BA 370 (EMPLOYMENT LAW) ALL CASE ANALYSES AND COURSE

PROJECT
To purchase this, visit here
http://www.coursehomework.com/product/ba-370-employment-law-all-caseanalyses-and-course-project/
Contact us at:

+1 315-750-4434
help@coursehomework.com

BA 370 (EMPLOYMENT LAW) ALL CASE

ANALYSES AND COURSE PROJECT - A+
WORK
Case Analyses 1

Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list
below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of
both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical
citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific
information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed
guidelines for APA format.

Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes (Ch 1, p 17)

Nino v. The Jewelry Exchange (Ch 1, p 22)

Narayan v. EGL, Inc. (Ch 2, p 37)

Solis v. Laurelbrook Sanitarium and School (Ch 2, p 42)

Zheng v. Liberty Apparel Co. (Ch 2, p 51)

Jones v. Oklahoma City Public Schools (Ch 3, p 77)

Hasan v. Foley & Lardner, LLP (Ch 3, p 80)

Collazo v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Manufacturing (Ch 3, p 89)

Case Analyses 2

Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list
below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of
both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical
citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific
information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed
guidelines for APA format.

EEOC v. Target Corp. (Ch 4, p 113)

Harrison v. Benchmark Electronics Huntsville Ch 4, p 119)

Stewart v. Jackson & Nash (Ch 4, p 123)

D.D.N. v. FACE (Ch 4, p 136)

Burghy v. Dayton Racquet Club (Ch 5, p. 147)

Sigal Construction v. Stanbury (Ch 5, p. 153)

Case Analyses 3
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list
below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of
both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical
citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific
information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed
guidelines for APA format.

Brownfield v. City of Yakima (Ch 6, p 176)

EEOC v. Dial Corp. (Ch 6, p 185)

Lanning v. SEPTA (Ch 6, p 191)

Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections (Ch 7, p 204)

Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America (Ch 7, p 213)

Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority (Ch 7, p 220)

Case Analyses 4
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list
below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of
both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical
citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific
information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed
guidelines for APA format.

Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County (Ch 8, p 242)

Lomack v. City of Newark (Ch 8, p 249)

Dean v. City of Shreveport (Ch 8, p 251)

EEOC v. Fairbrook Medical Clinic, P.A. (Ch 9, p 277)

Hardage v. CBS (Ch 9, p 286)

EEOC v. Xerxes Corp. (Ch 9, p 291)

Case Analyses 5
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list
below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of
both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical
citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific
information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed
guidelines for APA format.

Horgan v. Simmons (Ch 10, p 313)

EEOC v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions (Ch 10, p 322)

Cloutier v. Costco (Ch 10, p 335)

Scobey v. Nucor Steel-Arkansas (Ch 11, p 357)

Bachelder v. America West Airlines (Ch 11, p 361)

Petty v. Metropolitan Govt of Nashville & Davidson County (Ch 11, p

369)

Case Analyses 6
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list
below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of
both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical
citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific
information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed
guidelines for APA format.

Chao v. Gotham Registry (Ch 12, p 395)

Whalen v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 12, p 405)

Vehar v. Cole National Group (Ch 12, p 415)

Livick v. Gillette (Ch 13, p 430)

Battoni v. IBEW Local Union No. 102 Employee Pension Plan (Ch 13, p
435)

DiFelice v. U.S. Airways (Ch 13, p 443)

MasTec Advanced Technologies (Ch 14, p 466)

United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 204 v. NLRB (Ch 14, p
475)

NLRB v. Whitesell Corp. (Ch 15, p 490)

Case Analyses 7
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list
below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of
both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical
citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific
information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed
guidelines for APA format.

R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC (Ch 15, p 510)

Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (Ch 15, p 528)

State Ex Re. Gross v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (Ch 15, p 533)

Senske v. Sybase, Inc. (Ch 16, p 554)

Cortez v. Walmart Stores (Ch 16, p 562)

Hoffman v. Caterpillar (Ch 16, p 571)

Hernandez v. Hillsides (Ch 17, p 591)

Stengart v. Loving Care Agency (Ch 17, p 602)

Dietz v. Finley Fine Jewelry (Ch 17, p 610)

Case Analyses 8
Case Analyses: select TWO court cases (from different chapters) from the list
below, and respond in writing to the case questions. The written analysis of
both cases should be approximately 2-3 pages total; use parenthetical
citations and a corresponding works cited list when referencing specific
information from the text or other sources, and follow other prescribed
guidelines for APA format.

Dillon v. Champion Jogbra (Ch 18, p 632)

Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services (Ch 18, p 639)

Sharkey v. J.P. Morgan Chase (Ch 18, p 647)

Descotiis v. Whittemore (Ch 18, p 662)

Collins v. Gee West Seattle LLC (Ch 19, p 686)

Wittenburg v. American Express (Ch 19, p 692)

Proudfoot Consulting v. Gordon (Ch 19, p 708)

Course Project Overview

Develop a training program to help new managers learn the fundamentals of
employment law and their role in implementing the policies and practices that

maintain legal compliance in the workplace. Components of the project are

assigned in each module, contributing to the comprehensive final product by
the end of the course.

Training Objectives
Develop 5-7 training objectives for the program. What should managers know
and be able to do when they have completed the training program?

Program Outline
Develop a 1-page outline of the content you plan to include in the training
program. What major topics and subtopics will be covered? What are the most
important things managers will need to know about their role in employment
law compliance? Include ideas about the kinds of training methods best suited
for delivering the content and achieving the learning objectives.

Informational methods: one-way communication to convey important

factual information (i.e. lectures and audiovisual media).

Experiential methods: interactive methods to give trainees opportunity

to apply knowledge, practice skills, and demonstrate behaviors (i.e. elearning, simulations, case study analysis, and role play).

Annotated Bibliography
Write an annotated bibliography to gather descriptive information about the
sources you will use to develop your training program; use at least five
credible, scholarly resources besides the text. Once complete, the annotated
bibliography will also serve as a reference list for trainees, a takeaway new
managers can use on the job when confronted with employment law issues
and the need to consult specific resources for further information.

In addition to the bibliographical information about the source that would

typically appear in a works cited list, include a concise paragraph or two to
briefly summarize the content of the source and to describe how it is relevant
to the training or how it will be useful to managers beyond the training.

Here is an example of an annotated bibliography entry for the Purdue Online

Writing Lab (OWL):

Purdue OWL. Annotated Bibliographies. The Purdue OWL. Purdue U Writing

Lab, 08 Jan. 2010. Web. 10 March 2010.
<http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/01/>
This webpage from the Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) defines how an
annotated bibliography is different from a typical works cited list, in that it
includes additional descriptive information about the sources in paragraph
form. It further explains that the annotations, or additional notes about a
source, might serve one or more purposes: to summarize the content of the
source; to evaluate its usefulness, reliability, and objectivity; and/or to reflect
about its applicability to a particular argument or research. Students who are
asked to write an annotated bibliography will find this information helpful
because it clearly explains what an annotated bibliography is, why it might be
useful to write one, and how to do so (including links to additional
information on formatting in various writing styles such as MLA and APA).

Training Content, Part 1

Expanding on the outline created in Module 2, develop the content for the
first half of the training program as it will be presented to trainees. In the
outline, you identified the most important things managers will need to know
about employment law. In this part of the project, you will explain those
things in greater detail so that new managers can better understand their

role in human resource practice and workplace compliance with employment

laws.
This component of the project will likely take the form of a Power Point
presentation, although other delivery methods may be considered. Whatever
medium is used, it should allow for a sufficient amount of detail about each
subtopic and key point. For example, the slides in a Power Point presentation
might contain concise bullet points, while elaboration of those key points is
provided in the notes section below each slide (in normal view, but not
visible in slideshow mode). Alternatively, audio recordings can be added to
the presentation so that trainees may view it in slideshow mode and hear the
trainer elaborate on the key points in each slide. Be sure to cite sources and
provide references for trainees to seek further information.

Training Content, Part 2

Develop the content for the second half of the training program.

Case Study
Write a 2-page original case study in which you present a scenario (related to
some aspect of employment law) for trainees to analyze. The scenario may be
hypothetical, or based on actual events or circumstances (so long as the
names of individuals and companies are changed to protect privacy and
confidentiality). The case study should provide sufficient background
information and factual details so that trainees can apply knowledge gained
from the training as they analyze the scenario and formulate solutions or
recommendations. The written case study should include 4-5 questions to
stimulate critical thinking and discussion about the scenario and relevant
concepts.

Trainee Assessment (Knowledge and Application of Content)

Develop an instrument to measure the trainees understanding of and ability

to apply specific concepts from the training. To what extent are they able to
do that which was identified in the training objectives? This portion of the
project may take the form of a traditional paper/pencil quiz or a computerbased simulation, if students have sufficient technology skills. Be sure to
provide both questions and answers so that trainees are able to self-evaluate
their understanding of the concepts and their degree of achievement of the
training objectives.

Complete Training Program

Based on feedback from the instructor and peers in previous modules, make
revisions to various portions of the training program as needed or
appropriate. Compile the individual components into an integrated whole, and
submit the final project.