Philosophers

and scientists describe the scientific world as broad. Thus making

it difficult to concoct a complete description of scientific knowledge, which they
have proven to be unsuccessful.

The affiliation between individual and social scientific knowledge continues to
astound analysts as the idea that science is neither complete nor independent is
continually reinforced. Science has held many interpretations throughout
history, from an individuals initiative to uncover the workings of nature too
science as a social convention. Though it is true that collaborating is needed to
achieve quality results.

Research is the extension of knowledge, aiming to increase our understanding of
the scientific landscape. Individual knowledge undergoes extensive processes of
review and revision to gain approval and acceptance as general scientific
knowledge. This causes people to become more accepting and the individual to
be more diligent and critical of their work, in turn reducing subjectivity.

Social factors of science not only corroborate scientific knowledge but also affirm
other methods such as experimental procedures in reporting research. The
execution of this is substantial in demonstrating credited scientific practice.