You are on page 1of 75

Stochastic geometry in nature:

fractals and multifractals and how to study them

Ilya A.
Il
A Gruzberg
G b
University of Chicago

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Random shapes in nature: growth patterns


Real patterns in nature:
Hele
Hele-Shaw
Shaw flow
Mineral dendrites
Electrodeposition

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Random shapes in nature: thin films

AFM image of WO 3 thin film


Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Random shapes in nature: thin films


Height clusters and isolines

Positive heights in color,


negative heights black

Boundaries of positive
height clusters

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Random shapes in nature: turbulence


Inverse cascade in 2D Navier-Stokes turbulence
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-0.8

Vorticity clusters

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

Zero vorticity lines

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

0.2

Random shapes in nature: turbulence


Surface quasigeostrophic (atmospheric) turbulence

(a)

x0

Temperature clusters

Temperature isolines

These
Th
shapes
h
resemble
bl percolation
l ti clusters
l t
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Random shapes in 2D
Two classes:
Critical clusters in equilibrium statistical mechanics
Local Boltzmann weights or probabilities
Non-equilibrium growth patterns
Non-local, history-dependent rules
Similar complexity but very different understanding

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Critical clusters
Percolation clusters (site percolation)
Every site is either ON (black) with probability
or OFF (white) with probability

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Critical clusters
Larger critical percolation clusters

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Critical clusters
Ising spin clusters

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Other equilibrium clusters


q-states Potts model: q = 2 Ising, q = 1 percolation

Can continue
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Other equilibrium clusters

O(n)
( ) loopp models:
n = 0 self-avoiding walks
(polymers)
Can continue

Solid-on-solid ((SOS)) models,, roughening


g
g transitions,,
dimers, random tilings,

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

DLA applet

S
Show
ow DLA app
applet
et from
o
http://apricot.polyu.edu.hk/~lam/dla/dla.html

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

DLA applet

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Growth patterns
Diffusion-limited aggregation

T. Witten, L. Sander, 1981

Many different variants


Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Viscous fingering vs. DLA


O. Praud and H. L. Swinney, 2005

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Random shapes: stochastic geometry


Fractal properties
Multifractal spectrum of harmonic measure
Crossing probability
Left vs. right passage probability
Many more

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Stochastic geometry: fractal properties


Fractal properties

Dimensions (critical exponents)

Correlation functions

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

B. Mandelbrot, 1967

Stochastic geometry: fractal properties


Subsets and boundaries with different fractal dimensions

Backbone, dangling
eends,
ds, minimal
a path
pat

Hull and external


perimeter
pe
ete

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Stochastic geometry: multifractal exponents


Lumpy charge distribution on a cluster boundary
Cover the curve by
of radius

small discs

Charges (probabilities) inside discs


Moments
Non-linear

is the hallmark of a multifractal

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Harmonic measure on DLA cluster

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Stochastic geometry: multifractal exponents


Multifractal measures: electric field of a charged cluster

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

2D critical phenomena
Scale invariance

L.Kadanoff, A. Patashinski, V. Pokrovsky, 1966

Critical fluctuations (clusters) are self-similar at all scales


The basis for renormalization group approach
Conformal invariance
In 2D conformal maps = analytic functions

A. Polyakov, 1970

0.5

3
0.4
0.3

0.2

1
0.1
0

0.1

0.2
0.3

2
0.4

0.5
0.6

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.6

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

2D critical stat mech models


Traditional approach:

A. Belavin, A. Polyakov,
A. Zamolodchikov, 1984

Conformal field theory: correlations of local observables


Important parameter: central charge
New focus:
Stochastic geometry: non-local
non local structures cluster
boundaries, their fractal and global properties
Finite geometries: conformal invariance made precise

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Crossing probability
Crossing probabilities

J. Cardy, 1992

Is there a left to right crossing of white hexagons?


Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Crossing probability

And now?
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Cluster boundaries
Focus on one domain wall using certain boundary conditions
Conformal invariance allows to consider systems in simple
domains, e. g. upper half plane

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Exploration process
Cluster boundary can be grown step-by-step
Eachh step is
i determined
d
i d by
b local
l l environment
i

Description in terms of differential equations in continuum

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Exploration process
Cluster boundary as a stochastic growth process: percolation

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Conformal maps
Specify a 2D shape by a function that maps it to a simple shape
Always possible by Riemanns theorem

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Loewner equation
C Loewner
C.
Loewner, 1923

Describes upper
pp half pplane with a cut alongg a curve

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Loewner equation

Example:

In general

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Loewner equation: sketch of derivation

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Loewner equation
Properties of the trace
If

is smooth,,

are quite amazing:


never intersects itself

If
is singular enough,
may touch itself
or the boundary at double points

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

SLE postulates
Conformal invariance of the measure on curves

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Lattice models: domain Markov property

b
c

c
a

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

SLE postulates
Markov property and stationary increments

iindependent
d
d from
f
(Markov
(
k property)) andd
has the same distribution as

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Schramm--Loewner evolution
Schramm
O. Schramm, 1999

Conformal invariance leads uniquely to Loewner equation


driven by a Brownian motion:

Noise strength

is an important parameter:

SLE generates conformally-invariant random curves


statistically equivalent to critical cluster boundaries
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Properties of SLE
S Rohde
S.
R hd and
dO
O. S
Schramm,
h
2001
V. Beffara, 2002

is a simple curve for

touches boundary and itself for

densely fills a 2D region for


(t )

0<

(t )

<4

Kt

4<

Fractal dimension of

<8

is

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Kt

>8

SLE versus CFT


Conjecture: SLE describes all critical 2D systems with
M. Bauer and D. Bernard, 2002
R. Friedrich and W. Werner, 2002

Relation between noise strength and central charge:

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

SLE versus CFT


B. Duplantier, 2000

Duality
For
describes the trace

(t )

Kt

describes its perimeter


4<

Example:
while

percolation hull with


external perimeter with

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

<8

SLE versus CFT: examples


Loop-erased random walk
Self-avoiding walk
Ising model spin clusters
Crystal facets, dimers,
level lines of Gaussian field
Ising model FK clusters
Percolation hull
Uniform spanning trees
O(n) model and q-states
q states Potts models are related to SLE via

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

A path in a uniform spanning tree: loop-erased


random walk

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Self-avoiding walk

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Double domino tilings

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Level lines of Gaussian free field

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Boundary of a percolation cluster

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Random Peano curve

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Calculations with SLE


SLE as a Langevin equation

Shift

Langevin dynamics

diffusion equation

Simple way of deriving crossing probabilities,


probabilities various
critical exponents and scaling functions
Multifractal spectra
p

for critical clusters

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Crossing probability
J. Cardy, 1992

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Crossing probability
L. Carleson
S. Smirnov, 2001

C
x
X

Most
Most difficult theorem
about the identity function

r
A

B
P. Jones

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Left--passage probability
Left
O. Schramm, 2001

Take

SLE trace

in the upper half plane

passes to the left of

with probability

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Conformal multifractality
Originally obtained by quantum gravity

B. Duplantier, 2000

For critical clusters with central charge

Generalization to include winding of curves

II. Binder,
Binder 1998
B. Duplantier, I.Binder, 2002

Can obtain from SLE, somewhat difficult


Can now obtain this and more using traditional CFT
E. Bettelheim, I. Rushkin, IAG, and P. Wiegmann, 2005
A Belikov IAG II.Rushkin,
A.Belikov,IAG,
Rushkin 2008

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Variants and generalizations of SLE


Different geometries: radial and others

Radial SLE gives curves growing from the unit circle


to the origin (or infinity):

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Variants and generalizations of SLE


J. Cardy, 2003
M. Bauer, D. Bernard, K. Kytola, 2005

Multiple SLE

Dyson Brownian motion (random matrices)


Calogero-Sutherland models
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Variants and generalizations of SLE


E. Bettelheim, IAG, A.W.W. Ludwig and P. Wiegmann, 2005

SLE for
f CFT with
i h continuous
i
symmetries
i andd
(Wess-Zumino models)
SLE trace acquires twisting (a spin) described by an
additional noise

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Variants and generalizations of SLE


I. Rushkin, P. Oikonomou, L. P. Kadanoff and IAG, 2005

SLE driven by Lvy processes: branching growth

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Variants and generalizations of SLE


P. Oikonomou, I. Rushkin, IAG and L. P. Kadanoff, 2007

SLE driven by Lvy processes: global properties

X ( t ) t 1= ;

Y ( t ) A + B t 1 1=

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Applications of SLE
2D turbulence

D. Bernard, G. Boffetta, A. Celani, G. Falkovich, 2006

with 5:9

Zero vorticity contours are


(percolation?)

(( t)1/2 P((t))

0.06

< (t)2 >

0.05
0.04
0.03

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
1/2

9
8
7
6
5
4

(t)/( t)

0.02
0.01

<(t) >/t

0
0

0.005
t

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

0.005

0.01

0.01

Applications of SLE
2D turbulence

D. Bernard, G. Boffetta, A. Celani, G. Falkovich, 2006

Temperature isolines are


(Gaussian free field?)

with = 4 0:2

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Applications of SLE
2D quantum chaos

J. P. Keating, J. Marklof, and I. G. Williams, 2006


E. Bogomolny, R. Dubertrand, C. Schmit, 2006

Nodal
N d l lines
li
off chaotic
h i wave functions
f
i
are
with
ih
5:3 ( 6:05; 5:92) (expect percolation = 6 )

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Applications of SLE
2D Ising spin glass
C. Amoruso, A. K. Hartmann, M. B. Hastings, M. A. Moore, 2006
D Bernard
D.
Bernard, P
P. Le Doussal
Doussal, A
A. Middleton
Middleton, 2006

Domain walls are


with 2:1 ( 2:32 0:08)
(somewhat disappointing: nothing special about this value)

[ ((2t)- (t)]/t

0.05

300

y
1

-0.05

0.25

100
0

0.5

0.75

L=256, from constrained end


L=128, from constrained end
L=128, floating BCs
L=64, floating BCs

200

P()-P2()
P

L=W=400, R=50, F-AP


L=W=720, R=90, F-AP
L=W=720, R=360, F-AP
L=128, W=1024, R=64,
L-AP (fixed end)
P=2.24()-P=2()
P=2.32()-P=2()
P=2.40()-P=2()
P=2.85()-P=2()

0
0
10

100
x

200

10

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

10

10

10

10

Applications of SLE
Length of SLE: fractal variation
Xm
`

jz( t i + dt ) z( t i ) j d f

i= 1

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

T. Kennedy, 2006

Applications of SLE
First passage times along fractal curves
A. Zoia, Y. Kantor, M. Kardar, 2007

0.5

0
1

0.5

0.5

0
x

0
0.5

0.5
x

0
0.5

0.5
x

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Applications of SLE
Morphology of thin ballistically deposited films
0.3
(0)(t)

1.0x10-06

(t)

0.2

0.0x10+00

-1.0x10-06

0.05

0.1

(t)1/2 P
P((t))

0.1

-1

0.02

0.04

0.06

(t)/(t)1/2

0.08

t
Height
g isolines are

with = 3 0:2 ((Ising)


g)

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

0.1

Applications of SLE
Morphology of KPZ surfaces

Height isolines are


with = 8=3 0:1
(self-avoiding random walk)
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

What about growth patterns?

Both for DLA and Hele-Shaw patterns


Multifractal
M ltifractal spectrum
spectr m

is known
kno n numerically
n mericall

Very few analytical results

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Continuous Loewner chains


Growth along the whole boundary of a domain

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Examples
Radial (multiple) SLE for

Laplacian growth for


Integrable
g
model with finite time singularities
g
Dielectric breakdown for
Hele-Shaw flow with surface tension

Other regularized Laplacian growth problems

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Integrability of Laplacian growth


S. Richardson, B. Shraiman and D. Bensimon
I. Krichever, M. Mineev-Weinstein, P. Wiegmann, A. Zabrodin

LG conserves exterior harmonic moments of the interface

Families of explicit solutions


Integrable model related to random matrices
Loewner equation appear as a reduction

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Discrete Loewner chains


Iterated conformal maps

M. Hastings and L. Levitov, 1998

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Discrete Loewner chains


M. Stepanov and
L. Levitov, 2001

Excellent tool for generating and studying DLA


DLA-like
like patterns
Variants and generalizations: interpolations between DLA
and LG
LG, Laplacian random walks,
walks
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Challenges
Applications of SLE to disordered systems: spin glasses,
electronic localization and quantum Hall transitions
Application to non-equilibrium systems: turbulence,
force chains in jjammed granular
g
matter
Analysis of Loewner chains and applications to growth
phenomena: Laplacian growth,
growth DLA,
DLA fractures,
fractures etc.
etc
Combining integrability with stochastic dynamics?
3D random shapes: conformal maps are not useful

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

3D DLA

From http://math.mit.edu/~chr/research/3d-dla.htm
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

Thanks
M. Bauer
R. Bauer
A. Belikov
D. Beliaev
D Bernard
D.
E. Bettelheim
I. Binder
J. Cardy
B. Duplaniter
L. Kadanoff
W. Kager
T. Kennedy

G. Lawler
A. Ludwigg
N. Makarov
B. Nienhuis
P Oikonomou
P.
I. Rushkin
O. Schramm
S. Sheffield
S. Smirnov
P. Wiegmann
g
T. Witten

Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008

You might also like