APR 23-2015 A, ‘Supreme Court of New Jersey ba Single-Justice Disposition on Application for Rmergent Relief (Rule 2:9-8) ‘Gee Helatar Spot Worlds, LLL V. Quan “Rampage” Jackson ne oat a Da aera 7-14 (73800) ton ti ones ior Sport Woelvide, LUC ‘The applieaat’s request for permission toile an emergent motion and any related request fora temporary say or other relief pending disposition ofan emergent mation are DENIED forte following reason(s C1 I. The matter doesnot eoncem a genuine emergency or otherwise does not warrant suction ‘onsiort atic, The applicant may Se a regular matin for evi by the Suptiot Court, ‘Appellate Division inthe ordinary cours, [2 2. Appelt Divison bas entred an oxer or jadgment, and te mater is not emergent ot coterie dos ot warrant adjcetion on sort notice. Te applicant ay ile egular ‘mation for review by the Supreme Court inthe ordinary coves, [1 3. The application concems an order entered daring or onthe eve of tal st which here is no rime facie owing thet immediate inrlocutory intervention is reqied. The spleen: may Se rgular motion inthe appropiate court for review inthe ondinay couse. [4 The applicant mast obtain a signed order or disposition from the Appellate Division before requesting clit rom the Supreme Cou. 1B S0benf> te: 4232015 “The foregoing Is 1148 COPY ‘ofthe original on ein ry ‘OF NEW JERSEY