Context Purpose Lacey v general (QLD) 242 573 Involved the term appeal basic common law rights 6-1 majority party of the High Court (Heydon J dissenting) settled on the word appeal in the opening words to hold like other appeals the appellate court could not intervene unless it first determined error in the original sentence A Principle of double jeopardy Sentence on conviction Error or discretion Provision like the s669A of the Criminal Code (QLD) (1) The Attorney-general may appeal to the court against any sentence pronounced by o (a) the court of trial; or o (b) a court of summary jurisdiction in a case where an indictable offence is dealt with summarily by that court; And the court may in its unfettered discretion vary the sentence and impose such sentence as to the court seems proper Ambiguity Texts within a statute cannot be cut out- the assumption that parliament intended every word to amount to the Act Judicial method and parliamentary method marriage in the constitution may be subject to interpretation before court 1998 NSW governing bodies with power to conduct enquires and to make known its findings to the executive to recommend further action. Otherwise prosecuted Exercise of its powers may compel the content of