Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Resource Management in Construction - A Case
Resource Management in Construction - A Case
Resource Management in
Construction Projects a case study
SK. Nagaraju
Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering
Adama Science and Technology University (ASTU),
Adama, Ethiopia.
E-mail I.D: sknagaraju.ce@gmail.com
B. Sivakonda Reddy
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering
JNTUH College of Engineering (AUTONOMOUS)
Hyderabad, India.
E-mail I.D: bskreddy_246@yahoo.com
Resource
I.
Management,
Resource
Leveling,
INTRODUCTION
II.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
660
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
Activity
per day
Excavation
1.5 M3
0.2 M3
6.0 M2
0.2 MT
PROJECT ATTRIBUTES
B. Preparation of Estimates
Generally, for resource constrained analysis the man power
requirements for various activities are very essential and these
are to be calculated based on the quantities. These quantities
required for man power study are calculated from the
drawings.
C. Manpower Required
Manpower output is the output quantity i.e., the quantity of
work which can be done per day per person considering all
safety and quality measures as required by client. This was
calculated based on the [2] and [12] and also considering
6.0 M2
- Block Masonry
6.0 M2
8.0 M2
Plastering
10.0 M2
TABLE II.
Mason
Bhisti
Beldar
1 Cum
0.1
0.7
1.63
Barbending work
1 Ton
7.5
10
Shuttering work
4 Sqm
1 Cum
0.17
0.9
1 Cum
0.72
0.217
1.56
Activity
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
0.9 M3
Reinforced Cement
Concrete (RCC)
Masonry work
Unit
Plastering work
10 Sqm
0.67
0.93
0.86
Painting work
10 Sqm
0.54
0.54
D. Project Scheduling
The schedule contains different types of activities with
different durations based on their nature of work and
quantities calculated from drawings. From these quantities,
man power required for various activities are calculated.
Based on the quantities, manpower required and realistic
durations in the current situations are taken in to account and
durations are calculated. Based on the data obtained, network
diagram is prepared and relations are assigned to the activities
to calculate the critical path. Finally the total duration of the
project is calculated by Primavera. After preparing the
661
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
2.
3.
day.
= 31 numbers
Total masons for activities = Sum of all the
individual resources of each
Activity if
corresponding duration
= activity 1030 = 1.64 numbers
= activity 1050 = 81 numbers
= 39,364 hours
4.
5.
6.
7.
662
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
8.
9.
= 469 days
11. Similarly, the procedure was carried out for
barbenders, masons, painters and unskilled helpers.
Details have been presented in Table III to VI
respectively.
12. The effected change in all the resources namely
masons, barbenders, unskilled helpers, and painters
were reflected in the main schedule.
13. It was observed that the total project duration was
increased to 515 days, with the same total man-hours
for all the different activities.
TABLE IV.
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
Resource
Constraints
Duration for
Barbenders
Total
Increased
duration
15
13.5
12
10.5
7.5
306
314
317
326
332
348
507
515
518
538
566
620
14. The same procedure was carried out for masons, bar
benders, unskilled helpers and painters for another 4
trials reducing resources as shown in Tables III, IV,
V and VI respectively.
15. The reduction in resources of different activities has
resulted in increase in total project duration from 507
days to 515, 518, 538, 566 and 620 days respectively.
The cost implication for increased durations is shown
in Figure 6.
B. Decreased resource constraints for different trials
The decreased resource constraints for masons, bar
benders, unskilled helpers and painters of different trials are
shown in Tables. The Figure 5 shows decrease in resource
constraints to the % increase in project duration.
TABLE III.
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
CONSTRAINTS
Resource
Constraints
Duration for
Masons
Total
Increased
duration
31
27.9
24.8
21.7
18.6
15.5
461
469
472
492
520
574
507
515
518
538
566
620
Resource
Constraints
Duration for
Unskilled
Helpers
Total
Increased
duration
143
128.7
114.4
100.1
85.8
71.5
505
513
516
536
564
618
507
515
518
538
566
620
663
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
TABLE VII.
Increased
Duration in days
507
515
518
538
566
620
% increase in cost
45293639
45348540
45424029
45636772
46041670
46817152
0
0.121
0.167
0.468
0.887
1.684
Resource
Constraints
Duration for
Painters
Total
Increased
duration
35
31.5
28
24.5
21
17.5
25
25
25
25
25
25
507
515
518
538
566
620
Figure 6. Cost for the increased durations
V.
CONCLUSIONS
C.
= Rs. 4117603.5
= Rs. 205880.17
= Rs. 6862.67
664
IRACST Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN: 2250-3498,
Vol.2, No. 4, August 2012
of the project and finally enhances the total project cost. The
percentage increase in duration is about 18.23% causing
percentage increase in project cost about 1.684%.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are indebted to Mr. A. Kameshwarao,
Senior Manager in Abir Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. and
Ms. M. G. Prasanna, Assistant Engineer in Andhra Pradesh
Municipal Department for providing real time data of the
project in the pursuit of this case study. The authors would like
to thank Mr. Bogale Tessama at the Adama science and
Technology University for his English language editing.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
665