You are on page 1of 4

KARSAN Vs.

OTOKAR
INCOME STATEMENT
Net Sales
Cost of Sales (-)
Gross Profit
Marketing, Selling, Distribution Expenses (-)
General Administrative Expenses (-)
Research and Development Expenses (-)
Other Operating Income
Other Operating Expenses (-)
Operating Profit (Loss)
Income from Investments
Loss from Investments
Income (loss) from Associates -Equity MethodFinancial Income
Financial loss (-)
Income Before Tax
Tax
NET INCOME

- VERTICAL ANALYSIS

KARSAN 2014
total
358,284,009
-323,911,959
34,372,050
-51,112,988
-35,863,427
-2,150,105
81,500,144
-83,577,525
-56,831,851
3,343,134
-11,192,458
0
0
-46,134,065
-110,815,240.00
10,796,622.00
-100,018,618.00

100%
-90.41%
9.59%
-14.27%
-10.01%
-0.60%
22.75%
-23.33%
-15.86%
0.93%
-3.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
3.01%
-27.92%

L ANALYSIS
OTOKAR 2014
total
% of net sales
1,231,633,772
100%
-919,528,400
-74.66%
312,105,372
25.34%
-132,494,804
-10.76%
-39,819,107
-3.23%
-28,658,352
-2.33%
87,200,968
7.08%
-76,415,130
-6.20%
121,918,947
9.90%
55,898
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
14,467,603
0.00%
-54,658,600
0.00%
81,783,848.00
0.00%
-9,012,650.00
-0.73%
72,771,198.00
5.91% Arelik is more profitable.

Seems, both of them suffered from exhange differences of comme

Vestel is paying less interest than Arelik but still has much financ
Interest payments VESTEL: 164 million TL
Interest payments ARELK: 320 million TL

differences of commercial operations (other operating expenses). But, Vestel suffered more (-%5)
still has much financial loss than Arelik.

more (-%5)

You might also like