KNOWLDEGE MANAGEMENT

CHALLENGES IN BULDING KM SYSTEM

KNOWLEDGE
EVALUATION

CULTURE

KNOWLEDGE
IMPLEMENTATION
KNOWLEDGE
PROCESSING

CONVENTIONAL

VS
SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE

CONVENTIONAL

KM SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE

System analyst deal with

information from the user

Knowledge developers deal

with knowledge for company
specialist

Users know the problem but

not the solution

Company specialist know the

problem and the solution

System development is
primarily sequential

KMSLC is incremental and

interactive

CONVENTIONAL

KM SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE

System testing normally at

end of cycle

KM system testing evolves

form beginning of the cycle

System development more

extensive than for KMLSC

System development less

extensive than for
conventional system life cycle

A process-driven specify then

build

Result oriented start slow

and grow

Does not support rapid

prototyping

Support rapid prototyping

Rapid Prototyping Process

Structure the
Problem
Reformulate the
Problem

Repeated Cycle (s)

Structure a Task

Make modifications

Repeated Cycle (s)

Build a Task

CONVENTIONAL

KM SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE

Both begin with a problem and end with a solution

Both begin with information gathering or capture

Testing is essentially the same to make sure the system is right

and it is the right system

Both developers must choose the appropriate tool(s) for

designing their respective systems