You are on page 1of 3

April 2, 2014

Dear VEHA Board Members:


Thank you for including the check register at the last meeting.
1) This is a formal request to include the check register at each
VEHA Board meeting, to ensure accountability and transparency.
Since the president bellowed, YOU ARE OUT OF ORDER at me
when I dared asked a question regarding the budget at the last
board meeting, I am asking for written clarification here.
2) Please explain the justification for the check dated 2/28/15
#70015072 Rosquist Issue $1,031.68.
3) Please explain the justification for the check dated 2/11/15
Professional Legal Phillips Case: $260.69/1,1131.69.
4) If these checks are for the deposition of board members or for
mounting a defense against Mr. Phillips, why isnt this being
handled through the organization and management liability
insurance policy that the Board of Directors has? In other words,
why is it being billed to the homeowners of Victoria Estates?
I look forward to your reply,

Annette DuPont-Ewing
102 Royal Court
Georgetown, KY 40324

April 14, 2015


Dear VEHA Board Members:
On April 2, 2015, I asked, in writing, by certified letter, for an explanation of the charges
for the check dated 2/28/15 #70015072 Rosquist Issue $1,031.68. I also asked for the
justification for the check dated 2/11/15 Professional Legal Phillips Case:
$260.69/$1,131.69. .
I have yet to receive a response. At the last VEHA board meeting, Mr. Phillips also
requested an explanation of the charges/checks and was told by the VEHA Treasurer,
Mr. Parrish, I dont really know, I dont understand it! Mr. Parrish, further stated that
he was insulted when he received a certified letter for something that a simple phone
call could have handled. Obviously, a simple phone call would not be sufficient when he
provided such evasive answers to the homeowners inquiries. When asked if there were
other charges associated with this issue, Mr. Parrish responded, I dont know. In fact,
there is yet another charge for $810.00 on March 20 th Check # 01848 Rosquist Matter
that I am requesting a copy of the receipt and the justification. Homeowners pay the
treasurer over $300.00 a month and are entitled to some clear answers and
accountability.
Mr. Rembacki, as well as Mr. Phillips, asked for the receipts. Mr. Goodner responded
with, No, youre not entitled to those receipts! Frankly, if the VEHA homeowners are
paying for the legal costs and deposition of board members in a civil suit/property line
dispute between two homeowners (Phillips vs Rosquist), where the VEHA Board is
NOT named as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, homeowners are certainly entitled to see
the receipts. Homeowners have the right to see any and all receipts if
homeowners dues are utilized to make payment. The VEHA board has been accused
of lacking accountability and transparency many times. This is another example of
both.
Again, I am asking for an explanation of the costs. I am also asking for a copy of
the receipts. Mr. Parrish routinely says at the VEHA monthly meetings, The books are
open to everyone. If that is the truly the case, please present the receipts
I look forward to your reply,

Annette DuPont-Ewing

On April 2, 2015, I asked, in writing, by certified letter, for an explanation of the


charges for the check dated 2/28/15 #70015072 Rosquist Issue $1,031.68. I also
asked for the justification for the check dated 2/11/15 Professional Legal Phillips
Case: $260.69/1,1131.69. There is another charge in March for $810 under
Rosquist Iissue.

I have yet to receive a response. At the last VEHA board meeting, Mr. Phillips also
requested an explanation of the charges/checks was told by the VEHA Treasurer, Mr.
Parrish, I dont really know, I dont understand it! When asked if there had been
other charges related to this issue, Mr. Parrishs response was I dont know.Mr.
Parrish, stated that he was insulted when he received a certified letter for
something that a simple phone call could have handled. Obviously, a simple phone
call would not be sufficient when he provided such evasive answers to the
homeowners inquiries.
Mr. Rembacki, as well as Mr. Phillips, asked for the receipts. Mr. Goodner
responded with, No, youre not entitled to those receipts! Frankly, if the VEHA
homeowners are paying for the legal costs and deposition of board members in a
civil suit/property line dispute between two homeowners (Phillips vs Rosquist), we
are certainly entitled to see the receipts. Homeowners have the right to see
any and all receipts if homeowners dues are used for this and every other
expense. The VEHA board has been accused of lacking accountability and
transparency many times. This is another example of that and also a lack of
leadership and response to homeowners.

Again, I am asking for an explanation of the costs. I am also asking for a


copy of the receipts. Mr. Parrish routinely says at the VEHA monthly meetings,
the books are open to everyone. If that is the truly the case, please present the
receipts. If Mr. Parrishs statement is true, then why is the board acting in such an
evasive and secretive manner, when utilizing homeowners money?

Annette DuPont-Ewing

You might also like