Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Implant Instrument Limitations and Challenges

    Uploaded by

    davidstoffel123
    11 views1 page
    Limitations and Challenges- Inadequate root debridement, 65 % of the times in PD >=5 mm, Furcations, Root anatomy, CEJ, Removal of cementum in an attempt to eliminate endotoxin adherent to the root, may result in hypersensitivity. Tissue type, fibrotic, inflammed and retractable, Existing restorations, overcontoured, overhangs, broad interproximal contacts Skill level of the therapist. Compliance with oral hygiene and maintenance IMPLANT INSTRUMENTS, Implant Probes: Calibrations are in 3-mm sections. IMPLANT INSTRUMENTS. Implacare: Anterior Sickle Scaler H6/7, Posterior Sickle Scaler 204S- Columbia curette 4R/4L IMPLANT TIP. Made of PEEK material, a type of composite, Use on LOW power with plenty of water. IMPLANT MAINTENANCE- The choice of instrumentation is based on the following: Location of the deposit, Nature of the debris, soft or hard Anatomic access Restorative design Implant component.Advantages- To remove extrinsic staining that is otherwise not removed during toothbrushing/scaling, To prepare the teeth for caries-preventative agents (e.g. pit-and-fissure sealants, Fluoride gels and varnishes), To contribute to patient motivation and as a teaching tool after disclosing solution is applied. Disadvantages- Polishing for 30 sec with a pumice paste may remove up to 4 μm of enamel, The outermost layer of tooth structure contains the highest level of Fluoride, A coarse abrasive may create a rougher tooth surface than existed prior to polishing, Steady pressure with a rapidly revolving rubber cup an a minimum of wet abrasive material can cause pain and possible pulpal damage, Gingival damage can occur: a rubber cup an pumice for 2 minutes can completely remove sulcular epithelium, Pumice particles can be pushed subgingivally.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Limitations and Challenges- Inadequate root debridement, 65 % of the times in PD >=5 mm, Furcations, Root anatomy, CEJ, Removal of cementum in an attempt to eliminate endotoxin adherent to the root, may result in hypersensitivity. Tissue type, fibrotic, inflammed and retractable, Existing restorations, overcontoured, overhangs, broad interproximal contacts Skill level of the therapist. Compliance with oral hygiene and maintenance IMPLANT INSTRUMENTS, Implant Probes: Calibrations are in 3-mm sections. IMPLANT INSTRUMENTS. Implacare: Anterior Sickle Scaler H6/7, Posterior Sickle Scaler 204S- Columbia curette 4R/4L IMPLANT TIP. Made of PEEK material, a type of composite, Use on LOW power with plenty of water. IMPLANT MAINTENANCE- The choice of instrumentation is based on the following: Location of the deposit, Nature of the debris, soft or hard Anatomic access Restorative design Implant component.Advantages- To remove extrinsic staining that is otherwise not removed during toothbrushing/scaling, To prepare the teeth for caries-preventative agents (e.g. pit-and-fissure sealants, Fluoride gels and varnishes), To contribute to patient motivation and as a teaching tool after disclosing solution is applied. Disadvantages- Polishing for 30 sec with a pumice paste may remove up to 4 μm of enamel, The outermost layer of tooth structure contains the highest level of Fluoride, A coarse abrasive may create a rougher tooth surface than existed prior to polishing, Steady pressure with a rapidly revolving rubber cup an a minimum of wet abrasive material can cause pain and possible pulpal damage, Gingival damage can occur: a rubber cup an pumice for 2 minutes can completely remove sulcular epithelium, Pumice particles can be pushed subgingivally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    Implant Instrument Limitations and Challenges

    Uploaded by

    davidstoffel123
    Limitations and Challenges- Inadequate root debridement, 65 % of the times in PD >=5 mm, Furcations, Root anatomy, CEJ, Removal of cementum in an attempt to eliminate endotoxin adherent to the root, may result in hypersensitivity. Tissue type, fibrotic, inflammed and retractable, Existing restorations, overcontoured, overhangs, broad interproximal contacts Skill level of the therapist. Compliance with oral hygiene and maintenance IMPLANT INSTRUMENTS, Implant Probes: Calibrations are in 3-mm sections. IMPLANT INSTRUMENTS. Implacare: Anterior Sickle Scaler H6/7, Posterior Sickle Scaler 204S- Columbia curette 4R/4L IMPLANT TIP. Made of PEEK material, a type of composite, Use on LOW power with plenty of water. IMPLANT MAINTENANCE- The choice of instrumentation is based on the following: Location of the deposit, Nature of the debris, soft or hard Anatomic access Restorative design Implant component.Advantages- To remove extrinsic staining that is otherwise not removed during toothbrushing/scaling, To prepare the teeth for caries-preventative agents (e.g. pit-and-fissure sealants, Fluoride gels and varnishes), To contribute to patient motivation and as a teaching tool after disclosing solution is applied. Disadvantages- Polishing for 30 sec with a pumice paste may remove up to 4 μm of enamel, The outermost layer of tooth structure contains the highest level of Fluoride, A coarse abrasive may create a rougher tooth surface than existed prior to polishing, Steady pressure with a rapidly revolving rubber cup an a minimum of wet abrasive material can cause pain and possible pulpal damage, Gingival damage can occur: a rubber cup an pumice for 2 minutes can completely remove sulcular epithelium, Pumice particles can be pushed subgingivally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Implant Instrument Limitations and Challenges

    Description: Limitations and Challenges- Inadequate root debridement, 65 % of the times in PD


    >=5 mm, Furcations, Root anatomy, CEJ, Removal of cementum in an attempt to eliminate
    endotoxin adherent to the root, may result in hypersensitivity. Tissue type, fibrotic, inflammed and
    retractable, Existing restorations, overcontoured, overhangs, broad interproximal contacts Skill
    level of the therapist. Compliance with oral hygiene and maintenance IMPLANT INSTRUMENTS,
    Implant Probes: Calibrations are in 3-mm sections.
    IMPLANT INSTRUMENTS. Implacare: Anterior Sickle Scaler H6/7, Posterior Sickle Scaler 204SColumbia curette 4R/4L IMPLANT TIP. Made of PEEK material, a type of composite, Use on
    LOW power with plenty of water.
    IMPLANT MAINTENANCE- The choice of instrumentation is based on the following: Location of
    the deposit, Nature of the debris, soft or hard Anatomic access Restorative design Implant
    component.Advantages- To remove extrinsic staining that is otherwise not removed during
    toothbrushing/scaling, To prepare the teeth for caries-preventative agents (e.g. pit-and-fissure
    sealants, Fluoride gels and varnishes), To contribute to patient motivation and as a teaching tool
    after disclosing solution is applied. Disadvantages- Polishing for 30 sec with a pumice paste may
    remove up to 4 m of enamel,

    Reference URL: http://medical.wesrch.com/paper-details/pdf-ME1T5LIAXLAWX-implant-inst


    rument-limitations-and-challenges

    You might also like