Professional Documents
Culture Documents
seenmcror eter ov meron mice Q 2 a od that will for any other ronson reduce costs oF improve quality. Al- though there fs much to criticise in these foreign Mandards, they are highly meritorious, worthyotcontinuourand ("Jp (*tcmecmarearereet is careful attention, and a [rp haere great eredit to those who eS i tsea a have devised them. Fig. 3. Staxpanp Srapous yon Pnocess 21 It must be re- Cuaners (Continued) membered that the kind of standard adopted will affect the process almost invariably. ‘There fore standardization must be considered if the one best way to do work is to be derived.10 PROCESS CHARTS 22 Particular attention should be called to the fact that the creation of national standards of manufacture, even to the smallest components of the arts and trades, means also the stabilization of ‘employment and business in general, because manufacturers without sufficient orders in their regular lines of business to keep going will find it more profitable, in many instances, to manufacture the national standards and thus to turn their stores inventories into money immediately, rather than let their specially trained and skilled men leave them, with all the disadvantages of a high labor turnover. Here is an endless spiral of benefit, for the more chances there are for a manufacturer to dispose of his inventory for eash and keep his ‘organization together @ little longer, even in times of general timidity, the more he will dare be a purchaser of raw material, for the process for such emergencies can be standardized and ready. ‘The result is standardization combined with stabilization of employment, a quick capital turnover and a low labor turnover. 23 Many fear standardization of the component elements of a process chart as something from which, once done, it will be difficult to escape. Forthe purpose of allaying such groundless fears, the standard change order, Fig. 2, has been provided. ‘This, when signed by the authorized party, instantly changes, or for a certain instance, or a certain time, waives the existing standard whether it relates to a thing, a method, a procedure or a process. Tt will be noted that this change order blank contains provisions for the notification of, and for the acknowledgment of receipt of notification of, all persons who fare concerned with, or interested in, the change. 24 Note that in the lower right-hand corners of the various spaces in Fig. 2 there are small consecutive numbers. ‘This is stand- ardized to agree with write-ups and standing orders for using standard blank forms. It not only makes the writing of the standing ‘order more simple, exact and clear, but it also shortens the time of the learning period for using these blank forms. This is a valuable feature at all times, but particularly useful during the transitory period of installing new methods of management. 25 Experience shows that if process charts are made use of, exceedingly few of the existing blank forms survive in their present form. ‘The savings that can be made in any large organization resulting from submitting them to the test of this process will in variably prove it to be @ good investment. 26 If all departments of tho United States Government would adopt two features, namely:FB. AND L. M. GILBRETH u @ Put small numbers in each space to be filled out on all of its blank forms, and | Make write-ups and standing orders of exactly how each blank form is to be filled out and would then make a survey and criticism in accordance with the known laws of micromotion study, the resulting savings would be astounding. 27 We believe that, as a result, not one per cent of present ia, 4 Stanpano Process-Cuanr Srumors Maps wirn Sranpan CELLULOTD ‘Guives axp Usina Stanpano Pen No, 707 (Oneourth actal sis) blank forms would remain unchanged. All Government blank forms that we have seen violate all laws of motion study and learn- ing methods of least waste. 28 The standing order is for enforcing standards and other standing orders. This has already been described in a paper before this Society.PROCESS CHARTS 12 Sat S200 e9 FRIES HOY Sa On S50 © suuuas\7 - on HEE @ som uaris V el BEST RH Bila EB rv woussesmiar @ TEN oR saavuauo sun! ar sucvor_@ satis _seao0u13 FB, AND L. M, GILBRETHE SxavRID FURY OMIGVOT Wo IAVHD FEDOUT g “OLE SwOLLYI40 NIZMLIE SUD @ -gusuyiodeg sououpio voRaHW40 SZLVIS GZLINA szomnzua ams snunn soruzurwo suoueszao @ _SWIZIBYN JOMNIHD OSHSINLLOL sun 20y2auI at aarousiszu s2999 @ socuca nroatuo suoisvasio @ aanass so RY waeoa sorrenosuouresio. @ Bo sesvowo sours @ “aaah ed Sav SamaOoNe cox oowce soece omen siounais @ enasant [seus soouses 7 sosnsnosuouvaxo @ sar mcente maw pauses suuond ont ier EOE seuszesn ure <> awaaiay we i Sito suena snus @ ones v mm 23 sowvlBEE cy“ PROCESS CHARTS 29 The more detail in which the standing order is made, the better. ‘The more the procedure is described by it, the greater will be the improvements and the greater the automaticity resulting." 30 If any operation of the process shown in the process chart is one that will sufficiently affect similar work, then motion study seenormomeae~ ° ° ° Fic, 6 Sraxpina Onen Bian should be made of each part of the process, and the degree to which the motion study should be carried depends upon the opportunities existing therein for savings. * See Paychology of Management; Applied Motion Study; and Bullen of ‘the Taylor Society for June, 1921F. BAND 1. Mf GILBRETHE 15 31 If the operations are highly repetitive or consist of parts or subdivisions that can be transferred to the study of many other operations, then micromotion studies al- ready made can be referred Conse Eraneens Reeawne Proven ‘Sains Ole Fa Bein ® a Seroenae CONSTI ENGINEER SONS REUSITION. : weer Ly cegeuscor ao nso sz fo; ako new and further ey riromotion studies may be ©) HSER RATER! warranted in order that the details of method with the exact times of each of the individual subdivisions of the eycle of motions, or “ther- bligs,” as they are called, that compose the one best way known, may be recorded for constant and cumulative improvement. Such motion study ean be best: visualized if seen in chart form and similar process charts ean be made of any or all of the large or small circles, squares and diamonds shown on the process charts. These sub- divided motion charts ean be made of each and all of the cycles in any given opera~ tion. Much benefit can often be derived, even if such motion charts are made roughly. For best results, ‘and especially when complete records are required, such, for example, as when the process charts are of work that is highly repetitive, mieromotion charts can be made which will give the ‘maximum amount of analysis and visualization of com pio, 7 Paocess Cxart yon Onpammwa ponent parts of the existing Baxx Fonws— Presswr Meruop secounrayr asst 70 PASSES O47 FON iNBacaiveboowrorven™ INS ager ogioes WHETHER HOT & es SPECIFICATIONS AND Bigase eal ae Erepoaeioeeh TPs puncusenEcUSt- HEN Sere aia Sheet runcusin ago specs foe uuiry Fae Gao nae Sw TO. aren soos (q)brseroms surizor ‘Faneionntons (5) BF sar PONTES CME Acces Mane eSTHATE Ae BEES ON Bas OF PREMIO BEER tite ewe ee ROOM PLACES HBAS, MESSENGER DELIVERS 0 POST ORICEAND ENE Baka not ver have Ono16 PROCESS CHARTS and proposed processes. ‘These can be still further visualized by the chronocyclegraph processes. Both tho chronocyclegraph and the micromotion process have been described before the Society and more recent developments in these methods and devices for visualiz- ing existing and proposed processes will be the subject of a later paper. 32. The records of the micromotion study and the chronoeycle- graph methods and devices present permanently all the facts in such form that they can be used at any time. ‘These photographie records can be studied as slowly as desired, regardless of how fast the motions of the process were actually made and the marvels of the details of © @ @) moses te moses © Fia. 8 Prorosen Puocess Cuanr rox First Onvens, superskill, unknown and unrecognized even by those who possess it can be studied at will, leisurely and intensively, by learners every- where, far as well as near. If desired, these errorless records may be used only as far as to fill the need of present requirements, or they may be laid away until further needs demand further study, such records being in such perfect detail that they are practically as usable when old as when new. ‘These permanent records of complete se- quences of details of complete processes furnish the foundation of the best kind of trade and industrial education, namely, the dis- semination of detailed instructions as to the synthesized processes of the best workers obtainable. 88. These synthesized records of details of processes in turn may be further combined and large units of standard practice become available for the synthesis of complete operations in process charts.BAND 1. M. GILBRETH Ww 34 While the process-chart methods will be helpful in any kkind of work and under all forms of management, the best results can come only where there is a mechanism of management that will enforee and make repetitive the conditions of the standards. MECHANISM OF MAKING PROCESS CHARTS 35. There are shown herewith: a The symbols used with their meanings (Fig. 3) } The mechanical devices for making the symbols on the process charts (Fig. 4) ¢ Completed process chart (Fi d Accompanying forms (Fig. 6) ¢ Illustrations of collecting and using data, - 6) SUMMARY 36 The procedure for making, examining and improving a process is, therefore, preferably as follows: a Examine process and record with rough notes and stereoscopic diapositives the existing process in detail } Have draftsman copy rough notes in form for blueprinting, photographic projection and exhibition to executives and others ¢ Show the diapositives with stereoscope and lantern slides of process charts in executives’ theater to executives and workers 4 Improve present. methods by the use of — 1 Suggestion system 2 Written description of new methods or “write-ups,” “‘manuals,” “codes,” “written systems,” as they are variously called 3 Standards 4 Standing orders 5 Motion study 6 Micromotion studies and chronoeyclegraphs for obtaining and recording the One Best Way to do Work. ¢ Make process chart of the process as finally adopted as a base for still further and cumulative improvement. 87 Note that — @ Visualizing processes does not necessarily mean changing the Processes b Process charts pay.SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HOSPITAL’ By Frank B. Gruarern, Mem. A. 8. M. E., Providence, R. I. It is impossible to give in a paper of this length much idea of a plan of management that takes as long to learn as it does to learn medicine or surgery. {Scientific management might be, perhaps, better defined as Measured Functional Management. It rests on the principle of applying accurate measurement to pres- ent practice, deriving from the results of this measurement and the observations made while taking it, the standard practice, and so dividing the work to be done that the standard practice may be carried out by those best fitted to do each part of the work. ‘These being the underlying principles of the seience of manage- ment, it is obvious that they are applicable to all fields of activity, and our investigations prove conclusively that the hospital can avail itself of this science with greater results than have been ob- tained in the industries, where the science was first discovered and applied. It may be difficult for you, who are primarily interested in the hospital, to realize this fact, for the reason that most of the books as yet written on the subject of scientific management are written in the vocabulary of the shop. At first reading you may find difficulty in transferring the things there stated into the vo- cabulary of the hospital, However, having spent years of study in the theory and practice of management of the industries, and having also spent years in observing hospital practice and in studying hospital problems, we are able to tell you with authority not only that the same laws which govern efficient shop practice also govern efficient practice in the hospital, but also that many of the problems involved are not only similar, but identical, and ‘Delivered at the American Hospit ‘80e " Prycholory of Manazement. Amociation, St. Paul, Minnesota. ‘Stureis and Walton, 1 Want 970% Grant Nowy Want2 ScteNTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HosPrTaL that many of the solutions which we have found to those prob- lems in the shop can be carried over bodily into the fleld of hos- pital management. The problems of transportation; problems of assembling; problems of enforcing and maintaining system, or- ders and discipline; problems of motion study, time study, and standardization; problems of teaching; problems of synthesizing these elements into methods of least waste; all may make two ap- parently dissimilar and unrelated lines of activity so closely akin that a successful solution in one case can be applied with little or no change with equal success to the other. You can recognize at a glance that all of these problems stated are to be found in hospital management, and that it may be possible for you to save much time and effort by becoming acquainted with efficient prac- tice in the industrial world. At first glance the hospital offers a particularly difficult field for scientific management, the reason being the difficulty in deter- mining units of measurement. As a matter of fact, the problem of the hospital is less difficult than that of the industries because of the fact that the field contains a larger percentage of highly educated men and women, who are, therefore, better able to ap- preciate the scientific method applied to their problem. More- over, hospital workers have not been led to the false belief that “small individual outputs are best for all workers, because small outputs make more work for all.” Again, hospitals do not have the fierce financial competition for existence that the average busi- ness has, that makes it frequently necessary that all changes shall immediately, as well as ultimately, be financially profitable. It is natural that scientific management should be developed first in the industries where the pressure of the need for survival is most forcibly felt. By the same reasoning it will go into the hos- pital last, for when they “run behind in the hospital and need more money, they just go out and get it.” Again, in the average hospital the various departments are not so closely related but that one or more can be subjected to scientific management, and features can be installed without seriously affecting the others. ‘This allows not only of ease of attacking the large problem at sev- eral points, but of standardizing the separate results, and of in- stalling the successful methods with no loss of time in other de-SclENTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HosPITAL 3 ‘There are several concessions which you must make at the outset before you can expect to do any valuable work in intro: ducing the science of management into the hospitals. ‘The first ix that you must submit to having accurate measure: ment applied to your present methods and practices, You recognize that for ages there has existed a disinclination not only on the part of surgeons and doctors, but on the part of all those connected with the hospital, to allow their work to be inspected and the methods and the results to be measured. This accurate measurement for the purpose of analysis of methods into their elements, and synthesis of the least wasteful elements into a standard is the absolute prerequisite of any further work, and you must make up your minds to submit to it at the start, and not consider such accurate measurement an impertinence or as unprofessional. ‘The second concession that must be made ix in the willing: ness to allow a man not trained either in surgery, medic hospital management to apply the measurement and deter the resulting standards, ‘This necessity is a question of the pres: ent only, or of such time as hospital managers shall I training in the science of management. Ultimately, of course, is expected that the work will all be done by men trained both hospital practice and in the science of management. At present no men with such combined training are available, and you must be xutisfied to be taught the method of procedure by men trained primarily in the industries. This you will doubtless be willing to do, ax soon ax you realize the likenesses in all fields of activity, or have actually observed the improvements that can be achieved. ‘The third concession to be made ix the recognition of the value of the standard that has been derived by such methods as motion study. We ean show you pictures whieh illustrate plainly the fact that standardization such as is used under scientifie man- agement is to-day practically unknown in many parts of hospital management, and especially in the operating room. You would see in these pictures not only that the “set up” for similat cases differs to a surprising degree, that the tools used, called “instru- ments” when used by a doctor, differ widely for operations, which, so far as is known at the time of “set up” (preparation), are iden- nist re received4 SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HosPITaL tical, that the costumes vary, but that even non-essential details, which are in no wise governed by the desires of the operating sur- geon, are arranged not only differently in different hospitals, but also by different members of the same hospital corps and by the same members at different times. It is, however, not necessary for us to show you such pictures, because you yourselves could, perhaps, supply more examples of this lack of standardization than we could give you. In the hospital, as in all other centers of activity, there is some one best way for doing each thing that is done, but the complete best way is seldom in the consecutive acte of any one person. We must therefore attempt to find this best way, that large practice with comparatively few standards may be had, that the teaching, installing and revising difficulties may be reduced to a minimum. Various articles in hospital literature and conversations with hospital authorities lead us to think that the “follow-up system” is believed to be scientific management. ‘The “follow-up system” is but a very small portion of the prob- lem. It bears about the same relation to scientific management as a “shingle does to a house.” The “follow-up system” makes for better surgery and treatment. Scientific management's first aim is to install a self-perpetuating system for standardizing and using the best of present knowledge and practice. Then, with such standards for a base line, inventing downwards is discour- aged and eliminated; the trend of progress is thus ever upward. At such a time the “follow-up system” will produce the greatest benefit. ‘The fourth concession to be made is that no one man is fitted to handle every kind of function of hospital management, and that the work will be better done if it is divided or “funetion- alized” and each division put in the hands of a man specially fitted and specially trained to do the work of his function. There has been a feeling prevalent that the surgeon is, because of bis severe medical and surgical training, fitted to handle any and every part of hospital management. This feeling is gradually be- ing broken down, and it is becoming more generally realized that the doctor's training, as such, in no way fits him for management or to manage, and that the management of the hospital should be handed over to a specialist, a trained manager, who can relieveScIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HosPITAL 5 the doctor of much work for which he is not fitted, and for which he has not been trained, and can thus allow him to devote his time entirely to such work as he can best perform, and get the best results and cause the greatest number of happiness minutes. While many of you to-day exemplify the uew idea in hospital management, in that you have received late special training to be- come the heads of institutions, yet many of you must acknowl- edge that the men working under you in the various departments are not specialists in the general, and not the medical sense of the term, and are not specially trained nor particularly fitted to do the work assigned them. When proper standards are deter- mined, your work must be so divided and assigned that each man 1 the organization will do that work only w! the highest valued and most efficient work that he is able to do. This short outline will give you in a few words what it is necessary to do at the outset in order to undertake to install the science of manage- ent in a hospital. You will probably immediately ask, “What application, then, have functional foremanship, time study, motion study, standard- ization, theory of notification, and scientifically selected person- nel and method of pay to do with the hospital problem?” These are all methods or devices for measuring the units, making the standards, or insuring that the standards be maintained and con- tinuously improved after they are once established. If you keep this idea clearly in mind, you may go through the existing liter- ature, and find that all the theory and the practice of installing the science has a direct application to your field, and that many things may be done by you immediately.* ‘A first step that we recommend is taking a survey of your present practice and of the members of your organization. In the industries we always state this first step as “reducing present practice to writing.” You will be surprised what improvements will suggest themselves to you as a result of seeing in cold ink exactly what you are now doing in each department. While you cannot hope to reduce your management to a science without years of application to the problem, and without direction from a management specialist, you can at least make a beginning. See “ Motion Study " and “Primer of Scientife Management,” D. Van Nostrand, 25 Park Place, New York City.6 ScleNTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HosPITaL. Begin, then, to reduce your present practice to writing with. out any idealization, and to determine in your own minds exactly what the work is that you are doing in your hospital; what nex of activity are included, and what kinds of work each member of the organization is doing. Then attempt to determine how many different kinds of methods you are at present employing for doing the same thing, and exactly which methods you consider best, and, therefore, worthy to be carefully measured and used as a starting point for a permanent standard. You will probably be surprised to find that you have not one place where you have a standard that you would care to have go before the world as the standard that you recommend. Begin next to observe these va. rious kinds of work, to see the units by which each kind of work could be measured, the different methods that are being used in doing the work, and the different devices which are at hand or use. We can tell you at the outset that you will be astounded to see how many methods you are using, and how many diff kinds of devices are on hand for doing exactly the same kind of work. Remember always that the larger the number of different kinds of devices the less practice and the less skill you will have h each, You will also be astounded to find upon what prin- ciple your work is divided, or, in many cases, that your work ix not divided according to any principle at all, but that mixcella- neous duties are heaped upon many members of the organizatio according to whether or not they have any more spare time. It is your task to decide which methods and which devices shall be first submitted to accurate measurement ax possible starting points for the determination of the standards, that will be at the same time the most potent object lessons ax to what ean be done under scientific management. ‘The second piece of work which you can do at the outset, and which may be done simultaneously with the first, is a study of the members of the present organization as related to one another in your organization chart, which is a graphical portrayal of what exists, to the end that you can visualize exactly what is the present state of the division of labor of your working force. At the head of this chart you will put your hospital superintendent, and under him you will put each member of the organization. rentScrENTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HosPITAL 7 connecting each individual with the others according as his du- ties relate him to them aud the paths of authority. With data of your present practice and your organization chart, you will have your problem clearly before you. If you do not put a man- agement expert in to make thix survey, you will get the next best results by having each member of the organization, so far as he is willing to co-operate to this extent, write down his own prac- tice of his duties, and, where this is not feasible, appointing some member of the organization, whom you know to be observant, to make a close study of the practice of the individual and to record it for him. In any case it will be a valuable check to have the work even of those who are making records for themselves ob- served and described by an unprejudiced observer. In selecting such methods and units ax you desire to submit to accurate measurement, observe and compare the motions used in the vations methods and the amount of fatigue caused.* Tt may be of interest also to know the “over all” time, though this must in no wise be confused with “time study,” and can only serve, in the final analysis, ax a base line from which to start your learning curves and your progress, You might be interested to know that probably no present methods and even no present cycle of mo- tions is the one that you will ultimately decide to use. The ulti- mate method will be a synthesis of the hest elements of all meth- ods submitted, but you will take most satisfaction out of this ul- timate method when you can compare it a carefully made record of the old method and note the exact changes and im- provements. With regard to the ultimate organization charts, it is pos: sible for us to give to you our functional chart, which illustrates the functions and paths of authority under scientific manage- ment, so that you may visualize for yourselves exactly what you are trying to do and the sequence of steps in making the changes. The aim of this chart is to show not only how the work should be divided, but how the individuality of the workers should be con- served and utilized. ‘There is probably no doubt in your mind as to the desirability of funetionalizing the work, and determining not only the kind of work, but the pace at which work is to be "See “Fatigue Study,” Sturgis & Walton, New York. ‘See “Avoied Science,” of Toronto University. March. 1912,8 SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HosPrTAL. done. Under present conditions in the hospital, there is usually little or no data as to the pace or the fashion of work. The win- dow-washer usually takes on the fashion of work of the surgeon, and the laborer who proceeds to get ready to undertake the be- ginning of his “operation” of sweeping a corridor looks at the broom and pail of sawdust with quite the same expression and mannerisms that the doctor uses when he looks upon the etherized patient, and is apt to perform his work with the same disregard of methods of least waste as the surgeon may use in performing a critical operation. ‘The point here is not that the surgeon should speed up his work. On the contrary, he should be so relieved of everything but his proper work that he may be able to slow down jcal work to as great an extent as is desirable. ‘The point is that a large amount of work done in the hospital is in no way a surgical or medical problem or of a critical nature, and there is no excuse for the prevalence of but one fashion of doing work for the whole establishment, Here is a typical example of where the methods, devices, standards, tasks and methods of inspection al- ready derived by motion study aud time study in the industries can be taken over bodily. Most workers in the hospital acquire, together with doctors and nurses, the feeling against specialization in the functions, and the belief that the giving up of general duties tends to im- pair permanent usefulness. They are apt to believe that those who are willing to do things entirely outside of their own special duties shall be recognized as having special merit only in their performance, while in reality the specialist in the function is the man of greatest usefulness and earning power to-day. Those who are doing their work with greatest efficiency for the organization as @ whole can afford almost no time for work outside that spe- cialty at which they are particularly efficient. This fact you must accept, and must recognize also the necessity for specializing such functions as inspection and discipline. We emphasize this par- ticularly, because in the hospitals these are the two fields in which specialization is most opposed. Without proper inspection no accurate records of performance can be obtained. Without specialized discipline no true co-operation can be obtained, and co-operation, after all, is the maintaining force.ScreNTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HOSPITAL 9 ‘The following are the principles of functionalization to which you must ultimately conform: 1. The planning must be separated from the performing. 2. The superintendent must have such a training that he is capable of investigating conditions all through the hospital on the eaception principle; that is to say, he must, when a case of peculiar success or failure is brought to him, be able to deduce the cause and to see that desirable results only are repeated. 3. ‘The planning work must be divided into four parts, one of which shall include prescribing toho shall do the work, where it shall be done, and when it shall be done; the second of which shall prescribe how it is done; the third of which shall keep ac- count of how much time it took to do it, and how much it cost; and the fourth of-which shall take care of the function of disci- pline and employment and induce and maintain co-operation by explaining the “why.” 4, The performing department must also be divided into four parts, the first and second of which shall consider different grades of teaching and the transference of skill and maintaining standard conditions; the third of which shall consist of prevent- ing breakdowns and repairing; and the fourth of which shall con- ist of inspection. 5. A study of individuals to determine who had better work under each function, and to what extent, will do much to hasten the speed of installation. All of this work you can begin immediately. It would be futile at the present time to outline to you in detail the further progress of installing scientific management in hospital work, for several reasons. The first is that the process, as so far outlined, is absolutely a preliminary to everything which follows. ‘The second is that, until you have done some preliminary work, it will scarcely be possible for you to understand the details of the in- stallation period. It remains but for you to ask what will be the ultimate sav- ings through the introduction of scientific management. They will be such savings as always result when for judgment, personal opinion and guess work is substituted the use of accurate meas-10 SclENTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE HosPITAL urement. The doctor now usex such measuring devices as a watch, thermometer, ete., but there are many more measuring de vices that are just ax necessary for purposes of obtaining efft- jency. Mcientifie management will cause elimination not only of waste of materials, but of waste of human effort, which is, in the final analysis, the most pitiful waste of all. ‘When your management becomes a science, there will result greater efficiency in you as-individuals, and in the great work of the hospitals to which you all devote your lives. All great revolutions follow the same steps of progress, namely: (1) Attention; (2) Interest; (3) Action. ‘We have been very fortunate in obtaining the affention and interest of such well-known leaders as your president, Dr. Howell, and some of the other leading surgeons of this and other coun tries; but we have not as yet been able to obtain any action to amount to anything; because of the fact that the entire structure upon which hospital management ix built ix wrong. Ax the in- centive, so will the result be, sooner or later, ‘The incentive nec essary to adopt the best from the industries does not exist at present.Delivered defore the Hospital Section of the American Medicat “Association. MOTION STUDY IN SURGERY* BY FRANK B, GILBRETH, PROVIDENCE, R11. ‘Tue real subject of this paper is ‘Motion Study in Surgery,” although it is listed in the official program as ‘‘The Standardiza- tion of the Surgical Clinic.”” I will state at the outset how we happened to undertake our campaign for revolutionizing hos- pital procedure and management. It was after hearing a most entertaining and instructive lec- ture on the subject of ‘‘Scientifie Management” by its founder, Dr. Frederick Winslow Taylor, ME., Se.D., in which he stated that the surgeon was the best mechanic and the best teacher of the learners of anyone in any craft—that we decided to make a special investigation of this subject from a motion study stand- point for the special purpose of adding to our data such inethods for the transference of manual skill and experience from any expert who has had sueh experience to a learner who has not. Dr. Taylor’s ideas of the manual dexterity and highly eff- cient standardized methods for the transference of skill in the surgical profession did not agree with my recollections of two hundred or more important operations that I had observed in large hospitals of the highest rank in 1884-1885, or of the five experiences I personally had in hospitals, or of my experience while building new hospitals and additions to several old hos- pitals, which brought me in constant contaet with surgeons and hospital management. We, therefore, proceeded to investigate the hospital from the standpoint of transference of skill, motion study, and measured functional management, that we might learn any advanced methods of teaching the trades for use in connection with our work of installing scientific management. * Reprinted from The Canadian Journal of Medicine and Surgery, July, Be2 After visiting some of our most prominent hospitals, we found that the surgeons could learn more about motion study, time study, waste elimination, and scientific management from the industries than the industries could learn from the hospitals, We then and there decided to make a vigorous campaign to revolutionize the present methods of hospital management, and to teach surgeons our methods of motion study, that waste in the transference of skill in surgery might be eliminated, and that the best methods in the mechanical trades of the industries might be available and at the service of the surgeon and the managers of the hospitals. ‘We have since studied many hospitals, some as far west as California, as far north as Toronto and Montreal, as far south as South Carolina, as far east as Germany. In each hospital, while recording existing methods, we have tried to create interest in the subject of motion study and intensive methods for obtaining mental and manual efficiency in teaching and practising surgery, and in changing the management so that the methods of the best may be recognized, standardized, and available to all. In the beginning our investigations caused much laughter, and we might have been completely routed by the derision and criticism encountered, if we had not had measured facta to guide us in- stead of tradition, personal opinion, and “judgment” (‘“judg- ment’? being too often the more sclection that comes from famil- iarity with too many wrong methods). We are pleased to see that many of the doctors whom we interviewed are now mem- bors of committees on hospital efficiency, who are recommending the beginning of actual campaigns to do that which some three years previously was considered a joke, and in some cases an impertinenee. In studying these many hospitals we find the conditions, as rule, much worse from a managerial standpoint than in the average factory, and some hospitals are 80 bad that they should be actually closed immediately. But the object of this paper is construetive, helpful criticism, consequently we will leave all other kinds, for the present at least, and proceed immediately to explain to you exactly what3 the process is for obtaining standards of least waste in any pro- fession, trade or industry. ‘The standardization of hospitals is now gradually being recognized as desirable and necessary. Such standardization must be based on measurement, which, so far as the manual processes of the surgical clinie are concerned, consists mainly of Motion Study.* It is upon this that we shall chiefly concen- trate to-day, showing the exact relation of this measurement, as made by Motion Study, to standardization, and tracing the re- sults which will come from it. Motion Study concerns itself with the investigation of activ. ity and rest, and with an attempt to accomplish the most of a given quality of output with the least expenditure of time, energy and fatigue. The three main divisions of Motion Study per- tain to: 1. The worker; 2. His equipment, surroundings, and tools; 3. His motions. Data relating to Motion Study in any one kind of work are usable in every other kind of effort, and the surgeon furnishes in every respect the ideal example to be motion studied, for the four following reasons: A, As a worker, in that he is the most interesting of all mechanics; the motions that he makes being the most delicate, the most interesting, and the most far-reaching in their importance. ‘We have already discovered sixty distinct variables of the worker, and investigation shows that this forms but a partial list. These variables are physiological and psychological; and it was the latter group that led us to make our investigations in the psychology of management, which have proved so valuable in standardizing methods of transmitting information and ex- “See ** Motion Study." D. Van Nostrand, Now York.4 perience from the superskilled to the skilled and the unskilled without any loss in transmission.* B. In his equipment, surroundings, and tools. Because of ‘the importance of his work, these should receive more attention than those of other workers, and it is generally conceded that any amount of time and money spent upon their study is well justified. In spite of this fact, as yet, the tools of the surgeon have not been standardized in any satisfactory way. Any mnemonic classification made of the tools of a hospital shows that the tool situation is positively pathetic and ridiculous, this present state being the outcome of the incentive which ever exists to design special tools. This condition can be realized only by subjecting the present tools to the tests of motion study. ‘The natural laws and underlying principles relating to effi ciency resulting from the design, selection, standardization, care and use of tools are as clearly defined as the laws of mathe- maties, and these laws are the same for all tool users, all trades and all professions, though they vary in degree in their appli- cation, ‘The possibilities of increased efficiency resulting from a scientific investigation of tools in any kind of work can be best appreciated by studying Dr. Taylor’s classic, ‘On the Art of Cutting Metals.””* Great practice with comparatively few tools is one of the laws of the most efficient use of tools. How does this compare with the custom universally present in surgery to-day? ‘The average doetor usually considers that the possession of specially designed tools is a desirable asset. The constant incentive under present conditions in surgery is to design more tools, since the designer receives eredit from the public, and sometimes also from his co- workers, and oceasionally has the honor of having the new tools named for him, Naturally, the greater the number of tools, the less must be the practice with each; the smaller becomes the chance of having a standard tool which is used by all, and the skilled use of which becomes the part of the learning and prac- See," Primer of Sclentife Management.” D. Van Nostrand, New York. SESS tramuaellons American Aoctets of Mechanical Engineers,tice of all. At present many individually owned, specially de- signed tools vary so slightly from the instruments of the hos- Pital that the operating room nurses acknowledge that they con- tinually get them mixed up with the instruments furnished by the hospitals for the same kind of operations. The gencral tools of the hospital are by no means as carefully selected as are those of the trades and factories. Gradually increasing quality of standards will not come by the practice of each surgeon design- ing new tools without a complete survey of all such tools now in existence. Instead there should be one central, specially equipped laboratory for measuring, testing and comparing all new designs with existing standards. The standardization of the tools alone is not sufficient; equip- ment and surroundings must be subject to the same process of measurement and standardization. ‘The standardization of the location of the large pieces of equipment and the arrangement of the small pieces and tools in an obvious sequence, that new cycles of motions may have that speed that comes with long practice due to the standardization of the location and habits of sequence, has already been determined with great accuracy. ‘These laws apply to the motions of surgery just the same as to all other work. Some may say that other things are more im- portant in surgery. To this we reply that our Motion Study standardizations in no way interfere with the other processes of the surgeon or his clinic, and we now have gone far enough to see that we can save more than ten per cent. of the time that the patient is under ether in the average operation, and at the same time give the surgeon more time to do his work and with less distraction. In no way does the increased efficiency due to Motion Study ‘“‘speed up” the surgeon, nor give him more to think about at the critical times. On the contrary, Motion Study standardization will permit longer periods for the surgeon and his assistants and attendants to keep their eyes on the foci of attention. C. The motions used by the surgeon offer the most fertile ficld of investigation, in that they also are at present in a surprising state of lack of standardization.6 D. Most important of all, the surgeon is, psychologically, by far the most interesting subject possible for Motion Study. The product which he handles is the most valu- able, his own attitude and that of all concerned has the most effect upon the outcome, and the effect of any changes made is the most deeply and widely felt. A Manual Research and Standards Laboratory that would act as the central measuring station for analyzing and synthesiz- ing present methods for acceptance as standards, and furnis definite methods of measurement for discovering better standards than exist anywhere either as a whole or as elements would cause progress in the surgical clinic unbelievable to-day. ‘The law for obtaining standards that automatically increase in efficieney consists of : 1. Finding the units in which to measure the desired stan- dards; 2. Determining the methods of measuring the above units; 3, Securing such devices as will make the cost of measuring these units inexpensive. It has been difficult to determine properly the units of meas- urement in surgery. The ‘‘cost per patient’? has often been advanced as a unit of measurement and is apt to be the first unit mentioned when one talks hospital efficiency. Yet, but a mo- ment’s consideration will show that this unit is comparatively unimportant, The “cost per patient’? really means nothing when unrelated to the result per patient or the total cost. to society. Even as considered, it is seldom, if ever, thought of from more than one point of view, for who ever heard anyone estimate the cost to the community for the patient’s delay in having proper attention, or the “cost per visit to the patient” who comes to the outpatient department, and must visit the hospital at that hour when it is most inconvenient and most expensive for him to come. Not to discuss further the “‘units of measurement’? which cannot prove themselves fundamental, we will state at once that the variable of the motion is the elementary unit of measurement of surgery, and is the unit for determining the efficiency of the1 hospital. Until this fact is recognized the surgeon cannot pos- sibly obtain methods of least waste. The variable of the motion is also the unit for measuring efficiency in the industries and in engineering works and where this is recognized in determining the methods workers have achieved astonishing increases in eff- ciency, sometimes as great as three to sixfold increase in produc- tivity with better resulting product, less fatigue, and more dur- able satisfaction in the outcome. The motions of the surgeon are, then, the units that are to be measured. Now exactly how do we determine these motions, and subject them to measurement? First, by analyzing activity into its vari- ous functions. This analysis is best visualized by examining the funetional chart, which classifies graphically the investigations to be made by their various functions, each of which embodies some phase of individuality, and through it to discover ulti- mately the proper man to measure at that work which he is best fitted to perform as the “observed worker.”” In this manner the work of the surgeon can be divided among the superskilled, and it ean be determined exactly whose motions are to be studied, and which of his motions are to be measured. Having determined the unit of measurement, we must next apply the methods of measurement, which are Motion Study and Time Study. The primary aim of Motion Study is to determine exactly that element which should be tested. The primary aim of Time Study is to compare the various elements measured and to decide through their time duration exactly which ones should be selected. ‘The devices to be used in making these motion studies and time studies are determined largely by the type of work and of worker to be studied. ‘Time and Motion Studies may be made by various methods: 1. By the stop watch, or with various combinations of stop watches; 2. ‘Through what we call ‘‘micro-motion study” 3. ‘Through the eyclegraph method. It is necessary for us oply to explain the latter two methods to you in detail here, (Explanation and illustration.)8 Having determined and tested the elementary motions, the next step in standardizing the methods of work is to select and combine these motions into standard eycles and these eyeles into standard methods, In order that this may be done, we must decide, first of all, exactly what work is actually necessary. Now any working day consists of four parts: 1. Necessary work; 2. Unnecessary work; 3. Avoidable delay; More or less usable for rest, 4, Unavoidable delay. } necessary to overcome fatigue. ‘We have found by long investigation that to get the greatest output with the least fatigue the following must be noted: a. All unnecessary work must be eliminated. b. Bach kind of work requires its own percentage of rest for overcoming the fatigue caused by that work. ¢. Fatigue must be recognized, and rest periods must be pro- vided for overcoming fatigue. a. Each kind of work requires its own number of rest periods for the greatest output and least fatigue. e. Too few rest periods will increase the total percentage of time that must be allowed for overcoming fatigue. £, Too many rest periods in a given total of time of rest for overcoming fatigue will reduce the quantity of output with a given amount of fatigue. g. Standard practice is less fatiguing than unstandardized practice. h, Devices ean be used to reduce fatigue of necessary work. i. Devices can be used during the rest period to make quicker recovery from fatigue. j. After the most economical periodicity of the rest intervals for the recovery from fatigue have been determined, the final step is to discover and standardize the motions of the method of least waste that make up the work intervals. It is impossible for anyone who has made critical examinations of the histories of a typical day’s work of workers in the indus-9 tries not to shudder at the general practice in hospitals of caus- ing unnecessary fatigue during the day’s work. For one ex- ample, let us cite the unnecessary fatigue due to the present practice of confounding obsolete etiquette, unscientific discip- Tine, and unnecessary fatigue in our hospitals. Having determined exactly what work is necessary the ele- ments may be combined to show how this work may be done in the most efficient manner. ‘The result is the standard. There are two ways in which the surgeon can contribute to this process of standardization: 1. By an intensive physiological study, which will help in determining the ultimate units to be measured in all 2. By being the first and foremost to volunteer individually and as a body to submit his work to accurate measurement. One hindranee to rapid progress in standardizing work in the industries has been the occasional lack of understanding of the aim of such measurement, and the consequent dislike in some instances, if not more active resentment, to having activity ac- eurately measured, There is excuse for a man of the industries, who has not had the advantage of either a general or a special edueation, being opposed to something that is quite extraordi- nary, and new to him, and that has often been misunderstood. There is absolutely no excuse for the surgeon who rejoices in a general and special education which is broader than that joyed by any other profession in the world, not understanding exactly what the seience of management is attempting to do, and not stepping forward as a body to lead the way in this great achievement of the twenticth century, and we call upon you surgeons to-day to volunteer collectively and individually, in as far as lies with you, not only personally to help in the work, but to demonstrate to others its necessity and importance. It is obvious that the results of your so doing will be a great help to science and a benefit to the entire world. It will mean the establishment of at least one standard hospital with standard practice, and the dissemination of standards, which is not to-day10 possible; it will mean a race of superskilled, each one trained with the best methods first, and ready to teach the work effi- ciently to others who are fitted for it; it will mean co-operation which is based upon a knowledge of what should be done, how 1 should be done, and who can best demonstrate and teach it; it will mean the elimination of waste so enormous that no other waste in the world equals it; finally it will mean the conservation and increase in the output of happiness minutes, the ultimate unit in which the work of the surgeons is measured,[Reprinted from the Bostox Mrpicat axp SuncicaL JOuRNAL, ‘Vol. elxxif, No. 21, pp. 774, 775, May 27, 1916.) HOSPITAL EFFICIENCY FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE EFFICIENCY EX- PERT.* By Frank B. Giierera, Provence, R. I. In order to describe what an unprejudiced and trained observer in the field of waste elimination thinks of the hospital problem, and what method of attack upon it he would advocate, it is necessary to state what an efficiency expert does, and also to state what hospital efficiency is, from the stand- point of waste elimination. An “efficiency expert,” so called, is simply an en- gineer who substitutes accurate measurement for personal opinion, judgment, and unscientifically derived conclusions: who has devised units, meth- ‘ods, and devices of measurement that enable him to measure and compare the factors of results of problems that confront him. He comes with no ready made conclusions that are results of theory only, but comes, rather, with measuring means for comparing any performance with its plan. You, whatever your interest in the hospital problem, are primarily scientists. You. are interested in facts, and the underlying laws the facts illustrate. All science is based on measurement. You know what we owe to science and measurement. The problem resolves itself into this:—How far has measure- ment been applied to hospital work, and how far have the results been taken as standards for prac- tice; how can we consider the hospital as a factory; what methods of measuring efficiency in the manu- facturing establishment are usable in a hospital? * Abstract of paper read at a meeting of the Suffolk District Medical Society, on January 6, 1916. 1In considering hospital efficiency, there are two questions which must be asked:—(1) “What does this factory, called a hospital, manufacture; what is the hospital’s aim; and how it is attempting to at- tain this aim?” (2) “Are we getting the product as cheaply, as quickly, and in as large quantities as is possible?” To consider the hospital in the most general terms, it must be considered as a “happiness fac- tory.” The hospital is subject to all the laws and processes of obtaining efficiency in the manufactur- ing establishment. The output of the hospital is “happiness minutes”; the aim of the hospital is to give the largest number of units of happiness to the most people, with the least expenditure of time, money and effort,—or, in other words, with the least expenditure of energy possible. ‘We must think of this product, happiness, (1) as of the happiness of mankind as a whole—of the social group—(2) as of the individuals comprising the group. The happiness of the social group will be best gained when each individual in the group is happy, and when all are working together for the good of all. In the factory, this condition is called “hearty codperation.” It is one of the nine funda- mental features of measured, functional manage- ment. There is nothing corresponding to this in the management of any of the scores of hospitals that we have surveyed. ‘The problem is not one of medi- cine or surgery. It is a problem of management. Tf you do not agree with me, I suggest that you write down what you think the purpose of a hos- pital is. It is not important that we agree, today, as to what the fundamental aim is. It is important that the aim be determined accurately. The next question is, “Are we getting what we are aiming for?” Individual surgeons _and_hos- pital superintendents have said, “Yes.” But if we are, have you so formulated your results that others may use them to transfer skill, and improve upward from the results of the most successful? If your 2hospital force is getting what it desires, how about the individuals comprising the group? Each indi- vidual is most efficient when he does what he can do best, and likes most, for the greatest per cent. of his time possible. The social group is most efficient when its every member has been assigned function- alized work. No hospital has as yet submitted its aims and methods to accurate measurements. Most hospitals have not put that work which they have done in such form that it can be effectively used. To apply accurate measurement,—first of all, apply the survey principle. Record what you are doing, how, and why. The first step in all improve- ment is an accurate record of present practice. But where is there such a record of hospital practice? We have been trying for three years to get some sur- geon to write a detailed account of an operation. The next step is applying measurement to the records. Such measurement is technical work. It demands an understanding of the fundamentals of management. The various tests which have been worked out, and which apply to capacity of all sorts, must be applied. The likenesses that underlie all lines of activity must be realized. It has been customary always to emphasize the difference be- tween things. We look for likenesses as well as dif- ferences. The great fundamental, underlying all lines of activity, is the fact that it is human activ- ity. ‘What we propose to you is that you learn to think in the industrial yocabulary,—to use industrial ex- perience. The industrial world has been oblis through economic pressure, to study waste elimin: tion. It has derived underlying laws for attaining least waste, underlying methods for applying these laws, and an equipment of units, methods, and de- vices of measurement. You, with the greater need, education, field, and work of greater importance,— can gain results from measured functional manage- ment, the magnitude and far reaching effects of which no industry could hope to equal. 3You have but to see and accept the necessity for measurement. What has been done in the industries is at your service. You, as individuals, can take these results, and work at your own problems; but the big things demand codperation. Functionaliza- tion, inspection, standardization, the right incentive, the proper teaching, the least fatigue, the greatest welfare—these are the results. At the root of them all lies Measurement. Time study, motion study, the chronocyclegraph and micro-motion processes,— these are means of making measurements that lie ready to your hand. The great question to be an- swered is, “Shall we make the hospital a place fit for scientists to live and work in; shall we submit our work to measurement, and act on the results?”