=char(32)

Lab Report : Webquest

Teacher Name: Nicole Markes
Student Name:
CATEGORY
Presentation 20%

________________________________________

Excellent
Students flow of
work was
seamless with no
errors and high
level of
formatting.
Evidence blog
was completed
above and
beyond project
scope and
demonstrated
critical thinking.
Research Skills Student
- 30%
researched the 4
forensic test
methods and also
investigated
additional tests
beyond project
scope with
exceptional
descriptions and
critical
explanations.
Analysis of
Student shows
Information and exceptional
Hypothesis identification of
30%
steps with
advanced
reasoning.
Expected
evidence
completed in
great depth and
understanding
beyond project
scope.

Very Good
Student had
good logical
flow with no
errors.
Formatting was
excellent and
evidence blog
was completed
to a sound level.

Satisfactory
Students work
had good logical
flow with
minimal errors.
Blog had basic
formatting.
Evidence blog
was completed
to a required
standard.

Needs Improvement
Students work had
no logical flow with
multiple errors. No
thought given to
formatting of the
blog. Evidence blog
was not complete.

Student did 4
forensic test
methods with
advanced
descriptions and
detailed
explanations.

Student did 4
forensic test
methods with
basic
descriptions.

Student did less

than 4 forensic test
methods with
limited or
incomplete
description.

Student shows
clear
identification of
steps with sound
reasoning.
Expected
evidence
completed in
detail with clear
and concise
reasoning.

Student shows
ability to
identify basic
steps. Expected
evidence
completed with
little or no
reasoning.

Student shows
limited
identification of
steps. Expected
evidence
incomplete with
little or no
reasoning.

Conclusion 20%

The conclusion
was recognizable
and was
supported by
details used to
explain which
suspect was
incriminated or
discounted due
to insufficient or
lack of evidence.

A conclusion
was
recognizable and
most details
were used to
explain which
suspect was
incriminated or
discounted due
to insufficient or
lack of evidence.

Date Created: Apr 05, 2015 10:33 pm (CDT)

A conclusion
There is no clear
may have been conclusion, the blog
present but
just ends.d
lacked detail but
explained which
suspect was
incriminated or
discounted due
to insufficient or
lack of
evidence.