Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accounting For Intangibles
Accounting For Intangibles
Understand what types of assets can be considered intangible assets and understand the
differences between intangible and tangible assets
Understand that intangible assets will either need to be systematically amortised or be the
subject of impairment testing and that this choice will depend upon whether the asset is
expected to have a limited useful life or an indefinite life
Be able to describe some empirical research that has been undertaken on corporate
accounting practices relating to research and development
Be able to define goodwill and explain how it is calculated for accounting purposes
Greater value nowadays being placed on intangible assets for many companiesvaluation is
therefore an important issue
Internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and items similar
in substance shall not be recognised as intangible assets
Recognition
Separable
Expenditure on internally generated intangibles does not qualify for deferral and must be
expensed
Cost of an asset to include the cost of acquiring the asset and preparing it for use
Acquired intangible assets may be revalued to fair value only where there is an active
market
Example 8.1
Intangible assets (other than goodwill) that are considered to have a limited useful life are
required to be depreciated/amortised over their useful lives
The period of time over which the asset is expected to be used by the entity, or the number of
production or similar units expected to be obtained from the asset by the entity
Under AASB 138 the residual value of intangible assets with finite lives is generally
considered to be zero
Amortisation method should reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits are derived
Example 8.2
Revaluation of intangible assets
Only assets that have been acquired at cost can subsequently be revalued
Example 8.3
(e) A reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period
AASB 138 applies to intangible assets generallyhowever, there are a number of paragraphs
dealing specifically with research and development
Accounting problem: will the expenditure, with reasonable probability, provide future
benefits?
AASB 138 applies the simplifying assumption that all expenditure undertaken on the
research component of research and development is to be expensed
In the research phase of an internal project, an entity cannot demonstrate that an intangible
asset exists that will generate probable future economic benefits. Therefore, this expenditure is
recognised as an expense when it is incurred
Development expenditure can be deferred only if the entity can show all of the following (AASB 138,
par. 57):
How the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits, including
the existence of a market for the intangible asset or, where the intangible asset is to
be used internally, its usefulness
The availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the
development
The ability to measure reliably expenditure on the intangible asset during its
development
Where the total of the deferred development costs exceeds the expected recoverable
amount, the deferred costs must be written down to the recoverable amount
If the expenditure is initially expensed in one period then it may not subsequently be written
back to the statement of financial position. General principle (AASB 138, par. 71):
Expenditure on an intangible item that was initially recognised as an expense shall not be recognised
as part of the cost of an intangible asset at a later date
AASB 138 is inconsistent with Conceptual Frameworkhowever, accounting standard takes
precedence.
The requirement to write off all research expenditure as incurred:
will result in much research activity that in fact does lead to subsequent economic benefits
nonetheless having to be written off
will have major implications for reported profits of entities that are heavily involved in R&D
is less conservative than US position, where all research and development expenditure must
be expensed as incurred
Costs of internally generated assets (e.g. research and development) are all directly
attributable costs necessary to create, produce and prepare the asset to be capable of
operating in the manner intended by management (AASB 138, par. 66)
Example 8.4
output levels
expiration of time
Goodwill
What is goodwill?
Represents the future economic benefits associated with an existing customer base, efficient
management, reliable suppliers, etc.
Example 8.7
Impairment of goodwill
Impairment testing
Requirement to amortise goodwill was removed in 2005 and replaced with requirement to
undertake annual impairment testing
AASB 3 (par. 55)
Goodwill acquired in a business combination shall not be amortised. Instead, the acquirer
shall test it for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances
indicate that it might be impaired, in accordance with AASB 136 mpairment of Assets
AASB 136 (par. 124)
IN CLASS
Problem1
Singh Ltd involved in the research and development of a new type of three-finned surfboard. For this
R & D it has incurred the following expenditure:
$50,000 obtaining a general understanding of water flow dynamics
$30,000 on understanding what local surfers expect from a surfboard
$90,000 on testing and refining a certain type of fin
$190,000 on developing and testing a full prototype of the three-finned board, to be called the
thruster.
There is expected to be a very large market for the product, which will generate many millions of
dollars in revenue.
Required:
Determine how the above expenditure would be treated for accounting purposes
Answer
Subject to certain tests for deferral, expenditure on development activity can be deferred to future
periods and disclosed as an asset. Expenditure on research activities is to be written off as an
expense as incurred. Paragraph 59 of AASB 138 provides examples of development activities. These
are:
(a)
the design, construction and testing of pre-production or pre-use prototypes and models;
(b)
the design of tools, jigs, moulds and dies involving new technology;
(c)
the design, construction and operation of a pilot plant that is not of a scale economically
feasible for commercial production; and
(d)
the design, construction and testing of a chosen alternative for new or improved materials,
devices, products, processes, systems or services.
The $50 000 spent on developing a general understanding of water flow dynamics would be
considered as research and would be expensed as incurred.
The $30 000 spent on understanding what local surfers expect from a surfboard would be research
and would be expensed as incurred
The $90 000 spent on testing and refining a certain type of fin and the $190 000 spent on the
prototype would be construed as development expenditure and to the extent that the expenditure
satisfies the tests for deferral then the expenditures will be capitalised.
Testing your thinking: Glass 4 Windows is involved in a research and development project to create
a filtering window that removes the need for curtains. For the current year ended 30 June 2011
expenditure on the project is as follows:
Research
Development costs
$235,000
$350,000
The window is expected to earn revenues of $70 000 per year for the 10 years commencing 1 July
2011. Assuming straight-line amortisation, how much of the research and development cost should
be expensed this period and what amount should be amortised in the year ended 30 June 2014?
A. Expensed in 2011: $58 500; amortisation in 2014: $58 500
B. Expensed in 2011: $235 000; amortisation in 2014: $35 000
C. Expensed in 2011: $235 000; amortisation in 2014: $28 000
D. Expensed in 2011: $350 000; amortisation in 2014: $23 500
Problem 2
Suparna Ltd acquires 100 per cent of Arora Ltd on 1 July 2013. Suparna Ltd pays the shareholders of
Arora Ltd the following consideration:
Cash
$70,000
fair value $250,000; carrying amount in the books of Suparna Ltd $170,000
Land
fair value $300,000; carrying amount in the books of Suparna Ltd $200,000
There are also legal fees of $35,000 involved in acquiring Arora Ltd.
On 1 July 2013 Arora Ltd s statement of financial position shows total assets of $700,000 and
liabilities of $300,000. The fair value of the assets is $800,000
Required:
Has any goodwill been acquired and, if so, how much?
Answer
Fair value of consideration
Cash
$70 000
$250 000
Land
$300 000
$620 000
$800 000
less Liabilities
$300 000
Goodwill
$500 000
$120 000
In relation to the legal fees of $35 000, these have been excluded when calculating goodwill.
Although the acquisition cost of assets would normally include associated legal fees, AASB3,
paragraph 53, specifically notes that in a business combination, acquisition-related costs, such as
legal fees, are to be treated as expenses. Specifically paragraph 53 states:
10
Acquisition-related costs are costs the acquirer incurs to effect a business combination. Those costs
include finders fees; advisory, legal, accounting, valuation and other professional or consulting fees;
general administrative costs, including the costs of maintaining an internal acquisitions department;
and costs of registering and issuing debt and equity securities. The acquirer shall account for
acquisition related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services
are received.
11
Problem 3
Nat Ltd purchases a 100 per cent interest in Rashmi Ltd, the cost of the acquisition is $1,400,000 plus
associated legal costs of $70,000. As at the date of acquisition, the statement of financial position of
Rashmi Ltd shows:
Assets
Current assets
Cash
20,000
Accounts receivable
80,000
(10,000)
70,000
Inventory
100,000
190,000
Non-current assets
Land and building, at cost
850,000
Accumulated depreciation
(150,000)
510,000
Accumulated depreciation
(100,000)
700,000
410,000
1,110,000
Total assets
1,300,000
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
90,000
Bank overdraft
20,000
110,000
Non-current liabilities
Bank Loan
190,000
Total liabilities
300,000
Net assets
1,000,000
12
Additional information
The assets and liabilities of Rashmi Ltd are fairly stated except for land and buildings, which have a
fair value of $800,000
Rashmi Ltd has brand name that is not recognised on the statement of financial position and that
has a fair value of $50,000
Required:
(a) Determine, for accounting purposes, the amount of goodwill that has been acquired by Nat
Ltd
(b) Why do you think that Nat Ltd would have been prepared to pay for goodwill?
(c) Can Nat Ltd revalue the goodwill upwards in a subsequent period?
Answer
(a)
Fair value of consideration
Direct cost of acquisition
$1 400 000
$1 000 000
$50 000
$100 000
$1 150 000
$250 000
As can be seen from the above calculation, an adjustment was made for the fair value of the brand
name. The brand name was not shown on the statement of financial position of the acquired
company (perhaps because it was internally developed). Paragraph 63 of AASB 138 states that
internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and items similar in
substance shall not be recognised as intangible assets. This is explained by paragraph 64 which
states that expenditure on internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists
and items similar in substance cannot be distinguished from the cost of developing the business as a
whole. Therefore, such items are not recognised as intangible assets.
If the acquiring entity has clearly included a payment of $50 000 for the brand name (as part of the
total payment) and this is quite explicit in the purchase agreement, then the amount of goodwill can
be reduced to $250 000 and a $50 000 brand name could also be disclosed within the statement of
financial position.
13
(b)
Nat Ltd would have been prepared to pay for the goodwill because of the economic benefits
that the goodwill is expected to generate. Further, Nat Ltd must believe that it is more efficient to
acquire existing goodwill rather than trying to create the goodwill itself.
(c)
Because only purchased goodwill is allowed to be disclosed in the financial statements, there
is a general prohibition on the subsequent revaluation of goodwill.
14