You are on page 1of 51

Introduction to Radar Systems

Dr. Robert M. ODonnell

MIT Lincoln Laboratory


Introduction-1
AG 6/18/02

Disclaimer of Endorsement and Liability

The video courseware and accompanying viewgraphs presented on this


server were prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the
United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any
agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology and its Lincoln Laboratory, nor any of their contractors,
subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or
implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,
completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, products, or
process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately
owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product,
process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise
does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation,
or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of
their contractors or subcontractors or the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology and its Lincoln Laboratory.

The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect
those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or any of their
contractors or subcontractors

Introduction-2
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Introduction to Radar Systems


Introduction

MIT Lincoln Laboratory


Introduction-3
AG 6/18/02

Acknowledgement

Developers of Tutorial Material


Dr. Eric D. Evans
Dr. Andrew D. Gerber
Dr. Robert M. ODonnell

Introduction-4
AG 6/18/02

Dr. Robert G. Atkins


Dr. Pamela R. Evans
Dr. Robert J. Galejs
Dr. Jeffrey S. Herd
Dr. Claude F. Noiseux
Dr. Philip K. W. Phu
Dr. Nicholas B. Pulsone
Dr. Katherine A. Rink
Dr. James Ward
Dr. Stephen D. Weiner
And many others
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Background on the Course

One of Many Radar Courses Presented at the Laboratory

Relatively Short

Introductory in Scope

Introduction-5
AG 6/18/02

Basic Radar Concepts


Minimal Mathematical Formalism

Prerequisite A College Degree

10 lectures
40 to 60 minutes each

Preferred in Engineering or Science, but not Required

More Advanced Issues Dealt with in Other Laboratory Radar


Courses

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Outline

Introduction-6
AG 6/18/02

Why radar?

The basics

Course agenda

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

What Means are Available for


Lifting the Fog of War ?
D-Day + 1

The Invasion of Normandy


D-Day

Courtesy of National Archives.

Introduction-7
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

What Means are Available for


Lifting the Fog of War ?
Courtesy of US Marine Corp, History Division.

Iwo Jima
1945

Courtesy of National Archives.

Introduction-8
AG 6/18/02

Courtesy of National Archives.

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Military Means of Sensing


Radar

Ground surveillance/
reconnaissance/ID
Laser targeting
Night vision
Space surveillance
Missile seekers

Attributes

Applications

Optical/IR

Introduction-9
AG 6/18/02

Acoustic

Other

Chem/Bio
Surveillance
Sonar
Radiological
Tracking
Blast detection
Fire control
Troop movement
Target ID/
detection
discrimination
Ground surveillance/
reconnaissance
Ground mapping
Moving target detection
Air traffic control
Missile seekers
Long range
All-weather
Day/night
3-space target location
Reasonably robust against
countermeasures
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Early Days of Radar


Chain Home Radar, Deployment Began 1936
Chain Home Radar Coverage
circa 1940
(21 Early Warning Radar Sites)

Sept 2006 Photograph of


Three Chain Home
Transmit Towers, near
Dover

Dover
Radar Site

Courtesy of Robert Cromwell.


Used with permission.

Introduction-10
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Chain Home Radar System


Typical Chain Home Radar Site
Radar Parameters

Frequency

Wavelength

350 kW

Detection Range

Introduction-11
AG 6/18/02

About 100o

Peak Power

Dipole Array on
Transmit
Crossed Dipoles on
Receive

Azimuth Beamwidth

10-15 m

Antenna

20-30 MHz

~160 nmi on
German Bomber

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Chain Home Transmit & Receive Antennas


Two Transmitter Towers
/2

360'

One Receiver Tower

/2
240'
215'

95'
45'
0'
Main Gap Filler
Antenna Antenna

Transmit Antenna
Introduction-12
AG 6/18/02

Receive Antenna
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar and The Battle of Britain


Chain Home Radar Coverage
circa 1940
(21 Early Warning Radar Sites)

The Chain Home Radar


British Force Multiplier
during the Battle of Britain

Timely warning of direction


and size of German aircraft
attacks allowed British to
Focus their limited numbers
of interceptor aircraft
Achieve numerical parity
with the attacking German
aircraft

Effect on the War


Germany was unable to
achieve Air Superiority
Invasion of Great Britain
was postponed indefinitely

Introduction-13
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Surveillance and Fire Control Radars


Courtesy of Raytheon.
Used with permission.

Courtesy of Raytheon.
Used with permission.

Courtesy of Raytheon. Used with permission.

Courtesy of Raytheon. Used with permission.

Courtesy of US Navy.

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Introduction-14

Courtesy of
Global Security.
AG 6/18/02
Used with permission.

Photo courtesy
of ITT
Corporation.
Used with
permission.

Courtesy of Raytheon. Used with permission.

Airborne and Air Traffic Control Radars


Courtesy of US Air Force.

Courtesy of US Navy.

Courtesy of Northrop Grumman.


Used with permission.

Courtesy Lincoln Laboratory.


Courtesy of US Air Force.

Introduction-15
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory


Courtesy of US Air Force.
Courtesy of US Air Force.
Courtesy of Boeing Used with permission

Instrumentation Radars

Introduction-16
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Outline

Introduction-17
AG 6/18/02

Why radar?

The basics

Course agenda

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

RADAR
RAdio Detection And Ranging
Antenna
Propagation

Target
Cross
Section
Transmitted
Pulse

Reflected
Pulse
(echo)

Radar observables:
Target range
Target angles (azimuth & elevation)
Target size (radar cross section)
Target speed (Doppler)
Target features (imaging)
Introduction-18
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Electromagnetic Waves

Courtesy Berkeley National Laboratory

Radar Frequencies

Introduction-19
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Properties of Waves
Relationship Between Frequency and Wavelength

1, 2, 3,

Speed of light, c
c = 3x108 m/sec
= 300,000,000 m/sec

Figure by
MIT OCW.

Frequency (1/s) =

Examples:

Introduction-20
AG 6/18/02

Frequency
100 MHz
1 GHz
3 GHz
10 GHz

Speed of light (m/s)


Wavelength (m)
Wavelength
3m
30 cm
10 cm
3 cm
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Properties of Waves
Phase and Amplitude
Amplitude (volts)
A
Phase,

Amplitude (volts)

A sin( )

90 phase offset

A
Phase,

Introduction-21
AG 6/18/02

A sin( 90 o )

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Properties of Waves
Constructive vs. Destructive Addition

Partially Constructive
(somewhat out of phase)

Constructive
(in phase)

Destructive
(180 out of phase)
Introduction-22
AG 6/18/02

Non-coherent signals
(noise)
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Polarization
y
Electric Field
Electric Field

Electromagnetic Wave
Electromagnetic Wave

Magnetic
Magnetic Field
Field

Horizontal Polarization

Vertical Polarization

E
x
Introduction-23
AG 6/18/02

z
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar Frequency Bands


Wavelength

1 km

Frequency

UHF

1m

1 MHz

L-Band

1 GHz

S-Band

1 m

1 mm

109 Hz

1 nm

1012 Hz
IR
UV
Visible

C-Band

Ku
K
Ka
W

X-Band

VHF
0

30 20
Introduction-24
AG 6/18/02

10 9

5
6
7
8
Allocated Frequency (GHz)

8 7

6
5
Wavelength (cm)

10

11

12

3
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

IEEE Standard Radar Bands


(Typical Use)
HF
VHF
UHF

Introduction-25
AG 6/18/02

3 30 MHz
30 MHz300 MHz
300 MHz1 GHz

L-Band

1 GHz2 GHz

S-Band

2 GHz4 GHz

C-Band

4 GHz8 GHz

X-Band

8 GHz12 GHz

Ku-Band

12 GHz18 GHz

K-Band

18 GHz27 GHz

Ka-Band

27 GHz40 GHz

W-Band

40 GHz 100+ GHz

Search
Radars

Search &
Track Radars
Fire Control &
Imaging Radars

Missile
Seekers

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar Block Diagram

Propagation
Medium
Target
Cross
Section

Transmitter

Waveform
Generator

Signal Processor
Antenna

Receiver

Pulse
Compression

A/D

Main Computer

Detection

Introduction-26
AG 6/18/02

Tracking &
Parameter
Estimation

Doppler
Processing

Console /
Display
Recording

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar Range Equation

Antenna Aperture A
Transmitted Pulse

Transmit Power PT

Target Cross Section

Received Pulse

Figure by MIT OCW.

Received Signal
=
Energy

Introduction-27
AG 6/18/02

Transmit
Power

Transmit
Gain

Spread
Factor

Losses

Target
RCS

PT

4A
2

1
4R2

1
L

Spread Receive
Factor Aperture

1
4R2

Dwell
Time

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Signal-to-Noise Ratio

Received Signal

Noise

SNR =

Introduction-28
AG 6/18/02

Received Signal Energy


Noise Energy

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

What the #@!*% is a dB?


The relative value of two things, measured on a
logarithmic scale, is often expressed in deciBels (dB)

Example:

Signal-to-noise ratio (dB) = 10 log 10

Factor of:
10
100
1000

.
.
.

1,000,000

Introduction-29
AG 6/18/02

Scientific
Notation
101
102
103

106

Signal Power
Noise Power

dB
10
20
30

0 dB = factor of 1
-10 dB = factor of 1/10
-20 dB = factor of 1/100

60

3 dB = factor of 2
-3 dB = factor of 1/2
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Pulsed Radar
Terminology and Concepts

Peak power

Power

Pulse length

Target
Return
Pulse repetition interval
(PRI)

Duty cycle =

Time

Pulse length
Pulse repetition interval

Average power = Peak power * Duty cycle


Pulse repetition frequency (PRF) = 1/(PRI)
Continuous wave (CW) radar: Duty cycle = 100% (always on)
Introduction-30
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Pulsed Radar
Terminology and Concepts

Peak power

Power

Pulse length

100 sec

1 MW

Target
Return

1 W

Pulse repetition interval


(PRI) 1 msec

Duty cycle =

Pulse length
Pulse repetition interval

Time
10%

Average power = Peak power * Duty cycle

100 kW

Pulse repetition frequency (PRF) = 1/(PRI)

1 kHz

Continuous wave (CW) radar: Duty cycle = 100% (always on)


Introduction-31
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Brief Mathematical Digression


Scientific Notation and Greek Prefixes

Scientific
Notation

Standard
Notation

Greek
Prefix

Radar
Examples

109

1,000,000,000

Giga

GHz

106

1,000,000

Mega

MHz, MW

103

1,000

kilo

km

101

10

100

10-3

0.001

milli

msec

10-6

0.000,001

micro

sec

MHz = Megahertz
MW = Megawatt
Introduction-32
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar Waveforms
What do radars transmit?

Waves?

or Pulses?

Introduction-33
AG 6/18/02

Waves, modulated
by on-off action of
pulse envelope

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar Waveforms (contd.)

Frequency

Pulse at single frequency

Time

Frequency

Pulse with changing frequency


Linear
FrequencyModulated
(LFM)
Waveform

Time
Introduction-34
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar Range Measurement

e
ng
a
R

Target
d
tte
i
nsm se
a
r
T Pul
ted
c
e
fl
Re ulse
P

Target range =

c
2

where c = speed of light


= round trip time
Courtesy of Raytheon. Used with permission.

Introduction-35
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Antenna Gain

Isotropic antenna

Directional antenna
G = antenna gain

Introduction-36
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Propagation Effects on Radar Performance

Atmospheric attenuation

Reflection off of earths surface

Over-the-horizon diffraction

Atmospheric refraction

Radar
Radarbeams
beamscan
canbe
beattenuated,
attenuated,reflected
reflectedand
and
bent
bentby
bythe
theenvironment
environment

Introduction-37
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar Cross Section (RCS)

RCS
Incident
Power Density
(Watts/m2)

(m2)

Reflected
Power
(Watts)

Radar Cross Section (RCS, or s) is the effective crosssectional area of the target as seen by the radar
measured in m2, or dBm2
Introduction-38
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Signal Processing
Pulse Compression
Problem: Pulse can be very long; does not allow accurate range measurement
1 msec x c = 150 km
2

?
Figure by
MIT OCW.

Solution: Use pulse with changing frequency and signal process using matched filter

Matched
Filter
Uncompressed pulse
Introduction-39
AG 6/18/02

Compressed pulse
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Narrowband
Waveform
Bandwidth

Frequency

Bandwidth

Compressed
Pulse

R =

Low
Range
Resolution

c
2B

Range

Time

Bandwidth

Frequency

Wideband
Waveform

Time
Introduction-40
AG 6/18/02

High
Range
Resolution

Compressed
Pulse

Range
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Why Bandwidth is Important


Wideband Target Profile
Bandwidth

Power

Very High
(X 30)

High
(X 10)

Medium
(X 3)

Low

Relative Range (m)

Introduction-41
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Detection of Signals in Noise

Detected Target

Power

False
Alarm
Missed
Target

Detection
Threshold

RMS
Noise
Level
Range

Introduction-42
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Coherent Integration

Voltage

Signal buried
in Noise
(SNR < 0 dB)

Pulse 1

+ Pulse 2

0
+ Pulse 3
Signal integrated
out of Noise
(SNR increases by N)

..
.

Signals are same each time;


add coherently (N2)
Noise is different each time;
doesnt add coherently (N)
Introduction-43
AG 6/18/02

|x|2

Power

+ Pulse N

0
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Doppler Effect

Observer A

Observer B

Observer A Hears

Observer B Hears

Driver Hears
Figure by MIT OCW.
Introduction-44
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Doppler Shift Concept

f ==
c

c
f

c
f = f (2v/)

Introduction-45
AG 6/18/02

Doppler
shift

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Why Doppler is Important


Surface Radar

Clutter returns are much larger than


target returns
however, targets move, clutter
doesnt.

Airborne Radar

Note: if youre moving too, you need


to take that into account.

Doppler
Doppler lets
lets you
you separate
separate things
things that
that are
are moving
moving from
from things
things that
that arent
arent
Introduction-46
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Clutter Doppler Spectra


70

Land
Sea
Rain
Chaff
Birds

Relative Power (dB)

60
50
40
30
20
10

Target

0
-10
-20
0

50

100

150

200

Velocity (m/s)
Introduction-47
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Radar Block Diagram

Propagation
Medium
Target
Cross
Section

Transmitter

Waveform
Generator

Signal Processor
Antenna

Receiver

Pulse
Compression

A/D

Main Computer

Detection

Introduction-48
AG 6/18/02

Tracking &
Parameter
Estimation

Doppler
Processing

Console /
Display
Recording

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Outline

Introduction-49
AG 6/18/02

Why radar?

The basics

Course agenda

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Introduction to Radar Systems Tutorial


Agenda

Introduction

Radar Equation

Propagation Effects

Target Radar Cross Section

Detection of Signals in Noise & Pulse Compression

Radar Antennas

Radar Clutter and Chaff

Signal Processing-MTI and Pulse Doppler

Tracking and Parameter Estimation

Transmitters and Receivers

Introduction-50
AG 6/18/02

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

References

Introduction-51
AG 6/18/02

Skolnik, M., Introduction to Radar Systems, New York,


McGraw-Hill, 3rd Edition, 2001
Nathanson, F. E., Radar Design Principles, New York,
McGraw-Hill, 2nd Edition, 1991
Toomay, J. C., Radar Principles for the Non-Specialist, New
York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989
Buderi R., The Invention That Changed the World, New
York, Simon and Schuster, 1996

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

You might also like