You are on page 1of 1

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C.

, whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is


among the counsel to the respondents in this case.
Holding: Daimler cannot be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its Argentinian subsidiary
when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 14, 2014. Justice Sotomayor filed an
opinion concurring in the judgment.

Feb 6
2012

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2012)

Feb 27
2012

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of


neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.

Mar 5
2012

Waiver of right of respondents Barbara Bauman, et al. to respond filed.

Mar 6
2012

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of


neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.

Mar 7
2012

Brief amici curiae of Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Inc., et al. filed.

Mar 8
2012

Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et


al. filed.

Mar 8
2012

Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed.

Mar 14
2012

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 30, 2012.

Mar 21
2012

Response Requested . (Due April 20, 2012)

You might also like