You are on page 1of 21

2010 API Spring Refining and Equipment Standards Meeting

Differences Between API-2000


5th and 6th Editions
Brad Otis
April 26, 2010

The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly or indirectly owns investments are separate
entities. In this presentation the expressions "Shell", "Group" and "Shell Group" are sometimes used for
convenience where references are made to Group companies in general. Likewise the words "we", "us"
and "our" are also used to refer to Group companies in general or those who work for them. The
expressions are also used where there is no purpose in identifying specific companies.
Shell Global Solutions is a network of independent technology companies in the Shell Group. In this
presentation the expression Shell Global Solutions is sometimes used for convenience where reference
is made to these companies in general, or where no useful purpose is served by identifying a particular
company.

The information contained in this presentation contains forward-looking statements, that are subject to
risk factors which may affect the outcome of the matters covered. None of Shell International B.V., any
other Shell company and their respective officers, employees and agents represents the accuracy or
completeness of the information set forth in this presentation and none of the foregoing shall be liable
for any loss, cost, expense or damage (whether arising from negligence or otherwise) relating to the
use of such information.
The information contained in this presentation is intended to be general in nature and must not be
relied on as specific advice in connection with any decisions you may make. Shell Global Solutions is
not liable for any action you may take as a result of you relying on such material or for any loss or
damage suffered by you as a result of you taking this action. Furthermore, these materials do not in any
way constitute an offer to provide specific services. Some services may not be available in certain
countries or political subdivisions thereof.
Copyright 2010 Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc. All copyright and other (intellectual property) rights in
all text, images and other information contained in this presentation are the property of Shell
International B.V. or other Shell companies. Permission should be sought from Shell International B.V.
before any part of this presentation is reproduced, stored or transmitted by any means, electronic or
mechanical including by photocopy, recording or information storage and retrieval system.

Agenda
Recent History
Significant Differences
o Normal Tank Venting
o Internal Deflagration
o Flame Propagation Through PVVs
o Refrigerated Tank Venting
o Testing of Venting Devices
Path Forward

Recent History
API-2000 5th Edition
o Published April 1998
o Work started on 6th edition
ISO - 28300
o New work item submitted in June 2006
o Convert and update API-2000 into ISO Standard
o FDIS 28300 submitted Jan 2008
o Memo highlighting differences issued
o FDIS approved with no negative ballots
API adopted-back in Dec 09 with no negative ballots
Now working 2nd edition of ISO-28300 (API-2000 7th
edition)

Microsoft Office
Word 97 - 2003 Document

Significant Differences
Normal Tank Venting
EN 14015 Tank Venting
o EN 14015 Tank design standard used in Europe
o Venting model based on theory and validated via test
o Applicable to any tank service, any temperature, and
any size
o Therefore placed in main body of ISO standard
API-2000 5th Edition Tank Venting
o Venting model based on theory with simplified
assumptions
o Applicable to hexane or similar services, temperature
< 120 F, and tanks < 180,0000 bbls
o Therefore placed in Annex A of ISO standard

EN-14015 Validation Test


Tests and model calculations at Hoechst in 1980 and 1981

Tank: V = 617 m3; D = 8,5 m; H = 10,6 m


17 C T 26 C
Water (rain) flow density: about 60 kg/m2h
TRbF-model calculation

Significant Differences
Normal Tank Venting - continued
Discussion
o Both methods are acceptable when applied correctly
o Both were included
To fill gap where Annex A method does not apply
To allow continued use of the Annex A method
To ensure global support for the FDIS
o EN-14015 vent loads can be higher than Annex A
Calculations and comparison courtesy of Protego
(USA) Inc.

Calculation Examples
Tank 1
Tank:
- Height: 5m
- Diameter: 7m
- Tank volume: 192.4 m3
- Pump in rate: 96 m3/h
- Pump out rate: 96 m3/h
- Vertical tank
- No insulation
- MAWP: 7.5 mbar
- MAWV: 2.5 mbar

Inbreathing Requirements (Total) for Tank 1

Outbreathing Requirements (Total) for Tank 1

226

116

117

123

130
118

122
109

Overview Inbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)


Small tanks (<3,180 m3)

Overview Inbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)


Large tanks (>3,180 m3)

OutsidescopeofAPI2000

Overview Outbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)


Small tanks (<3,180 m3)

Overview Outbreathing Venting Requirements (thermal)


Large tanks (>3,180 m3)

OutsidescopeofAPI2000

Significant Differences
Normal Tank Venting - continued
Discussion
o Operational experience with petroleum or
petrochemical fluid storage tanks indicates that tank
failures/damage due to vacuum have not been
caused by inadequate venting when that relief
system is designed using the method in this Annex
o Tanks that meet the criteria in Annex A can have
tank vents designed using the method shown in
Annex A.
o Tanks that dont meet the Annex A criteria, then the
general method in 4.3.2.1 should be used.
Questions?

Significant Differences
Internal Deflagration
New section on tank internal deflagration
Provides examples on how this may be mitigated
Previously no home for this issue
Detailed presentation on this on 4/28/10 at API-2000
meeting
Questions?

Significant Differences
Flame Propagation Through PVV
The 5th edition states A flame arrester is not
considered necessary for use in conjunction with a PV
valve venting to atmosphere because flame speeds are
less than vapor velocities across the seats of PV.
Recent controlled experiments have shown that flash
back through a PVV is possible during very low
unstable outflow conditions or if there is an external
flammable vapor cloud that ignites with sufficient
overpressure to lift the vacuum pallet.

Significant Differences
Flame Propagation Through PVV - continued
API-2010 and NFPA-30 have language similar to what
was stated in the 5th edition of API-2000
Until those standards are updated, there will appear to
be an inconsistency on this issue.
Questions?

Significant Differences
Refrigerated Tank Venting
Completely re-written
Previously was based on hexane
Borrowed heavily from EN14620 and EN1473
Questions?

Significant Differences
Testing of Venting Devices
New section to provide consistency in capacity testing
Combination of API 2000 5th edition section 4.6 and EN
14015 Annex L.6.
Questions?

Path Forward
2nd Edition of ISO-28300 is being worked now
Fall 2010 is deadline for submitting new items

You might also like