Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bracket Positioning
Bracket Positioning
76
After initial bracket placement, the goal is to completely express the brackets prescription and position
through complete leveling and aligning. For example,
Fig 6. Ideal vertical positions of posterior brackets. Marginal ridges equidistant from wire slot.
only that the orthodontist level the bracket slots, finishing with a full-sized wire. The resulting tooth-to-tooth
relationships should be ideal without wire adjustments.
We do not encounter this situation often, but the lesson
it provides is an important onefilling the bracket slot
provides complete expression of bracket prescription
and position.
If, during the initial alignment stage, you find a
severe bracket-positioning error, reset the bracket
while still in the light initial wire (.014 or .016-in
nickel-titanium). This reduces the need to drop down
in wire size at the reset appointment. Minor bracketpositioning errors, on the other hand, are most efficiently corrected at the reset appointment after the
reset evaluation.
Completely seat a full-sized wire in each bracket
slot before moving on to the reset evaluation. A
smaller wire will only partially express the bracket
prescription and position. We recommend a .018
.018-in Sentalloy wire (GAC International, Islandia,
NY) for a 0.018 slot appliance. Allow sufficient time for
Fig 11. Root-paralleling radiographic series. Note the mesial root inclination of the mandibular left
first premolar and maxillary left lateral incisor.
Fig 12. Bracket-positioning errors noted in a designated area of the patients chart. Abbreviations for
each tooth specify necessary reset instructions.
this wire to completely express the bracket prescription and position (4-8 weeks).
STEP 3: RESET EVALUATION
The reset evaluation involves both a clinical examination and a radiographic evaluation. For most
patients, the reset evaluation can take place within the
first 6 months of active treatment. Perform the clinical
examination at the appointment before the reset
appointment and prescribe a root-paralleling radiographic series (Fig 11).
Examine each tooth individually for bracketpositioning errors, paying close attention to base adaptation, marginal ridge height discrepancies, crown rotations, and nonparallel roots. We note the deficiencies in
SUMMARY
The information gathered during the reset evaluation are the instructions for the reset appointment.
Schedule the reset appointment with adequate time for
debonding, debanding, bracket preparation, tooth
preparation, rebonding, and rebanding. We recommend
at least an hour for this appointment.
It is easier to position brackets at the reset appointment than it is at the initial bonding. By the reset
appointment, the tooth-to-tooth relationships have
greatly improved, making it much easier to assess the
relative positions of brackets between neighboring
teeth. Also, visibility of each tooths facial surface is
greatly improved.
Remove the brackets and bands from teeth with
positioning errors. Clean each tooth of excess composite or cement. Remove excess composite or cement
from the bands and brackets by using a micro-etcher.
Refit each band before cementation. Refitting the band
is particularly important for rotational resets because
initial band fitting and burnishing creates a rotational
memory in the bands metal. This memory can be
removed by reshaping the band with bird-beak pliers
before refitting. Reposition the bands and brackets
according to the principles described in step 1. Use the
root-paralleling radiographs at chairside to determine
the amount of tip correction.
After cementation and bonding, fully engage the
same .018 .018-in Sentalloy wire (GAC International) that was used for primary expression of bracket
prescription and position. Use a lighter wire if the positional change of 1 or more brackets was severe.
REFERENCES
1. Swain BF. Straight wire design strategies: five-year evaluation
of the Roth modification of the Andrews straight wire appliance.
In: Orthodontics: state of the art, essence of the science. St
Louis: CV Mosby; 1986. p. 279-98.
2. Creekmore TD, Kunik RL. Straight wire: the next generation.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:8-20.
3. Balnut N, Klapper L, Sandrik J, Bowman N. Variations in
bracket placement in the preadjusted orthodontics appliance. Am
J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:62-7.
4. Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct
versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978;74:62-78.
5. Aguirre MJ, King JG, Waldron JM. Assessment of bracket
placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to
indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1982;82:269-76.
6. Koo BC, Chung C-H, Vanarsdale RL. Comparison of the accuracy
of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:346-51.
7. Silverman E, Cohen M, Gianelley AA, Dietz VS. A universal
direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J
Orthod 1972;62:236-44.
8. Moin K, Dogon IL. Indirect bonding of orthodontic attachments.
Am J Orthod 1977;72:261-75.
9. Hoffman BD. Indirect bonding with a diagnostic setup. J Clin
Orthod 1988;22:509-11.
10. Hickham JH. Predictable indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod
1993;27:215-17.
11. Moskowitz EM, Knight LD, Sheridan JJ, Esmay T, Tovilo K. A
new look at indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:277-81.
12. Kasrovi PM, Timmins H, Shen A. A new approach to indirect
bonding using light-cure composites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1997;111:652-6.
13. Simmons M. Improved laboratory procedure for indirect bonding of attachments. J Clin Orthod 1978;12:300-2.
14. Thomas R. Indirect bonding: simplicity in action. J Clin Orthod
1979;13:93-105.
15. Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and
treatment. Periodontol 2000 1996;11:18-28