THE SENATE OF CANADA LE SENAT DU CANADA The Henousable Joseph 2 Day Cfienoradle joseph A. “bay Saini Jolin - Kemrebecasts Sart Join - -Kennebevws3s New Beunewtel Nortvcaa Brummwick January 14, 2005 Mr. David R. Amos: 153 Alvin Avenue Milton, MA 02186 United States of America Dear Mr. Amos: Thank you for your correspondence sharing with me your views on various issues, | have reviewed the many pieces of correspondence that you have included in the package you left at my office. It is my understanding that many of these documents relate to a Trust action in the United States. Ag a result, | fail to understand why you feel it is necessary for me to review the extensive and voluminous material that you disclosed to me on this matter. In addition, | do not see how it relates to the operation of the government of the Province of New Brunswick or the Government of Canada. However, | appreciate the effort you have taken to express your views with me on many issues found within this correspondence. | hape that you can find resolutions to some of your concerns in the near future. If you feel | can be of further assistance on a specific matter involving the Goverment of Canada, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best wishes. Yours truly, Joseph A. Day, Senator S01 Edifier Vietoria Builiting Ollawa, Ontarie X11 OL ‘Telephone *Tliphione t613 Farx/Télieapie nr (613) F-Mail/ Courriel: duyjawsenpartge.ca 992-0833Friday the 13" of August, 2004 Senator Joseph A. Day Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson 14 Everett St. 66 Slater St., 22nd Floor Hampton, NB Ottawa, ON. KiA 0C9 Prime Minister, Paul Martin Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler, 80 Wellington Street 900 Justice Building Ottawa, ON. KIA OA2 Ottawa, ON. KIA OA6 Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS) Philippe Rabot 340 Laurier Avenue West RCMP External Review Committee Ottawa, ON. K1A OP8 P.O. Box 1159, Station B Ottawa, ON. KIP 5R2 RE: Corruption Hey Joe, The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me. T just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just another lawyer who couldn't get elected so you were politically appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget your former employer's interests and do your job. Tt is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well. I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all to the other above named government employees and to the Arar Commission in particular. T can easily prove prior contact to all the above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a double check on your ethics. One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3", It is attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad things really are in Canada and the USA. T am not sorry for the delay in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls or answered my email.Thad spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament. I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any longer for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now want me in court. The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel in court on the first day of Brad's new plan to defend the rights of the people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in Henrik's court that day was more than willing to take me away and under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff's paycheck? Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip from July 29"" to August 3"! for Brad Green to be adequately informed before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and Brad Green that I wasn't joking and that I am well within the jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New Hampshire. If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a complaint against them and several others with the Law Society anyway. I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical lawyer that T can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted ethically ina Pro Se fashion? My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me about NB politicians. I didn’t believe what he said about Wayne Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing T would want is such aman to speak for me. So I promptly told him I would see him in court and ended our conversation, He was obviously arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal friends to chum with. For all T know he may have just got back from Larry's Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue. nNTI can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr. Richard and Brad Green. Iam used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three years ago a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city limits of Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown was quick to inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone everywhere in Canada, If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance of a NB law as I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer employed as a Senator in the federal government, in what court would I appear? What if I served this material upon the cop that had the authority stop me? If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex Provincial Court shouldn't Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse himself because of his words to me in court on July 29"", Would T not have the right to make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt offense and change the jurisdiction to the USA? A far better example is what happened on June 24". A man who claimed represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New Brunswick legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had jurisdiction over me and the right to throw me out of the public building. However when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both suggested, they refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I file a complaint against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a building in NB. Who defends the Crown if not Green? Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends someone to see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to him the night of his debate on June 21. Everybody in the churchyard watched that old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman can listen to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22"¢ on the CBC, As I told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes within that envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for the Arar Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how far the FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know if the priest denies he got them or Hooper won't give them up, I have several more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have. Hooper can hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I must protect my ass if he won't, If you look at the photo T have provided, you will see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding Harper in Sussex on June 19"*. Now you know what I was talking about to him. What T want to know is that cop's name. Harper wasn't long spilling the beans to his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers weren't long shutting him up on June 24" after Waldman demanded that he testify at the Inquiry. Why is that? Waldman should have known of me if Arar's lawyers at CCR in the USA had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as I became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough for him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes. Mr. Arar's lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against Ashcroft and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last November. I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed last January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and settle? Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada?If you don't believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call Arthur Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a little while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn't know because I saved his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk with our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent? T have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan about the Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but lots of time to golf with Clinton and McKenna. IT demand to know if the many documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not, why not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to both Customs and Immigration the instant T landed in Canadian jurisdiction. If I am not called to testify, I will never understand. I did manage to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only arguments about jurisdiction as usual. Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don't know because as you can see T served his law office this stuff on June 25" the day before he and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After your review of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why Paul Zed and his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb, Paul Zed was elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst others, correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their conscience they should act according to it as well. I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a lawyer is worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true Progressive Conservatives in Canada, The fact that another lawyer, John Crosbie advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too funny and sad for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and ran for Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper and his buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie did too for awhile anyway. Ain't it funny how he now sings a different tune? There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a monumental a crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days after the election. He can play well within Mulroney's league. It was truly sad that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin simply because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country down a garden path and under an evil Bush, Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help me expose all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I will give this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it is time for the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even though the NDP have only 19 seats in Parliament T believe they have the power to inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election. I think the NDP politicians should think about the following statement a long time then review how they made out in the last election. I did say at the Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to place a vote. However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if they did that their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so they must vote out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on what I had said during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should have one more line on it "None of the above” then I am certain many more Canadians would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree.Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada Elections office as she worked in support of Herron, Please don't deny the fact that the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed and applauded at many of my remarks, Everybody heard what T said to Herron in front of Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he thought T was kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends, spoke to him very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen. It should be interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire for lawyers to defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting a judge but I am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers, Lawyers do have an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you check my work, you should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and the political ones in particular. None of this would have been necessary if just one lawyer had upheld their oath or one public servant had blown the whistle. Why is not the question, The answer is Filthy Lucre. Today is Friday the 13". I am expected to stand in court in Boston and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by a lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making an appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I suspect foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA. T have little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to appear in that court. T notified everyone down in Boston that I look forward to trial. Monday will tell the tale. Tn closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to finally break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of all places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the reason for my joy. That said, let's see if I can make the Internet work for me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little behind the times in that regard. Although T do not wear a blue coat, I did give the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed off Candidate) and I tried to do it ina fun fashion so that my efforts would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to check my words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest reporting of the political circus in America can be found on the Canadian comedy shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie Sloan and the Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you read the documents I have provided, Now all I can say is Hooray for Canada and thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am glad that at least one Percent understood and agreed with me. Quite likely not one of them was a lawyer. Now Tonly need one lawyer in the right place in government to do the right thing and things will change for the better. Until that happens T will continue torturing lawyers with dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve. Tt is just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks and become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my first political speech I ama son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be found in Fundy, Although I have separated myself from that Clan and founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, T will always honour from whence I came. I simply don't care what lawyers or politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in my forefather's motto "Veritas Vincit",So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or against me? Ignoring me just won't do. Please send your answer to the following address just as Brad Green did. I don't know where I will be from day to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses to my sad complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if it is to refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee lawyer, David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to hide but you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me ina timely fashion, I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that came to your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my hat for over two months, I demand assistance from the Senator appointed to watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity that is mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me, I am wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue jurisdiction. T am here, What do you think? Should I run for Senator if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr, assist the ex FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan. If any of the above named parties don't like anything I have stated, Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not file any sort of motion to dismiss the matter but T will demand a jury. I will call many witnesses in my defense. I think the first one would be Mr. Harper. Wouldn't it be fun if he was a hostile one? a ! Cya'll in court of “David R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA, 02186 Certificate of Service I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the jurisdiction of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings on Friday the 13" of August, 2004 delivered the above named material to the office of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB. I will also email many people in many places the proof that this was done on this day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the news about the Canadian Postal Service's political issues with Paul Martin today and t t should be obvious why this is necessary for me to do in person. Q) ih / pus David R. Amos