You are on page 1of 5

34 12

2 0 1 3 12

ACTA ARMAMENTARII

Vol. 34 No. 12
Dec.

2013

, , ,
( , 100191)

: ,
, ( GERT)

,
,

: ; ; ; ;
: TJ590

: A

DOI: 10. 3969 / j. issn. 10001093. 2013. 12. 018

: 10001093(2013)12161105

Aircraft Support Process Time Analysis


Based on Graphic Evaluation and Review Technique
WU Yong, PAN Xing, KANG Rui, MA Lin

( School of Reliability and System Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)

Abstract: To deal with the uncertainty problem about the logical relationship and time of aircraft support

activities, a support process model based on random network is built by analyzing the aircraft support operating
process. The support operating time is solved by graphical evaluation and review technique ( GERT) , and
the solution steps are given. A support process example is studied to demonstrate the effectiveness and
applicability of the proposed methodology. According to sensitivity parameter analysis, the corresponding
suggestions on aircraft support operations are presented.

Key words: systems engineering methodology; aircraft; support process; random network; graphic
evaluation and review technique

,, MAS

[1] ,
( ) ,
2 :1)
,

[2 - 6]

[2] [4] Petri


[5] ;2)
[7 - 10] ,
[7]
[8]
[9 - 10]
,
,

: 2013 - 05 - 30

: (71171008)
: (1982) ,, Email:skyworldwy@ dse. buaa. edu. cn;
(1966) ,,, Email:kangrui@ buaa. eud. cn

1612

34

,
;,
,,
,
,
,,
,

( PERT) ( GERT) ,
GERT
[11] GERT Eisner 1962 ,1966

Pritsker [12] , GERT ,


Whitehouse [13]
GERT , GERT

,GERT
[14 - 15] [16]

[17]

,,
GERT ;
,

Fig. 1 Flow chart of aircraft support

3 ;
, 1

Tab. 1 Node type of random network

1
1 1
,

F / A18C ,

,;
,,
,


,:

1) ,

,,

, ,

;,

;;

1 2

2) ,

12

1613

3) ,

,,

1 ,

Fig. 2 Random network model of aircraft support operations

,(i,j) 2 :(i,j)
P ij t ij .

2
GERT
GERT , [12]
M E ( s) n s = 0
t n ,

W ij ( s) ;L j ( m,s) j
m W j ( s) ;H( s) GERT

, 1
[13]

W E ( s) P E

M E ( s) ,
W E ( s) = P E M E ( s) .

(1)

W E ( s)

d
E( t) = M E ( s)
.
(2)
ds
s =0
E( t) , M E ( s) t ij

W E (0) = P E M E (0) = P E

E[ t ] =

dn
M E ( s)
ds n

:p i ( s) j

s =0

st

- e f( t) dt,
st
M( s) = E( e ) =
e st P( t) ,
t

;
.

(3)
:f( t) ( i,j) t ;
P( t) t

2 :( i,j)
i Pij (i,j)
M ij ( s) . GERT ,

W ij ( s) = P ij M ij ( s) .

(4)

GERT

W E ( s) =

p i ( s)

[ 1 + ( - 1)
m

H( s)

L j ( m,s)

[15]

s = 0 ,

M E ( s) =

e st f( t) dt

W E ( s)
.
W E (0)

M E ( s)

s =0

(6)

= PE ,

(7)
(8)

1) ,

2)

:
;

3) ,(4)

GERT
W E ( s) ;

4) W E ( s) ,

M E ( s) ,
E( t) .

(5)

3
,

1614

1 + 45 F / A18

[18]

, 2

2 1 + 45

Tab. 2 Statistics of support activities at 1 + 45 tempo


i

CAD

/ min

/ min

34

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12,L1 ( m,s) = 1;

012 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 12,L2 (m,s) = 1;


0 1 2 7 8 9 10 12,L3 ( m,s) = 1.

2 1 :
3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 3,

3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3.

12 0

GERT

5 0
5 0

193 0

3 0

14 0

CAD

100 0

2 0

8 3

3 0 min

10 2

WE(s) =

38 8(2 91 106 -1 28 107s +1 36 107s2 -1 97 106s3 +76 000s4)e0 27s


.
(1 13 108 -5 94 108s +7 93 108s2 -1 99 108s3 +2 03 107s4 -9 34 105s5 +16 000s6)
(7)

3 0
1 2

W E (0) = 1,

M E ( s) = W E ( s) / W E (0) = W E ( s) .

(2)

60 10

W01W12W1012(W27 +W23W35W56W67 +W23W34W46W67)


=
1 -W67W1011W113(W34W46 +W35W56)

E( t) =

50 ~ 70

d
M ( s)
ds E

F / A18 24% .

,10%

4 1

1 4 1, 14%
3% .
,
,
, 3

1 00

0 25

e0 25s

1 00

0 59

1 00

CAD(27) 0 76

1 00

1 00

1 00

(12)

0 24

0 41

1 00

CAD(67) 1 00

1 00

0 03

(23)
(34)
(35)
(46)
(56)

(78)
(89)

(910)
(1011)
(113)
(1012)

0 97

1 148 1 60 = 68 886 min,,


,

4 2

Tab. 3 Parameters of aircraft support activities

(01)

= 1 148 1 h.

( i - j)

s =0

12 50

12 5 / (12 5 - s)

0 31

0 31 / (0 31 - s)

12 50
0 60

12 5 / (12 5 - s)

12 5 / (12 5 - s)

20 00

20 / (20 - s)

20 00

20 00

20 / (20 - s)

12 50
0 02

0 3]. 3

20 / (20 - s)

4 35 / (4 35 - s)

12 50

, 2 a,b[0,

12 5 / (12 5 - s)

4 35
5 88

0 6 / (0 6 - s)

12 50
12 50

F / A18 a

5 88 / (5 88 - s)

Fig. 3 The effect of the change in operating

12 5 / (12 5 - s)
12 5 / (12 5 - s)
e

0 02s

0 12 ,
L j ( m,s) . 3 :0 1

probability on operation time

12

4 3

,
, 3
:

1) ,

MTBF,
MTTR.

2) ,

,

,

modeling method for integrated logistic support of the carrier

aircraft[ J] . Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010,32 (1 ) :

211 - 216. ( in Chinese)

[7] . [ D] .
:,2012.

LIN Jipeng. Research on aircraft sortie generation rate based on


discrete event[ D] . Harbin:Harbin Engineering University,2012.
( in Chinese)

[8] ,. GRASP
[ J] . , 2002,13(7) : 43 - 45.

ZHANG Liu, YU Yongli. GRASPbased maintenance time and

manhour model [ J ] . China Mechanical Engineering, 2002,

13(7) : 43 - 45. ( in Chinese)

[9] ,,.
[ J] . ,2006,18(10) :2945 - 2951.
XU Hang, ZHU Yifan, CHEN Chunliang.

Research on

battlefield damaged armored materiel maintenance man hour

,
,

,
( References)
[1] Jewel A.

1615

Sortie generation capacity of embarked airwings,

ADA359178[ R] . Alexandria:Center for Naval Analysis,1997.

[2] ,,. MAS [ J] .

simulation and its distribution[ J] . Journal of System Simulation,

2006,18(10) :2945 - 2951. ( in Chinese)

[10] ,,,. [J].


, 2010,16(10) : 2227 - 2232.

WANG Xuewang, KANG Rui, ZHANG Zhenying,et al. Task


driven support activity time optimization[ J] . Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems, 2010, 16 ( 10 ) : 2227 - 2232. ( in
Chinese)

[11] ,. [ M] . :
,1987:9 - 11.

FENG Yuncheng, LYU Chunlian. The random network and


application[ M] . Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics and
Astronautics Press,1987:9 - 11. ( in Chinese)

, 2009,30(11) : 2119 - 2125.

[12] Pritsker A A. GERT graphical evaluation and review technique[M].

for dynamic scheduling of carrier aircraft[ J] . Chinese Journal of

[13] Whitehouse G E. Systems analysis and design using network

FENG Qiang, ZENG Shengkui, KANG Rui. A MASbased model


Aeronautics, 2009, 30(11) :2119 - 2125. ( in Chinese)

[3] ,,. [J].


, 2012,24(6) : 1207 - 1211.

MA Dengwu, GUO Xiaowei, DENG Li. Ammunition scheduling

of carrierbased aircraft based on modified ant colony algorithm


[J] . Journal of System Simulation, 2012, 24(6) : 1207 - 1211.
( in Chinese)

[4] , , .
[ J] . , 2012, 27(1) : 111 -

114.

WEI Changquan,CHEN Chunliang,WANG Baoru. Research on


the aircraft support scheduling model of carrierbased aircraft based
on launch mode [ J ] . Journal of Naval Aeronautical and
Astronautical University,2012,27(1) : 111 - 114. ( in Chinese)

[5] ,,,. Petri


[ J] . , 2007,26(8) : 25 - 26.

HOU Yu, WANG Bin, WANG Ping, et al. Application of


workflow network based on Petri net in launching out modeling of

aircrafts on carrier [ J] . Ordnance Industry Automation, 2007,

26(8) : 25 - 26. ( in Chinese)

[6] ,,.
[ J] . ,2010,32(1) : 211 - 216.

FENG Qiang, ZENG Shengkui, KANG Rui. Multi agentbased

Santa Monica:Rand Corporation,1966.

techniques[ M] . Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall, 1973: 243 -

250.

[14] Nicolai W. On the temporal analysis of special GERT networks


using a modified Markov renewal process [ J ] . Zeitschrift fr
Operations Research, 1980, 24(7) : 263 - 272.

[15] Singh H R, Shankar G. GERT analysis of twostage attribute


sampling plans based on an exponential failure model [ J ] .
Microelectronics Reliability, 1988, 28(2) : 319 - 321.

[16] Zimmermann J. Time complexity of singleand identical parallel


machine scheduling with GERT network precedence constraints[J].

Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 1999, 49(2) :

221 - 238.

[17] , , .

GERT [ J] . , 2007,

21(2) : 55 - 58.

WU Yanxia, HU Haiqing, SHEN Tuanying. Make up GERT


net model research of project group risk and period reviewing on

bringing forth new ideas of enterprise technology [ J] . Journal of

Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007,

21(2) :55 - 58. ( in Chinese)

[18] Jewell A, Wigge M A, Gagnon C M, et al. USS nimitz and


carrier airwing nine surge demonstration, ADA362472 [ R ] .
Alexandria:Center for Naval Analyses,1998.

You might also like