You are on page 1of 52

Estimation of Hydrodynamic

Forces during Subsea Lifting

Tormod Be
DNV Marine Operations
4th December 2012

Content

Brief overview of relevant DNV publications

DNV Rules for Marine Operations, 1996,


Pt.2 Ch.5 Lifting Capacity Checks

Simplified Methods for prediction of Hydrodynamic Forces


o in Splash Zone, DNV-RP-H103 Ch.4
o in Deepwater, DNV-RP-H103 Ch.5

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 2

Relevant DNV Publications


Lifting- and subsea operations :
DNV Rules for Planning and Execution of
Marine Operations 1996 and
DNV-OS-H101 Marine Operations, General - 2011
Specially planned, non-routine operations of
limited durations, at sea. Marine operations are
normally related to temporary phases as e.g.
load transfer, transportation and installation.

DNV-OS-E402 Offshore
Standard for Diving Systems
October 2010

DNV Standard for Certification


No.2.22 Lifting Appliances
October 2011

DNV Standard for Certification


No. 2.7-3 Portable Offshore Units
May 2011

Specially planned non-routine operations

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Routine operations

Slide 3

Relevant DNV Publications - Other

DNV-RP-C205 Environmental Conditions


and Environmental Loads, October 2010

DNV-RP-H103 Modelling and Analysis of


Marine Operations, April 2011

DNV-OS-E407 Underwater Deployment


and Recovery Systems, October 2012

Upcoming DNV publications:

Remaning DNV Marine Operation Offshore


Standards DNV-OS-H202,H204-H206

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 4

Relevant DNV Publications - WebSite


DNV publications can be downloaded for free at:

http://www.dnv.com/resources/rules_standards/

The 1996 DNV Rules for Marine Operations is not in the DNV
intranet site.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 5

Content

Brief overview of relevant DNV publications

DNV Rules for Marine Operations, 1996,


Pt.2 Ch.5 Lifting Capacity Checks

Simplified Methods for prediction of Hydrodynamic Forces


o in Splash Zone, DNV-RP-H103 Ch.4
o in Deepwater, DNV-RP-H103 Ch.5

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 6

Capacity Checks - DNV 1996 Rules


Part 2 Chapter 5

Dynamic loads, lift in air

Crane capacity

Rigging capacity,
(slings, shackles, etc.)

Structural steel capacity


(lifted object, lifting points,
spreader bars, etc.)

Dynamic loads for subsea lifts are estimated according to DNV-RP-H103

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 7

Capacity Checks DAF for Lift in Air

Dynamic loads are accounted for by


using a Dynamic Amplification Factor
(DAF).

DAF in air may be caused by e.g.


variation in hoisting speeds or motions
of crane vessel and lifted object.

The given table is applicable for


offshore lift in air in minor sea states,
typically Hs < 2-2.5m.

DAF must be estimated separately for


lifts in air at higher seastates and for
subsea lifts !

Table 2.1 Pt.2 Ch.5 Sec.2.2.4.4

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 8

Capacity Checks - Crane Capacity


The dynamic hook load, DHL, is
given by:

DHL = DAF*(W+Wrig) + F(SPL)


ref. Pt.2 Ch.5 Sec.2.4.2.1

W is the weight of the structure,


including a weight inaccuracy factor

The DHL should be checked against


available crane capacity

The crane capacity decrease when


the lifting radius increase.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 9

Capacity Checks - Sling Loads


Example :
The maximum dynamic sling load, Fsling,
can be calculated by:
Fsling = DHLSKLkCoGDW / sin
ref. Pt.2 Ch.5 Sec.2.4.2.3-6

where:

SKL = Skew load factor extra loading


caused by equipment and fabrication tolerances.

kCoG = CoG factor inaccuracies in estimated


position of centre of gravity.

DW = vertical weight distribution e.g.


DWA = (8/15)(7/13) in sling A.

= sling angle from the horizontal plane.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 10

Capacity Checks - Slings and Shackles


The sling capacity Minimum breaking load,
MBL, is checked by:

Fsling

MBLsling
<
sf

The safety factor is minimum sf 3.0.


(Pt.2 Ch.5 Sec.3.1.2)

Safe working load, SWL, and MBL, of the


shackle are checked by :
a) Fsling < SWL DAF
and

b) Fsling < MBL / 3.3

Both criteria shall be fulfilled (Pt.2 Ch.5 Sec.3.2.1.2)

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 11

Capacity Checks Structural Steel


Lifting points:

Other lifting equipment:

The load factor f = 1.3, is increased by a


consequence factor, C = 1.3, so that total
design faktor, design , becomes:

A consequence factor of C = 1.3


should be applied on lifting yokes,
spreader bars, plateshackles, etc.

design = c f = 1.3 1.3 = 1.7

Structural strength of Lifted Object:

The design load acting on the lift point becomes:

The following consequence factors


should be applied :

Fdesign = design Fsling = 1.7 Fsling

A lateral load of
minimum 3% of the
design load shall be
included. This load
acts in the shackle
bow !
(ref. Pt.2.Ch.5 Sec.2.4.3.4)
Table 4.1
Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Pt.2 Ch.5 Sec.4.1.2


Slide 12

Capacity Checks Summary


Compute

DAF

DHL

Fsling
Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

Check

Apply

Lift in air: VMO Rules Pt.2 Ch.5

Subsea lift: DNV-RP-H103

Weight of lifted object


and lifting equipment

Skew load, CoG and sling angle

Safety factors

4. December 2012

Crane
capacity

Capacity
of lifting
equipment
Slide 13

Content

Brief overview of relevant DNV publications

DNV Rules for Marine Operations, 1996,


Pt.2 Ch.5 Lifting Capacity Checks

Simplified Methods for prediction of Hydrodynamic Forces


o in Splash Zone, DNV-RP-H103 Ch.4
o in Deepwater, DNV-RP-H103 Ch.5

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 14

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - DNV-RP-H103


The

Recommended Practice; DNV-RPH103 Modelling and Analysis of Marine


Operations was issued april 2009. Latest
revision is april 2011.

A Simplified

Method for calculating


hydrodynamic forces on objects lifted
through wave zone is included in chapter 4.

This

Simplified Method supersedes the


calculation guidelines in DNV Rules for
Marine Operations, 1996, Pt.2 Ch.6.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 15

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Assumptions


The Simplified Method is based upon the
following main assumptions:

the horizontal extent of the lifted object is


small compared to the wave length

the vertical motion of the object is equal the


vertical crane tip motion

vertical motion of object and water dominates


other motions can be disregarded

The intention of the Simplified Method is to


give simple conservative estimates of the
forces acting on the object.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 16

New Simplified Method - Assumptions


Time-domain analysis:

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Coupled multi-body
systems with individual
forces and motions.

Wind, wave and current


forces.

Geometry modelled.

Motions for all degrees


of freedom computed.

Non-linearities included.

Coupling effects.

Continous lowering
simulations.

Varying added mass.

Statistical analysis of
responses.

Visualization of lift.
Slide 17

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Crane Tip Motions

The Simplified Method is unapplicable if the crane tip


oscillation period or the wave period is close to the
resonance period, Tn , of the hoisting system

Heave, pitch and roll RAOs for


the vessel should be combined
with crane tip position to find
the vertical motion of the crane tip

If operation reference period is


within 30 minutes, the most
probable largest responses may
be taken as 1.80 times the
significant responses

Unless the vessel heading is


fixed, vessel response should be
analysed for wave directions at
least 15 off the applied vessel
heading

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Tn = 2

M + A33
K

Slide 18

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Wave Periods


There are two alternative approaches:
Alt-1) Wave periods are included:
Analyses should cover the following zerocrossing wave period range:

8.9

Hs
g

Tz 13

A lower limit of Hmax=1.8Hs=/7 with


wavelength =gTz2/2 is here used.

Alt-2) Wave periods are disregarded:


Operation procedures should in this case reflect that the calculations are only valid for
waves longer than:
Tz 10.6

HS
g

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

A lower limit of Hmax=1.8Hs=/10 with wavelength


=gTz2/2 is here used.

4. December 2012

Slide 19

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Wave Kinematics


Alt-1) Wave periods are included:
The wave amplitude, wave particle
velocity and acceleration can be taken as:

a = 0.9 HS
4 2 d

2
v w = a
Tz

2
aw = a
Tz

T z2 g

4 2 d
T z2 g

d : distance from water plane to CoG of


submerged part of object

Alt-2) Wave periods are disregarded:

vw = 0.30

The wave particle velocity and acceleration can


be taken as:

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

g Hs e

aw = 0.10

g e

0.35 d
Hs

0.35 d
Hs

Slide 20

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Hydrodynamic Forces


Slamming impact force
Slamming forces are short-term impulse
forces that acts when the structure hits the
water surface.
AS is the relevant slamming area on the
exposed structure part. Cs is slamming coeff.

v s = v c + v ct2 + v w2

vc = lowering speed
vct = vertical crane tip velocity
vw = vertical water particle velocity
at water surface

The slamming velocity, vs, is :

Varying buoyancy force

F = V g

Varying buoyancy, F , is the change in


buoyancy due to the water surface
F = V g
elevation.

~
V = Aw

V is the change in volume of displaced


water from still water surface to wave crest
or wave trough.
Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

a 2 + ct2

a = wave amplitude
ct = crane tip motion amplitude
w = mean water line area in the
wave surface zone
Slide 21

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Hydrodynamic Forces


Drag force
Drag forces are flow resistance on submerged
part of the structure. The drag forces are
related to relative velocity between object and
water particles.

v r = vc +

The drag coefficient, CD, in oscillatory flow for


complex subsea structures may typically be
CD 2.5.

Relative velocity are found by :

Mass force

Crane tip acceleration and water particle


acceleration are assumed statistically
independent.
Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

vc = lowering/hoisting speed
vct = vertical crane tip velocity
vw = vertical water particle velocity
at water depth , d
Ap = horizontal projected area

FM =

Mass force is here a combination of inertia


force, Froude-Kriloff force and diffraction
force.

4. December 2012

vct2 + v w2

[(M + A ) a ] + [(V + A ) a ]
2

33

ct

33

M = mass of object in air


A33 = heave added mass of object
act = vertical crane tip acceleration
V = volume of displaced water relative to
the still water level
aw = vertical water particle acceleration
at water depth, d
Slide 22

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Basics


Properties:

Forces:

Mass, M [kg]

Weight [N]

Volume, V [m3]

Buoyancy [N]

Added mass, A33 [kg]

Weight = M*gmoon

Buoyancy = *V*g

Weight = M*g

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 23

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Added Mass


Hydrodynamic added mass for flat plates
Example:
Flat plate where
length, b, above
breadth, a, is
b/a = 2.0 :

A33 = 0.76

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

2
a b
4

Slide 24

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Added Mass


Added Mass Increase due to Body Height

A33 1 +

A
2 33o
2( 1 + )

1 2

1.8
1.7

A33/A33o

The following simplified approximation of the


added mass in heave for a three-dimensional
body with vertical sides may be applied :

Added Mass Increase due to Body Height

1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1+SQRT((1-lambda^2)/(2*(1+lambda^2)))

1.2

and

Ap
h + Ap

1.1
1
0

0.5

1.5

2.5

ln [ 1+ (h/sqrt(A)) ]

where

A33o = added mass for a flat plate with a


shape equal to the horizontal projected
area of the object

h = height of the object

Ap = horizontal projected area of the object

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 25

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Added Mass


Added Mass from Partly Enclosed Volume
A volume of water partly
enlosed within large plated
surfaces will also contribute
to the added mass, e.g.:
The

volume of water
inside suction anchors
or foundation buckets.

The

volume of water
between large plated
mudmat surfaces and
roof structures.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 26

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Added Mass


Added Mass Reduction due to Perforation
Recommended reduction:

Effect of perforation on added mass


1

if p< 5

A33
= 0.7 + 0.3 cos[ ( p 5 ) / 34 ]
A33 S

if 5 < p < 34

A33
=e
A33 S

10 p
28

if 34 < p < 50

0.9
Added Mass Reduction Factor

A33
= 1.0
A33 S

0.8
0.7

0.6
0.5
0.4

e^-P/28
BucketKC0.1-H4D-NiMo
BucketKC0.6-H4D-NiMo
BucketKC1.2-H4D-NiMo
BucketKC0.5-H0.5D-NiMo
BucketKC1.5-H0.5D-NiMo
BucketKC2.5-H0.5D-NiMo
BucketKC3.5-H0.5D-NiMo
PLET-KC1-4
Roof-A0.5-2.5+
Hatch20-KCp0.5-1.8
Hatch18-KCp0.3-0.8
BucketKC0.1
BucketKC0.6
BucketKC1.2
RoofKCp0.1-0.27
RoofKCp0.1-0.37
DNV-Curve
Mudmat CFD

0.3
0.2
0.1

A33S = added mass for a nonperforated structure.

0
0

10

Perforation
20
30

40

50

No reduction applied in added mass when perforation is small. A significant drop in the
added mass for larger perforation rates. Reduction factor applicable for p<50.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 27

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Hydrodynamic Forces


The hydrodynamic force is a time dependent function of slamming impact
force, varying buoyancy, hydrodynamic mass forces and drag forces. In the
Simplified Method the forces may be combined as follows:

Fhyd = ( FD + Fslam ) 2 + ( FM F ) 2

The structure may be divided into


main items and surfaces contributing
to the hydrodynamic force

Water particle velocity and


acceleration are related to the
vertical centre of gravity for each
main item. Mass and drag forces
contributions are then summarized :
FM =

Mi

FD =

Di

FMi and FDi are the individual


force contributions from each
main item
Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 28

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Load Cases Example


The static and hydrodynamic force should be calculated for different stages. Relevant
load cases for deployment of a protection structure could be:
Load Case 1
Still water level beneath top of ventilated buckets

Slamming impact force, Fslam, acts on top of


buckets. Inertia force to be included.

Varying buoyancy force, F , drag force, FD


and hydrodynamic part of mass force, FM are
negligible.

Load Case 2
Still water level above top of buckets

Slamming impact force, Fslam, is zero

Varying buoyancy, F , drag force, FD and


mass force, FM, are calculated. Velocity and
acceleration are related to CoG of submerged
part of structure.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 29

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Load Cases Example


Load Case 3
Still water level beneath roof cover.

Slamming impact force, Fslam, acts on the roof


cover.

Varying buoyancy, F , drag force, FD and mass


force, FM are calculated on the rest of the
structure. Drag- and mass forces acts mainly on
the buckets and is related to a depth, d, down to
CoG of submerged part of the structure.

Load Case 4
Still water level above roof cover.

Slamming impact force, Fslam, and varying


buoyancy, F, is zero.

Drag force, FD and mass force, FM are calculated


individually. The total mass and drag force is the
sum of the individual load components, e.g. :
FD= FDroof + FDlegs+ FDbuckets applying correct CoGs

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 30

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Load Cases Example

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 31

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Static Weight

In addition, the weight inaccuracy factor should be applied

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 32

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - DAF


Capacity Checks
The capacities of crane, lifting equipment and
lifted object are checked as for lift in air. The
following relation should be applied:

Ftotal
DAF =
Mg
where
Mg : weight of object [N]

Fstatic-max is the maximum static


weight of the submerged object
including flooding and weight
inaccuracy factor

Fhyd is the hydrodynamic force

Fsnap is the snap load (normally


to be avoided)

Ftotal : is the characteristic total force on the


(partly or fully) submerged object. Taken as the
largest of;

Ftotal = Fstatic-max + Fhyd

or

Ftotal = Fstatic-max + Fsnap


Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 33

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - DAF

DAF < 1.0


Possible ?

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 34

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - DAF


The DAF factor is given by:


= 1 +

Hence, if the buoyancy is larger than the


hydrodynamic forces DAF becomes less than 1.0
Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 35

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Slack Slings


The Slack Sling Criterion.

Snap forces shall as far as possible


be avoided. Weather criteria should
be adjusted to ensure this.

The following criterion should be


fulfilled in order to ensure that snap
loads are avoided:

Fhyd 0.9 Fstatic min


Fstatic-min

= weight before flooding,


including a weight reduction applied
by the weight inaccuracy factor.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 36

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Results


Hydrodynamic force on object, Fhyd

Tables

can be
computed giving an
overview of
operable seastates

Maximum

allowable
Fhyd is derived
from max allowable
DAF and the slack
sling criterion

Red

results are
above installation
limit

Outside

means
non-existent
seastates

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

Tz\Hs
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0

0.5
12.24
8.33
6.14
4.79
3.89
3.29
2.87
2.57
2.35
2.16
2.00
1.85
1.73
1.62
1.52
1.43
1.36
1.29
1.23
1.17
1.12
1.07
1.03

1.0
Outside
Outside
20.45
15.54
12.34
10.19
8.73
7.70
6.92
6.27
5.72
5.24
4.82
4.45
4.13
3.84
3.59
3.37
3.17
2.99
2.83
2.69
2.55

1.5
Outside
Outside
Outside
32.45
25.53
20.89
17.76
15.57
13.90
12.53
11.36
10.34
9.46
8.68
8.01
7.42
6.90
6.43
6.02
5.66
5.33
5.03
4.75

2.0
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
35.40
29.97
26.17
23.30
20.94
18.92
17.17
15.65
14.32
13.17
12.16
11.27
10.48
9.78
9.16
8.60
8.09
7.63

2.5
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
53.71
45.35
39.52
35.10
31.49
28.40
25.72
23.39
21.36
19.60
18.06
16.71
15.51
14.45
13.50
12.65
11.89
11.19

3.0
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
63.92
55.61
49.32
44.18
39.79
35.98
32.68
29.81
27.31
25.13
23.22
21.53
20.03
18.69
17.49
16.41
15.42

3.5
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
74.44
65.96
59.02
53.10
47.97
43.52
39.66
36.30
33.37
30.79
28.52
26.51
24.71
23.10
21.65
20.34

4.0
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
Outside
85.00
76.01
68.33
61.68
55.91
50.91
46.56
42.76
39.44
36.50
33.90
31.58
29.50
27.62
25.93

+
. ( )

4. December 2012

Slide 37

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Summary


Compute
Fd, Fm,
Fslam and F

Apply

Object motion equal crane tip

Wave kinematics dependent on


assumed Hs,Tz seastate

Different deployment levels

Structure divided in main items

Check

Fhyd

No slack
slings

DAF

Capacity
checks

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 38

Simplified Method, Splash Zone - Summary


The simplified method
assumes that:

Vertical motion of
structure is equal
to the crane tip
motion.

The horizontal
extension of the
structure is small.

Only vertical
motion is present.

More accurate
calculations can be
performed applying:

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Regular design
wave approach
(Ch. 3.4.2)

Time domain
analyses

CFD analyses
Slide 39

Content

Brief overview of relevant DNV publications

DNV Rules for Marine Operations, 1996,


Pt.2 Ch.5 Lifting Capacity Checks

Simplified Methods for prediction of Hydrodynamic Forces


o in Splash Zone, DNV-RP-H103 Ch.4
o in Deepwater, DNV-RP-H103 Ch.5

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 40

Deepwater Operations - Challenges


Challenges :

Static weight at crane tip


increases linearly with cable
length.

The resonance period of the


lifting system increases with
cable length. Dynamic forces
may increase due to resonant
amplification induced by the
vertical crane tip motion.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 41

Dynamic Forces Vertical resonance

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 42

Simplified Method, Deepwater - Assumptions


DNV-RP-H103 Chapter 5 includes a simplified
method for estimating dynamic response of
lowered object.
The following main assumptions are applied:

the subsea structure is lowered into


deepwater and is unaffected by wave
forces

the vertical motion of crane tip and


subsea structure dominates other
motions can be disregarded

Offset due to current forces is


disregarded

Heave compensation systems are not


taken into account

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 43

Case Study Crane Tip Motion

Lift at side of
crane vessel

Wave heading
15 off bow

RAO in heave,
pitch and roll are
combined in
order to find the
vertical motion at
the crane tip

Vessels natural
period in roll at
T=9s dominates

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 44

Case Study Dynamic Load at Lifted Object

Cable length L=2750m


Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 45

Case Study Dynamic Load at Lifted Object

Transfer

functions
for dynamic load
in cable and
crane tip motion
are combined
with a wave
spectrum S()

Most

probable
largest response
for dynamic force
in cable is found
by:

A duration time t =30 minutes


gives Fd=530kN in this case
Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 46

Case Study Dynamic Load at Lifted Object

Non-operable
seastates

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 47

Simplified Method, Deepwater - Summary


DNV-RP-H103 chapter 5 contains a simplified
method for establishing dynamic loads and
limiting weather criteria during deepwater
lifting operations.

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 48

Finally One Last Comment:

When planning
Marine Operations,
remember to take
into account ....

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 49

Easy Handling ..

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 50

.. and Access for Survey !!

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 51

Estimation of Hydrodynamic Forces during Subsea Lifting

4. December 2012

Slide 52

You might also like