1. If the letter is produced by the accused, then it can be used as evidence.

But the letter is produced by the accused.

So, it cannot be used as evidence.
2. If the law abridges the freedom of speech, then it is unconstitutional.
If the law prevents freedom of expression, then it is unconstitutional.
If it is unconstitutional, it has no binding effect.
Hence, if the law abridges the freedom of speech and prevents freedom of
expression, then it has no
binding effect.
3. All media have the freedom of expression.
But all tv and radio stations are media.
Thus, they have freedom of expression
4. Unless the restriction is content-based, then it shall not be subjected to clear and
present danger test.
But the restriction is not content-based.
Ergo, it shall not be subjected to clear and present danger test.
5. If and if it is a valid exercise of police power will media be restrained.
But the media will be restrained.
Hence, there is no valid exercise of police power.
6. Only if it is a broadcasting media will Comelec be free to adverstise.
But the Comelec is free to advertise.
Ergo, it is a broadcasting media.
7. If there is infringement of freedom, then the prohibition is unconstitutional.
If the prohibition is unconstitutional, then it is illegal.
So, if there is infringement of freedom, then it is illegal.
8. Some movies are regulated.
But The Jessica Alfaro Story is a movie.
So, The Jessica Alfaro Story is regulated.
9. If the television program is owned by the Government, then it is exempted from
review.
If it is a newsreel, then it is exempted from review.
Ergo, if the television program is owned by the Government, then it is a newsreel.
10. No exit poll is prohibited by law.
But the poll conducted is not an exit poll.
Ergo, it is prohibited.