Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6 - Applications For Radiation Processing of Materials-Main
6 - Applications For Radiation Processing of Materials-Main
www.elsevier.com/locate/nimb
Abstract
The physical and chemical properties of polymeric materials can be modied by treatment with ionizing radiation in
the form of gamma rays, X-rays and energetic electrons. High-energy electron beams are especially useful in this regard.
Polymerizing (curing), grafting, crosslinking and chain scissioning reactions can be initiated by irradiation. The results
of such reactions can enhance the utility and value of commercial products. Brief reviews of a variety of successful
applications are given in this paper. Additional information is provided about reaction yields (G-values), temperature
rises during treatment and the radiation stability of common polymers.
2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PACS: 01.30.Cc; 01.30.Rr; 81.05.Lg; 81.05.Qk; 81.40.Wx; 82.50.Kx
Keywords: Radiation processing; Electron beam processing; Curing; Polymerizing; Polymerization; Grafting; Crosslinking; Chain
scissioning; Polymer degradation; Temperature rise; Radiation stability
1. Introduction
Practical applications for radiation processing
of materials have been evolving since the introduction of this technology nearly fty years ago.
Crosslinking plastic materials, sterilizing medical
products and preserving foods were the earliest
developments. Processes for curing monomeric
coatings and inks were developed somewhat later.
The use of these and other processes has grown
and they are widely practiced today. Electron
beam crosslinking is used to produce heat-shrinkable plastic lms for packaging foods and other
consumer products, heat-shrinkable plastic tubing
and encapsulations for industrial products, plastic
foam and hydrogels for medical applications. The
Corresponding author.
0168-583X/03/$ - see front matter 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(03)00655-4
M.R. Cleland et al. / Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 208 (2003) 6673
kJ=kg;
67
The specic energy requirement can also be expressed in terms of the molecular weight (Mol.Wt.)
and the G-value (G) of the reaction. The G-value is
dened as the number of reactions or events per
100 electron volts (eV) of absorbed energy.
Therefore, SE is given by
SE 6:022 1023 100=G 1:602 1019 =103 ;
2
SE 9:65 103 =G
kJ=mole;
3
kJ=kg:
kGy:
68
M.R. Cleland et al. / Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 208 (2003) 6673
Table 1
Thermal capacities and temperature rises per kGy in common
plastic materials
Plastic
material
Thermal
capacity
(J/g K)
Temperature
rise (K/kGy)
Nylon 6
Nylon 6,6
Polycarbonate (max)
Polycarbonate (min)
Polyethylene
Polymethylmethacrylate
Polypropylene
Polystyrene
Polytetrauoroethylene
Polyvinylchloride
1.67
1.67
1.26
1.17
2.30
2.09
1.92
1.34
1.05
1.34
0.60
0.60
0.79
0.85
0.43
0.48
0.52
0.75
0.95
0.75
3. Temperature rise
The temperature rise in irradiated materials is
also proportional to the energy absorbed per unit
mass, so it is proportional to the absorbed dose,
provided that the energy released or absorbed by
chemical reactions and by heat exchanges with
the surroundings are small in comparison to the
absorbed dose. In the following equation, DT is
the temperature rise in degrees Kelvin (K), D is
the average dose in kiloGrays (kGy) and c is the
thermal capacity in joules per gram per degree
Kelvin (J/g K).
DT D=c
K:
Table 2
Thermal capacities and temperature rises per kGy in common
metallic elements
Elemental
material
Thermal
capacity (J/g K)
Temperature
rise (K/kGy)
Carbon
Aluminum
Silicon
Titanium
Iron
Copper
Germanium
Silver
Tin
Tantalum
Tungsten
Gold
Lead
0.71
0.90
0.71
0.52
0.44
0.38
0.32
0.235
0.227
0.14
0.13
0.128
0.13
1.41
1.11
1.41
1.92
2.27
2.63
3.13
4.26
4.41
7.14
7.69
7.81
7.69
4. Polymerization
4.1. Coatings, adhesives and inks
Solvent-free coatings, adhesives and inks are
cured (polymerized) by treatment with low-energy
electron beams. These materials are combinations
of oligomers (polymers with low molecular weights)
and monomers, which control the viscosity before
M.R. Cleland et al. / Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 208 (2003) 6673
curing. Volatile solvents are not needed and curing occurs without loss of material. Typical oligomers are acrylated urethane polyesters, acrylated
epoxies and polyethers. A typical multifunctional monomer is trimethylolpropane triacrylate
(TMPTA). Dose requirements are relatively low,
in the range of 1030 kGy, and line speeds as
high as 1500 m/min are achievable at 10 kGy with
high-current, low-energy, multiple-beam electron
accelerators [15,16].
4.2. Composite materials
Fiber-reinforced composite materials are used
where greater strength is needed. Such materials
are usually cured with heat, but electron-beam
curing oers signicant improvements in processing technique, curing time and cost. Typical materials are acrylated epoxies with carbon bers.
Doses are usually in the range of 150250 kGy
[1719]. Initial formulations are mixtures of oligomers and monomers. The radiation curing process involves a combination of polymerization and
crosslinking. The main applications are in automotive and aerospace industries.
5. Grafting
The surface properties of polymers can be
modied by graft copolymerization with dierent
monomers [20]. Grafting can be accomplished by
electron beam irradiation on common polymers
such as polyethylene, polypropylene and uoropolymers. Most work has been done on polymer
lms, membranes, bers and natural and synthetic
textiles. Some examples of monomers that can be
grafted onto polytetrauoroethylene (PTFE) lms
are styrene, acrylic acid, 4-vinylpyridine and Nvinylpyrrolidone [21]. Other examples are the
bonding of styrene on cellulose, vinylpyridines on
wool and p-nitrostyrene on polyethylene, polypropylene and polyvinyl chloride [22]. Permselective membranes can be made by radiation grafting.
Hydrophilic properties can be imparted to hydrophobic polymers [23]. Biocompatibility of various
polymers can be improved in this way for medical
uses [24]. Other applications include ion exchange
69
membranes, fuel cell/battery separator lms, permeation separation membranes, surface adhesion
promotion, chelating bers for sea-water treatment and recovering of precious metals, etc. Some
dose requirements may be less than 10 kGy.
6. Crosslinking
Crosslinking is the most important eect of
polymer irradiation because it can usually improve
the mechanical and thermal properties and chemical, environmental and radiation stabilities of
preformed parts as well as bulk materials. Both
polymer crosslinking and degradation by chain
scission occur during treatment, but one or the
other of these eects may be predominant in some
materials [1013]. Examples of both types are given in Table 3. More than fty years ago, polyethylene was the rst polymer to be recognized as
cross-linkable by irradiation [10], and it is still the
most important commercially because of the great
variety of products made with it.
G-values for crosslinking GX and for chain
scission GS in a number of pure polymeric materials are given in Table 4 [25]. Materials with
GS=GX ratios below 1.00 are favored for crosslinking applications. Polyethylene has an attractive
ratio because its GS values are about half as high
as its GX values. Natural rubber has a very
favorable ratio because of its very low GS value.
Polybutadiene also has a very favorable ratio because of its very high GX value. The ratios for
polymethylmethacrylate, nylon and polypropylene are not particularly favorable. The ratios
for polytetrauoroethylene and polyisobutylene
Table 3
Radiation characteristics of generic polymers
Mainly crosslinking
Mainly scission
Polyethylene
Polyacrylates
Polyvinyl chloride
Polysiloxanes
Polyamides
Polystyrene
Polyacrylamides
Ethylene vinylacetate
Polyisobutylene
Polymethacrylates
Polymethylstyrene
Polymethacrylamides
Polyvinylidene chloride
Polytetrauoroethylene
Polypropylene ether
Cellulose
70
M.R. Cleland et al. / Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 208 (2003) 6673
Table 4
G-Values for crosslinking and chain scission in common polymeric materials
Polymeric material
Crosslinking GX
Scission GS
Ratio GS=GX
0.81.1
0.51.1
1.00
0.5
0.5
0.67
0.50
0.30
0.27
0.16
0.0190.051
1.05
5.3
0.10.3
0.5
(low)
0.40.5
0.40.5
0.30
0.77
0.04
0.68
0.70
0.07
0.22
0.24
0.00940.019
0.10.2
0.53
3.05.0
5
11
0.47
0.56
0.30
1.54
0.07
1.01
1.40
0.23
0.81
1.50
0.41
0.14
0.10
20
10
(high)
are extremely unfavorable for crosslinking. Polystyrene has a favorable ratio, but its GS and
GX values are both extremely low because of the
stability of aromatic compounds.
The values of GX and GS both change with
absorbed dose. Usually GS would increase more
than GX does with increasing dose. So, it is
possible that upon reaching a certain dose level,
cross-linking dominated polymers, e.g. polyethylene or natural rubber latex, will change to be degradation dominated. GX and GS are also
dependent on irradiation conditions, such as temperature and atmosphere. A good example is
PTFE, which undergoes degradation readily under
ambient conditions, but can be cross-linked at elevated temperatures (>340 C) in an oxygen free
atmosphere.
Typical dose requirements for crosslinking are
in the range of 50200 kGy. Additives, typically
multifunctional monomers, may be mixed with the
basic polymer to enhance the crosslinking eect
and reduce the dose requirement. Antioxidants,
UV stabilizers and ame retardants may also be
added to meet industrial performance specications. Such additives may reduce the crosslinking
eect. So, the properties of commercial compounds may be dierent from those of pure polymers. However, the information given in Tables 3
and 4 may be helpful in selecting the type of material for a particular application.
Materials with low GS=GX ratios are usually able to tolerate very high doses without excessive degradation. The radiation stabilities of
some common polymers are given in Table 5.
Polymers with benzene rings in the chain tend to
have high radiation stability. Polystyrene and
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are outstanding
examples of radiation-resistant materials, while
polypropylene, polytetrauoroethylene (PTFE)
and cellulose cannot tolerate very high doses. In
general, radiation degradation is greater with
gamma rays or X-rays in comparison to highpower electron beams because lower dose rates
and longer treatment times allow more oxidative
reactions to occur.
6.1. Insulated wire and cable
The crosslinking of insulation on electrical wires
and cables was one of the rst practical applications of electron beam processing. It was introduced by the former Raychem Corporation (now
Tyco Electronics) during the 1950s, and it has
been adopted by many other manufacturers since
then. Some polymers used in this application are
polyethylene, polyvinylchloride, ethylene-propylene rubber, polyvinylidene uoride, and ethylene
tetrauoroethylene copolymer. Product improvements obtained by irradiation include increased
tolerance to high temperature environments and
M.R. Cleland et al. / Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 208 (2003) 6673
71
Table 5
Radiation stability of polymers with high doses
Polymer type
Radiation stability
Polyethylene
Polypropylene
Polystyrene
PET
PVC
Polyurethane
Polycarbonate
PTFE
Cellulose
Goodexcellent
Poorfair
Excellent
Excellent
Goodexcellent
Goodexcellent
Excellent
Poor
Fair
1003000
1080
80030,000
150030,000
40015,000
1001000
500010,000
560
80600
Discoloration
Discoloration, disintegration
Brittleness, discoloration
Brittleness, discoloration
Brittleness, discoloration
Brittleness, discoloration
Discoloration
Disintegration
Brittleness, discoloration
Thin-walled plastic tubing is crosslinked to enhance the so-called memory eect. Irradiation
xes or stabilizes the original dimensions of the
tubing. When it is heated above the temperature
where the unirradiated material would melt, the
tubing becomes elastic and can be expanded to
several times its original diameter. When cooled, it
maintains the expanded dimension but retains the
memory of its original dimension. When heated
again, it contracts to the original dimension.
Polyethylenes are commonly used for this application [29]. Many commercial products have been
developed to take advantage of the memory eect.
Some examples are encapsulations for electronic
components, bundles of electrical wires and exterior telephone cable connectors.
6.3. Heat-shrinkable plastic lm
Thin plastic lm is also crosslinked to enhance
the memory eect. The applications are mainly
in the food industry, where heat-shrinkable
wrapping material is used to make attractive,
sealed packages. This process was developed and
72
M.R. Cleland et al. / Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 208 (2003) 6673
Both the inner and outer plastic layers are irradiated simultaneously with high-energy electrons.
6.6. Plastic foam
Plastic foam is made by mixing a foaming
compound with the basic polymer and then heating the mixture to form gas bubbles in the plastic
material. Polyethylene, ethylene vinlyacetate copolymer and polypropylene are suitable materials.
The foaming agent can be azodicarbonamide or
nitrogen gas. Radiation crosslinking allows the use
of higher expansion temperatures and simplies
the control of the expansion process. Applications
include foamed insulation in coaxial cables, gaskets, coated tapes, oor backing, helmet liners,
athletic safety pads, bra cups, automobile seat
padding and jewelry case liners [32,33].
6.7. Hydrogels
A hydrogel is a polymeric material which has
the ability to swell in water and retain a signicant
fraction (more the 20%) of water within its structure. However, it will not dissolve in water. The
network of hydrogel can be formed by radiation
crosslinking. Some polymers that can form hydrogels are polyvinylalcohol (PVA), polyacrylamide (PAAm), polyvinyl-pyrrolidone (PVP),
polyethylene oxide (PEO) and methyl cellulose
(MC). Hydrogels have excellent biocompatibility
and can be used for enzyme supports and controlled release of drugs which can be incorporated
in the hydrogel [34].
7. Degradation
ground readily. It can also be blended with unirradiated PTFE to adjust the melt ow and improve the processability. The resulting powder has
several uses, e.g. additives to greases, engine oils,
printing inks, coatings and thermoplastics. The
dose requirements can be very high, in the range of
5001000 kGy, although doses as low as 50 kGy
are also used for specic applications [1,3538].
7.2. Cellulose
Cellulose bers extracted from wood pulp can
be converted to a thick liquid called viscose, which
is used to make commercial products such as rayon fabrics and cellophane lms. The molecular
weight of the natural cellulose is reduced by
treatment with sodium hydroxide and heat. Then
this material is reacted with carbon disulde to
make viscose. Initial irradiation of the cellulose
causes a reduction in molecular weight, and enables the rest of the process to be completed in less
time with less chemical treatment. This reduces the
cost and also reduces the environmental pollution.
The dose requirement is about 15 kGy [39,40].
7.3. Polypropylene
Polypropylene and a few other polymers are
intentionally degraded by radiation in air to improve the processability for extrusion, etc. With
the reduction of the molecular weight, the melt
ow of the polymer will increase and the melt
viscosity will decrease. The irradiated polymer can
be mixed with the unirradiated polymer, and the
degree of degradation can be controlled so that the
mechanical property is not deteriorated too much
[41]. Doses are usually in the range of 1580 kGy.
7.1. Polytetrauoroethylene
8. Conclusion
According to the data given in Table 4, polytetrauoroethylene (PTFE) has a high G-value for
chain scission and a low G-value for crosslinking.
Therefore, irradiation will reduce its molecular
weight. This eect is used to convert scrap PTFE
into ne particles or micronized powder. The
unirradiated scrap is too tough, doughy and slippery to grind, but the irradiated material can be
Radiation processing is a practicable and economical method for modifying the physical and
chemical properties of polymeric materials. A few
industrial applications of this technology were
introduced about fty years ago, and many
more have been developed since then. The number
of irradiation facilities and the annual sales of
M.R. Cleland et al. / Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B 208 (2003) 6673
References
[1] R. Bradley, Radiation Technology Handbook, Marcel
Dekker, Inc., New York, 1984.
[2] J.H. Bly, Electron Beam Processing, International Information Associates, Yardley, PA, 1988.
[3] Proceedings of the twelve International Meetings on
Radiation Processing, Radiation Physics and Chemistry,
Pergamon, Elsevier Science, Inc., Tarrytown, New York,
Vols. 9, 14, 18, 22, 25, 31, 35, 42, 46, 52, 57, 63, 19772002.
[4] Proceedings of the four International Conferences on
Ionizing Radiation and Polymers (IRaP), Nucl. Instr. and
Meth., North-Holland, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Vol.
105, 1995, Vol. 131, 1997, Vol. 151, 1999 and Vol. 185, 2001.
[5] Proceedings of the Pacichem Symposia on Polymer
Radiation Chemistry, Radiation Physics and Chemistry,
Pergamon, Elsevier Science, New York, Vol. 48, No. 5,
1996 and Vol. 61, No. 1, 2001.
[6] A. Singh, J. Silverman (Eds.), Radiation Processing of
Polymers, Hanser, Munich, 1992.
[7] R.J. Woods, A.K. Pikaev, Applied Radiation Chemistry:
Radiation Processing, Wiley, New York, 1994.
[8] R. Clough, S. Shalaby (Eds.), Irradiation of Polymers:
Fundamentals and Technological Applications, ACS
Books, Washington, DC, 1996.
[9] University of Notre Dame Web Site. Go to www.nd.edu,
Search for Radiation Laboratory, Select Radiation Chem.
Data Center, Select Recent Papers in Radiation Chemistry
and Photochemistry.
[10] A. Charlesby, Atomic Radiation and Polymers, Pergamon
Press, 1960.
[11] A. Charlesby, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 9 (13) (1977) 17.
[12] J. Silverman, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 9 (13) (1977) 1.
[13] J. Silverman, J. Chem. Educat. 58 (1981) 168.
[14] M.R. Cleland, J. Indust. Irrad. Technol. 1 (3) (1983) 191.
[15] S.V. Nablo, E.P. Tripp, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 9 (13) (1977)
325.
[16] W.A. Frutiger, S.V. Nablo, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 22 (35)
(1983) 431.
[17] C.B. Saunders, V.J. Lopata, W. Kremers, M. Chung, A.
Singh, D.R. Kerluke, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 46 (46) (1995)
991.
[18] A.J. Berejka, C. Eberle, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 63 (2002) 551.
73