Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classification of Expansive Soils
Classification of Expansive Soils
expansive soils
A. Sridharan, PhD, DSc and K. Prakash, PhD
&
Introduction
Proc. Instn
Civ. Engrs
Geotech. Engng,
2000, 143, Oct.,
235240
Paper 12075
Written discussion
closes 21 December
2000
Manuscript received
8 June 1999;
revised manuscript
accepted 5 June 2000
Soil expansivity
A. Sridharan,
Professor of Civil
Engineering,
Department of Civil
Engineering, Indian
Institute of Science,
Bangalore
K. Prakash, Assistant
Professor,
Department of Civil
Engineering, Sri
Jayachamarajendra
College of
Engineering, Mysore
235
wL: %
Chen
IS 1498 4
530
3040
4060
460
2035
3550
5070
7090
FSI
Ip : %
Holtz and Gibbs
520
1234
2345
432
10
Chen 6
IS 1498 4
015
1035
2055
435
512
1223
2332
432
Vd Vk
100
Vk
Vd
10
Colloid
content 10 :
% minus
0001 mm
Shrinkage
limit 10 : %
Shrinkage
index 4 : %
Free swell
index 4 : %
Per cent
expansion in
oedometer*
as per Holtz
and Gibbs 10
Low
Medium
High
Very high
517
1227
1837
427
413
818
612
510
515
1530
3060
460
550
50100
100200
4200
510
1020
2030
430
236
Per cent
expansion in
oedometer{
as per Seed
et al. 12
015
1550
525
425
CLASSIFICATION
PROCEDURES FOR
EXPANSIVE SOILS
Table 4. Soil expansivity classication based on MFSI 18
MFSI: cm 3 /g
Sediment volume in
carbon tetrachloride:
cm 3 /g
515
1520
1520
2040
440
110300
411 and 5MFSI
411
411
411
Clay type
Soil expansivity
Non-swelling
Mixture of swelling and non-swelling
Swelling
Swelling
Swelling
Negligible
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
111%
Montmorillonitic soils
100
111%
111%
111%
Kaolinitic soils
444%
A-line
80
Plasticity index: %
111%
222%
333%
556%
222%
444%
222%
60
(a)
(b)
(c)
40
100%
0
0
Negligible
High
Low
Very
high
444%
20
20
40
60
80
Liquid limit: %
100
556%
Medium
120
(d)
(e)
low to very high degree of expansivity. Plasticity index, activity and liquid limit predict a
high to very high degree of expansivity in
about 555, 666 and 778% of cases respectively. However, the evaluations based on the
MFSI given in Table 4 are in better agreement
with those from the oedometer tests.
15. Figure 3 illustrates the comparison of
the evaluation of the degree of expansivity of
montmorillonitic soils by the dierent criteria.
It can be noted that liquid limit, plasticity index
and activity greatly overestimate the soil
expansivity in comparison with those observed
in oedometer tests. As Chen 6 quotes, while it
may be true that a high-swelling soil will
manifest a high index property, the converse
need not be true. On the other hand, the
222%
222%
Fig. 2. Prediction of
soil expansivity of
kaolinitic soils by:
(a) liquid limit;
(b) plasticity index;
(c) activity;
(d) oedometer test;
and (e) MFSI
Fig. 3. Prediction of
soil expansivity of
montmorillonitic soils
by: (a) liquid limit;
(b) plasticity index;
(c) activity;
(d) oedometer test;
and (e) MFSI
222%
222%
111%
778%
667%
556%
(a)
(b)
111%
333%
(c)
222%
444%
333%
Negligible
High
Low
Very
high
111%
Medium
222%
222%
(d)
(e)
237
51
15
515
1525
425
410
1015
1520
2040
440
Clay type
Soil expansivity
Non-swelling
Mixture of swelling and non-swelling
Swelling
Swelling
Swelling
Negligible
Low
Moderate
High
Very high
238
Modified percent
expansion
111%
889%
111%
778%
(a)
111%
111%
222%
222%
222%
111%
556%
(b)
Negligible
High
Low
Very high
444%
Moderate
Fig. 4. Prediction of
soil expansivity by
proposed oedometer
per cent expansion
and free swell
ratio criteria for:
(a) kaolinitic soils; and
(b) montmorillonitic
soils
CLASSIFICATION
PROCEDURES FOR
EXPANSIVE SOILS
Free swell ratio
142%
857%
100%
(a)
142%
429%
429%
571%
Oedometer (compacted
state)
42
34
26
18
429%
10
10
45
18
26
34
Sediment volume in water: cm3
(b)
High
Moderate
Very high
Conclusions
14
Sediment volume in kerosene: cm3
Low
42
Fig. 6. Comparison of
equilibrium sediment
volumes in 0025%
NaCI solution with
those in distilled
water 23
12
10
45
8
8
10
12
14
Sediment volume in carbon tetrachloride: cm3
Fig. 7. Comparison of
equilibrium sediment
volumes in kerosene
with those in carbon
tetrachloride 23
239
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
240