Taylor Hawkin1

You might also like

You are on page 1of 2

Taylor Hawkins

Professor Rubio
EDU 360
5/17/15
Technology Assessment 2
As can be viewed in the picture gallery above, Technology Assessment 2 was a great
experience of forming questions to a certain learning level. Each question should be individually
formed, and also have a difficulty level that is appropriate for the capabilities of those children
within the classroom. My particular questions were aimed at the overarching ability of students
in typical or atypical styles of a classroom.
According to the statistics of the assessment, the difficulty levels of my questions did not
necessarily vary at a substantial rate. According to the recommended level of effort needed for
each question, the students should be scaffold up throughout the quiz. It is important to offer
students with an appropriate level of challenge that will only enable them to learn with a greater
level of understanding. Even though my questioning portrayed a significant level of
understanding, a gradual increase of challenge was lacking.
As a teacher constructs learning procedures for a particular classroom, it is important to
take each childs capabilities into account. Each student was given the opportunity to learn and
succeed, but this freedom of learning for all students was not offered during each question. As
you read through this brief essay reflection, please look above to the screenshot graphs. These
pictures will give you a further understanding of the differentiation between the students, and the
questions being asked.

You might also like