The Oxford comma is a punctuation mark placed before the word "and" in a list. Its purpose is to separate items in the list and clarify their grouping. While some modern writers argue it is unnecessary, others believe the Oxford comma is important for avoiding ambiguity. The author of "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" argues that omitting the Oxford comma can change the meaning of a sentence. Whether to use the Oxford comma remains a topic of debate among writers and grammarians.
The Oxford comma is a punctuation mark placed before the word "and" in a list. Its purpose is to separate items in the list and clarify their grouping. While some modern writers argue it is unnecessary, others believe the Oxford comma is important for avoiding ambiguity. The author of "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" argues that omitting the Oxford comma can change the meaning of a sentence. Whether to use the Oxford comma remains a topic of debate among writers and grammarians.
The Oxford comma is a punctuation mark placed before the word "and" in a list. Its purpose is to separate items in the list and clarify their grouping. While some modern writers argue it is unnecessary, others believe the Oxford comma is important for avoiding ambiguity. The author of "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" argues that omitting the Oxford comma can change the meaning of a sentence. Whether to use the Oxford comma remains a topic of debate among writers and grammarians.
Definition: The oxford comma is a punctuation mark placed between
the last word in a list or phrase, and the word and. Also known as a serial comma, the oxford comma earns it name from the Oxford University press. Its purpose is to separate words and make clear their separation.
Examples: I was speaking to my parents, Jim Caldwell, and Richard
Sherman. - The comma placed between Caldwell and the word and separates the three names. If there was no oxford comma then the speakers parents would be Jim Caldwell and Richard Sherman. We invited our friends, Jim and Mike. -In this situation no comma is needed. If an oxford comma was added then the speakers would have stated that Jim and Mike were not their friends. They would instead be saying they invited their friends, and Jim and Mike. Jim and Mike as such would be separated into a different group apart from the speakers friends.
Disagreements: Many modern writers do not believe the oxford
comma is necessary. Writers such as Cormac McCarthy believe they are not only unnecessary but also out dated. Authors such as McCarthy argue the Oxford Comma is a punctuation mark from the printing press era and is not needed by modern readers. That readers can understand the writers
intention by using logic and reading skills. Others still believe it to be a
necessity. Author of Eats, Shoots and Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation, Lynn Truss, argues that the oxford comma is needed. Trusss argument is for clarification. She believes that it is impossible, or at least difficult, to understand a phrase without the comma. Her title is a play on this. The title of Eats, Shoots and Leaves is a joke made to display the need for the serial comma. Does the Panda, which is doing the eating, eat then shoot and leave or does it eat shoots and leaves. Truss believes that the coma literally changes the meaning of the sentence. Grammatical philosophy is hotly debated. A simple google search will bring up thousands of opinions on either side.
Works Referenced:
Truss, Lynne. Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero
Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. New York: Gotham, 2004. Print.