a is dul - March 20, 2015 AWD Unit 2 Refléction ~ , Semester after semester, students call, émail, visit, and even snail mail thank you notes for the * +” work we've done in this class; many even write after graduating. Nearly every student mentions +.) the literature review assignment. My question for you is, why? What characteristics or tasks do ~ you see in this assignment that make it a memorable and (according to your peers) valuable leaming experience? Please think on paper here — in a well-organized reflection, explore why you think so many consider this assignment to be an asset, even if they don’t go on to academia. What do you see in this assignment, in the process of writing it, not just the final product? You have a lot of evidence to draw from: your experience, your process and work in this unit, your classmates’ work, myths about AWD, or anything else that you feel might be pertinent. Also consider how this assignment worked with your wnting process. How did (or could) your writing process change to better fit this assignment? In what ways has your research process changed? Looking forward, what would you do differently the next time you write this type of document? (Note: not this exact document, but a similar review of material.) Given time, resources, and sleep, what would you change about your current literature review? ‘As always, please be very specific — mention particular paragraphs or passages in your paper, searches that you did, Geta Pigs, oor reviews [ Fovnd that the Werahit"a0u shed me te orthtaly Hdnk and —resenrch beer than my works ia the past. My ablilty ho tesenrch mater lal ou dlPeren! dathabwes and ey panel further were poshed. Mp greater ee inthe wae: Pina bag a tole and realy | inpsaolg typing lel on ie effecttel wih other prHde, Whea | olecidled te reskad In a d Meret veln for ny 6S say; teal! eed there was ¢ belles, niche fle me fe BN se, | wostortenate eneugh tv learn a let by my Wee Heorgh my teadlng aad welhing, I did} juct have. ines ob a fyplo, but Instead, | had a could lem Proms deeb n, presial succectey nai from hows I. develyred ms sty le |n read ing : arblele In ee way Hat el for me, they 7 notes tn a way Hal 1 cavld. fall al he a Ia [ of i OUP ESE reach: my concfestey Sine WO them fash, My aged “Ph roughivk Hh - more pretil waterpelig of my eleven, x0 by Me Line 1 reachded eee oF bund hurler he figure owt ee ay) fee ee 5 ot ry work research shout, Pc rand berblng Hats HET coulel ranch fob ford Saner, ] oovld do More Eéaareh to Lad ei wre flapers ae Het revrdd oul here —ang—pageere my —arguaests Fully. 1 was wlth nm ee oe ba L anol. hele Lato what | would have fred ie} dhdn¥ feel as yatessed tur Hine. Also, b hes Is the wost ve ever well atice hers. It wac very heldv, CP | ot nee Ind Val frustratton wut th thy took: and ty Foviees te molol a hey teat off oft hen sevcee, “