Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bjig 01 Call Him Immanuel Math 1 23 6 5 15
Bjig 01 Call Him Immanuel Math 1 23 6 5 15
Some say that if Jesus is Immanuel in Mathew 1:23 and that means God with us then Jesus must be God.
On the face of it this might seem like a valid argument, however I will show that this interpretation is an incorrect
conclusion and that Mathew 1:23 does NOT show Jesus to be God.
Whether you agree or disagree, in part or in whole, big or small, please email me any feedback to help improve this
study. I would also appreciate any help with its logic, grammar, typos, editing etc.
Before analyzing the passage in question in Mathew 1:23, and the relationship of Christ with God, I am going to
provide some evidence that has to be taken into account when interpreting our passage.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
intents and purposes it does not really matter if it is one or the other. What matters is that we recognize that this sign
was fulfilled in the days of Ahaz and Isaiah. A time frame of 65 years (v.8) is specifically given in vs15-16, where it
is made clear this will all take place during the reign of King Ahaz.
Once we realize that the birth of the child Immanuel will occur during the life of King Ahaz and the prophet Isaiah,
it should also be clear that it is impossible to interpret Immanuel, "God with us," to mean that the God of
Israel would come down from heaven and be living in a human body and to be located in the same space as Israel.
And it is also quite clear how God would be with them, and it is concerning the war situation. God would not be
there with them in a human body but He is with them in plan and purpose. So the LORD God would not descend to
them but He would give them the sign of the baby. It is not possible to interpret that the child would be the LORD
God Himself, specifically as Immanuel would not know evil from good.
In the Hebrew writings the people of the time would have already known that the meaning of the name Immanuel
meant "God with us," just as they knew the meanings of other first names listed in Part 3.
Summary:
Isaiah 7:14 The virgin shall bear a son and call him Immanuel. This passage was fulfilled during the reign of King
Ahaz because it was a sign specifically for him. The overall meaning at that time meant that the LORD God was
with His people, not physically but in plan and purpose.
Elzaphan:
Ezekiel:
Gabriel:
Gedaliah:
Immanuel
Isaiah:
Ithiel;
Jehu:
Jesus:
Joshua:
John:
Mathew:
Nathaniel:
God is protector
strong God and YHWH is a strong God
strong God
Jehovah is great
God with us
Salvation of God
"God is" or "God is with me"
Jehovah is he
God will help (Jesus is the Greek form of Joshua)
The Lord saves
Jehovah is a gracious giver
Gift of God
Gift of God
Should we say that a person with any of the above names are God? This list shows that there is not just a couple of
possibilities, there are over twenty here.
Should we say that Eli is God, or Eliathah, or Mathew?
Should we say Isaiah is God because his name means "salvation of God?"
These men of God, are messengers sent from God just as Jesus was.
The word Immanuel represents the joining of two Hebrew words: immanu and el.
Since el is the shortened Hebrew word for God (Heb. elohim), Jews would have known that
the name Immanuel (God is with us) signified not the incarnation of God in human form,
but a promise of divine help to the Jewish people.
Summary:
To conclude that because someone has a name with a meaning that they are that meaning, is reading into the text
something that obviously does not exist. The name Jesus, or Immanuel, or Isaiah, Eli, Eliathah, Mathew and so on
are names with meanings related to the LORD God. These names do not signify YHWH came and was that person,
but in the case of Immanuel that God is "with" them in plan and purpose.
None of the parents who named them ever did it as a declaration that their child was God.
In the case of Mathew 1:23 it says he was called, NOT he is.
Vs28 What does "the Lord is with you" mean? Does this mean that Gabriel is the Lord? Does it mean that Gabriel
the Lord is with Mary and therefore Mary is Gabriel the Lord? This passage means that God is with Mary in a way
that he is supporting her in plan and purpose.
God Was With Jesus in the NT
Mathew 12:28 it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons
John 3:2 Rabbi we know you are a teacher come from God, for no one can do these signs that you do
unless God is with him
John 14:10 the Father who dwells in me, does his works
Acts 2:22 Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that
God did through him.
Acts 2:38 how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and power
God was with Jesus in the NT which enabled him to do powerful acts.
Summary:
Acts 7:9 And the patriarchs, jealous of Joseph, sold him into Egypt, but God was with him
Acts 14:27 the church declared all that God had done with them
Acts 15:4 the apostles and the elders declared all that God had done with them
1 Cor 15:10 but the grace of God that is with me
Phil 2:9 practice these things and the God of peace will be with you
Luke 1:28 the Lord is with you!
Mathew 12:28 it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons
John 3:2 Rabbi ...... no one can do these signs that you do unless God is with him
John 14:10 the Father who dwells in me, does his works
Acts 2:22 Jesus of Nazareth, wonders and signs that God did through him.
Acts 2:38 how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and power
Just as God was with Israel in the OT in plan and purpose, he was "with" his people in the NT, and he was "with"
Jesus is a similar way. For God to be "with" anyone did not mean he was that person, but that he was in support of
them.
She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.
22
All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:
Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel (which means,
God with us).
24
When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife,
25
but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus.
23
the reign of King Ahaz because it was a sign specifically for him. The overall meaning at that time
meant that the LORD God was with His people, not physically but in plan and purpose.
Part 2
When the scripture says that God is "with" the people it means spiritually and functionally rather
that spatially and physically. He is "with" them in plan and purpose.
Part 3
To conclude that because someone has a name with a meaning that they are that meaning, is
reading into the text something that obviously does not exist. The name Jesus, or Immanuel, or
Isaiah, Eli, Eliathah, Mathew and so on are names with meanings related to the LORD God. These
names do not signify YHWH came and was that person, but in the case of Immanuel that God is
"with" them in plan and purpose.
None of the parents who named them ever did it as a declaration that their child
was God.
In the case of Mathew 1:23 it says he was called, NOT he is.
Part 4
Just as God was with Israel in the OT in plan and purpose, he was "with" his people in the NT, and
he was "with" Jesus is a similar way. For God to be "with" anyone did not mean he was that
person, but that he was in support of them.
Part 5
God being with Jesus is similar to the ending of Matthews gospel. Therein, the
risen Jesus says to
his disciples, I am with you always, to the end of the age.
Just as Jesus being with his people
does not make people Jesus, so God being
with Jesus does not make him God
Part 6
There were several other "signs" from God or that God was "with" people in plan and purpose
throughout scripture.
Part 7
Although most agree that Mathew 1:23 is referring to Jesus it still remains that
A/ He wasnt called Immanuel which means God with us
B/ He was Jesus called Jesus which means God will help
C/ Immanuel is a name with a meaning, just as it was in Isaiah 7.
D/ The scriptures says "he will be called" not "he will be" or "he is."
The term "God with us" refers not to the idea that "Jesus is God" but to the idea that God was with
Israel in plan and purpose by sending His Son to them. This was a sign, the fulfillment of the Old
Testament sign. The immediate context of the passage, and the facts behind the origin of the
quotation, demand we comprehend the name "God with us" in the sense of plan and purpose.
Matthew was speaking in terms of God's function, not his geographic location.
Part 8
Here in Revelation 21, at the end of time, God will be "with" his people in a full and complete
way. Geographically, in the future, God will be "with" all His people.
Final Conclusion:
Immanuel was not literally Jesus' name. It was a name or a title intended to indicate that God was with his people in
plan and purpose by providing his son Jesus to die for their sins. Jesus was God's Messiah and God's Savior.
Even if Jesus were to have the name Immanuel, it was still a name with a significant meaning, nothing more.
Nothing in Mathew 1:23 says that Jesus is God