Selection Committee Evaluation Form 8975-01775 — Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street March 24, 2018 igs he eae In the Evalustion column, that score. A proposal may receit the maximum percentay Quality of overall proposal (10 points) bers shall score each propos Committee Member Name: _\\ jl Lay A Alcea Assessments ey q\25 Deal. Fealey Proposal oa oa Ze Wn PARAMEIT pip OFFI, GoatyD = or Fuel pide ars Dest Score 0-10 Project | Project characteristics; construction and Assessments Zuey> Characteristics | operational and management plan (15 points) Welt ol =a rern 15% RG Cone Soervex, ef. Calf UNO 2 ae ying. Work Web WO Ac Raut d= Score 0-15 estas al Quality | Quality of financing plan and financial resources, | Assessment: 20% | project feasibility (20 points) "a WELL UBIO Homa OF DeeK, Brit ead RY coon = . ie Score 0-20 ‘Terms and | Aeceplance ofthe terms and provisions ofthe | Assessment: Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is cichinaiiiasiaitil wacd / 20% requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) BNO Cow tre. Score 0-20 City Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) Assesment” Guyer p> Th ip i 25% _ oe wl ict Sune Full Gone & oe | 0 Score 0-25 Wik RUG Ny rapt DBE | Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Assessment: quo Bl = Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) lee Aas Net ee é@ 1 Yenapetun Score 0-10 v 4Selection Committee Evaluation Form 8975-01775 — Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street, March 24,2015 assessment of the Respondent's pi Tn the Evaluation column, Committee Members shall score each proposal on the Technical criteria and weighting factors is that score. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion of this score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an a Final Score. ‘below and provide an assessment of Proposal | Quality of overall proposal (10 points) "Assessment: ail atir| oe PE al cet FUN Soules Wink sive Aten Tit? ae Ge Score 0- 10 earl. Resimakwh ALS Geral OWIeEr Project | Project characteristics; construction and “Assessment: zy Cchurscrisica | Operational and management plan (15 pois) |g cacy ayia ad Be Seg 1% SPRAICH PACA. MART CAPONE GUIRRIONS cr 14 ec eae piker lars hl tp Quality | Quality of financing plan and financial resources; | Assessment: [Ye Qpsae> WO Apceup uA) Miciecr ee eee w] ob wlo “The Clare. Wel CatrclO VARS le Score 0- 20 Former Terms and | Acceptance of the terms and provisions of the ‘Assessment: ; Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is Botany KARMA oF op} THY 16 20% requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) CNRS Te te NECETATED- Score 0-20 City Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) Assessment: Rly Yay MBAS TD AF. CCE _ sboMe. 2% Score 0-25 DBE _| Disadvantaged a ecg Program Assessment pyesenke PALL, WERT CP DEE Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points ie BE Prncreiad & Score 0- 10 aT Committee Member Signaturé , Mule had]Selection Committee Evaluation Form 8975-01775 ~ Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street March 24, 2015 In the Evaluation column, Comtnitice Merbers shall soore each proposal on te Technical ecteia and weighting factor list below and provide a aseessinent of that score. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion of this score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an Proposal | Quality of overall proposal (10 points) Quality 10% Score 0-10 Bro oe Catal [yy Project | Project characteristics; construction and “Assessment: Characteristics | operational and management plan (15 points) Soume Weséeliony vLewb. tol UKs. 15% Ane, yavepeaml ar Voor, FRA vypotive] 17 Score 0-15 ‘Quality | Quality of financing plan and financial resources; | Assessment: OF INN 42 ea” 20% | project feasibility (20 points) ee ABIL os Bh L Si & Score 0-20 Terms and | Acceptance ofthe terms and provisions ofthe | Assessment: Ayre a covvemcs. TOUS Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is Noceqacte” A i 2 20% requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) ae IS Score 0-20 i ;d NOI i ment: Ciy Beefs Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) Assess De AWS. PIMDA- 3 as Nps wo Wl ry. Demers. \ Score 0-25 DBE | Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program ‘Assessment: Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) 10% @ Score 0-10 ee Committee see nuanle SehitaeSelection Committee Evaluation Form 8975-01775 — Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street March 24,2015 assessment of the Respondent's price proposals before Committee Member Name: Wut A Glazier “In the Evaluation column, Committee Members shall score each proposal on the Technical eriteria and weighting factors listed below and provide an assessment of that score. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion of this score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an oviding a Final Score. project feasi ity (20 points) Assessments Kay BOW, SMO) FO WMD ih, Tadeo? Proposal | Quality of overal proposal (10 points) AMeeinem e215: ALGS White cin Gualty = DA AND tery ON-GRACE y 10% SURE PRET FAVRE. 4 Score 0- 10 Project | Project characteristics; construction and Assessment: Goyleqwlertnad Depts THE Characteristics | operational and management plan (15 points) pul ee, fern, Cone TECHN) BAD CYBAOTEL. OE YORU l = PEL Ya uNlpREOaoten - Score 0- 15 Quality Quality of financing plan and financial resources; Score 0-20 “Terms and | Acceptance of the terms and provisions of the Assessment: Zeb) A waacsVE our Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is i. in = 4 [G 20% requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) Swe Score 0- 20 City Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) Assessment: ge eC WOKE ane BP 40 OE i 23% MEP WAC pap Gerepel Her 1S Score 0-25 DBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Assessment: NG Kinston a LAG. Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) cots, Tes 6 10% Gre © ew epee Score 0- 10 Committee Member Signature Z ZSelection Committee Evaluation Form 8975-01775 ~ Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street Committee Member Name: Willa) A. Gib March 24, 2015, ee Tn the Evaluation column, Committee Members shall score each proposal on the Technical criteria and weighting factors listed below and provide an assessment of that score. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion ofthis score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an assessment of the Respondent’s price proposals before providing a Final Score. Proposal | Quality of overall proposal (10 points) ASSESEMERE Lor At, ANE Yow) Quay OF cay Bote 0 site YER. g Score 0-10 * conc] ennremeennin ins) | "SS Vee Net va trynenoat | 18% AIO PhePoRy lag Au esc os Score 0-15 it ity of fir i le 1d fin ial : | Assi i 5 a a ET EO kean) eat ours | ASCE shies ap WCAC UTE SIMO Re Asecacer Vint LaMar oF Pax TRAD, Pratan| LS Score 0-20 ARE, 440 cateetal Fmtasciey. ‘Terms and Acceptance of the terms and provisions of the Assessment: ()\). OM PerY) _ Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is ry BARLSHON ab Accor inics ” 20% requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) Score 0-20 City Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) Assessments aga yBilign> 4 NERC: 25% 10 Score 0-25 DBE | Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program | Assessment: ° Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) Le Lok fygecune Poa’ te Per 10% FUL OF BNL PIA Gor Ati FiAly Gimy- G Score 0-10 ‘Committee Member sou