Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Case Study
Bhavana K. Ajudiya
PG Student (WRM)
Lakhadhirji Engineering College,
GTU, Morvi-363642, India
Email:bhavanathummar@yahoo.com
Dr. S. M. Yadav
Prof. B.H.Pandit
PG In charge (WRM)
Water Resource Management
SVNIT, Surat-395007, India
Email: smy@ced.svnit.ac.in
Head of Department
Water Resource Management
Lakhadhirji Engineering College,
GTU, Morvi-363642, India
Abstract
This paper concerns for the design of rural water distribution
systems in developing countries. Most of population of India is
staying in rural area. At end of nineteen century community is
not getting water at their resident in the village. But water is
basic need of human being and it is directly effete on human
health. Indian government is decided to provide safe, regular and
adequate water to the community at their resident.
This paper is helpful to water supply engineers are
facing the problem of designing new distribution network in
haphazard developed rural area. For designing of best
economical water distribution system LOOP version 4 heuristic
software is used with a case study. Design procedure satisfied all
constraints with a minimum total cost. The constraints include
residual nodal pressure, velocity of flow in pipe, pipe material,
reservoir level, peak factor and available commercial pipe
diameters. In investigation, it is found that water distribution
network cost occupied almost 70% of the total cost of water
supply system. Extensive research has been done to minimize cost
through optimization in design of water distribution network.
In addition to the simulation tool, optimization
techniques to identify the least cost design of distribution systems,
while achieving the most equitable distribution of water have
been developed.
I. INTRODUCTION
At the launch of the International drinking water supply and
sanitation decade (in November 1980), Dr H.T.Mahler,
Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO),
stated that: . . the number of water taps per 1000 population
is a much better indicator of a country's health status than the
number of hospital beds, (Development Forum, 1987). The
importance of water supply is acknowledged by all
governments in developing countries who have and are giving
priority to this provision. Providing a water supply for a
community involves tapping the most suitable source of water,
ensuring that it is safe for domestic consumption and then
supplying it in adequate quantities.
The World Health Organization, (WHO Study Group, 1987),
defines:
B. Pressure
Adequate pressure should be available in distribution mains at
all points located even at the remotest spots.
The following pressures are considered satisfactory:
i)
Residential districts:
Upto 3 storey
: 2 kg/cm2
3 to 6 storey heights
: 2 to 4 kg/cm2
6 to 10 storey height
: 4 to 5.5 kg/cm2
Above 10 storey
: 5.5 to 7 kg/cm2
ii)
Commercial districts
: 5 kg/cm2
A minimum velocity of .6 m/s should be maintained. The
velocities in pipes of different diameters should be as fallow:
i)
Pipe Diameter(cm)
:velocity(m/s)
10
15
25
40
: 0.9
: 1.2
: 1.5
: 1.8
C. Manual Recommendations
The manual on Water supply and Treatment prepared by the
Ministry of Urban Development, gives the following
recommendation for minimum residual pressures at ferrule
points:
Single storey building
: 7m
Two storey building
: 12m
Three storey building
: 17m
Distribution system should not ordinarily be designed for
residual pressures exceeding 22 meters. Multistoried buildings
needing higher pressure should be provided with boosters.
D. Minimum pipe sizes
The manual recommends the following minimum pipe sizes:
Town with population up to 50000 :
100mm dia.
Town with population above 50000 :
150 mm dia.
For the dead end, less than 100 mm can be
considered.
E. Peak factors
The manual on water supply has recommended the following
value of the peak factor, depending upon the population:
i)
Population up to 50,000 :
3.0
ii)
Population between
50,001 -2,00,000
:
2.5
iii)
Population above 2 lakh :
2.0
iv)
For Rural Water supply schemes, where
supply is effected through stand post for
only 6 hours.
:
3.0
F.
A STUDY AREA
91.95
19
92.92
100 mt
24
91.0
90.80
11
13
20 mt
Exi. Stand Post
25
30mt
26
27
50 mt
100 mt
20 mt
20 mt
23
21
Zone-1
95.64
28
16
96.84
22
24
18
93.17
30mt
75mt
75mt
20 mt 94.92
20
General Bathroom
92.07
gram panchayat
15
18
93.99
Zone-2
25mt
90.48
Exi. Cistern 12,000 Lit.
10
14
91.27
80mt
92.68
22
30 mt
70 mt
40 mt
80mt
15 mt
30 mt
19
92.52
94.40
85 mt
28
40 mt
12
30 mt
26
94.04
22
30 mt
94.50
18
40 mt
21
95.67
94.24
20
24
93.51
30 mt
21
23
94.51 10 mt 94.34
23
25
27
92.27
39 mt
92.0
17
50 mt
19
17
17
95.42 20 mt
16
100 mt
Meldi ma temple
13
11
12
100.36
30 mt
101.42
11
12
97.37
96.00
20 mt 20 mt
31
15
13
95.52
30
29
95.51
16
30
150 mt
20mt 99.10
99.83
96.89
10
30 mt
15
14
135 mt
150 mt
30 mt
30 mt
94.0
150 mt
99.05
99.03
40mt
CT.
99.96
B.m. 100.00
150mt
103.61
pro. sump 70000lits
94.50
96.00
3
50 mt
30 mt
1
94.50
250 mt
Sanosara Road
1
4
3
97.0 4
Nakrani road
30 mt
150 mt
99.83
3
200mt
99.0
Primary School
Node number
Pipe line
Pipe number
Fig:1 Design Alternative-1,Water Distribution Network
with Direct Pumping.
IV.
91.95
35
92.92
100 mt
31
91.0
90.80
2000000
45
40
20 mt
39 mt
30 mt
95.67
30 mt
95.64
46
44
80mt
90.48
91.27
Exi. Cistern 12,000 Lit.
General Bathroom
33
36
40mt
96.84
22
18
41
37
92.68
26
24
80mt
30 mt
70 mt
40 mt
15 mt
30mt
28
92.52
94.40
30 mt
94.50
94.04
40 mt
39
85 mt
100 mt
20 mt
20 mt
34
40 mt
30mt
21
94.24
93.51
92.27
50 mt
29
94.51 10 mt 94.34
23
25
27
32
93.17
25mt
92.07
75mt
75mt
20 mt 94.92
total cost
gram panchayat
42
10mt
93.99
92.0
38
43
50 mt
19
17
95.42 20 mt
100 mt
Meldi ma temple
13
100.36
30 mt
101.42
11
12
97.37
96.00
20 mt 20 mt
15
30 mt
30 mt
14
135 mt
95.52
95.51
16
99.83
10mt
150 mt
20mt 99.10
96.89
9
10
30 mt
49
150 mt
99.05
99.03
30 mt
Exi. Stand Post
150 mt
99.83
4
10mt
99.96
B.m. 100.00
3
3
10 mt
50
96.00
30 mt
1
103.61
C.
CONCLUSIONS
T.
51
47
175mt
48
Nakrani road
75mt
VI.
250 mt
Sanosara Road
200mt
52
Primary School
Node number
Pipe line
Pipe number
Fig:2 Design Alternative-2, Water Distribution Network
with ESR 50000lits, 12mt staging.
V.
COST ANALYSIS
DESIGN
Remark
As per
design
alternativ
e2
As per
design
alternativ
e1