The document summarizes a student paper on using rapid prototyping (RP) for direct manufacture instead of injection molding. It discusses that RP has lower costs for smaller production quantities as it can build more parts faster than injection molding. However, the actual crossover point where RP becomes cheaper is higher than expected. The conclusion is that while RP is suitable now for low volume production, its costs are expected to decrease further as the technology improves.
The document summarizes a student paper on using rapid prototyping (RP) for direct manufacture instead of injection molding. It discusses that RP has lower costs for smaller production quantities as it can build more parts faster than injection molding. However, the actual crossover point where RP becomes cheaper is higher than expected. The conclusion is that while RP is suitable now for low volume production, its costs are expected to decrease further as the technology improves.
The document summarizes a student paper on using rapid prototyping (RP) for direct manufacture instead of injection molding. It discusses that RP has lower costs for smaller production quantities as it can build more parts faster than injection molding. However, the actual crossover point where RP becomes cheaper is higher than expected. The conclusion is that while RP is suitable now for low volume production, its costs are expected to decrease further as the technology improves.
Class: GCP 12 Date: 3/4 Background: To use rapid prototyping (RP) as a way to manufacture end products, replacing the current injection molding method. Costs, use of materials, quality control, and suitable applications are covered in the paper. Method: Internet based conference from November 2000 January 2001 Compare and contrast the difference on how rapid prototyping and injection molding manufacture products with the same function. Data and information are gathered from Boeings Rocketdyne propulsion and power section and NASAs Jet Propulsion lab. Results: The cost of RP when compared to the cost of injection molding is lower when manufacturing products in smaller quantities because RP can build up more parts in less time. However, the actual number which the two crosses are much higher than what is expected. Conclusion: RP may be a suitable way of manufacturing for small quantities for now, but it is expected to reach a lower cost per part in the future as the machines for RP will improve and be more common in industries. References: Hopkinson, N., & Dickens, P. (n.d.). Rapid Prototyping for direct Manufacture. Loughborough Universitys Institutional Repository.
Mulligan CJ - Wilson M - Bryant G - Vaughan B - Zhou X - Belcher WJ - Dastoor PC. A Projection of Commercial-Scale Organic Photovoltaic Module Costs - Solenergymat and SCs 2014