(0.98-1.64)
4.60
EASY-AMI
1.15 (0.96-1.37)
8.92
Overall (I-squared=20.1%,p=0.270)
1.08 (1.02-1.15)
100.0
0.5
IV better
1.5
IC better
GPIIb/IIIa IC versus IV
SHORT-TERM TVR
Study
RR
(95% CI)
% Weight
CICERO
0.87 (0.36-2.12)
32.91
Iversen
0.40(0.17-0.95)
54.08
Wu
0.33 (0.01-7.86)
4.91
0.20(0.01-4.10)
8.11
0.54 (0.30-0.96)
100.0
Thiele
Overall (I-squared=0.0%,p=0.552)
0.5
IC better
1.5
IV better
GPIIb/IIIa IC versus IV
30 DAY MORTALITY
Study
RR
(95% CI)
% Weight
CICERO
0.69 (0.22-2.16)
28.34
Iversen
0.20 (0.04-0.93)
37.42
Wu
0.49(0.05-5.27)
8.05
Thiele
0.67(0.11-3.98)
11.97
Yang
0.19 (0.01-3.71)
10.33
Bellandi
1.05(0.07-15.70)
3.90
Overall( I-squared=0.0%,p=0.777)
0.45 (0.23-0.90)
100.0
0.5
IC better
1.5
IV better
GPIIb/IIIa IC versus IV
SHORT-TERM BLEDNG EVENTS
Study
RR
(95% CI)
% Weight
CICERO
1.11 (0.68-1.81)
35.69
Iversen
0.69 (0.41-1.17)
38.01
Dominguez-Rodriquez
0.67(0.12-3.65)
3.91
Wu
0.76(0.31-1.91)
11.82
Thiele
0.80(0.22-2.87)
6.51
Yang
2.17(0.63-7.51)
4.05
Overall( I-squared=0.0%,p=0.562)
0.92(0.68-0.1.24)
100.0
0.5
IC better
1.5
IV better
Intravenous
(n=122)
1214
1746
0.008
154
232
0.003
3.03
4.36
0.008
Intracoronary
(n=271),
n(%)
Intravenous
(n=263)
Mortality
5 (1.8)
7 (2.7)
0.524
Cardiac mortality
4 (1.5)
6 (2.3)
0.492
TVR
9 (3.3)
10 (3.8)
0.764
ReinfarcXon
3 (1.1)
4 (1.5)
0.721
In-stent thrombosis
1 (0.4)
3 (1.1)
0.366
MACEs
15 (5.5)
16 (6.1)
0.786
ST-Segment-Resolution
Frequency
IV Abciximab
p=0.37
IC Abciximab
Conclusions
This randomized, multi-center, large-scale trial involving
more than 2000 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI
showed that IC abciximab bolus administration is safe.
The IC bolus administration of abciximab does not add a
benefit in comparison to the standard IV bolus with respect
to the combined primary study endpoint consisting of death,
reinfarction, or new congestive heart failure within 90 days.
The IC route might be related to reduced rates of new
congestive heart failure.
Bolus Dose
Infusion dose
Abciximab
0.25mg/kg
0.125g/kg/min
E[ibaHde
180 g/kg
2g/kg/min
Tiroban
10 g/kg
0.15g/kg/min
TROMBEKTOM
LE
BRLKTE
YAPILIRSA
?
From: Intracoronary Abciximab and Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Anterior Myocardial
Infarction: The INFUSE-AMI Randomized Trial
JAMA. 2012;307(17):1817-1826. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.421
Figure Legend:
More than 1 reason for study exclusion were present in some patients who were not eligible for randomization. Cardiac magnetic
resonance imaging (cMRI) at 30 days was not performed in 70 enrolled patients for the following reasons: patient refusal or
withdrawn consent for cMRI (n=27); patient inability to complete the cMRI (most commonly for claustrophobia) (n=15); death
before the 30-day cMRI (n=13); too ill (n=4); patient forgot (n=4); contrast contraindication (n=2); other (n=5). In addition,
despite being performed, the cMRI study was
not evaluable
for the primary
point of infarct size in 29 patients because of
Copyright
2014 American
Medical end
Association.
Date
of
download:
12/8/2014
technical issues in image acquisition, including incorrectAll
image
inadequate inversion recovery time, excessive
rightssequencing,
reserved.
breathing artifact, and missing slices. CABG denotes coronary artery bypass graft; GPI, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor; IC,
STEMI IV Antiplatelet
Therapy:
Recommendations
I IIa IIb III
In patients undergoing primary PCI treated with UFH, it is
a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (abciximab, doublereasonable to administer
bolus eptifibatide, or high-bolus dose tirofiban), whether or not
patients were pretreated with clopidogrel. (For GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor
administration in patients not pretreated with clopidogrel, Level of
Evidence: A; for GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration in patients
pretreated with clopidogrel, Level of Evidence: C)
These agents might provide more benefit in selective use, such as in patients with large anterior MI and/or
large thrombus burden (TIMI thrombus grade >3)
Levine et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:917-24
Manuel Aspirasyon
Mekanik Aspirasyon
Distal-Proksimal Proteksiyon
ASPRASYON CHAZLARI
MANUEL
MEKANK
EXPORT
ANGIOJET
DIVER CE
X-SIZER
PRONTO
THROMCAT
QUICKCAT
RINSPIRATOR
THROMBUSTER
RESCUE
TVAC
PROTEKSYON CHAZLARI
DSTAL
FLTRE
BALON TIKAYICI
Angioguard
Guardwire
Filterwire
TriActive
Cardioshield
(Emboshield)
Theron
Spider RX
MoMa
Interceptor
Arteria
PROKSMAL
PROKSS
KERBEROS RINSPIRATOR
PARODI
MANUEL ASPRASYON-30 GN LM
alma
RR
(95% CI)
De Luca ve ark.
0.19(0.01-4.08)
6.59
EXPIRE
0.33 (0.01-8.11)
4.01
EXPORT
0.35(0.01-8.93)
3.78
EXPORT ALIMASI
0.64 (0.15-2.72)
12.55
PIHRATE
0.94 (0.18-4.77)
8.02
REMEDIA
1.00(0.19-5.22)
7.51
VAMPIRE
0.97(0.06-15.66)
2.69
TAPAS
0.52(0.25-1.08)
54.82
TOPLAM(%95 CI)
0.58 (0.34-0.98)
100.0
P=0.04
0.1
0.5
Manual trombektomi
iyi
10
Kontrol iyi
De Luca G et al. Eur Heart J 2008;29:3002-3010
RR
(95% CI)
DEAR MI
2.28(0.91-5.71)
5.49
De Luca ve ark.
1.73 (0.61-4.88)
4.79
EXPIRE
2.03(1.00-4.11)
9.60
EXPORT
5.49(0.59-50.79)
0.73
EXPORT ALIMASI
1.93 (0.70-5.32)
4.95
PIHRATE
1.42(0.73-3.60)
8.33
VAMPIRE
1.70(0.94-3.05)
15.20
TAPAS
1.29(0.92-1.82)
50.91
TOPLAM(%95 CI)
1.59 (1.26-2.00)
100.0
P<0.0001
0.1
0.5
Kontrol iyi
10
Manual trombektomi
iyi
MANUEL ASPRASYON-MBG 3
alma
RR
(95% CI)
DEAR MI
9.48(4.11-21.85)
2.54
De Luca ve ark.
3.85 (1.22-12.14)
2.06
EXPIRE
5.91(3.08-11.35)
4.84
EXPORT
2.27(0.73-7.07)
2.58
EXPORT ALIMASI
1.63 (0.92-2.90)
11.86
PIHRATE
2.33(1.21-4.48)
7.68
VAMPIRE
3.32(2.07-5.33)
12.55
TAPAS
1.77(1.36-2.29)
55.99
TOPLAM(%95 CI)
2.44(2.04-2.92)
100.0
P<0.00001
0.1
0.5
Kontrol iyi
10
Manual trombektomi
iyi
P=0.05
5.3
2.8
Adjuvant cihaz
Sadece PKG
P=0.018
2.7
4.4
P=0.69
3.1
3.4
0
Manuel Aspirasyon
Mekanik Aspirasyon
Proteksiyon cihaz
30 gnlk Mortalite
SONU
PPKG'de adjuvant mekanik yntemler
Manuel aspirasyon cihazlar ile mortalitede bir
azalma,
Mekanik aspirasyon cihazlar ile mortalitede bir
art saptanrken,
Emboli proteksiyon cihazlar ile mortalitede bir
fark saptanmamtr
TAPAS
TRIAL
Manuel
Aspirasyon
N=1071,
tek
merkez,
randomize,6F
Export
Aspirasyon+
direkt
stent
vs
stent
MBG
0-1
%17,1
vs
%26.3
,P<0.00
Tam
ST
segment
dzelmesi
%56.6
vs
44.2,
p<0.01
lm
insidansnda
azalma
%2.1
vs
%4,
RR
0.52
%95CI
0,26-
1.07;p=0.07
Svilaas
TL,
N
Eng
J
Med
2008
EXPIRA
Erken
sonu:
2 yllk sonular:
Sardella
G.
American
Heart
AssociaXon
2009
ScienXc
Sessions;
November
14,
2009;
Orlando,
FL.
TASTE
ALIMASI
TASTE
(Thrombus
aspiraHon
during
ST-
segment
elevaHon
myocardial
infarcHon)
almas,
STEMIde
trombs
aspirasyonu
ile
ilgili
en
nemli
almadr
.
TASTE
almasna
7244
hasta
alnm,
3621i
trombs
aspirasyonu
koluna,
3623
kontrol
grubuna
randomize
edilmiHr.
1000
2000
3000
4000
Number
of
paXents
5000
6000
7000
8000
ReinfarcXon at 30 days
TASTE-1.YIL
SONULARI
Lagerqvist
B1,
Frbert
O,
Olivecrona
GK,
Gudnason
T,
Maeng
M,
Alstrm
P,
Andersson
J,
Calais
F,
Carlsson
J,
Collste
O,
Gtberg
M,
Hrdhammar
P,
Ioanes
D,
Kallryd
A,
Linder
R,
Lundin
A,
Odenstedt
J,
Omerovic
E,
Puskar
V,
Tdt
T,
Zelleroth
E,
stlund
O,
James
SK.
Outcomes
1
year
a[er
thrombus
aspiraHon
for
myocardial
infarcHon.
N
Engl
J
Med.
2014
Sep
18;371(12):1111-20.
doi:
10.1056/NEJMoa1405707.
TASTE-
1.
YIL
Bir
yllk
takipte
primer
sonlanm
olan
tm
nedenli
lmler
aspirasyon
yaplanlarda
%5.3,
yaplmayanlarda
%5.6
olarak
bulunuyor
(p=0.57).
Miyokart
infarktsyle
tekrar
hastaneye
yaI
ve
stent
trombozu
da
iki
grupta
benzer
kyor.
Mekanik
Trombektomi
AIMI
(Ali
A
et
al
,JACC
2006;48:244-252)
ReoliHk
trombektomi+PKG
vs
PKG
nfarkt
alan
(12.5
vs
9.8,
p0.03)
ve
mortalite
(%4.6
vs
0.8,
p
0.02)
daha
yksek
JETSTENT
(Migliorini
et
al,
JACC
2010;
56:1298-1306)
Stent
ncesi
RT
vs
stent
6
ay
MACE
dk
%11.2
vs
%19.4,
p
0.011
1
yl
olaysz
sakalm
yksek%85
vs
%75,
p
0.009
lem Srasnda
Hava Embolisi
-Aspirasyon kateteri kartlrken hava
klavuz kateterde haps olabilir
Damar Anatomisi
Disseksiyon/perforasyon
-Tortyoz
-Kalsifikasyon
-Kk damar <2.5 mm
Klavuz kateter destei
TIMI 0-1
TROMBOASPRASYON/ANJYOJET
TROMBUS YOUNLUU
AZ
OK
(TIMI TROMBUS <3)
(TIMI TROMBUS 3)
TIMI 0-1 IC TROFBAN TIMI 2-3 IC TROFBAN
DREKT STENT
TROMBOASPRASYON/
ANJYOJET
STYM-Primer PKG
2009
Primer PKG srasnda aspirasyon trombektomi
yaplmas nerilir
STYM-Primer PKG
2011
Primer PKG srasnda aspirasyon trombektomi
yaplmas nerilir
PPKG
Manuel
PPKG
manuel
trombektomi
trombektomi
IIa
IIa
EXPRA
TAPAS
Metaanaliz
Bavry
et
al
Metaanaliz
de
Luca
et
al
Meta
analiz
Bavry
et
al
Burzoa
F
TAPAS
ONSET almas
Faz II, ok merkezli, randomize, ift kr, paralel gruplu alma1
Hasta Poplasyonu
Randomizasyon
123 hasta
18 yanda
Belgelenmi stabil KAH
Devam eden ASA tedavisi
(75-100 mg/gn)
Tikagrelor
90 mg, 6 hafta sreyle gnde iki kez
180 mg ykleme dozu ile
Klopidogrel 75 mg, 6 hafta sreyle gnde bir
600 mg ykleme dozu ile
Plasebo (n=11)*
* Tm hastalara ASA verildi.
Balang
(1. gn)
Ykleme dozu
Tedaviye Devam
(6 hafta)
Sonlanm
(10. gn)
Son doz
Conclusions
First study to comprehensively characterize onset and offset of the
antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in stable
CAD patients.
3
Major
Findings:
-
Ticagrelor
onset
is
very
rapid
and
markedly
greater
than
high
loading
dose
clopidogrel
-
Greater
inhibitory
eect
of
Hcagrelor
is
sustained
during
maintenance
-
Ticagrelor
oset
as
determined
by
IPA
slope
was
signicantly
faster
than
clopidogrel
These
eects
may
explain
the
lower
occurrence
of
the
primary
endpoint
with
Hcagrelor
therapy
as
compared
to
clopidogrel
therapy
in
PLATO
whereas
numerically
less
CABG-related
bleeding
occurred
in
the
Hcagrelor
group
despite
greater
platelet
inhibiHon.
Tikagrelor 180 mg
ykleme dozu
(n=54)
Klopidogrel 600 mg
ykleme dozu
(n=50)
%41 IPA
%8
IPA
Tikagrelor 180 mg
ykleme dozu
(n=54)
Klopidogrel 600 mg
ykleme dozu
(n=50)
%88 IPA
%38 IPA
N=18,624
AKSli hastalar
(UA, NSTEM
ya da STEM)
Klopidogrel (n=9,291)
Primer etkililik
sonlanm:
Kardiyovaskler
lm, M ve
inme bileimi
Primer
gvenlilik
sonlanm:
Toplam PLATO
majr kanama
Randomizasyon
Tarama
Vizit 2
Vizit 3
Vizit 4
Vizit 5
Vizit 6
<24 saat 1. Ay
3. Ay
6. Ay
9. Ay
12. Ay
Daha nce klopidogrel ile tedavi edilmemi olan hastalarda 300 mg ykleme dozunda klopidogrel verilmesine gz yumuldu,
buna ek olarak aratrmacnn kararna gre ek 300 mg daha verilmesine izin verildi.
TU-47-272-Ekim-2013
1. James S, et al. Am Heart J 2009;157:599-605. 2. Wallentin L, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045-57. 3. 3. Cannon CP, et al. Lancet
2010;375:283-93.
TU-47-272-Ekim-2013
%0.6
%12
RRR
%5.4
%4.8
HR
0.88
%95
GA
0.77-1.00
P
deeri
0.045
Tikagrelor
(n=9333)
Klopidogrel
(n=9291)
TU-47-272-Ekim-2013
ARR
%1.9
ARR
%16
HR
0.84
%95
GA
0.77-0.92
P
deeri
<0.001
Tikagrelor (n=9333)
RRR
Klopidogrel (n=9291)
NNT=54
Her iki grupta da ASA kullanld. nme asndan tedavi gruplar arasnda fark yoktur.
ARR: Mutlak risk azalmas, RRR: Rlatif risk azalmas; NNT: Tedavi edilmesi gereken hasta says
1. Wallentin L, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045-57.
TU-47-272-Ekim-2013
%9.8
%29
RRR
HR
0.71
%95
GA
P
deeri
0.60-0.84
<0.0001
Tikagrelor
(n=8025)
Klopidogrel
(n=8034)
* 75-150 mg
1. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (2011) TicagrelorDossier zur Nutzenbewertung. http://www.g-ba.de (son eriim tarihi: 01.08.13)
2. Theidel U, et alClin Res Cardiol 2013;102:447-58.
TU-47-272-Ekim-2013
PLATO STE-ACS:
Primer ve sekonder sonlanm
noktalar
Olay
KV lm, MI ve inme
Tikagrelor,% Klopidogrel, %
(n=3752)
(n=3792)
HR (95% CI)
p deeri
9.4
10.8
0.07
9.8
11.3
0.05
13.3
15.0
0.03
MI
4.7
5.8
0.03
KV lm
4.5
5.5
0.07
Inme
1.7
1.0
0.02
Tm nedenlere bal
lm
5.0
6.1
0.05
Total lm, MI ve
inme
KV lm, MI, inme,
iskemi, TIA, arteriyal
thromboz
0.5
1.0
Tikagrelor
iyi
ACS,
akut
koroner
sendrom;
CI,
gven
aral
;
CV,
kardiyovaskler;
HR,
hazard
raHo;
MI,
miyokart
enfarkts;
STE,
ST-segment
ykselmesi;
TIA,
geici
iskemik
atak.
Steg
PG,
et
al.
CirculaCon
2010;122:21312141.
2.0
Klopidogrel
iyi
10.8%
10
9.4%
8
6
STE-ACS
BRILINTA (n=3752)
Klopidogrel (n=3792)
2
0
0
10
12
PLATO
almas
genel
primer
sonlanm
noktas:
HR:
0.84;
95%
CI:
0.770.92;
P<0.0012
1.
Steg
PG
et
al.
CirculaHon
2010;122:21312141;
2.
WallenHn
L
et
al.
N
Engl
J
Med
2009;361:10451057
92
STEMI
semptom
balangcndan
12
saat
-
14
gn
sonra
(Post-
STEMI)
STEMI
semptom
balangc
sonras
12saat
(Primer
PKG)
DiyagnosXk
Kateterizasyon
PKG plan
Medikal
tedavi veya
CABG plan
Randomize etme
Randomizasyon
alma
lac
Ykleme
Dozu
PKG*
* Elik eden tedavi ve cihaz
seimi hekim insiyatifinde
TRITON-TIMI 38:
Klopidogrel
KV
lm,
MI,
nme
10
%19
RRR
Prasugrel
5
Non-CABG
TIMI
majr
kanamalar
30 60 90 120
180
Prasugrel
270
360
9.9
(643)
p<0.001
138
olay
p=0.03
35
olay
Klopidogrel
0
12.1 (781)
2.4
(146)
1.8
(111)
450
TRITON-TIMI
38
prasugrel
Ykleme
Dozu
TRITON-TIMI 38
KV
lm
/
lmcl
olmayan
MI
/
lmcl
olmayan
inme
1
4
1
2
Klopidogrel 11%
1 0
%
26
RRR
NNT
37
Prasugrel
8.3%
6
4
2
0
Prasugrel
1.95%
Klopidogrel
1.50%
30
90
180
270
Sre (Gn)
360
450
Hasta (%)
SWAP
almas:
Klopidogrel
idame
tedavisinden
prasugrele
hem
yklemeli
hem
yklemesiz
gei,
anXagregan
etkinlii
arrr.
Placebo
LD/Clopidogrel
75
mg
MD
(N=33)
Placebo
LD/Prasugrel
10
mg
MD
(N=36)
Prasugrel
60
mg
LD/10
mg
MD
(N=31)
VN-P2Y12 PRU
200
150
100
50
*
0
0 2
*
12
24
saat
*p<0.0001
vs.
klopidogrel
75
mg
MD;
p<0.0001
vs.
prasugrel
10
mg
MD
LD=Ykleme
Dozu;
MD=dame
Dozu;
PRU=P2Y12
ReakHvite
nitesi
Angiolillo
DJ
et
al.
JACC
2010;
56(13):1017-23.
10
12
14
gn
The
DAPT
Study
was
designed
in
response
to
a
request
from
the
FDA
to
evaluate
the
eect
of
dual
anXplatelet
therapy
beyond
one
year
in
subjects
DAPT-CONCLUSIONS
Following
drug-eluHng
stent
treatment,
conHnuaHon
of
thienopyridine
plus
aspirin
beyond
one
year
reduces
the
risk
of
stent
thrombosis
and
MACCE
compared
with
aspirin
alone.
RelaHve
reducHons
of
71%
for
ST,
29%
for
MACCE
and
53%
for
M
Myocardial
infarcHon
reduced
both
in
the
stent
and
in
other
locaHons
Treatment
benet
on
ST
and
MI
consistent
across
drugs,
for
newer
and
older
stents,
and
across
subjects
with
higher
or
lower
risk
of
events
Tikagrelor
1.
10.
2013
ACCF/AHA
Guideline
for
the
Management
of
ST-ElevaHon
Myocardial
InfarcHon.
CirculaHon
2013;127:00-00.
DOI:
10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742c84
TU-47-272-Ekim-2013
Tikagrelor