Selection Committee Evaluation Form 8975-01775 — Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street March 24, 2015 ‘Committee Member Name: ileal Govdere 2 Canal Street Redevelopment In the Evaluation column, Committee Members shall score each proposal on the Technical criteria and weighting factors listed below and provide an assessment of that score. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion of this score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an assessment of the Respondent's price proposals before providing a Final Score. Criteria & aD ae 5 Score Weight Criteria Deseription Evaluation Proposal | Quality of overall proposal (10 points) Assesment! Dua iny papese | , Feet, Quality Latha Lege, Ss co : & | 10% edo ek, tye Cty Speece Score 0-10 ccuay Project | Project characteristics, construction and ‘Assessment! S4eny (en ot rs Charatrisiss | operational and management plan (15 pons) | goa et ay ined feos ra - ; Ls beers) HGthe deer ep Cae Oo 12. Weel. eee Score 0- 15 Quality (Quality of financing plan and financial resources; | Assessment: @ a» pe——¢ l— S——cel pl, 20% project feasibility (20 points) [re Pay tam eee | iz Derrerrtemted eet leti ties o& Sade Score 0-20 ‘Terms and | Acceptance of the terms and provisions oF the | Assessment: Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is 20% requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) \s Score 0-20 City Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) “Assessment: Great Ca Xavier Croll; er 25% Mec tien tein); CBA W/AFL cho; 22. Comey trent Desir Bea, neg Score 0-25 DBE | Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Assesiment: aw mene DBE pool; | Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) Feents 0 fel ge eatin | 10% Meee as Score 0- 10 Final Score yes Committee Member Signaturei i 3 Vbtren 24, 2015 ction Committee Evaluation Form -01775 — Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street ‘Committee Member Name: (Carpenter & Company | Woodward Interest, LLC (Rour Seasons) ie Evaluation column, Committee Members shall score each proposal on the Technical criteria and weighting factors listed below and provide an assessment of 4 riescore. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion of this score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an ssment of the Respondent's price proposals before providing a Final Score. Wane Griteria Deseription feyaldaion Score’ ] ‘T Proposal — | Quality of overall proposal (10 points) Assessment: | Quality 4 | 10% Feore 0-10 | Project characteristics; construction and ‘Assessment S weBoet tleet i operational and management plan (15 points) Few Bets is cheng bed eto” meresto) Wie Weary athe et ew Vries ean ‘Quality of financing plan and financial resources, | Assessment: Goya-6vl Ques. re joer project feasibility (20 points) ante ee Cig Op eel \9 donee tete dd Game eie( cope et bee Seer ree Stesens ip (werting + (scot in. 8 ; ‘Acceptance of the terms and provisions of the | Assessment: Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) 17 “Ti iy Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) ‘Assessment: Wee eae Ces; | 25% Comite) th ey t omens | Highne weges (clam dba tinaation of Jp 4/mnged as Bysore 0-25 “7 DBE | Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Assesoment? mt DBE ay Cece +siticipation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) erie - 0Ge pros Abad 3 5. ale Jo | 10% a tog Perens TSN Lit ely. __[Ezore 0-10 Prndttoly 4 geclant coreest a ‘ ty 4S Final Score oan ett phy Fa t ee £<@umittee Member SignatureSelection Committee Evaluation Form 8975-01775 — Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street March 24, 2015 Committee Member Name: _Prstsle* 4 Garde — RI Properties In the Evaluation column, Committee Members shall score each proposal on the Teck I criteria and weighting factors listed below and provide an assessment of that score. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion of this score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an assessment of the Respondent's price proposals before providing a Final Score. eae Criteria Deseription Evaluation Sctrs Proposal | Quality of overall proposal (10 points) ‘Assessment: Sib wae Del ee ee Quality elle: taleony be rh é 10% cuneate Score 0- 10 Project | Project characteristics; construction and ‘Assessment: Fab ee Lowe ay Characteristics | operational and management plan (15 points) pemcacss Ar coy Katy w/lecat v rad BRamtate Contin ties 6 evel enney | Score 0- 15 mage compete Cobengibe Js Quality | Quality offinancing plan and financial resources; | Assessment: SX pep ome Payette 20% project feasibility (20 points) He atheetion cones ; “en Gig (ed Avie eas 2k Score 0-20 ae ‘ey Terms and | Acceptance of the terms and provisions of the “Assessment Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is 20% requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) \2 Score 0-20 City Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) ‘Assessment: G-eft Qo Oe ABS 25% JOAn, Seetegat 5 42% Vert asec | sn Senn 2 | (4 Score 0-25 1 DBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Assessment! Cees; orem #8 CBE gel Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) Were eas TE a eet ing = 10% cso Score 0- 10 Final Score ‘Committee Member Signature ¢ Le aSelection Committee Evaluation Form ‘8975-01775 — Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street, ‘Mareh 24, 2015 Committee Member Nam (Oxford Capital Group In the Evaluation column, Committee Members shall score each proposal on the Technical criteria and weighting factors listed below and provide an assessment of that score. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion of this score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an assessment of the Respondent's price proposals before providing a Final Score. Criteria & Hee a E ‘Score Wop Criteria Description Evaluation Proposal | Quality of overall proposal (10 points) Assessments [oe kim cla | i gee i eee detet gee enus hee) Ft Score 0- 10 Project Project characteristics; construction and Assessment: Po —Hree w/strene tmob— Characteristics | operational and management plan (15 points) |, aeg—d Lut orepe pt el ny 4 13% cereaie a New Ome! aaa Score 0- 15 Quality | Quality of financing plan and financial resources; | Assessment: (ait Guy. — | 20% project feasibility (20 points) > a a m eel lo Score 0-20 | |Terms and | Acceptance of the terms and provisions of the | Assessment: Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is 20% | requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) 12 Score 0-20 City Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (25 points) ‘Assessment: Fo 5g yk ee me a 23% ~ c ed 7 Score 0-25 DBE | Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Assessment: Camas Osea e te DBE gt Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) Nice clocslew be wygliens 5 Rating 7 1 3 2 Score 0-10 cre Final <5 Y% Committee Member SignatuSelection Committee Evaluation Form 8975-01775 — Redevelopment of 2 Canal Street March 24, 2015 Committee Member Nam Penlerak God ‘Two Canal Street Investors In the Evaluation column, Committee Members shall score each proposal on the Technical criteria and weighting factors listed below and provide an assessment oF that score. A proposal may receive the maximum percentage, a portion of this score, or no percentage at all. Thereafter, Committee Members shall provide an assessment of the Respondent's price proposals before providing a Final Score, anne Criteria Description Evaluation Sore Proposal | Quality of overall proposal (10 points) ASSESMENE SSC @rage pel bok aevtions Quality ce ee L 10% “a —_—— Score 0-10 Project | Project characteristics; construction and “Assessment: : ieee ies Characteristics | operational and management plan (IS points) |. e.g] Sieg ana. ar lo 15% es Score 0-15 Quality ‘Quality of financing plan and financial resources; | Assessment: FF —eyaj—( WOe an De | 20% —_| project feasibility (20 points) eee raid ‘ to meet oe nd Oe es 5, Score 0-20 hh ane "Terms and | Acceptance of the terms and provisions ofthe | Assessment: Provisions | Lease and Parking Agreement (if parking is la "20% | requested in the Parking Facility) (20 points) Seore 0-20 aneiheory City Benefits | Benefits to the City and NOBC (5 points) Assesment PIs ciple, dave pent 25% rrp aw Score 0-25 DBE | Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Asscumentl Canoe tere ne “G DBS als Participation | (DBE) Participation (10 points) Parking aK we for: so 10% eee Score 0-10 Rept geet ele v t U LEE Su