Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introductory Electromagnetics - H. Nef PDF
Introductory Electromagnetics - H. Nef PDF
0 and €) = 3€9 for z <0. It is given that Ey = 10a, + 20a, for z <0,
and our task is to determine D2, Dj, and E;. There is no surface charge density
present. We immediately obtain
Dy = enf = €y(30a, | 60a).
Tangential E and normal D are continuous, so Ex) = Ey = En = Ex. = 10,
and D.y = Dyy = Daz = Dex = 60eo from Fquations (2.53) and (2.55). Also.
Dy, = (€\/€2)Dx2 = 50€o, and = (€)/€;)E-2 = 12. Thus, we have
D, = €0(50a, + 60a,),
E,; = 10a, + 12a.
The results are shown in Figure 2.11. | |
POISSON AND LAPLACE EQUATIONS
Substituting Equation (2.51) into (2.36), we obtain
V-cE=p,.2 ELECTROSTATIC AND MAGNETOSTATIC FIELDS
Since E = —V@, the last result can be written
V-(eV®) = —p,. (2.56)
We now need a vector identity for the divergence of the product of a scalar & and
vector V®, since they both will, in general, depend on position. This identity can
be found on the inside back cover, and gives
eV + (Vb) + VO Ve = —p,. (2.57)
Using Equation (1.28) twice for the del operator, we find that
Pb FO ah
ViVb = VO = > + — + .
ax? © ay? © az (2.58)
for Cartesian coordinates. V? is the second-order differential operator called the
Laplacian operator, and its form for cylindrical and spherical coordinates can be
found on the inside front and back covers. Equation (2.57) can now be written
eV'b + V+ Ve = —p,|- (2,59)
This is the partial differential equation to be satisfied by ® in an inhomogeneous
region containing charge density. It and its equivalent, Equation (2.56), are point
forms. They can be converted to forms pertaining to regions by integrating both
sides of Equation (2.56) throughout the region (volume) of interest, applying the
divergence theorem to the left-hand side, and then recognizing the right-hand side
as the negative of the charge enclosed. The result is the Gauss law:
peve -ds=—Q | Gauss’s law. (2,60)
$s
In the special case where the dielectric is homogeneous, € is not a function of
position, Ve = 0, and Equations (2.59) and (2.60) reduce to
Vo = —p,le | Poisson’s equation (2.61)
and .
fro +ds = -Qle. (2.62)
Equation (2.61) is very famous and appears in many areas of engineering, physics,
and mathematics. It is called Poisson’s equation. If, additionally, the region is
charge-free, then we obtain2.6 POISSON AND LAPLACE EQUATIONS 63
Vb =0 | Laplace's equation (2.63)
and
pve -as=0. (2.64)
3
Equation (2.63) is called Laplace's equation.
‘The formal solution to the Poisson and Laplace equations is the superposition
integral for potential, Equation (2.24), with €9 replaced by e:
= fffam , 3
wn) = 7 ee (2.65)
A solution for ® can be obtained from Equation (2.65) if we know p, at every
point. Many times p, is not known, but a solution for ® can be found if certain
boundary conditions are known. A unique solution for ® exists” inside a region
(closed surface s) if:
1. @ is specified everywhere on s, or
2. 9®/dn (normal outward derivative) is specified everywhere on s, or
3. ® is specified on s; and d®/dn is specified on s2, where s = 5) + 52.
Conducting surfaces are equipotential surfaces in the static case. That is, the
potential on and inside the surface of a solid conductor is a constant in order to
ensure that electrostatic E is zero (E = —V® = —VC = 0) in the conductor. If the
electrostatic field were not zero in a conductor, it would lead to charge motion (a
conduction current density, to be discussed later in this chapter), and charge motion
is not a static situation. Thus, electric fields leave (or enter) a charged conductor
in a direction normal to the (equipotential) conductor surface in the static case.
WH Example 2.10
Consider the parallel plate capacitor shown in Figure 2.12. The battery and ground
connections to the conducting plates assure us that @ = 0 when z = 0 and ® = Vo
when z = d. It is normally assumed that if the plate dimensions are large compared
wd, then fringing of dhe eclectic field at the sides and front and back can be ignored
as a minor effect. Here we need only say that no fringing is exactly equivalent
to requiring that 9®/dn = 0 for the two sides and the front and the back of the
capacitor. We can accomplish this by requiring that 3/ax = d/dy = 0 for all
x, y, and z, and the resulting one-dimensional boundary-value problem is of the
third type above. Laplace’s equation is
"See Neff, 1981 in the references at the end of this chapter for a proof of the uniqueness theorem.2 ELECTROSTATIC AND MAGNETOSTATIC FIELDS
p= *eVo/d,
p,~ eVold Ee ahold
——— ‘® = Constant
Figure 2.12, Parallel-plate capacitor (ignoring fringing of E at the sides).
yp 22, 2P eh 8H ee
Ox? ay? — azt az? dz?
The solution is easily found by successive integrations to be B(z) = Az + B, and
applying the two boundary conditions imposed by the battery gives
®(z) = Voz/d, Osz=d.
Equipotential surfaces are parallel planes, and this is a unique solution for the
stated boundary conditions (including all six faces).
The clectric ficld is given by E = —V®, or E, = —d@/dz:
E,=-Vold, O0 c, Hg = 0, so that the system is “shielded.” A plot of Hg against p shows
that Hg is a continuous function of p.
Wi Example 2.17
The ideal solenoid consists of the surface current density J, = ayJ,y covering the
infinite cylinder p = a. The field must be independent of z and ¢, and can depend2 ELECTROSTATIC AND MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD
=ay—aya~az'
ad¢' dz’
—> 0, y,0)
Field point
x
Figure 2.26, Biot-Savart law applied to the idealized solenoid.
at most on p. In order to show that only a z component of field is produced we
use the Biot-Savart law with Figure 2.26.
The Biot-Savart law gives
a a [J ax PoE ag! ae!
7 oS ror’ ip 1]
0 Jax
where
= ayy — aya — ac! — —aacos $' —a,(asin g’ —y) — aye!
and
ag X (r—r') = —arz'cos $' — ayz’sin $' — a-(y sin g' — a)
since
ag = —a,sin d' + a cos ¢’.
Also, we have
|r-r'P =[y? + a? - 2yasin $' + (2'P P?,
Thus, the integrands for H, and Hy in the Biot-Savart integral above are odd
functions of z’, and are to be integrated over symmetric limits (—», +). H, and
Hy are both identically zero, and H = a,H,(p) at most.
It is easy, however, to show that H, is constant. Consider Figure 2.27. For
p > a we see that H,, = H-2 in order that $H - dl = 0. Therefore H, is a constant
for p > a. This constant must be zero, since H; must vanish for large p. For the
other path §H + dl = Icy, or H,] = J,gl where 1 is the length of the path in the z
direction. Remember that H, = 0 for p > a. Thus, H, = J,g for p< a, or2.11 AMPERE’S LAW IN POINT FORM (MAXWELL'S EQUATION) 85
Path of integration,
pa Path of integration
4 p>a
Figure 2.27. Ampere’s law applied to the idealized solenoid.
H= [e pa, ideal solenoid (2.96)
A real solenoid, which is simply a coil or helix of finite length, will have a
z component of current (not just a @ component), since it has a nonzero pitch.
Ampere’s law applied to a circular path of radius p > a gives fH- dl =1 = coil
current, and thus Hyg #0 for p > a. Thus a real solenoid will always produce
leakage flux.
2.11 AMPERE’S LAW IN POINT FORM (MAXWELL’S EQUATION)
Stokes’ theorem [Equation (1.46)] may be applied to Ampere’s law (2.95), giving
pu-as| VxH-ds=I, (2.97)
c sr
where s; is any one of the infinite number of possible open surfaces defined by
the path of integration used for the line integral (see Figure 2.28). We also have
Equation (2.75):
r= {| J:ds (2.98)
Combining Equations (2.97) and (2.98), we get2 ELECTROSTATIC AND MAGNETOSTATIC FIELDS
€
Figure 2.28. Geometry for deriving the point form of Ampere’s law (Maxwell's equation).
[Jv ened] fsa
Since the surfaces s; and s2 are arbitrary, they may be made identical, but still
arbitrary. In this case, we have
[Joma [fa
where s is arbitrary. Since s is still arbitrary, we arrive at the result
VxH=J | (Maxwell’s curl H equation). (2.99)
This is the point form of Ampere’s law, and is also one of Maxwell’s equations
for steady currents. The modification to this equation for time dependent currents
was probably Maxwell’s most important contribution. Recall that the electrostatic
field had no curl (V x E = 0) and was conservative. The magnetic field is thus
nonconservative.
Let us next take the divergence of both sides of Equation (2.99). We have
V-VxH=0=V'J, (2.100)
since the divergence of the curl of any vector is identically zero [see Equation
(1.42)]. Equation (2.100) verifies Equation (2.71) which we “derived” on the basis
of conservation of charge.
a Example 2.18
Consider the coaxial cable of Example 2.16. The field was
Ip
eo 0, so
An By — Bro ee (2.129)
In many cases J, = 0 and
An = An, Briley = Bio! pa (Js =O) |. (2.130)
Applying the flux equation gfB + ds = 0 to the can for Ah —>0 gives
Bn = Bn2, MiHnt = ba2Hn2 |. (2.131)
It is also true in many cases of practical interest that wz > p, (medium 2 is
silicon steel and medium 1 has 4 = yo for a ferromagnetic material next to air,
for example). In the case of Equation (2.130), By; = Br2éi/p2 or Bry < Bro,
and so magnetic flux lines leave medium 2 at right angles to the surface for all
practical purposes. The surface of medium 2 must then be an equipotential surface
(®, = C).
Next we would like to consider magnetic circuits. The uniform flux density
inside the ideal solenoid was found in Example 2.17, and from Equation (2.96)
we get By = wJyg when the magnetic material within the solenoid (the cure) has
permeability 41. The flux is easily found with Equation (2.93): V_, = Bs = pJsgs,
where s is the cross-sectional area of the solenoid. If we now suppose that the
surface current density J,y, is being produced (approximately) by an N-turn helical
coil (a real solenoid) that is / (m) in length (J is the length of the solenoid, and is
Region (1), 4, As
Ah
tT Region (2), Baa
Figure 2.31. Geometry for determining the boundary conditions at the interface beiween simple
magnetic media..13 MAGNETIC MATERIALS 7
not the total length of wire). then J. ~ NI/I (A/m) and the magnetic flux can be
written
NI
Vv, = —— (Wd). 2.132
Tus) (Wb). (2.132)
At this point we need to refer back to some information gained from a sophomore
circuits course. A conductor of cruss-sectional area s, length /, and conductivity
a has a resistance R = 1/(as) [also below Equation (2.145)] and a current given
by Ohm’s law:
4 4
R Ios)’
Thus, comparing V,, with J, we see that in a magnetic circuit, magnetic flux V,,
is mathematically analogous to electric current /, NI (ampere-turns) is analogous
to an ideal voltage source and is called magnetomotive-force (mmf), and
a= oy (2.133)
is analogous to resistance and is called reluctance. These analogies are invaluable
when analyzing magnetic circuits.
Next let us consider the behavior of ferromagnetic materials graphically since
the relationship between B and H is nonlinear and j1g for a given sample is not
unique. This graph is called the B-H curve or hysteresis curve. If an mmf is applied
to a virgin (unmagnetized) sample of ferromagnetic material with B and H both zero
(point a), a magnetization curve such as that shown in Figure 2.32 is established
(from point a to b). As H is increased, for example, by increasing the current
in a solenoid around the sample, B increases, slowly at first, then more rapidly,
then more slowly to point b. Further increase in H gives little increase in B, and
finally B will not increase at all, indicating magnetic saturation (point c). The curve
a-b-c can be called the magnetization curve.
If, in the process of magnetization, point b is reached and then H is reduced,
the original curve is not retraced, but instead, the B-H relationship follows a curve
such as b-d, so that at point d a remnant flux density, B, exists even though H
is zero. This is permanent magnetization. Now if H is decreased (negative), the
B-H relation follows the curve d-e, and at point e, B is zero, but H has the value
—H_, where H, is the coercive mmf. Further decrease of H can lead to saturation
again; but if, instead. H is now increased at point f (which is symmetrical to h),
then the B-H curve will follow the path f-g-h-b. The path b-d-e-f-g-h-b is called
the hysteresis loop.
If, when the sample was first being magnetized, point b’ had been reached and
then H had been decreased, then a smaller hysteresis loop could be traced out.
In this way a sample can be demagnetized. That is, if an ac current is applied to
the solenoid around the sample, and if the amplitude of this ac signal is gradually
seduced, the hysteresis loops will become smaller and eventually degenerate to
point a where B is zero.2 ELECTROSTATIC AND MAGNETOSTATIC FIELDS
B
20
ob _ --—-4e
LS =
10 :
Ba
0.5,
€ a A
N i tHe 14
n | +H/200 400 600800
i
f
Figure 2.32. Magnetization curve and hysteresis loop for a ferromagnetic sample.
Wi Example 2.21
Let us next solve, approximately, a simple problem involving a magnetic circuit
composed of a ferromagnetic core with an air gap. Let the mmf be applied by
means of a toroidal coil as shown in Figure 2.33. Let the air gap be | mm, N
be 1000 turns, and the mean radius of the toroid be 22.5 cm. We would like
to find the coil current required to produce B = 0.5 Wb/m? in the core. Some
approximations must be made if we are to accomplish this. First of all we assume
that B is uniform in the ferromagnetic core. Second, the air gap is very small
compared to the diameter of the core, so the flux density is essentially normal
to the interface between the air and the ferromagnetic core and must therefore be
continuous [Equation (2.131)].
The small leakage flux around the periphery of the air gap is ignored. There
will also be some leakage flux between the turns of the coil, and flux lines may
even extend across the interior of the toroid through the air. These effects are small
and are neglected, but it should be recognized that magnetic flux lines “prefer”
the ferromagnetic material over air by a factor of only about 10°, whereas in the
equivalent electric problem the electric flux lines “prefer” good conductors over air
by a factor of about 10'5. That is, the permeability of the ferromagnetic material
will be roughly 10° times that of air, but the conductivity of a good conductor is
about 10'5 times that of air. Thus, the magnetic problem leads to a much more
crude (but still useful) model than the electric problem.Ferromagnetic
core
Figure 2.33. N-turn toroid with an air gap in its ferromagnetic core.
The magnetic material in this example has the B-H magnetization curve shown
in Figure 2.34 so that if B = 0.5, then H = 100. The assumptions we have made
lead to the equivalent electric circuit shown in Figure 2.35. For the air gap, we
have
LD 1073 7 te
Poe gs ~ ae X10 w(25 x 1O-Daya ~ 1621 * 10
and (everywhere)
-2)2
Um = Bs = 09.5: 02:5 x 1077)" _ 245.4 x 1078,
1.25
1.00
os]
S
=
5
0.50)
0.25
ee Se
50 100 150 200
(Aim)
Figure 2.34, Magnetization curve for the ferromagnetic core in Example 2.21.100 2 ELECTROSTATIC AND MAGNETOSTATIC FIELDS
Figure 2.35. Equivalent electric circuit (Example 2.21) showing the (linear) air-gap reluctance,
(nonlincar) reluctance of the core, and the applied mmf.
Therefore the mmf “drop” across the air gap is J Rag, neglecting flux fringing at
the gap; so
(ND ag = YmRag = (1.621 X 10°)(245.5 x 107%) = 398 (A-t).
Producing 0.5 Wb/m? in the ferromagnetic core requires Hie = 100 = (NI)fe/l, 80
the “core” mmf in Figure 2.33 can be calculated from (N/)j/1 = 100 (A> Um),
or
(NI )fe = 1001 = 100 X 27 X 0.225 = 141.4 (A-t),
using the mean radius for finding /. Therefore, the “source” mmf is
NI = (NI) ag + (NI) fe = 539
or
539,
l= 7000 = 0.539 (A).
Instead of requiring the B = 0.5, suppose we specify that / = 0.3 A and find
the resulting flux density. A trial and error technique will be followed to find B.
The answer to the preceding problem gives us a first trial. The reader is encour-
aged to show that B ~ 0.25.
2.14 FORCE AND TORQUE
If a point charge in motion is subjected to both an external electric and magnetic
field, we have the Lorentz force equation
F=Q(E+uxB) Lorentz force (2.134)
from Sections 2.2 and 2.9. The force on a differential filamentary current (con-
ductor) was given by
dF =1dixB (2.81)oD PURLE AND TORUS 101
In a conductor carrying a current, the force, just described, is actually a force on
the electrons that are moving (rather slowly) to constitute the current. We might
expect that this magnetic force would merely shift the electrons with respect to
the total conductor. There are, however, very strong Coulomb forces between the
elecuons and positive ions in a conductor, so any electron displacement due to the
magnetic force is very small. Thus, the magnetic force is transferred to the total
conductor according to Equation (2.81).
Any filamentary current path must ultimately be closed, so Equation (2.81)
results in an equation that can be verified experimentally:
F= praxe (N) (2.135)
1
We may extend this result, as we have previously done in similar situations, to
include surface currents and general current densities
F= If J; x B ds (2.136)
and
r-{{[sxnw. (2.137)
vol
One fact should be mentioned at this point. The magnetic field produced by a
current in a closed circuit will not produce a net force on the circuit (itself) which
would cause the circuit (itself ) to move. (Why not?) It will create a force of tension
in the circuit. For example, a large current in a very flexible square loop would
create a force of tension which would tend to make the loop circular in shape.
I Example 2.22
Consider the highly idealized radial gap de motor shown in Figure 2.36. The
cylinder (armature) at p = a carries the uniform surface current density J, =
Joa; (A/m) (produced by many windings). A magnetic flux density B = Boa,
(perhaps produced by a permanent magnet) exists at the cylinder surface. With
aT = Ry X dF and dF = J, x Bds, we obtain
dT = aa, X (Joa; X a,Boa dpdz),
dT = aa, X agaJ Bo dd dz = a*JoBy dpdza.,
Qa
T= «*JyBoa.|
5 j, do dz = 2mLa*JyBoa,,
or102 2 ELECTROSTATIC AND MAGNETOSTATIC FIELDS
B= a, at p= 0.05 m
OYou might also like