Video Project Rubric Project Title Team CONTENT |! 2 3 ‘Overall ‘Video was not | Video was Video was effectiveness of | visually interesting. | effective or effective, video Did notshow much | appealing, but not. | informative and imagination, Did | both. appealing. not convey information or compelling, message. Effectiveness of | Viewer had little | Viewer was fairly | Viewer was Introduction | good reason to keep watching. ‘well interested by the introduction, hooked from the beginning of the idco and kept | interest throughout. Project Clarity | Many elements of | Most elements of | All elements of the the video were | the video were _| video were irrelevant to the | relevant tothe _| relevant to the overall message, | overall theme. _| overall theme. Viewer was not | Events and ‘Events and sure what the messages were =| messages were in message was, mostly clear and in | a clear and order. sensible order. ‘Completion of | Few elements of assignment | the assignment were addressed satisfactorily. ‘Most of the elements of the assignment were addressed satisfactorily. ‘All elements of the assignment were addressed satisfactorily. Indication of __ | There was little ‘Thinking and — | indication of Learning Video showed a basic command of the subject, but Video stiowed creativity, motivation, and Hacked Seavity | teaMhinking tnd ‘The presenters clearly hd an thoughtfulness in| thoughtfulness. |< Bada tie topic, and did the CADoestoc\Working\pdf\1422eTe4- 2c66-4a8-bOac-296528eTeedl doc 5.102005