Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bank Guarantee
Bank Guarantee
Abstract
The UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) officially endorsed
the most recent revision of the ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG N 758) at
its 44th annual session in Vienna from 27 June-8 July 2011. It became effective on July 1,
2010. Jean-Guy Carrier, ICC Secretary-General said: The UNCITRAL endorsement of the
ICC URDG will undoubtedly define the direction of banking practice for demand guarantees,
establish international unity with regards to these practices, and alleviate any confusion and
miscommunication which could arise in the completion of trade transactions [10]. Clear,
precise and comprehensive new rules aim to maintain legal risk control through the high level
of certainty and predictability that they foster. The interest of financial stability of business
entities and the desire to quickly collect receivables need a legal instrument for security
payments which provide safety to business partners to the fullest extent and will minimize the
effect of risk factors. From the number of these instruments, the bank guarantee is the most
important security instrument for contemporary circulation of commodities in the world. In
this work, the object and purpose of the study is to analyze the legal aspects and results when
using the international banking guarantees and are based on the theoretical methodology of
scientific research.
Keywords: Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG), demand guarantees, bank
guarantees, beneficiary, applicant
Introduction:
The bank guarantee is the financial instrument and gives an opportunity to the party of
the agreement to be sure in getting due amount of money in cases when the other party of the
agreement fails or does not pay the amount determined by the agreement.
As it is shown by business practice, even an agreement that is made without any legal
defects is not the best protection mechanism when contracting party fails to fulfill obligations
of payment determined by the agreement. Bank guaranty warrants fulfillment of liabilities
defends financial interests of parties participating in international trade transactions.
In contemporary business conditions, which are characterized by spatial distance of
clients and impossibility of real assessment of credit standing of the business partner, it is
often necessary to use bank guarantees as instruments of security payments in business
transactions.
Understanding of the utilization of bank guarantees provides better negotiating
positions in business conclusions. Due to demand guarantee is a non-accessoriness,
abstractness and the fact that a fast and simple act of realization provides coverage for a great
amount of risk, the bank guarantee is one of the most important instruments of security
payments in the international trading operation [4].
The present work contains the analysis of URDG N 758 news [5].
69
European Scientific Journal December 2013 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
European Scientific Journal December 2013 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
guarantor and indicate which contractual obligation was not fulfilled by the applicant (Article
15 (a) (URDG 758) [5]. As a result of such relation, the beneficiary is sure to receive amount
from the guarantor and so sends the goods to the applicant. The applicant is sure first, to
receive goods and then make payment. He pays the bank commission, but it is cheaper than if
he took credit for this advance payment. The bank is satisfied that it did not disburse credit,
but it received commission for disbursement of the guarantee. Finally, the applicant and the
beneficiary fulfilled the contractual obligations and the beneficiary returned the bank
guarantee to the bank because the latter did not need it any more.
This scheme is complicated if companies of several countries and several banks are
involved in it, but the essence of such bank guarantee will not change.
Until the recent times, the scientist lawyers agree that the concept guarantees
terminologically and conceptually were vague and unclear and actually, the unified definition
of guarantees did not exist [1], [2]. The reason of this is the circumstance that the civil law of
different countries is founded on different concepts and different terms are used for
guarantees (guarantee, standby letter of credit, performance bond). At the same time, legal
practice of different countries differentiates the concepts of guarantee and letter of
guarantee and considers guarantee to be an initial obligation, issued for securing of the
guarantee, a certain amount to be paid, and the letter of guarantee-secondary obligation.
According to the opinion of several scientists, the circumstances became even vaguer after
taking over the Anglo-American terminology of continental law and bank practice. Today, the
term guarantee may mean collateral as well as independent means of security [3]. URDG N
758 made a step towards settlement of the problem and future practice shows how well the
definition offered by him works.
3. Independent legal nature of guarantee:
In publication URDG 758 of the international chamber of commerce, the 5th Article
of Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees, independence is defined in the following way:
A guarantee is by its nature independent of the underlying relationship, and the application
and the guarantor are in no way concerned with or bound to such relationship. A reference in
the guarantee to the underlying relationship for the purpose of identifying it does not change
the independent nature of the guarantee. The undertaking of a guarantor to pay under the
guarantee is not subject to claims or defenses arising from any relationship other than a
relationship between the guarantor and the beneficiary [5].
How should this extract be evaluated legally? To our opinion this very extract defines
the independent legal nature of the guarantee and means the following: if the guarantee
ensures payment of monetary obligations, undertaken by the agreement, which were made
between the customer and the counteragent of the guarantor, and then it appeared that this
transaction is void, this shall neither suspend not terminate the obligation of the guarantor.
The guarantor still remains obliged to pay the amount, indicated in the guarantee if the
beneficiary demands the payment. As a rule, the guarantee textually contains an indication on
the agreement which it secures, but this indication has only identification function and does
not bear any other legal burden.
Thus, if we put it shortly, the obligation of the guarantor before the beneficiary is valid
even when the agreement, whose fulfillment is secured by the guarantee, is void. The
guarantee is an independent abstract transaction which acts according to its own conditions
and within its framework.
4.
European Scientific Journal December 2013 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
the 2nd Article of UNO convention, according to which a bank, other institution or person
may act as a guarantor [6]. The convention does not restrict the circle of authorized persons,
issuing guarantees. Though, it is implied that financial stability of the guarantor is obligatory,
as at any moment it should satisfy the monetary demand of the beneficiary. This issue must be
resolved by internal legislation of countries [6]. Here it should be mentioned that banks are
more often involved in the issuance of guarantees, due to financial stability.
5.
Currency of payment:
According to general principles, the guarantor must make payment in the currency that
is indicated in the guarantee. But according to the Article 21 of URDG N 758, there are two
circumstances when the payment may be made in another currency: the first - if the payment
in the agreed currency violates the legislation that is in force in the place of payment and the
second - if due to reasons, independent of the guarantor, the payment cannot be made in the
agreed currency. In such a case, the payment must be made in the currency of the place of
payment. The result is obligatory for the applicant. In such circumstances, calculation of the
currency must be made according to the exchange rate in force at the place of payment. In
case of partial payment, the beneficiary shall be authorized to demand the difference either by
the rate, effective by that moment, when the payment had to be made completely, or
according to the exchange rate, effective at the place of payment by the moment of payment
of difference [5]. This point is new and important in the international trade.
8. Guarantee and force-majeure:
URDG N 758 was the first to introduce the concept of force-majeure: acts of God,
riots, civil commotions, insurrections, wars, acts of terrorism or any causes beyond the control
of the guarantor or counter-guarantor that interrupt its business as it relates to acts a kind
subject to these rulesand defined the following rule of the validity of the guarantee during
force-majeure circumstances.
72
European Scientific Journal December 2013 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
This mean that if the term of the guarantee expires at the time when submission of the
demand or payment fails due to force-majeure, the term of the guarantee shall be prolonged
by 30 calendar days from the date when this term had to expire. The guarantor must notify the
instructing party of the mentioned. If the guarantor accepts the documents submitted by the
beneficiary, but inspection cannot be performed due to force-majeure circumstances, the term
of inspection shall be suspended till commencement of the activities of the guarantor. If the
guarantor inspected documents, but the payment is hindered by force-majeure circumstances,
the payment should be made upon the end of force-majeure circumstances, even when the
term of guarantee expires. The instructing party shall be bound by any extension suspension
or payment under the Article 26 of URDG N 758 [5]. The guarantor assumes no further
liability for the consequences of the force majeure.
9. Transferable guarantee:
This is a new concept introduced by URDG N 758 and defined as follows: a
guarantee is transferable only if it specifically states it is transferable, in which case it may
be transferred more than once for the full amount available at the time of transfer. But a
counter guarantee is not transferable (Article 33) [5]. In this case, the guarantor will be
limited only by the terms with which he/she clearly agreed when disbursing the guarantee.
After disbursement of the guarantee, URDG N 758 releases the guarantor from any kind of
performance. What does transferability mean? It is changing of the beneficiary in the bank
guarantee. At a glance we may see its similarity with a bill of exchange (draft) which is
defined by The United Nations Convention on International Bills of Exchange and
International Promissory Notes [7]. Thus, it will be interesting how the change of the
beneficiary in the bank guarantee will be reflected in the international trade practice.
Paragraph (c) of the Article 33 says that a transfer guarantee means a guarantee that
may be made available by the guarantor to a new beneficiary (transferee) at the request of
the existing beneficiary (transferor). A transferred guarantee shall include all amendments
to which the transferor and guarantor have agreed as of the date of transfer. A guarantee can
only be transferred where the transferor has provided a signed statement to the guarantor that
the transferee has acquired the transferors rights and obligations in the underlying
relationship.
Unless the guarantee provides otherwise, the name and the signature of the transferee
may be used in place of the name and signature of the transferor in any other document.
These definitions make it clear what procedure is required when transferring
guarantee. The initial beneficiary must yield the demand by the main agreement to the
beneficiary (assignment of debts (cession)) and notify the guarantor that a new beneficiary
acquired his/her rights and demands according to the main agreement.
The initial beneficiary must yield the demand of the main agreement to the new
beneficiary, (assignment of debts (cession)) and notify the guarantor that the new beneficiary
acquired his/her rights and demands according to the main agreement. All changes must be
included in the guarantee, which are agreed between the guarantor and the first beneficiary as
of the date of transfer and transfer to the beneficiary.
URDG N 758 indicates that the initial beneficiary may yield the demand by the
guarantee to another person, notwithstanding whether the text of the guarantee mentions
transferability, but at the same time, it assigns the right to the guarantor not to pay the
guarantee amount to the new beneficiary, unless the guarantor him/herself agrees with such
payment.
10. Governing law and jurisdiction:
The innovation of URDG N 758 is that unless otherwise provided in the guarantee, its
governing law shall be that of the location of the guarantors branch, or office that issued the
73
European Scientific Journal December 2013 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.1 ISSN: 1857 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431
guarantee and any dispute between the guarantor and the beneficiary relating to the guarantee,
shall be settled exclusively by the competent court of the country of the location of the
guarantors branch or office that issued the guarantee. According to old URDG N 458
governing law and the court, reviewing the dispute might be current legislation and court
according to the location of the guarantor, as well as the applicant or instructing parties which
complicated court procedures to the parties.
Conclusion:
In this work, we tried to underline the innovations which were introduced to the
International Trading Market by URDG 758 as opposed to URDG 458. ICC publication 758
addresses such innovations as electronic format of communications. In new rules, as
compared to their predecessors, the legal relations are specified to such extent that they do not
allow ambiguity and serve to preservation of fair balance among the instructing party,
beneficiary and guarantor and the risk of unfair demand to the guarantor to make payment is
minimized.
Thus, arranged legal documents in the international trade approved by UNCITRAL
will make international trade more sustainable and reliable and will obtain much more support
than its predecessor ICC publication URDG 458.
References:
Bertrams R. Bank Guarantees in International Trade. The Hague (Kluwer), 2. ed. 1996.
Horn N. Wymerseeh E. Bank-Guarantees, Stand-by Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds
in International Trade. The Law of International Trade and Finance, Boston. in: Horn (ed.).
1989.
hotenashvili P. Some aspects of Bank (Independent) Guarantees according to national
legislation and private international law. 6. 2003-2/3, Georgian law review. at: 326-329.
Knezevich M., Lukich A. Bank Guarantees and their Representation in bank business
activities (Parallel Legal Presentation). University of Kragujevac. Economic insights trends
and challenges. No. 1/2012 42 50. 2010.
Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees including model forms. ICC Publication N 758.
2010 revisions ICC Inernational Chamber of Commerce the world business organization.
The United Nations Convention on Independent Guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit.
11.12.1995.
The United Nations Convention on International Bills of Exchange and International
Promissory Notes. 09.12.1988.
Uniform rules for demand gurantees. ICC Publication No. 458.1992.
Uniform Rules for Contract Guarantees.ICC Publication No. 325. 1978.
Senechal Th. UN endorses ICC Demand Guarantee Rules. Paris, 2011.
http://www.iccwbo.org/News/Articles/2011/UN-endorses-ICC-Demand-Guarantee-Rules/
(10.08.2013).
74