(ate - Morgen LCS ENGL1111 Project 3 Book Review Reflection Apr L203, i iting — you ‘The Book Review project asked you to once again work against some previous training in essay writi rete reviewing 2 book while incorporating well-documented research om the book in question, a to the reader and evaluating the hook solely in relation to your intended audience. Tell me about how that, process worked for you. How well were you able to move past some of the training you've 5 pea Ar essay and review forms? How difficult (or easy) was it to let go of the urge to simply criticize? Co te taal how successful you were in creating a complex, layered review. Tell me about how well you were sete your book in context — in both time and culture. What would you improve if you could? What ree evan the essay are you most proud of? How well were you able to use formatting to support the message of y« ‘essay? What did you leam by writing in this form? Before you start writing, please take a moment to organize your thoughts on paper foetens one of this sheet). Your final reflection may not be mechanically, grammatically perfect, but | would like deliberate organization, Ak the most bcnlt part of deins the book redid was Awl to chonos muy automatic, qraaned citatin $f to rene approprinte Gy a book revieds. Tt das defnitel > tet 90 of so oa > especially Lecouse T drat ae aggeesty Ghitete 1 a the nutty had te say’ ay find te forts but more deffictt to heahttye and acd Gale (ie thea Nooo « Gace tne ko was Atict U oi Weseatch, wb wot hai 4_ ott ae Pm son ov ofturs” ideas witiot restating SomeHung olyenct vacate f Whot+ x Rurd fan Jand ee ood ante "4 is Veptte Tye cone S cennecting o Wook ty an audienc % wdivectha, I thie T vas ae in shoai ee hak ‘ve what tha or explahac/as his TE ar jareey Gr dw } Te about my wn “experience halped theo rede ial ap rion) ft sgechve, Se Ahat Quen 1s talki etoout. BY wrihna MAW a & book reman, T Warned a (te Wout ectafion, ito a 5) anotysis of a text Wetton aa we ond ce