Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EDGS918 Task 1 Rubric.2015
EDGS918 Task 1 Rubric.2015
Tutor:
Criteria
Structure
Student name:
Student No:
0- Limited Achievement
1- Sound Achievement
2- High Achievement
3- Outstanding Achievement
Absence of spelling
mistakes and
grammatical
inconsistencies, sound
format
The work is of a very good
English standard and
follows academic writing
conventions
Adheres to word count
Sound information
provided
Uses own words to
demonstrate an
understanding of the
theory with convincing
links to key strengths and
weaknesses and related
theoretical concepts
Arguments are supported
with evidence and a
capacity to be critical,
evaluative or to make
judgments is
demonstrated
Reflection demonstrates a
considered response of
theories
Content
Spelling mistakes or
grammatical
inconsistenciesproofreading needs
attention
Lacks appropriate content
from the subject materials,
very poor presentation and
organization of ideas,
irrelevance and sources not
acknowledge/plagiarized or
a combination of these.
Well in excess or well below
word count
Lack of understanding
regarding type of research
critiqued (method)
Article selected did not
relate to the task requested.
Links not made or unclear
between research and own
teaching practice
Demonstrates a basic
understanding of three
different theories of reading.
Uses own words to
demonstrate understanding
of the reading theory
Equal weight given to each
theory (400 words each).
Students may organize the
assignment into three
distinct sections
Reflection (400 words)
demonstrates response to
the balanced approach.
Sources &
Referencing
Article sourced is
referenced correctly
Direct text referenced
consistently throughout
Consistent use of Harvard
referencing in-text and
reference list
Comment:
Mark: __________/30
length, way over length. A fail grade will also apply to any piece of work that does not satisfy the Faculty of Education
lateness of work and plagiarism policy.