Facts: A petition for prohibition with prayer for a writ of preliminary injunction was filed by concerned citizens, members of the National Assembly, parties with general interest common to all people of the Philippines, and as taxpayers, on the constitutionality of paragraph one, Section 44 of Presidential Decree No. 1177. The grounds are that Section 44 infringes upon the fundamental law of the land by authorising the illegal transfer of the public's money, by being repugnant to the Constitution, by allowing the President to override appropriations procedure acknowledged by the Constitution, and undue delegation of the legislative powers to the executive. The Solicitor General then, quickly questioned the legal standing of the public respondents and stated how one branch cannot be enjoined by another. Furthermore, it alleged that the petition has been considered moot and academic after the abrogation of Section 16, Article VIII of the 1973 Constitution by the Freedom Constitution stating, "No law shall be passed authorising any transfer of appropriations, however, the President may by law be authorised to augment any item in the General Appropriations Law for their respective offices from savings in other items of their respective appropriations." Issue: 1. Whether or not Paragraph 1, Section 44 of President Decree No. 1177 unconstitutional? Held: Paragraph one, Section 44 of Presidential Decree No. 1177 unduly overextends its privilege in accordance to Section 16[5], Article VIII of the 1973 Constitution that grants privilege to high officials in office such as the President to indiscriminately transfer funds from one department to another. The said provision does not only completely disregard the standards set by the Constitution, thus, leading to the undue delegation of legislative powers. Only when transfers of savings within one department to another included in the General Appropriations Act may be allowed by law. Because of these reasons, the provision is hereby declared null and void.