You are on page 1of 18

BUDGET-BUSTERS:

The shift to high-priced


innovator drugs in the USA

Welcome

September 2014

EvaluatePharmas USA Sales,


Volume and Pricing Intelligence
A clear picture of drug pricing in key markets, trends and competitor pricing is essential to our
clients in the Pharma and Biotech sector. We have heard from many of our clients that too much
of their time is currently spent on data collation and not enough time on market analysis and
strategic decision-making. They require an efficient way to analyse what is driving USA sales.
At Evaluate, our aim is to bring transparency to pricing and we focused our efforts initially
on the largest and most influential market, the USA. Our team of experienced analysts started
the development of an integrated, single source for USA sales, volume and pricing information.
We defined a methodology to provide insights into the annual cost per patient for the top selling
drugs as well as number of patients treated. The analysis combines USA government data sources
and is fully transparent as to the specific sources and the methodology of our calculations.
A comprehensive methodology document is available to all Evaluates subscribers.
The clients we collaborated with to develop the pricing insights told us that they
particularly valued:
A more efficient way to conduct pricing analysis
Transparency as to sources used to triangulate the analysis
Ability to calculate annual cost and volume per patient
Credible insights into competitors sales dynamics
Insights with regard to rebates and discounts
Retail level drug prices

Key features of this new intelligence include:


A single, trusted source for USA Sales, Volume and Pricing intelligence
Comprehensive prescription drug pricing in the USA

- Includes primary care medications, injectable biotechnology products and vaccines

- Sources: Retail Rx unit / pack prices (Medicaid), J-Code, NADAC, Federal Contract

E xclusive cost per patient and number of patients treated calculations for top-selling USA Drugs including
Orphan Drugs
Transparency to Off-invoice Discounts (Payer / Wholesale rebates)
Complete commercial context through EvaluatePharma content integration

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Commentary and analysis from the EP Vantage editorial team

To find out more about USA Sales, Volume and Pricing, future pricing developments and Evaluates
full range of services contact us:
North America:
Debbie Paul
Tel: +1 617 573 9453
Email: debbie.paul@evaluategroup.com

Japan:
Hiroshi Yamazaki
Tel: + 81 (0) 80 1164 4754
Email: hiroshi.yamazaki@evaluategroup.com

R
 est of the World:
Will Hau
Tel: +44 (0)20 7377 0800
Email: will.hau@evaluategroup.com

F or general questions:
Christine Lindgren
Tel: +1 617 866 3906
Email: christine.lindgren@evaluategroup.com

Disclaimer
All intellectual property rights in this report remain that of Evaluate Ltd and/or its respective third party licensors. Whilst all reasonable
steps have been taken to ensure that the data presented are accurate, Evaluate Ltd cannot accept responsibility for errors or omissions.
Neither does Evaluate Ltd warrant the accuracy, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose of the data. Nothing in the reports shall
constitute investment, financial or legal advice and the contents of the reports are provided for information purposes only. The data is not
intended to amount to advice and should not be used as a determining factor in any investment decision. This report may not be lent,
resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published, without
the prior written consent of Evaluate Ltd. Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

September 2014
EvaluatePharma Foreword:
Move to Higher Priced Drugs Within the Top 100 Selling Drugs in the USA
Over the last five years a fundamental shift in spending trends towards high-priced medicines,
which treat substantially smaller patient populations, has been underway in the US market.
Based on an analysis of the Top 100 selling drugs in the USA we have found that:
T he median revenue per patient of the Top 100 drugs has increased from $1,260 in 2010
to $9,400 in 2014, representing an seven-fold increase (see page: 4).
T he median patient population size served by a Top 100 drug in 2014 is 146,000, down from
690,000 in 2010.
T here are now seven treatments priced in excess of $100,000 per patient per year in 2014,
versus four in 2010.
(In this report the Top 100 drugs are based on net manufacturing sales disclosed by companies and we define a drug selling
for greater than the median price (>$10,000) of the Top 100 as high-priced.)

Why the Shift?


The changes in spending are complex, but we have identified a number of factors that could have
contributed to the increase in launch prices and drug price inflation, including:
Successful R&D innovation
Drug pricing models that impact launch price
Advancing patient outcome
Removing costs from healthcare
Improving patient economic productivity
Private and public ability to pay

An example of these factors in action is Sovaldi, the first of the so called budget-busting drugs. The
hepatitis C treatments $84,000 list price has been defended because it offers a step-change advance in
patient outcomes, removes costs from healthcare and improves patient economic productivity.
The US system of free market pricing also allows a correlation between higher drug prices and new
treatments which offer real innovation over current treatments. Thus, Sovaldi was able to charge more
than Incivek (Vertex) and Victrelis (Merck), the first advancements in hepatitis C treatment, whose
commercial edge lasted for only two and a half years.
The report also considers other factors that might be influencing drug pricing and changes in patient
population size, these are explored below.

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Shift in Focus - Tax and Regulatory System Biased Towards Orphan Drug/Smaller Patient
Population Drugs
Over the past 15 years FDA requirements for the approval of new drugs have become more
stringent, particularly for primary care products. This has pushed up primary care clinical trial sizes
and R&D costs. In addition, the unintended extended patent life/softer patent erosion available to
biologicals and the tax advantages of the Orphan Drug Act have skewed the R&D incentives
towards investment in non-primary care diseases with smaller patient population sizes. Our report
shows that this has increased the number of new product launches of higher-price/small-population
drugs.
In 2010 the number of Top 100 drugs treating 1-100,000 patients was 23. In 2014 the number
had jumped to 41.
C
 orrespondingly, the number of Top 100 drugs treating 500,000 plus patients had fallen
from 55 to 35.

Foreword

While some of the decline in top selling drugs treating large patient populations may have been due
to products such as Lipitor, Plavix and Actos losing patent protection, their places have been taken
by biologic drugs, which can command much higher median pricing and have so far enjoyed little or
no generic competition (see page 9).
The current lack of biosimilars means that successful biologicals have not only entered the Top 100,
but have not dropped out of it, despite some experiencing patent expiry, e.g. Epogen, originally
launched in 1989, has yet to experience biosimilar competition.

Drug Price Inflation and Monopoly Pricing


The report also shows that companies have aimed to maximise revenues, not only for new products but
for existing ones. We found that 19 drugs in the Top 100 have moved up a price bracket in the last four
years (see page: 7). E.g., nine products have gone from costing less than a $1,000 in 2010 to being priced
in the $1,000 to $5,000 bracket in 2014.
The US phenomenon of drug price inflation - where prices increase after initial launch - is in direct
opposition to Japan where the government reimbursement system reduces the price of successful products
which beat initial sales expectations at launch. US drug price inflation could be due to a number of factors:
L ack of Competition - The biggest brake to the price inflation of a first-to-market drug is the entry of
me-too or marginally differentiated products to treat the same disease providing additional competition. In
reviewing the Top 100 selling drugs in 2014 the cohort is biased to successful products, so it is not surprising
certain products move up a price bracket. Even when a me-too drug enters the market, the list price of the
first-to-market drug tends not to drop but off-invoice discounts start to occur to private payers.
D
 rug Profile Over the life of a product, a better understanding of the drugs benefits versus the competition
tends to emerge, which could justify price increases.
P
 atient Switching - Companies increasing the price of mature products, knowing that physicians will be
reluctant to switch to less expensive alternatives, when patients are responding well to the drug.

Budget-Busters Versus High-Priced Imitators


We define a budget-busting drug as a drug that offers a step-change in patient outcome and/or
removes costs from other parts of the health system, normally in a non-rare disease population size
(>200,000 patients in USA). Budget-busters lead to payers having to revisit budget size and
allocations to pay for innovative products.

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

However, its important to be aware of high-priced drugs which do not offer a step-change in patient
outcomes, and therefore do not justify a high-price. Zaltrap, initially priced highly was judged by the
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to offer little cost/ benefit over Avastin, the current colorectal
cancer treatment. Sanofi responded by halving the US price.
The report also shows that a number of drugs such as Roches cancer products, Herceptin and Rituxan,
were able to command prices well in excess of the other top 20 biggest selling cancer products in 2014
despite competing products on the market.
Celgenes Revlimid had the highest price premium within the Top 20 selling cancer drugs, achieving
$164,859 per patient and treating an estimated 17,380 patients in 2014 (see page 13).
However, with an increasing number of potential budget-busters on the horizon, these prices might
not be sustainable as payers could start to get even tougher on new and currently marketed products
that are poorly differentiated.

Foreword

Future of High Drug Pricing in Top 100


T he shift to high-priced medicines will increase friction between payers and companies. However, as long
as the economic basis of the high price is sound (namely improved patient outcomes, reduced healthcare costs,
or improved patient economic activity versus current treatments) budget-busters will - for now - get a slice of
the USA market. The losers will be poorly-differentiated products which get dropped from reimbursement
lists. This is how the market should operate and will actively encourage R&D spend to be allocated to
innovative products.
T he biggest concern is that with government drug spend approaching 43% of the USA market by 2017, up
from 24% in 2005, the system lacks enough automatic discounts off the private price, and safeguards against
drug price rises from companies, to be sustainable. This is particularly an issue for Medicare Part B and Part D
programs. The expansion of Medicare (2005+) and Medicaid (2014+) enrolment has incrementally expanded
the USA drug market, so any discounts off private drug prices will act only to moderate growth. Thus the call
for reform will grow stronger.
T he adoption of biosimilars appears crucial to moderate overall pharmaceutical sales growth in both the private
and public sector, but also to free up funds to pay for the innovation of tomorrow.
L aunch prices are likely to be determined more and more by competitive profile of the product rather than R&D
spend. Gilead paid $11.2 billion for Pharmasset because of the future commercial profile of Sovaldi at the time
of acquisition, not because Pharmasset had spent $272 million on R&D to get the compound into late-stage
phase III.

Conclusion
There appears to be little let up on the budgets of both government and private payers in the USA
seeking access to innovative drugs.
With the Affordable Care Act (ACA) set to add nine million additional Americans in 2014 to Medicaid
budgets and the increasing numbers of Medicare enrolments due to the aging baby-boomer generation,
the US government is already forecasting Medicare/Medicaid spend to account for 43% of the entire
USA prescription drug market by 2017, up from 24% in 2005.
The government has also raised its forecast for both Medicaid and Medicare prescription drug spend
by $10bn to $210.7bn in August 2014, with Sovaldi alone adding over $1bn to the Medicaid drug bill
in 2014. While efforts have been made to reduce Medicaid spend on generic drugs (see page 16) the
current system looks to be unsustainable.

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

To rein in costs or justify the prices private payers are expected to pay for innovation, private payers
could organise to conduct drug cost/benefit analyses to call out the effectiveness of high-priced drugs.
And while the 2003 Medicare Act explicitly stops Medicare from negotiating drug prices, a prohibition
that failed to get overturned in the Senate in 2007, the government-run health plan for seniors could
put pressure on its health plan providers to negotiate more aggressively.
As such the increasing rumblings of discontent from both government and private payers mean that
pharma companies need to be providing real innovation to justify the prices of their products and
closely work with the hand that feeds their growth.

Anthony Raeside
Head of Research, Evaluate Ltd

Table of Contents
Top 100 USA Drugs: Revenue per Patient per Year Analysis 2010 & 2014

Top 100 USA Drugs: Number of Patients Treated Analysis 2010 & 2014

Top 100 USA Drugs in 2014: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients Treated

10

Top 100 USA Drugs: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients (<100k)

11

Top 100 USA Drugs: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients (100 to 500k)

12

Top 100 USA Drugs: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients (>500k)

13

Top 20 Cancer Drugs in 2014: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients Treated

14

USA Primary Care (MEPS): Proprietary (NDA) vs. Generic (ANDA) 2005-12

15

Top 100 USA Generic Drugs (MEPS): Retail Sales per Patient 2012

16

Medicaid Generic Drugs: Generic Prescription Price Trend 2008 to 2014

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Top 100 USA Drugs: Revenue per Patient per Year Analysis 2010 & 2014
Median Annual Drug Revenue of Top 100 Drugs Balloons to $9,396 in 2014, from $1,258 in 2010
Seven Drugs in Top 100 Cost more than $100,000 per Year
EvaluatePharma finds that the median revenue per patient per year (annual drug cost net of discounts and adjusted for patient
compliance) within the top 100 selling products, has increased from $1,258 in 2010 to $9,396 in 2014. The shift to higher cost drugs
reflects industry product launches of innovative drugs aimed at smaller patient population sizes (see page 8), high priced biologicals not
being impacted by patent competition, but also drug companies increasing prices to maximise revenues. Further analysis reveals that 19
drugs, in both the 2010 & 2014 Top 100 lists, moved up a pricing band. There are now seven drugs in the Top 100 in 2014 which cost in
excess of $100,000, up from four drugs in 2010. In 2010, drugs selling for less than $1,000 was the largest component of the Top 100 at
40 (40% of the Top 100); in 2014, that number fell to 19 (19%).

Count of Products within Top 100

Count of Drugs in USA Top 100 by Revenue per Patient per Year Price Band in 2014
Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)
40
35
30
25
20

2014: Revenue per Patient $100k +


Advate
$449k
Soliris
$427k
Gamunex
$172k
Revlimid
$165k
Erbitux
$140k
Yervoy
$126k
Afinitor
$107k

15
4

2014
27

24
19

17

12

10
5

2010

40

11

10

10

0
$100,000+

$50,000 $100,000

$25,000 $50,000

$10,000 $25,000

$5,000 - $10,000 $1,000 - $5,000

$0 - $1,000

Revenue per Patient per year Banding ($)


Count of Drugs in USA Top 100 (2010 & 2014) by Revenue per Patient per Year Price Band
Revenue Banding
$100,000+
$50,000 - $100,000
$25,000 - $50,000
$10,000 - $25,000
$5,000 - $10,000
$1,000 - $5,000
$0 - $1,000

2010
4
3
9
10
7
27
40
100
26
74

$10,000+
$0 - $10,000

2014
7
12
11
17
10
24
19
100
47
53

USA Top 100


2010
2014
Median Revenue $1,258
$9,396
Average Top 100 $1,433 $1,524
Total USA Sales ($m) 143,340 152,440

Chg.
+3
+9
+2
+7
+3
-3
-21

2010
4%
3%
9%
10%
7%
27%
40%
100%
26%
74%

CAGR (2010-14)
+65.3%
+1.6%
+1.6%

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

2010: USA Top 100 Drugs by Cost Bands


$100,000+
4%

2014
7%
12%
11%
17%
10%
24%
19%
100%
47%
53%

2014: USA Top 100 Drugs by Cost Bands

$50,000 $100,000
3%

$25,000 $50,000
9%

$0 - $1,000
19%

$100,000+
7%

$10,000 $25,000
10%

$0 - $1,000
40%

$1,000 $5,000
27%

$5,000 $10,000
7%

$1,000 $5,000
24%

$50,000 $100,000
12%

$25,000 $50,000
11%
$10,000 $25,000
17%
$5,000 $10,000
10%

Top 100 USA Drugs: Number of Patients Treated Analysis 2010 & 2014

Count of Products Within Top 100

USA Top 100 Drugs Shifts to Higher Price, Smaller Patient Groups
EvaluatePharma finds that the median number of USA patients treated by a Top 100 product, has fallen from 689,604 to 146,252 per
drug. The number of drugs within the Top 100 that treat fewer than 100,000 patients annually has increased from 23 (23% of the Top
100) in 2010, to 41 (41%) drugs in 2014. The number of drugs serving groups of over 500,000 patients has decreased from 55 (55%) to
35 (35%) in 2014.
A number of factors have contributed to this shift to higher-priced, lower patient-population groups: the innovation potential of primary
care has somewhat matured; and, companies have switched strategic focus and are increasingly innovating in biologicals, orphan
diseases, cancer, and specialist markets. In addition the absence of patent competition on biologicals means established biologicals do
not drop off the list.

60

Count of Drugs in USA Top 100 by No. of Patients Treated per Year Bands in 2014
Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)
55

2010

50

2014
41

40

35

30

22

24

23

20
10
0
500,000+

100,000 to 500,000

0 to 100,000
No. of Patients Treated per Year Bands

Count of Drugs in USA Top 100 (2010 & 2014) by Number of Patients Treated per Year Bands
No. of Patients Treated
500,000+
100,000 to 500,000
0 to 100,000

2010
55
22
23
100

2014
35
24
41
100

USA Top 100


2010
2014
Median No. of Patients Treated 689,604
146,252
Average Top 100 1,733,705
1,266,910
Total No. Treated by Top 100 173,370,517 126,691,003

Chg.
-20
+2
+18

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

100,000 to
500,000
22%

500,000+
55%

2014
35%
24%
41%
100%

CAGR (2010-14)
-32.1%
-7.5%
-7.5%

2010: USA Top 100 Drugs by No. of Patients Treated Bands

0 to
100,000
23%

2010
55%
22%
23%
100%

2014: USA Top 100 Drugs by No. of Patients Treated

0 to
100,000
41%

500,000+
35%

100,000 to
500,000
24%

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)


Note: Top 100 drugs ranked by EvaluatePharma consensus USA sales in 2014. Excludes: Generics, OTC, Botox.

Top 100 USA Drugs in 2014: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients Treated
USA Top 100 Drug Cost (Revenue per Patient) is Strongly Correlated to Patient Size
EvaluatePharma finds the annual revenues per patient of a Top 100 USA drug is strongly correlated (R2 = 0.92) to the number of
patients it treats. This surprisingly strong correlation is likely due to the fact that only a subset of patients taking primary care drugs
require hospitalization and, in general, such drugs do not offer the same improvement in patient outcomes than drugs used to treat
smaller patient population groups. Gilead's Sovaldi is an outlier, with a list price of $84k an estimated revenue per patient of $56k in
2014. The predicted revenue per patient based on the regression is $8,726 for a product treating 135,182 patients. The innovation
Sovaldi offers over current treatments (patient outcomes, costs out of healthcare, patients improved economic activity) reflects this
price premium. We have analyzed three patient population subgroups over the next three pages.

Top 100 USA Drugs by Sales: Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated
USA Revenue per Patient ($)

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)

450,000

Number of Patients Treated Subgroups Analyzed:

400,000

USA Patients Treated: <100,000 Analysed:


USA Patients Treated: 100,000 to 500,000:
USA Patients Treated: >500,000

350,000
300,000

Page 10
Page 11
Page 12

Methodology: We chose to test the correlation of


revenues per patient and the number of patients treated
in 2014. The Top 100 drugs in USA, by definition, are
relatively successful so the expected commercial drug
profile has broadly been met. There are many factors other
than target patient population size influencing price.

250,000
200,000
150,000

Sovaldi (GILD)

100,000
y = 580,773,061.274791x-0.940023
R = 0.919463

50,000
0
0

500,000

1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 5,000,000


USA Number of Patients Treated

Note: To enhance the chart visual the x-axis has been limited to 5 million patients (Fluzone is not visible: 44m patients)
Fluzone is included in the trendline and R2 calculation.
Top 10 USA Drugs by Sales 2014: Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated
Product

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Company

USA Sales ($m)


2014

Sovaldi
Gilead Sciences
Humira
AbbVie
Lantus
Sanofi
Enbrel
Amgen
Remicade
Johnson & Johnson
Abilify
Otsuka Holdings
Rituxan
Roche
Neulasta
Amgen
Seretide/Advair GlaxoSmithKline
Avastin
Roche
Average Top 10
Average Top 100
Median Price

No. of
Patients

Revenue
Per Patient

Patient
Off-Invoice
Compliance Discount USA Cost Band
-31%

10,098

135,182

56,212

6,078

245,693

24,561

74%

5,759

4,905,321

1,190

51%

4,311

223,884

19,585

63%

4,154

277,633

14,716

65%

3,886

394,344

9,180

28%

3,707

70,347

52,459

3,523

277,894

12,679

94%

3,325

1,850,662

1,938

56%

2,928

44,552

66,828

4,777

842,551

25,935

1,524

1,266,910

31,740

979

146,252

9,396

$50,000 - $100,000
$10,000 - $25,000

-34%

$1,000 - $5,000
$10,000 - $25,000
$10,000 - $25,000

-27%

$5,000 - $10,000
$50,000 - $100,000
$10,000 - $25,000

-6%

$1,000 - $5,000
$50,000 - $100,000

Top 10 USA Drugs by Sales 2010: Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated
USA Sales ($m)
2014
Bristol-Myers Squibb
1 Plavix
6,154
Pfizer
2 Lipitor
5,329
3 Seretide/Advair GlaxoSmithKline
4,026
Otsuka Holdings
4 Abilify
3,606
Takeda
5 Actos
3,582
Amgen
6 Enbrel
3,304
Merck & Co
7 Singulair
3,219
AstraZeneca
8 Seroquel
3,107
Johnson & Johnson
9 Remicade
3,099
Roche
10 Avastin
3,068
Average Top 10
3,849
Average Top 100
1,433
Median Price
975

Product

Company

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)

No. of
Patients

Revenue
Per Patient

Patient
Off-Invoice
Compliance Discount USA Cost Band

5,110,004

1,204

66%

4,870,912

1,094

84%

-36%

$1,000 - $5,000

3,570,316

1,128

56%

-29%

$1,000 - $5,000

647,918

5,566

28%

-20%

$5,000 - $10,000

1,901,531

1,884

76%

-7%

$1,000 - $5,000

$1,000 - $5,000

209,777

15,750

71%

3,603,517

893

84%

-32%

1,651,254

1,882

35%

-24%

282,743

10,960

66%

45,273

67,764

2,189,324

10,813

1,733,705

16,013

689,604

1,258

$10,000 - $25,000
$0 - $1,000
$1,000 - $5,000
$10,000 - $25,000
$50,000 - $100,000

Top 100 USA Drugs: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients (<100k)
Revlimid, Avastin & Rituxan Priced at a Premium
EvaluatePharma finds that Revlimid (Celgene), Avastin and Rituxan (Roche) are priced at a premium versus other products used to treat
fewer than 100,000 patients in the USA. EvaluatePharma finds that annual revenue per patient of a Top 100 drug treating less than
100,000 patients is moderately correlated to the number of patients treated (R2 = 0.75).

Top 100 USA Drugs 2014: Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated (<100k)
USA Revenue per Patient ($)

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)

500,000

Price Premium vs. Peers

Advate (BAX)

450,000
400,000

Soliris (ALXN)

350,000
300,000
250,000

Revlimid (CELG)

200,000
150,000

Rituxan (Roche)

Avastin (Roche)

100,000

y = 171,870,708.729157x-0.823195
R = 0.751557

50,000
0
0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

USA Number of Patients Treated

Top 10 USA Drugs by Sales 2014: USA Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated (<100k)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Product

Company

Rituxan
Avastin
Revlimid
Copaxone
Herceptin
Gleevec
Tecfidera
Olysio
Lucentis
Avonex

Roche
Roche
Celgene
Teva
Roche
Novartis
Biogen Idec
Johnson & Johnson
Roche
Biogen Idec

USA Sales ($m)


2014

No. of
Patients

Revenue
Per Patient

Patient
Off-Invoice
Compliance Discount USA Cost Band

3,707

70,347

52,459

$50,000 - $100,000

2,928

44,552

66,828

$50,000 - $100,000

2,107

17,380

164,859

2,700

52,217

43,877

2,060

28,587

71,513

2,023

64,884

31,006

1,968

54,735

34,981

1,916

15,560

49,536

1,904

81,204

24,050

$10,000 - $25,000

1,837

31,953

57,125

$50,000 - $100,000

$100,000+
73%

$25,000 - $50,000
$50,000 - $100,000

40%

-23%

$25,000 - $50,000

-23%

$25,000 - $50,000

$25,000 - $50,000

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)


Note: Top 100 drugs ranked by EvaluatePharma consensus USA sales in 2014. Excludes: Generics, OTC, Botox.
EvaluatePharma is currently working on developing patient compliance rates for biological cancer products.
The lack of patient compliance percentages means that the revenue per patient will generally be overstated and the number of patients
treated understated.

10

Top 100 USA Drugs: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients (100 to 500k)
Sovaldi, Enbrel & Humira at Price Premium
EvaluatePharma finds that Sovaldi (Gilead), Enbrel (Amgen/ Pfizer) and Humira (AbbVie) are priced at a premium compared to other
products used to treat between 100,000 and 500,000 patients in the USA. The annual revenue per patient of the Top 100 drugs treating
between 100,000 and 500,000 patients is poorly correlated to the number of patients treated (R2 = 0.20).

USA Revenues per Patient ($)

Top 100 USA Drugs 2014:


Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated (100-500k)
Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2022)

60,000

Price Premium vs. Peers

Sovaldi (GILD)
50,000

40,000

Humira (ABBV)
30,000

Enbrel (AMGN)

Remicade (JNJ)

20,000

Neulasta (AMGN)

10,000

0
100,000

y = 109,478,787.773947x-0.782752
R = 0.199054

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

USA Number of Patients Treated

Top 10 USA Drugs by Sales 2014: USA Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated (100-500k)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Product

Company

Sovaldi
Humira
Enbrel
Remicade
Abilify
Neulasta
Atripla
Epogen
Eylea
Truvada

Gilead Sciences
AbbVie
Amgen
Johnson & Johnson
Otsuka Holdings
Amgen
Gilead Sciences
Amgen
Regeneron
Gilead Sciences

USA Sales ($m)


2014

No. of
Patients

Revenue
Per Patient

Patient
Off-Invoice
Compliance Discount USA Cost Band

10,098

135,182

56,212

6,078

245,693

24,561

74%

$10,000 - $25,000

4,311

223,884

19,585

63%

$10,000 - $25,000

4,154

277,633

14,716

65%

3,886

394,344

9,180

28%

3,523

277,894

12,679

94%

2,180

143,056

14,404

81%

1,950

129,971

14,555

1,750

112,514

15,662

1,560

153,475

9,960

-31%

$50,000 - $100,000

$10,000 - $25,000
-27%

$5,000 - $10,000

-26%

$10,000 - $25,000

$10,000 - $25,000
$10,000 - $25,000
$10,000 - $25,000
-34%

$5,000 - $10,000

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)


Note: Top 100 drugs ranked by EvaluatePharma consensus USA sales in 2014. Excludes: Generics, OTC, Botox.

11

Top 100 USA Drugs: Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients (>500k)
Januvia, Advair & Lantus at Price Premium
EvaluatePharma finds that Januvia (Merck & Co.), Advair (GSK) and Lantus (Sanofi) are priced at a premium to other products that treat
more than 500,000 patients in the USA. The annual revenue per patient of the Top 100 drugs, treating between 100,000 and 500,000
patients, is moderately correlated to the number of patients treated (R2 = 0.75).

Top 100 USA Drugs 2014: Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated (>500k)
USA Revenue per Patient ($)

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)

2,500

Januvia (MRK)

Price Premium vs. Peers

Advair (GSK)

2,000

Lantus (SNY)
1,500

Crestor (AZN)

1,000

y = 870,538,116.786405x-0.974941
R = 0.745858

500

0
0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

5,000,000

USA Number of Patients Treated

Top 10 USA Drugs by Sales 2014: USA Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated (>500k)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Product

Company

Lantus
Seretide/Advair
Crestor
Spiriva
Lyrica
Januvia
Prevnar 13
NovoRapid
Celebrex
Humalog

Sanofi
GlaxoSmithKline
AstraZeneca
Boehringer Ingelheim
Pfizer
Merck & Co
Pfizer
Novo Nordisk
Pfizer
Eli Lilly

USA Sales ($m)


2014

No. of
Patients

Revenue
Per Patient

Patient
Off-Invoice
Compliance Discount USA Cost Band

5,759

4,905,321

1,190

51%

-34%

3,325

1,850,662

1,938

56%

-6%

$1,000 - $5,000

2,894

3,098,491

887

57%

-53%

$0 - $1,000

2,473

1,693,829

1,458

36%

-39%

$1,000 - $5,000

2,422

1,241,435

1,756

90%

-27%

$1,000 - $5,000

2,138

1,040,874

2,031

74%

-36%

$1,000 - $5,000

1,986

3,739,698

532

1,863

1,624,457

1,192

62%

-58%

$1,000 - $5,000

1,672

3,082,429

462

13%

-29%

$0 - $1,000

1,644

2,264,508

723

63%

-74%

$0 - $1,000

$1,000 - $5,000

$0 - $1,000

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)


Note: Top 100 drugs ranked by EvaluatePharma consensus USA sales in 2014. Excludes: Generics, OTC, Botox.

12

Top 20 Cancer Drugs (2014): Revenue per Patient vs. No. of Patients Treated
Revlimid, Herceptin, Avastin & Rituxan at Price Premium
EvaluatePharma finds that Revlimid (Celgene) and Roche's trio of leading cancer products (Herceptin, Avastin & Rituxan) are priced at
a premium compared to other Top 20 biggest selling cancer products in 2014. The annual revenue per patient of the Top 20 cancer
drugs is moderately correlated to the number of patients treated (R2 = 0.48).

Top 20 USA Cancer Drugs in 2014, Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated
USA Revenue per Patient ($)

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)

180,000

Price Premium vs. Peers

Revlimid (CELG)

160,000
140,000
120,000

Herceptin (Roche)

100,000

Avastin (Roche)

Rituxan (Roche/ BIB)

80,000
60,000
40,000

y = 11,924,261.280x-0.544
R = 0.471

20,000
0
0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

USA Number of Patients Treated

Note: In theory the products with the highest sales should represent the best patient outcome, cost out of healthcare and
improved patient economic activity relative to the competition, for the indications sales are achieved in.
Within the USA market the price can rise or fall (off-invoice discounting) post approval, which in a free market system is to be
expected. A price rise should signify an enhanced understanding of the drug profile vs. the competition, but may also be the
company taking advantage of the risk of switching patients or entrenched prescribing habits.

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Top 10 USA Cancer Drugs by Sales: USA Revenue per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated 2014

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Product

Company

Rituxan
Avastin
Revlimid
Herceptin
Gleevec
Stelara
Alimta
Zytiga
Velcade
Afinitor
Average Top 10
Average Top 20

Roche
Roche
Celgene
Roche
Novartis
Johnson & Johnson
Eli Lilly
Johnson & Johnson
Takeda
Novartis

Sales ($m)
2014

No. of
Patients

Revenue
Per Patient

3,707

70,347

52,459

$50,000 - $100,000

2,928

44,552

66,828

$50,000 - $100,000

2,107

17,380

164,859

$100,000+

2,060

28,587

71,513

2,023

64,884

31,006

40%

1,269

37,327

32,997

78%

1,251

26,674

47,300

992

35,801

28,212

983

16,097

61,053

779

7,253

106,675

1,810

34,890

66,290

1,236

24,587

64,266

Patient
Off-Invoice
Compliance Discount USA Cost Band

$50,000 - $100,000
-23%

$25,000 - $50,000
$25,000 - $50,000
$25,000 - $50,000

44%

-20%

$25,000 - $50,000
$50,000 - $100,000

-15%

$100,000+

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)


Note: EvaluatePharma is currently working on developing patient compliance rates for biological cancer products.
The lack of patient compliance percentages means that the revenue per patient will generally be overstated and the number of
patients treated understated.

13

USA Primary Care (MEPS): Proprietary (NDA) vs. Generic (ANDA) 2005-12
Generics Fill 71% of Primary Care Prescriptions in 2012, versus 39% in 2005
EvaluatePharma, based on analysis of the primary care MEPS survey, finds that generic drugs (ANDAs) filled 71% of prescriptions in
2012, versus 39% in 2005. The estimated average retail cost per prescription was $31 for a generic and $206 for a branded drug (NDA).
The average retail cost of a generic prescription fell 4% per year between 2005 and 2012 to $31, whilst the average branded (NDA)
drug increased 13% per year to $206, from $89 in 2005.
The MEPS Survey recorded a decline in USA retail sales in 2012, down 2% to $251bn, with three trillion prescriptions filled.

Analysis of USA Retail Primary Care Sales: Proprietary (NDA) vs. Generic (ANDA) 2005-12
250,000

100%
NDA

ANDA

NDA as a %

ANDA as a %

90%

200,000
61%
57%

150,000

100,000

63%

47%

43%

39%

70%
60%

56%

52%

53%

66%

80%

71%

50%

44%

48%

37%

USA Prescription volume %

USA Retail Sales (MEPS) $m

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)

40%

34%
29%

50,000

30%
20%
10%

0%
2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Year

About MEPS: The MEPS (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey), is an annual survey conducted and published by AHRQ (Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. It covers 13,000 families/ 35,000 individuals, and
includes a representative sample of prescription medicines in the USA, analysing approx. 350,000 prescriptions. The survey results
are scaled-up to provide an estimate of total pharmaceutical drug consumption, retail sales and prescription volume, in the USA. The
focus of the survey is primary care dispensing of prescriptions and does not cover hospital based drugs.
USA Primary Care (MEPS) Retail Sales, Rx Volume & Cost per Rx: Proprietary (NDA) vs. Generic (ANDA) 2005-12
Year

NDA

ANDA

Total

% Chge

NDA
as a %

ANDA
as a %

USA Retail Sales (MEPS) - $m


2005

143,228

41,222

193,327

77.7%

22.3%

2006

143,168

48,371

197,315

+2%

74.7%

25.3%

2007

167,167

35,847

207,010

+5%

82.3%

17.7%

2008

180,394

42,944

227,622

+10%

80.8%

19.2%

2009

178,822

44,454

234,454

+3%

80.1%

19.9%

2010

190,234

50,054

245,053

+5%

79.2%

20.8%

2011

192,037

52,374

255,852

+4%

78.6%

21.4%

2012

174,843

64,839

251,262

-2%

72.9%

27.1%

2005

1,616

1,023

2,664

61.2%

38.8%

2006

1,573

1,167

2,748

+3%

57.4%

42.6%

2007

1,445

1,275

2,725

-1%

53.1%

46.9%

2008

1,368

1,504

2,878

+6%

47.6%

52.4%

2009

1,307

1,638

2,951

+3%

44.4%

55.6%

2010

1,133

1,907

3,043

+3%

37.3%

62.7%

2011

1,038

2,040

3,083

+1%

33.7%

66.3%

2012

848

2,120

2,974

-4%

28.6%

71.4%

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

USA Prescription Volume (MEPS)

Average Cost Per Prescription


2005

89

40

73

2006

91

41

72

-1%

2007

116

28

76

+6%

2008

132

29

79

+4%

Drug Inflation Analysis (2005-12)

2009

137

27

79

+0%

Generic (ANDA) Retail Cost Inflation

2010

168

26

81

+1%

2011

185

26

83

+3%

2012

206

31

84

+2%

-3.9%
Branded (NDA) Retail Cost Inflation
+12.8%

Note: "Other" not shown, includes primary care dispensed BLAs.


14

Top 100 USA Generic Drugs (MEPS): Retail Sales per Patient 2012
Simvastatin Tops MEPS Retail Sales Ranking for Primary Care Generic Drugs in 2012; Average Cost of $139 per Year
EvaluatePharma, based on analysis of the primary care MEPS survey, finds that generic simvastatin achieved the largest retail sales in the
USA at $2.6bn in 2012. The average retail cost per patient was $139 per patient per year, including patient discontinuation.
The annual retail sales per patient of the Top 100 generic drugs in the USA, by retail sales, were moderately correlated to the number of
patients treated (R2 = 0.73).

Top 100 USA Generic Drugs by Retail Sales (MEPS):


Retail Sales per Patient per Year vs. No. of Patients Treated 2012
Retail Sales per Patient

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)

4,500
4,000

-5%
+2%

3,500

+4%

3,000

-2%

-9%

2,500

-0%
+12%

2,000

+2%

1,500

y = 17,515,372.945768x-0.785390
R = 0.727077

1,000
500
0
0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000


No. of Patients

USA Generic Drugs by Retail Sales (MEPS) in 2012: Top 20


Generic name

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

simvastatin
omeprazole
atorvastatin calcium
acetaminophen; oxycodone hydrochloride
metformin hydrochloride
bupropion hydrochloride
gabapentin
acetaminophen; hydrocodone bitartrate
clopidogrel bisulfate
lisinopril
amlodipine besylate
fentanyl
losartan potassium
isotretinoin
venlafaxine hydrochloride
metoprolol succinate
pravastatin sodium
tacrolimus
escitalopram oxalate
zolpidem tartrate

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Total Top 20
Total Generic Drugs

USA Retail Sales ($m)


2012

No. of Patients
Per Year

Retail Sales per Patient ($)


2012

2,596

18,733,106

139

2,342

11,558,375

203

2,238

4,724,998

474

1,774

6,986,250

254

1,556

13,446,203

116

1,397

4,313,127

324

1,391

5,566,061

250

1,241

19,553,869

63

1,181

1,588,281

743

1,130

19,048,099

59

961

8,110,002

118

855

808,211

1,057

825

4,902,328

168

800

363,873

2,198

776

2,117,086

366

769

3,109,823

247

766

7,009,623

109

747

288,545

2,590

724

899,009

805

654

4,655,282

24,721

137,782,150

140
179

64,261.3

533,040,424

121

New Generic
2011/12

2011

2012

2012

Source: EvaluatePharma analysis of MEPS Survey (22 SEP 2014)


Note: Analysis based on 2012 AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS)
2012 survey released August 2014.

15

Medicaid Generic Drugs: Generic Prescription Price Trend 2008 to 2014

-17% -16%
-16% -15%

Source: EvaluatePharma (22 SEP 2014)

-14%

-12%

-10%
-5%

-11% -11%
-10% -10% -10% -10%

-8%

+2%

-6% -6%

-5%

-3%
+1% +2%
trazodone hydrochloride

amoxicillin

albuterol sulfate

ibuprofen

clonazepam

fluticasone propionate

cetirizine hydrochloride

loratadine

tramadol hydrochloride

azithromycin

ergocalciferol

metformin hydrochloride

lisinopril

gabapentin

ondansetron hydrochloride

+5%

simvastatin

-0%

montelukast sodium

-15%

Top 20 USA Generic Drugs by Prescription Volume (Medicaid): Price change 2008-14

acetaminophen; oxycodone
hydrochloride
acetaminophen; hydrocodone
bitartrate

-20%

omeprazole

Percentage Decline in Retail Price per Rx 2008-14

Average Retail Price of Top 20 Medicaid Generics Drop on Average 9% per Year
EvaluatePharma, based on analysis of Medicaid data, finds the average retail prescription price paid for a Top 20 most prescribed USA
generic fell on average 9% per year between 2008 and 2014, from $22.47 to $12.50.
Acetaminophen; hydrocodone bitartrate was the most prescribed generic in 2013. It was also one of only two generics to register a retail
price increase per prescription over 2008 and 2014, up 2.3% per year to $15.03.

Generic Name

USA Top 20 Generic Drugs by Prescription Volume (Medicaid) in 2013: Prescription Retail Price Trend 2008 to 2014

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Generic name*

USA Rx Volume
2013

Retail Price per Rx ($)


2008
2014

CAGR
(08/14)

1 acetaminophen; hydrocodone bitartrate

14,875,388

13.13

15.03

+2.3%

2 amoxicillin

12,668,753

10.26

7.53

-5.0%

3 ibuprofen

12,341,085

9.04

6.12

-6.3%

4 loratadine

8,048,186

11.63

6.17

-10.0%

5 omeprazole

7,551,832

34.03

11.39

-16.7%

6 lisinopril

7,512,410

11.78

4.74

-14.1%

7 cetirizine hydrochloride

6,833,522

15.71

8.36

-10.0%

8 metformin hydrochloride

6,352,548

16.25

7.40

-12.3%

9 albuterol sulfate

6,053,052

22.39

15.16

-6.3%

10 gabapentin

5,999,958

54.91

20.53

-15.1%

11 montelukast sodium

5,853,377

12 simvastatin

5,834,895

17.90

6.33

13 fluticasone propionate

5,565,945

33.07

18.11

-9.6%

14 acetaminophen; oxycodone hydrochloride

5,242,638

32.25

34.71

+1.2%

15 azithromycin

5,039,671

29.63

14.70

-11.0%

16 tramadol hydrochloride

4,978,809

13.99

7.24

-10.4%

17 ondansetron hydrochloride

4,606,949

70.49

25.22

-15.7%

18 trazodone hydrochloride

4,408,014

8.59

7.07

-3.2%

19 clonazepam

4,402,266

11.84

7.07

-8.2%

4,243,905
10.02
20 ergocalciferol
22.47
Average of Top 20
Source: EvaluatePharma analysis of Medicaid Drug Expenditure (22 SEP 2014)

4.87

-11.3%

12.50

-9.3%

Retail Price Trend


2008-14

22.30
-15.9%

Note: Prescription volume in 2013 based on Medicaid data. *Prescription volume and retail prices represent all generic products on the
USA market that are reimbursed by Medicaid.

16

Evaluates Solutions for the Life Science Industry


At Evaluate, our focus is on the business success of our clients.
Our services are delivered via online subscriptions and through custom
solutions. Contact us today to find out more.

Leader in consensus forecasts and analysis of pharma and biotech

Consensus sales forecasts of leading Wall Street analysts, currently to 2020


Must-have insights in an integrated, standardized platform
Interactive NPV discount cash flow model for asset valuation and Calendar of Events tool

A new standard in medtech industry analysis via a consensus view

Consensus forecasts of leading Wall Street analysts, currently to 2020


Simplified medtech classification system correlated to FDA and company specified segments
Six integrated FDA databases and EU CE Mark approvals

High quality global clinical trial intelligence linked to essential commercial insights

Full records of ClinicalTrials.gov, EudraCT and a Japanese Clinical Trials data source
Integrated with in-depth EvaluatePharma product and indication information
Unique search fields for custom analysis and reporting

Award-winning commentary and analysis by industry experts

Daily round up of share price movements

Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.

Future market events that will impact product value


Searchable news and commentary powered by high quality Evaluate data

F or more information please visit www.evaluate.com


On Twitter: @evaluatepharma,
@evaluatemedtech, @epclinicaltrial, @epvantage.

17

Established in 1996, Evaluate Ltd is the leader in high


quality life science sector analysis. Evaluates team of
expert analysts transform life science information into
insights so companies can perform well. EvaluatePharma
delivers exclusive consensus sales forecasts and trusted
commercial insight into biotech and pharmaceutical
performance. EvaluateMedTech sets a new standard in
commercial analysis and consensus forecasts of the global
medical device and diagnostic industry. EvaluateClinical
Trials delivers unique clinical trial intelligence expertly
curated to efficiently analyse the global clinical trial
landscape. An award winning editorial team, EP Vantage,
provides daily commentary and analysis with fresh
perspectives and insight into current and future
industry trends. The Evaluate services enable the
life science community to make sound business
decisions about value and opportunity.

Additional complimentary copies


of this report can be downloaded at:
www.evaluategroup.com/budget-busters

For general inquires about this report:


Christine Lindgren
Tel: 1-617-573-9458
Email: christine.lindgren@evaluategroup.com

Evaluate Headquarters Evaluate Ltd, 11-29 Fashion Street, London E1 6PX United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7377 0800 Fax: +44 (0)20 7539 1801
Evaluate North America EvaluatePharma USA, Inc., 15 Broad Street, Suite 401, Boston, MA 02109 USA
Tel: 1-617 573-9450 Fax: 1-617 573-9542
Evaluate Japan EvaluatePharma Japan KK, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: +81 (0) 80 1164 4754
www.evaluate.com
All intellectual property rights in this report remain that of Evaluate Ltd and/or its respective third party licensors. Whilst all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that the data
presented are accurate, Evaluate Ltd cannot accept responsibility for errors or omissions. Neither does Evaluate Ltd warrant the accuracy, merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose of the data. Nothing in the reports shall constitute investment, financial or legal advice and the contents of the reports are provided for information purposes only. The data is
not intended to amount to advice and should not be used as a determining factor in any investment decision. This report may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by
way of trade in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published, without the prior written consent of Evaluate Ltd. Copyright 2014 Evaluate Ltd. All rights reserved.
EPSVP2014BB

You might also like