Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0: 0606
abc
General Certificate of Education
Mathematics 6360
MPC4 Pure Core 4
Mark Scheme
2006 examination June series
Mark schemes are prepared by the Principal Examiner and considered, together with the relevant
questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at
the standardisation meeting attended by all examiners and is the scheme which was used by them
in this examination. The standardisation meeting ensures that the mark scheme covers the
candidates responses to questions and that every examiner understands and applies it in the
same correct way. As preparation for the standardisation meeting each examiner analyses a
number of candidates scripts: alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are
discussed at the meeting and legislated for. If, after this meeting, examiners encounter unusual
answers which have not been discussed at the meeting they are required to refer these to the
Principal Examiner.
It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed
and expanded on the basis of candidates reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about
future mark schemes on the basis of one years document should be avoided; whilst the guiding
principles of assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a
particular examination paper.
m or dM
A
B
E
or ft or F
CAO
CSO
AWFW
AWRT
ACF
AG
SC
OE
A2,1
x EE
NMS
PI
SCA
MC
MR
RA
FW
ISW
FIW
BOD
WR
FB
NOS
G
c
sf
dp
mis-copy
mis-read
required accuracy
further work
ignore subsequent work
from incorrect work
given benefit of doubt
work replaced by candidate
formulae book
not on scheme
graph
candidate
significant figure(s)
decimal place(s)
No Method Shown
Where the question specifically requires a particular method to be used, we must usually see evidence of
use of this method for any marks to be awarded. However, there are situations in some units where part
marks would be appropriate, particularly when similar techniques are involved. Your Principal Examiner
will alert you to these and details will be provided on the mark scheme.
Where the answer can be reasonably obtained without showing working and it is very unlikely that the
correct answer can be obtained by using an incorrect method, we must award full marks. However, the
obvious penalty to candidates showing no working is that incorrect answers, however close, earn no
marks.
Where a question asks the candidate to state or write down a result, no method need be shown for full
marks.
Where the permitted calculator has functions which reasonably allow the solution of the question directly,
the correct answer without working earns full marks, unless it is given to less than the degree of accuracy
accepted in the mark scheme, when it gains no marks.
Otherwise we require evidence of a correct method for any marks to be awarded.
MPC4
Solution
Marks
B1
1
2
1
1
1
1
p = 6 19 + 9 + 10
2
8
4
2
=0
B1
Q
1 (a)(i) p(2) = 0
(ii)
(iii)
(b)
2(a)
(b)
..
(c)
See
p( x) = (2 x + 1)( x 2)(3 x 5)
3 x( x 2)
(2 x + 1)( x 2)(3 x 5)
3x
=
(2 x + 1)(3 x 5)
=1+
5 5
= 1 + 3 x + 6 x
2 2
x <
A1
B1
B1
A1
Comments
Use 12
Arithmetic to show = 0 and conclusion.
Long division : 0/3
x2
Complete expression
For
3x ( x 2 )
their (a)(iii)
3x
Or 2
6x 7x 5
No ISW on A1
M1
A1
1 3x + x 2 term
2
2
5
5
x x , incl. x seen or implied
2
2
( or start again )
M1
15
75
x + x2
2
2
5
x <1
2
M1
M1
Total
( 3)(4)( x) 2
(1 x) 3 = 1 + (3)( x) +
2
2
= 1 + 3x + 6 x
5
1 x
2
Total
1
2
5
15
75
= 8(1 + x + x 2 ) = 8 + 60 x + 300 x 2
2
2
(d)
A1
CAO
M1A1
Sight of
5
8 expression or k 1 3 x
2
CAO
(M1)
(A1)
Total
5
2
or
2
5
5
k their 1 x
2
M1
A1F
OE
5
ft only on 8 1 x
2
MPC4 (cont)
Q
3(a) 9 x 2 6 x + 5
Solution
Marks
x =1
x=
B=4
(b)
B1
(ii)
cos 2 x = 2cos 2 x 1
tan x cos 2 x = 0
x = 45
B1
8
1
B1
A1
p ln(3x 1) + q ln( x 1)
Condone missing brackets
Follow through on A and B; brackets
needed.
AG convincingly obtained
Ignore x = 0 , x = 360 & any others
outside range
B1
1
1
2
or sin x =
2
2
M1
x =180
cos 2 x = 0 or cos 2 x =
M1
sin x
cos x
1
3
A1F
Total
M1
= sin x 2cos x
cos x
2cos 2 x 1
= sin x
= tan x cos 2 x
cos x
(c)
Substitute x = 1 or x =
= 3x ...
(b)
M1
M1
4(a)(i)
6x + 2
( 3x 1)( x 1)
Or 3 +
= 3 3 x 1 + x 1 dx
2ln(3x 1) + 4ln( x 1) ( +c )
Comments
B1
A1A1
Total
M1
A1
x = 135, 225,315
A1
Total
4
9
CAO
MPC4 (cont)
Q
5(a)
(b)(i)
Solution
Marks
x = 1 y2 y + 3 5 = 0
( y 2)( y + 1) = 0
M1
M1
y=2
A1
2y
y = 1
dy
=0
dx
A1
Alternative
dy
2
( y x ) = ( y x )( 0 6 x )
dx
dy
( 5 3 x 2 ) 1
dx
dy
2
( y + x ) + ( 5 3x 2 ) = ( y x )( 6 x )
dx
(ii)
(iii)
5 0
6x
Recognisable attempt at quotient rule
Completely correct OE
(A1)
Factorise out
(A1)
(1, 2)
dy
4
=
dx
3
M1
(1, 1)
dy 7
=
dx 3
A1F
y 6x = 0
dy
dx
3
14
AG convincingly obtained
B1
( 6 x ) x 6 x + 3x 2 5 = 0
M1
36 x 6 x + 3x 5 = 0
33x 2 5 = 0
A1
(B1)
(B1)
(M1)
(A1)
+ ( 5 3x 2 )
Given answer
Comments
+6x; 5 0
Chain rule
Product rule ( M1 two terms )
B1B1
B1
M1A1
dy
dy
x y + 6x = 0
dx
dx
6 x y + (2 y x)
Total
Total
MPC4 (cont)
Q
6(a)(i)
(ii)
(b)(i)
(ii)
Solution
3
6
!!!"
OC = 2 2 = 4
1 2
Marks
Total
B1
3 2 1
!!!"
AB = 2 4 = 2
1 1 2
M1
AC 2 = (6 2) 2 + (4 4) 2 + (1 2) 2 = 25
M1
AC = 5
A1
A1
Comments
A0 for line AB
Components of AC
2
AG
1 4
!!!" !!!"
AB AC = 2 0 = 4 + 6 = 10
2 3
A1F
!!!"
!!!"
Clear attempt to use AB and AC
!!!"
!!!"
ft AB from a(ii) and/or AC from b(i)
3 5 cos = 10
M1
Use of a
M1
b cos = a.b
= 48.189 48
A1
(c)
(M2)
(A1F)
(A1)
3
!!!"
BP = 2
1
CAO (AWRT)
B1
4
"
0 !!!
BP
=0
3
!!!"
Their BP
M1
4 3 15 = 0
A1
Total
3
12
AG convincingly obtained
MPC4 (cont)
Q
7
Solution
dy
Marks
M1
= 6 x dx
1
= 3x 2 ( +C )
y
x = 2 y =1
C = 13
y=
M1
A1
13 3 x 2
A1
(ii)
(b)(i)
(ii)
Comments
Attempt to separate
Either dx or dy in right place
A1A1
Total
8(a)(i)
Total
1
; 3x 2
y
CAO OE
B1
dx
= kx(5000 x)
dt
B1
M1
k = 0.00005
A1
4 2500
t = 4ln
= 5.5 (hours)
5000 2500
M1
A1
30
dx
= 200, x = 1000 in their diff. equation
dt
Condone ts and t = 0 for M1
CAO OE
x 2500 ( or 4 ln 4 )
CAO
B1
e4
4x
5000 x
M1
OE
m1
Soluble for x
A1
e7.5 =
4
10
75