Students are the only ones who truly know what teachers are like, and how effektive they are at teaching. Opening Statement (pro reviews): students should be able to anonymously review teachers. Closing statement (against reviews): teachers should not be judged solely on their teaching performance.
Students are the only ones who truly know what teachers are like, and how effektive they are at teaching. Opening Statement (pro reviews): students should be able to anonymously review teachers. Closing statement (against reviews): teachers should not be judged solely on their teaching performance.
Students are the only ones who truly know what teachers are like, and how effektive they are at teaching. Opening Statement (pro reviews): students should be able to anonymously review teachers. Closing statement (against reviews): teachers should not be judged solely on their teaching performance.
Should Students be able to anonymously review teachers?
Opening Statement (Pro reviews) Students interact with teachers every day, and are the ones who truly know what the teachers are like, and how efective they are at teaching. While teachers can be reviewed through standardized testing and administrative observation, these do not represent the daily experience students have with the teacher. Students are the only ones who are able to tell what teachers act like day after day. In an article in the New York Times, the story of Leila Campbell is told, a teacher at Aspire Lionel Wilson Prepatory Academy, where teacher reviews by students are performed. While she scored well, either at or above average in most categories including teacher, the reviews showed her that she wasnt connecting with her students. She scored below average in categories such as: I feel comfortable asking my teacher for help and My teacher really cares about me (Gonchar). These reviews showed Campbell what she could improve on, and also showed her what she was doing well at, and what students enjoyed about her class. This allows for constructive criticism, giving both positive and negative feedback to show what the teacher can improve on. Opening Statement (Against reviews) Countless times, students have not connected with teachers, and have attempted to turn others against them. One such occasion happened at Coventry High School a few years ago. In an interview with Cynthia Alkire of Coventry High School, a story was told about a student who did not get along with a teacher, and so was spreading rumors about them behind their back. When the teacher discovered this, they attempted to talk with the student and give them extra help when they were struggling in class. The student still responded negatively at this attempt to fix the situation and felt singled out and picked on (Alkire). Events like this would heavily skew the results of student evaluations of teachers and result in misinformation about the efectiveness of the teacher. Had an administrator observed the teacher and reviewed them, the review would be very diferent because they would be indiferent, and make themselves a neutral party. This would mean that the review would be based solely on the teachers teaching performance rather than allowing their personality and diferences with the student overtake the review and skew the results to make a good teacher appear as a poor one.