Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Senstivity Analysis
Senstivity Analysis
Incremental
Cash Flow
cash flow
with project
cash flow
without project
Govt regulation
Production efficiency
Capacity requirements
NPV (most important)
Consistent forecasts
Conflict of interest
Forecast bias
Selection criteria (NPV and others)
Sensitivity Analysis
Example
Given the expected cash flow
forecasts listed on the next
slide, determine the NPV of
the project given changes in
the cash flow components
using an 8% cost of capital.
Assume that all variables
remain constant, except the
one you are changing.
Sensitivity Analysis
Example - continued
I nvest ment
Year 0
- 5, 400
Sal es
Var i abl e Cost s
Year s 1 - 12
16, 000
13, 000
Fi xed Cost s
Depr eci at i on
2, 000
450
Pr et ax pr ofi t
. Taxes @ 40%
550
220
Pr ofi t af t er t ax
Oper at i ng cash fl ow
330
780
Net Cash Fl ow
- 5, 400
780
NPV= $478
Sensitivity Analysis
Example - continued
Possible Outcomes
Range
Var i abl e Pessi mi st i c Expect ed Opt i mi st i c
I nvest ment( 000s)
Sal es( 000s)
Var Cost ( % of sal es)
Fi xed Cost s( 000s)
6, 200
5, 400
5, 000
14, 000
83%
16, 000
81. 25%
18, 000
80%
2, 100
2, 000
1, 900
Sensitivity Analysis
Example - continued
NPV Calculations for Pessimistic Investment Scenario
Year 0
I nvest ment
Year s 1 - 12
- 6, 200
Sal es
16, 000
13, 000
Fi xed Cost s
2, 000
Depr eci at i on
Pr et ax pr ofi t
450
550
. Taxes @ 40%
220
Pr ofi t af t er t ax
330
Oper at i ng cash fl ow
780
Net Cash Fl ow
- 6, 200
780
NPV= ($121)
Sensitivity Analysis
Example - continued
NPV Possibilities
NPV (000s)
Var i abl e Pessi mi st i c Expect ed Opt i mi st i c
I nvest ment( 000s)
- 121
478
778
- 1, 218
478
2, 174
- 788
26
478
478
1, 382
930
Year 0 Year s 1 - 6
$900
Sal es
Var . Cost
Fi xed Cost s
Depr eci at i on
175
900 / 6 = 150
Pr et ax Pr ofi t
Taxes ( 50%)
Net Pr ofi t
Pl anes Sol d = 63
Decision Trees
Success
Test (Invest
$200,000)
Pursue project
NPV=$2million
Failure
Stop project
NPV=0
Dont test
NPV=0
Risk
Rates of Return
73 Years of Capital Market History
Measuring Risk
Risk & Diversification
Thinking About Risk
Index
1000
10
Common Stocks
Long T-Bonds
T-Bills
0.1
Year End
Rates of Return
Percentage Return
60
40
20
-20
Common Stocks
Long T-Bonds
T-Bills
-40
-60 26
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Year
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Expected Return
Expected market
return
interest rate on
Treasury bills
normal risk
premium
(1981) 23.3%
14
9.3
(1999) 14.1%
4.8
9.3
Measuring Risk
Variance - Average value of squared deviations from
mean. A measure of volatility.
Standard Deviation Square-Root of Variance. A
measure of volatility.
Measuring Risk
Coin Toss Game-calculating variance and standard deviation
(1)
(2)
(3)
Percent Rate of Return Deviation from Mean Squared Deviation
+ 40
+ 30
900
+ 10
+ 10
0
0
0
0
- 20
- 30
900
450 = 21.2%
Squared
Deviation
549.43
160.78
2.82
74.13
14.67
801.84
Year
Rate of Return
1994
1.31
1995
37.43
1996
23.07
1997
33.36
1998
25.58
Total
123.75
Average rate of return = 123.75/5 = 24.75
Variance = average of squared deviations = 801.84/5=160.37
Standard deviation = squared root of variance = 12.66%
Unique
risk
Market risk
0
5
10
15
Number of Securities
What does this tell you about mutual funds (unit trusts)?
Topics Covered
Measuring Beta
Portfolio Betas
CAPM and Expected Return
Security Market Line
Capital Budgeting and Project Risk
Market Return %
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Portfolio Betas
Diversification decreases variability from
unique risk, but not from market risk.
The beta of your portfolio will be an
average of the betas of the securities in the
portfolio.
If you owned all of the S&P Composite
Index stocks, you would have an average
beta of 1.0
12
Market
Portfolio
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Beta
0.8
20
Rm
Rf
0
0
Beta
Wait a second!
A project has a NPV=10,000 when r=.05
and a NPV=-10,000 when r=.1 and the
company can borrow at 5%. Why shouldnt
the company invest even if the cost of
capital is 10% because of a beta?
Shouldnt a project that is risky but has
Beta=0 be considered worse than a project
that is safe and has Beta=0?